Pencil leads are broken on PMMA plates at various source-sensor distances to evaluate the influence of the propagation distance and the sensor type on AE signals. The resulting waves are detected using a broadband or a resonant sensor. The ability of five transducers, PKBBI sensor, MICRO80 sensor, MICRO200HF sensor, Nano30 sensor, and WD sensor, to recreate the characteristic forms of plate waves is evaluated. Because of the response spanning between 300 to 400 kHz frequency range, Nano30 and MICRO80 sensors have a bigger magnitude in the S0 mode than in the A0 mode, especially for small sensor-source distances. Their different responses demonstrate why similar test specimens and test settings can provide diverse findings due to the sensor effect, which is significant for the use of AE data in the classification of AE sources. Then, based on the normalization method, we suggest a procedure to acquire equivalent values for the selected descriptors using Laplacian Score and Principle Component Analysis. In order to gain a thorough understanding of the sensor effect through 3D finite element simulation, a comparative analysis is conducted between the perfect contact sensor and the resonant sensor with sensor effect. The sensor effect arises from the convolution of the Fourier Transform of the signal with the sensitivity curve in the frequency domain. By comparing the waveforms in the time and frequency domain, it is useful to determine how the different sensors differ from the AE signals.