Twenty-one specimens of Jilin, sampling the whole spectrum of 21Ne concentrations and coming from the main mass as well as from various locations in the strewn field, were studied for their nuclear track record in olivines. Exceedingly low track densities were found in 19 of these specimens (< 300 cm −2), including 10 in which the low 60Co(T 1/2 = 5.3 years) activities were seemingly indicative of a low shielding during the second (4π) irradiation stage. In two specimens (VI-42-04 and VI-21-057, which have high 21Ne contents and the largest 40Ar (and 4He) losses, track densities of ∼ 750 and ∼ 1500 cm −2 clearly emerge from the background. These tracks are attributed to very heavy cosmic ray nuclei. (1)They were produced during the first- (2π) stage exposure. It follows that the two samples were: (a) the least-shielded during the first irradiation period (< 28 cm of chondritic matter); (b) not subjected to a last environmental temperature higher than 350°C for a few days—in contradiction with the thermal model of Müller and Jessberger, otherwise the cosmic ray tracks would have been totally erased; (c) located at a depth of at least 20 cm within the meteoroid during the second (4π) irradiation episode of 0.4 Myr, otherwise CRTDs produced during this time would have been detected. This depth implies that the 60Co activities of these two specimens (not known until now) should be around 130–140 dpm/kg. It remains then to explain why 10 other specimens, with 60Co activities in the range of 50–100 dpm/kg, defining depths of 6–15 cm within the meteoroid, show no evidence at all of CRTDs above the track density background of 150 ± 100 cm −2. (2)The CRTDs were registered during the second (4π) irradiation stage of 0.4 Myr. This requires the samples to have been located at depths of ∼ 15 and 12 cm from the pre-atmospheric surfaces (within a meteoroid with a radius of 85 cm). At such depths the predicted 60Co activities for specimens VI-21-057 and VI-42-04 would range between ∼ 70 and ∼ 100 dpm/kg. The major problem with our results is to understand why in 10 locations with low (50–100 dpm/kg) 60Co activities no CRTDs have been registered during the second irradiation stage. A possible answer would be that depths inferred from 60Co activities are in error, at least in the case of large meteoroids and for depths < 15–20 cm. This has indeed been found to be the case in Allende where at shallow locations (< 15 cm), depths of burial derived from CRTDs are larger by factors of 2–5 than those inferred from 60Co activities, while at larger depths the agreement between the two methods appears to be good. The ubiquitous presence of a track density background found in most samples is best explained by the spontaneous fission of 238U since 4.0 Gyr. This explanation allows one to define a strict upper limit to the temperature of the last thermal event responsible for the losses of radiogenic and spallogenic gases: a temperature of 500°C (1 hour) or 465°C (24 hours) would have annealed the internal fission tracks in olivines. These limiting temperatures are not in real disagreement with the thermal model of Müller and Jessberger. Provided the CRTDs found in the key specimens VI-21-057 and VI-42-04 were registered during the second (4π) irradiation stage and that shielding depths derived from CRTDs are right, the Jilin meteoroid had an original mass of about 15 tons ( R 0 ≅ 1 m ), of which about 4 tons were recovered.
Read full abstract