Purpose of study: The study objectives were to assess the degree to which the patterns of practice of primary care physicians in managing workers compensation board (WCB) patients are in compliance with current practice guidelines and determine whether providing family physicians and their patients with the guidelines would alter the degree of adherence.Methods used: A total of 724 patients with nonradicular lower back pain of less than 2 weeks duration and accepted WCB claims were randomized into five groups: Group 1, physicians received a single information package summarizing the guidelines for managing acute mechanical back pain at 0 to 4 weeks after injury; Group 2, physicians received the same package and, in addition, their patients received a layperson's summary of the guidelines at 0 to 4 weeks after injury; Group 3, physicians received the information package three times, at 0–4-week, 5–8-week and 8–12-week postinjury periods; Group 4, physicians and their patients received the information packages at the 0–4 week, 5–8 week and 8–12-week postinjury periods; Group 5, neither the physicians nor their patients received any guideline information (control group). The compulsory WCB physician report forms were collected and scored. The primary outcome was compliance with guideline recommendations regarding specific patient history items, physical examination procedures and treatment recommendations. The chi-squared test was used to compare the five groups.of findings: Primary care physicians in the control group demonstrated a high degree of compliance with the recommended history taking, physical examination procedures and imaging guidelines but were in poor compliance with the guideline-recommended treatments. Providing the physicians ± patients with a single information package (ie, Groups 1 and 2) did not result in any significant improvement in compliance. Information provided at three separate intervals (Group 3) improved compliance with some recommended treatments, such as exercise, medications, less use of bed rest and passive physiotherapy, but not others including recommendation for spinal manipulation, work modification and return to normal activity. No added benefit was observed when providing patients with an information package (Group 4).Relationship between findings and existing knowledge: In the last 8 years, 12 countries have published evidence-based guidelines to assist primary care physicians in the management of acute and chronic lower back pain. Despite this large international effort and high degree of agreement among independent multidisciplinary panels of experts, a number of studies have demonstrated that the implementation of the guidelines has been largely unsuccessful. No prior published studies have examined guideline implementation strategies in primary care physicians managing WCB patients. The results of this study provide convincing evidence that ignorance of the guidelines is not the only contributing factor in determining the patterns of practice of primary care physicians.Overall significance of findings: Providing physicians with information regarding clinical practice guidelines for the management of acute back pain at three stages of the patient's clinical course (ie, 0 to 4, 4 to 8 and 8 to 12 weeks after injury) altered some aspects of physician pattern of practice, but results were not ideal. Alternate strategies need to be developed for improving physician compliance with clinical practice guidelines for treatment of WCB patients with acute lower back pain.Disclosures: No disclosures.Conflict of interest: Dr. Paul Bishop, grant research support from the Workers Compensation Board of British Columbia.