Introduction.?Since the early history of formal education there has existed some form of pupil measurement. In recent years the objectives of education have been broadened so that such outcomes as attitudes, habits, and appreciations are considered as impor tant for the proper kind of growth in social experiences as is subject matter or factual knowledge. With the emphasis being placed on these new objectives of education, it is important to know how closely teachers' marks are related to standardized tests of achievement and native ability. Procedure.?The field of inquiry for this study has been limited to the data gathered in the Glenrock-Parkerton School System, Glenrock, Wyoming; The Las Animas County High School System, Branson, Colorado; and the Grover-Hereford School System, Grover, Colorado. The period of testing extended over a period of time beginning with the school year of 1932-33 and ending with the school year of 1936-37. Each of the school systems included in this study was under the direct supervision of the writer. The proce dure was uniform throughout the entire study. There were twenty-three teachers whose marks were included in the study. Of these, fourteen were high school teachers and nine were elementary school teachers. Only two of the entire group of twenty teachers were inexperienced. There was a group of pupils at each of two levels of school work. The first group con sisted of tenth and eleventh year pupils of the senior high schools and the second group was made up of fifth and sixth year pupils of the elementary schools. The tests selected and administered to the high school pupils consisted of the Sones Harry High School Achievement Test and the Otis Group Intelligence Scale. The tests se lected and administered to the elementary school dud?Is were the New Stanford Achieve ment Test and the Otis Group Intelligence Scale. The authors and publishers of these tests claim a high reliability for them. The schools used in the study were what the progressive educationalists would term conservative. However, they were progressive to the extent that teachers were allowed a large degree of freedom in choosing the methods used. The state course of study pro vided the only outline of a curriculum offi cially imposed upon the teachers. Teachers knew early in the year that standardized tests would be administered. However, none of the teachers had access to any standardized tests or their results before they were administered for the purpose of making this study. All of the teachers of high school subjects had standard four year degrees from accred ited colleges. Three of them had earned the Master's degree. Six of them had taken some graduate work in education. All of them had at least twenty-two and one-half quarter hours in education and at least the number of hours in the subject taught equivalent to that termed a minor by many colleges. All of the elementary school teachers had at least two years of college work and three of them had the standard four-year Bach elor's degree. All had majored in education. All those who had less than a four-year de gree had at least twenty-two and one-half quarter hours in education. The Findings.?The average number of cases for the five groups of correlations be tween teachers' marks and achievement, as measured by the Sones-Harry High School Achievement Test, is 128. The coefficients of correlation between teachers' marks and achievement are as follows: language and literature .51; mathematics .36; natural sci ence .18; social science .30; and the average of the above four subjects .54. The average number of cases for the five groups of correlations between teachers' marks and intelligence, as measured by the * Brief summary of: C C Moore, The Relation of Teach ers' Marks to Standardized Tests. Unpublished Doctor's Field Study, Number 1, Colorado State College of Education, Gree dy, Colorado, 1938.
Read full abstract