The number of pharyngeal tooth rows is an impor-tant taxonomic feature of cyprinid fishes (Cyprinidae)(Howes, 1991), which is used to elucidate the phyloge-netic links between single species and higher rank taxa(Heincke, 1892; Regan, 1911; Berg, 1912; Vladykov,1934; Chu, 1935; Vasnetsov, 1939; Nikol’skii, 1950;Fink and Fink, 1981; Nakajima, 1987; Cavender andCoburn, 1992; Golubtsov et al., 2005). Usually, thereare one to three rows of pharyngeal teeth in the cyprinidfishes (Nikolsky, 1950; Sibbing, 1991). In the majorityof cases, the number of pharyngeal tooth rows is thesame in all individuals of one species; however, it variesin some cyprinid species. Thus, decrease of the numberof pharyngeal tooth rows was noted in carp Cyprinuscarpio developing at high temperature (Tatarko, 1968).In addition, a decrease in the number of pharyngealtooth rows was also observed in single genotypes of C.carpio during studies on the inheritance of quantitativefeatures (Kirpichnikov, 1979).An increase in the number of pharyngeal tooth rowsfrom only one side was noted in such species as Clinos-tomus elongatus, Semotilus atromaculatus, C. carpio,and Notropis hudsonis. Abnormalities during develop-ment and tooth replacement (Evans and Deubler, 1955;Eastman and Underhill, 1973) were considered themost possible cause for this phenomenon. Cases whenthe fourth row of pharyngeal teeth appears on bothsides could hardly be considered the consequence ofabnormalities in tooth replacement. At least two speciesfrom the Schizotorax genus are known to have popula-tions with fish possessing both three and four rows ofpharyngeal teeth (Terashima, 1984; Mirza, 1991). Thepresence of four rows of pharyngeal teeth is noted insmall African barb Barbus paludinosus (Golubtsovet al., 2005). There have been a few finds of individualswith four rows of pharyngeal teeth in the populations ofEuropean barbs: B. barbus (Bodareu and Karlov,1984), B. lacerta, and B. mursa (Elanidze, 1983); anindividual with the following pharyngeal teeth formula1.1.2.3.5–5.3.2.1 was found in one of the populations ofa large African barb B. altianalis (Banister, 1973). Allindividuals from a recently found cyprinid species Ras-trineobola argentea have four rows of pharyngeal teeth(Anhelt et al., 2006).Although, some authors regard the operation ofancestral genes as the main reason for the appearance ofan additional fourth row of pharyngeal teeth, relying onthe examples provided above (Golubtsov et al., 2005;Anhelt et al., 2006), there have been no data on theinheritance of this state of the studied feature.Data on the state of the feature “number of pharyn-geal tooth rows” in the offspring of a large African barbB. intermedius obtained from spawners with three rowsof pharyngeal teeth, which is normal for this species,and from spawners with four rows of pharyngeal teethare given below.MATERIAL AND METHODSOne of the morphotypes of polymorphic large Afri-can barb B. intermedius from Lake Tana, Ethiopia,namely the “bigmouth small-eye” sensu Nagelkerke etal. (1995) (Fig. 1) served as the object of studies. A totalof 14 morphotypes of this species were found in thelake (Nagelkerke et al., 1994, 1995), being described asa separate species later (Nagelkerke and Sibbing,1997). A number of researchers put the validity of some(may be majority) described species under question(Mina et al., 2001; Zvorykin et al., 2006; Dzerzhinskiiet al., 2007). In this article we use the classification ofmorphotypes proposed by Nagelkerke (Nagelkerke etal., 1994, 1995). All morphotypes of large barbs fromLake Tana, as well as the majority of fish belonging tothe Barbinae subfamily, have the following pharyngealteeth formula 2.3.5–5.3.2 (Banister, 1973; our data).Experimental hybridizations of bigmouth small-eyemorphotype fish were performed in October 2005, in
Read full abstract