506 EIGHTEENTH-CENTURY FICTION 9:4 Erik Leborgne. Prévost d'Exilés. Paris et Roma: Éditions Memini, 1996. Bibliographie des Écrivains français, n° 4. 237pp. ISBN 88-86609-05-1. This volume is part of an ambitious new bibliographical series which, once established, is likely to become an essential working tool. The aim is to provide, for the featured author, a comprehensive list of editions, translations, and critical studies, classified according to general principles laid down for the whole series, with a brief comment on each critical work cited and a key to indicate which of these works are the most important. This latter takes the engaging form of a marginal symbol representing a pair of spectacles, with the "ouvrages signalés" in this fashion listed in a separate index. Erik Leborgne, in carrying out this exercise for Prévost, has had the fully acknowledged advantage of being able to work from Peter Tremewan's excellent Grant and Cutler bibliography, which, together with two updatings in the Cahiers Prévost d'Exilés, covers the period up to 1991. Leborgne's task has been essentially to add the most recent publications, reclassify Tremewan's lists according to rather simpler principles, cover areas such as manuscripts, translations, and early criticism that do not feature in Tremewan's work, and impose his own critical perspective, both in his comments on individual titles and in his overview of the state of Prévost studies. Quantitatively, his success is measured by the fact that he cites 1,081 titles where Tremewan, updatings included, cites only 779. The coverage of the full range of critical responses, from Prévost's contemporaries to the present day, marks an important advance; Leborgne makes no claims to completeness in the early period, but he does make it possible to survey at a glance the long evolution of a critical tradition. In the presentation, the new volume has many attractive features, especially the indexing; where Tremewan gives only a list of names of critics, Leborgne adds an index of key words, with separate listings of theses and book reviews as well as the "ouvrages signal és." A promised cd-rom version, to be updated every five years, should allow this venture to overcome the perennial problem of rapid obsolescence. The large quantity of careful transcription that this kind of work entails has been done accurately for the most part, although some flaws can be picked out: titles of works in languages other than French are given, where helpful, in translation; those from the English are mainly accurate, although "lecteur inconscient" for Naomi Segal's "unintended reader" will not really do. The critical part of this study is discreetly effective within its strict parameters . When comment on a large number of titles has to be compressed into a standard two to five lines, there is often little room to do more than summarize , but the list of "ouvrages signalés" does allow the author an opportunity to demonstrate preferences. It contains some sixty titles and the selection is fair, although inevitably there is scope for differences of opinion on what might have been included. The present reviewer, for instance, was surprised at the absence of Marie Rose de Labriolle-Rutherford's ground-breaking study of Le Pour et Contre , and would have wished to make a space for more of the work of Philip Stewart and Alan J. Singerman. Although Prévost studies are rightly recognized as no longer being simply a celebration of Manon Lescaut, the list of excellent critical studies of that novel could have been extended to include work by REVIEWS 507 Pierre Creignou, Jacques Proust, François Germain, and, above all, Segal. The list suggests a tendency to be harsh on Anglophone scholarship. Though brief summarizing comments allow little scope to distinguish between the mediocre and the bad, Leborgne makes the effort, and there are tart critical comments on works of which he disapproves, often on the grounds of providing insufficient specific reference to the text. Many such comments are appropriately directed, but at times they can appear excessively dismissive of works with substantial merits, such as Raymond Picard's contribution to the DeloffrePicard...