Exposures to mobile source air toxics (MSATs) have been associated with numerous adverse health effects. While thousands of air toxic compounds are emitted from mobile sources, members of a subset of compounds are considered high priority due to their significant contribution to cancer and noncancer health risks and the contribution of mobile sources to total exposure as evaluated by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) National-Scale Air Toxics Assessments (NATA). These pollutants include benzene, 1,3-butadiene, ethylbenzene, acrolein, acetaldehyde, formaldehyde, naphthalene, polycyclic organic matter, and diesel particulate matter/organic gases. This study provided year-long trends of benzene, 1,3-butadiene, acrolein, acetaldehyde, and formaldehyde in Las Vegas, NV. Results indicated that MSAT concentrations often did not exhibit trends typical of other primary emitted pollutants in this study. Instead, other mobile sources beyond the highway of interest contributed to the measured values, including a major arterial road, a large commercial airport, and a nearby parking lot. The data were compared with relevant census-tract NATA estimates, with estimated ambient 1,3-butadiene concentrations similar to the measured values. Measured benzene values were much lower relative to the NATA total ambient benzene concentrations. Measured acrolein values were much higher relative to the NATA total acrolein concentrations. Measured acetaldehyde and formaldehyde values were also higher relative to the NATA total acetaldehyde and formaldehyde concentrations for all wind conditions and downwind conditions. Some possible explanations for these differences include nearby sources influencing the measured values; meteorological influences that may not be well captured by the NATA modeling regime; chemical reactivity of measured compounds; and additional explanatory variables may be needed for certain urban areas in order to accurately disaggregate anthropogenic air toxics emissions. Implications: Comparison of air toxics concentrations measured at four long-term near-road sites in Las Vegas, NV, show generally good agreement with the EPA 2005 NATA total ambient concentrations. Measured concentrations did not compare as well with EPA 2005 NATA for the on-road mobile portion of the ambient concentrations. This highlights the complexity of air toxic emission sources and impacts in urban areas, especially around large highway facilities; NATA's inability to capture local-scale meteorology and fine-scale ambient gradients; and that additional explanatory variables may be needed for certain urban areas in order to accurately disaggregate anthropogenic air toxics emissions.