Shen et al. (2021) investigate the effect of COVID-19 on criminal behavior in Japan using a difference-in-differences approach. Their study covers a 3-year time period from 2018 to 2020, using a database of publicly available crime statistics (Hanzai Toukei) from all 47 prefectures. While there is a growing, global evidence base exploring how the COVID-19 pandemic has affected criminal behavior, Shen et al. is the first to investigate this important social issue in Japan to date. Their key contribution is the finding that Japan's voluntary lockdown in April and May 2020 reduced both violent and property crime victimization rates significantly. Additional findings show a significant decline in sexual assault victimization for those below the age of 30, and that the 30–59 age group saw the greatest fall in crime victimization due to the COVID-19 pandemic. In this context, I would like to offer some specific comments on Shen et al.'s approach to regional differences in the data, its conclusions on mental health, and, finally, its policy recommendations regarding COVID-19 resource allocation. First, it is not clear why Shen et al. did not consider the regional variations in the data. It is evident from the Hanzai Toukei figures that the decrease in the number of arrests for “property crime” varied by region between 2018 and 2020. Shen et al. closely follows Leslie and Wilson (2020), whose analysis of data on police calls for service from 14 large metropolitan US cities showed that COVID-19 increased domestic violence. Given that city characteristics are unlikely to vary, regional differences in the Japanese data are something that should be emphasized. It would therefore be helpful to explain and justify why these differences were not explored further. Second, I would like to comment on one of Shen et al.'s conclusions pertaining to mental health. Shen et al. state that, “Japan has shown that the lockdown had a positive effect on mental health when proxied by suicide rates.” The statistics do indeed show a decline in the number of suicides during the lockdown. However, the number started to increase after the lockdown. Shen et al. refer to Ueda et al. (2020), and Tanaka and Okamoto (2021). In fact, both papers conclude that the number of deaths by suicide declined during the initial phase of the pandemic (February to June 2020), but from July 2020 actually began to accelerate, exceeding suicide numbers in the previous year. The source of the increase was suicides among females, children, and adolescents. Furthermore, and somewhat disturbingly, the number of suicides recorded in October 2020 was higher than the total number of deaths due to COVID-19 from the entire months of February 2020 until October 2020. It would therefore be prudent to state the limitations of using suicide rates as a proxy for mental health. Although Shen et al. only analyzed data from January to May in 2020, they should be clear that, while their analysis suggests an initially positive effect on mental health during the lockdown (when proxied by suicide rates, which showed a significant fall during the voluntary lockdown period, primarily in suicides stemming from economic and living conditions), previous studies have shown that suicides increased in the period following the COVID-19 lockdown, and, thus, its medium-to-long-term effects on mental health present a much more complicated picture. Finally, I wish to address one of the policy implications that Shen et al. put forward in their discussion. Having found that the lockdown reduced both violent and property crime rates, Shen et al. suggest that limited public resources could be reallocated from some sectors – such as police and criminal justice – to health care, in order to alleviate the added stresses on the health sector during the pandemic. However, is it right to say that, overall, the Japanese health sector was under such levels of stress? Ii and Watanabe (2021) analyze the impact of the first, second, and third waves of the COVID-19 pandemic on the health care system in Japan, and find a drastic decline in outpatient visits and inpatient admissions. Only about 3% of the total general beds in Japan were used for COVID-19 patients. Those hospitals which accepted COVID-19 patients have been under additional stresses, but many other clinics and hospitals have, in fact, suffered from a loss in demand. While there may need to be resource reallocation within the health sector, a diversion of resources from other sectors may not be necessary.
Read full abstract