Large Between-subject Variability Research Articles

Asymmetries in the covert orienting of visual spatial attention to spatial and non-spatial cues in Alzheimer's disease.

The ability to direct covert visual spatial attention to the left (LVF) and right visual field (RVF) was examined in 15 patients with mild to moderate Alzheimer's disease and 15 age- and education-matched controls using the covert orienting of visual spatial attention task (COVAT) modified to include both spatial and non-spatial cues. Subjects responded with a button press when they detected a target at a location 8 degrees to either the left or right of fixation. On 70% of trials a spatial cue was flashed at the target location before the target appeared. On 15% of trials the spatial cue was flashed at the location contralateral to where it would appear and on the remaining 15% of trials non-spatial diffuse cue preceded targets. The cue to target interval (CTI) varied between 150 and 550 ms. Mean reaction times for each cuetype in the RVF and LVF were calculated. Compared with controls, the percentage of trials excluded because of very slow reaction times was significantly greater in the Alzheimer's disease group for the 550 ms CTI. Analysis of the symmetry of reaction times to LVF and RVF targets for the 150 ms CTI enabled us to classify Alzheimer's disease subjects into three subgroups based on the hemifield of abnormally slow attentional biases. The first subgroup showed a significant slowing of reaction time to all LVF targets, the second showed a significant slowing of reaction time to all RVF targets and the third showed a significant slowing of reaction time to both LVF and RVF targets. Patients with Alzheimer's disease who showed an abnormal attentional bias performed significantly better on neuropsychological tests of memory, language and executive function than Alzheimer's disease patients with no attentional bias. Eight of the Alzheimer's disease subjects were assessed serially on at least six occasions over a 12-month period. The initial classification of abnormal attentional bias or no attentional bias was reliable for seven Alzheimer's disease subjects. One Alzheimer's disease subject, initially classified as having a slowed rightward attentional bias, in subsequent testing over the 12-month period was more consistent with symmetrical COVAT performance. Control subjects showed no attentional biases over the 12-month period and the magnitude of asymmetric attentional slowing over the 12-month period was significantly more variable in individual Alzheimer's disease subjects than in controls. The presence of subgroups of patients with Alzheimer's disease with qualitatively different COVAT performance indicates a large between-subject variability in attentional deficits in Alzheimer's disease. The presence of asymmetric attentional slowing and milder neuropsychological deficits in a subgroup of patients with Alzheimer's disease suggests that in these patients there is functional impairment of attentional areas in only one hemisphere rather than an asymmetric impairment of both hemispheres and that the neurodegenerative disease process may have been less advanced or in an earlier stage than that present in Alzheimer's disease patients with symmetric attentional performance and bilateral COVAT impairment. The preservation of asymmetric attentional slowing over time, together with the increased intra-subject variability in the magnitude of these asymmetries, suggests that asymmetrical COVAT performance represents a reliable reflection of underlying hemispheric function in Alzheimer's disease, although designation of asymmetrical attentional biases should be made on the basis of two or more sequential testing sessions.

Effect of stress on diagnosis of hypertension.

Blood pressure assessment by a physician elicits an alerting reaction and a pressor response in the patient. The magnitude and time course of this response are described for a large number of hypertensive subjects in whom the assessments were performed during ambulatory intra-arterial blood pressure monitoring. In nearly all of the subjects, the physician's visit was accompanied by blood pressure and heart rate increases that peaked within 4 minutes and then declined. The response was characterized by a relatively high average value; a large between-subject variability; no relation with patient age, baseline hemodynamic values, and responses to laboratory stressors; and no attenuation with multiple repetition of the physician's visit. On the other hand, the increase in blood pressure was considerably less when blood pressure assessment was made by a nurse than when it was made by a physician; in both instances, a 10-minute wait was associated with marked reduction of the initial response. Thus, the stress inherent in usual blood pressure-measuring procedures is responsible for considerable overestimations of patients' blood pressures. There are means by which this can be minimized, although a residual error is likely to remain in most subjects. Whether the stress-devoid blood pressure is a better prognostic index than the stress-related one remains unknown.

Le «Voice Onset Time» chez des dysarthriques de Friedreich

This study concerned VOT measurements of voiced and voiceless occlusives produced in a sample of spontaneous language from 16 French speakers with Friedreich's ataxia. The results revealed that average VOT values were positive for voiceless stops and negative for voiced stops and thus were in agreement with published data for French. There was, however, a reduction of the difference between the two voicing categories and large between-subject variability. The factors that could have contributed to the increase in between-subject variability and to the reduction of the difference between the two categories are discussed. Finally, some leads for the use of VOT in the therapeutic process are proposed.

A comparison of single-subject and traditional statistical designs in steady-state evoked potential research

An experiment was conducted to assess the relationship between level of auditory noise and a measure derived from the steady-state evoked potential (SSEP) called relative transmission time (RTF). The visual stimulus consisted of a 150-fL light that was modulated at 45, 48, or 51 Hz to a depth of 30%. The auditory stimulus was bandpass-limited white noise at 65, 75, or 85 dB, The outcomes of single-subject and group statistical analyses were compared. Neither statistic indicated a significant effect for cross-modal white noise on the SSEP. Whereas the more traditional group approach indicated only large between-subject variability, the single-subject approach clearly indicated deviant data of one of the subjects.

Evaluation of the Remler M2000 blood pressure recorder. Comparison with intraarterial blood pressure recordings both at hospital and at home.

The Remler M2000 is a semiautomated device that has been used to collect epidemiological data and assess blood pressure variability. It has been subjected to limited evaluation in operation, however, and no studies of its accuracy away from the hospital or office environment have been undertaken. We recruited a group of 28 patients with essential hypertension who were undergoing intraarterial ambulatory blood pressure monitoring and compared the intraarterial recordings with those made with the Remler instrument both at home and in the hospital. The Remler recordings were also compared with simultaneous indirect blood pressure measurements made with the random zero sphygmomanometer. The mean difference between the Remler and intraarterial blood pressure recordings was -3/7 in the hospital and 7/0 at home. All standard deviations were greater than 10 mm Hg, indicating large between-subject variability. Overall, the relationship of the Remler M2000 readings to intraarterial pressures was as close if not closer than standard indirect sphygmomanometry and thus might provide useful data for epidemiological surveys or drug trials. It would appear that for accurate measurement of short-term blood pressure variation and 24-hour recording, intraarterial recording is the method of choice.

Is a Man, a Man, a Man? (or: Is an EEG an EEG?) Some Remarks on the Homogeneity of “Normal Subjects”.

Many studies involving computerized EEG analyses are based on the assumption that normal subjects constitute a homogeneous population, so that under specified conditions across-subject averaging is justified. Quite often EEG signals are processed with little or no concern for the state of the particular person from whom they are obtained. It is the purpose of this discussion to draw attention to the fact that only can normals have different EEG's one from another, but also that the same ones can display markedly different EEGs from recording session to recording session. A consequence of this situation is that there is always a large between-subject variability, and that the source of the signals needs to be carefully documented before generalizations can be made.