Sub-daily rainfall is used in modelling of small catchments, design of urban drainage, calculating soil erosion, understanding the water balance of vegetated catchments, and assessing the impact of climate change on short duration storms. Hence it is critical to ensure that sub-daily rainfall records are homogeneous, but with a global shift to automated measurement of rainfall, there has been a change in the rainfall recording instrumentation. Although changes in instrumentation should be documented, in many cases this is not the case and station metadata are missing. As result, studies of rainfall patterns, particularly those investigating trends, often cannot report their treatment of possible inhomogeneities and must assume the data is suitable for further analysis.Here, we argue that standard quality assurance methods for checking inhomogeneities in rainfall may not identify a change in the rainfall record due to a change in instrumentation. Through testing (1) an aggregation of rainfall to the coarsest instrument resolution, (2) removal of rainfall below a minimum rainfall depth, (3) removal of rainfall below a minimum accumulation (event) depth, and (4) a combination of the above adjustments, we present recommendations for ensuring sub-daily rainfall is homogenous with minimum alteration to the rainfall record.We assess the proposed methods using the case study of Australia’s sub-daily rainfall monitoring network, where, in 1996 the pluviograph network was switched to tipping buckets, creating a large-sample test bed with a known systematic instrumentation change. Our results show that event-based statistics are considerably more sensitive to instrument change than annually aggregated rainfall statistics and hence standard methods for quality assurance may not identify possible inhomogeneities. We suggest an aggregation of the data to the coarsest instrument resolution, with the removal of small rainfall accumulations, can alleviate inhomogeneities for event-based statistics, whereas, for annual statistics, aggregation to the coarsest instrument resolution is sufficient. In the absence of a known instrumentation change, removing rainfall at or below the instrument resolution is also a viable technique for improving rainfall record homogeneity for event-based statistics. These findings will aid future sub-daily rainfall studies by justifying the use of a minimum rainfall or event depth for subsequent analysis.
Read full abstract