Large-scale Open Source Projects Research Articles

An efficient approach to identify multiple and independent Move Method refactoring candidates

ContextApplication of a refactoring operation creates a new set of dependency in the revised design as well as a new set of further refactoring candidates. In the studies of stepwise refactoring recommendation approaches, applying one refactoring at a time has been used, but is inefficient because the identification of the best candidate in each iteration of refactoring identification process is computation-intensive. Therefore, it is desirable to accurately identify multiple and independent candidates to enhance efficiency of refactoring process. ObjectiveWe propose an automated approach to identify multiple refactorings that can be applied simultaneously to maximize the maintainability improvement of software. Our approach can attain the same degree of maintainability enhancement as the method of the refactoring identification of the single best one, but in fewer iterations (lower computation cost). MethodThe concept of maximal independent set (MIS) enables us to identify multiple refactoring operations that can be applied simultaneously. Each MIS contains a group of refactoring candidates that neither affect (i.e., enable or disable) nor influence maintainability on each other. Refactoring effect delta table quantifies the degree of maintainability improvement each elementary candidate. For each iteration of the refactoring identification process, multiple refactorings that best improve maintainability are selected among sets of refactoring candidates (MISs). ResultsWe demonstrate the effectiveness and efficiency of the proposed approach by simulating the refactoring operations on several large-scale open source projects such as jEdit, Columba, and JGit. The results show that our proposed approach can improve maintainability by the same degree or to a better extent than the competing method, choosing one refactoring candidate at a time, in a significantly smaller number of iterations. Thus, applying multiple refactorings at a time is both effective and efficient. ConclusionOur proposed approach helps improve the maintainability as well as the productivity of refactoring identification.

Symbolic approximation: an approach to verification in the large

This article describes symbolic approximation, a theoretical foundation for techniques evolved for large-scale verification – in particular, for post hoc verification of the C code in large-scale open-source projects such as the Linux kernel. The corresponding toolset’s increasing maturity means that it is now capable of treating millions of lines of C code source in a few hours on very modest support platforms. In order to explicitly manage the state-space-explosion problem that bedevils model-checking approaches, we work with approximations to programs in a symbolic domain where approximation has a well-defined meaning. A more approximate program means being able to say less about what the program does, which means weaker logic for reasoning about the program. So we adjust the approximation by adjusting the applied logic. That guarantees a safe approximation (one which may generate false alarms but no false negatives) provided the logic used is weaker than the exact logic of C. We choose the logic to suit the analysis.