Laparoscopic Total Gastrectomy Research Articles

Catheter-guided anvil insertion for circular stapler esophagojejunal anastomosis: a novel technique in laparoscopic total gastrectomy

ObjectiveThis study evaluates feasibility, safety, and short-term outcomes of employing the catheter-guided stapler anvil insertion technique for esophagojejunal anastomosis using a circular stapler during laparoscopic total gastrectomy (LTG).Materials and methodsFrom September 2021 to April 2023, the catheter-guided stapler anvil insertion technique was employed in 80 patients undergoing laparoscopic total gastrectomy (LTG) for esophagojejunal anastomosis. A modified D2 dissection, according to the en bloc technique, was performed in the patients. Subsequently, a longitudinal incision, approximately 2 cm in length, was made on the anterior wall of the esophagus, about 2 cm above the tumor. The transection line was pre-marked with blue dye along the esophagus's minor axis, and the tail of the anvil was capped with a 10-cm length of catheter (F14 d4.7 mm). The surgeon secures the head of anvil and carefully inserts it into the esophagus, ensuring that only a 5-cm segment of the catheter remains outside the esophagus. A linear cutter was employed to transect and seal the lower end of the esophagus. Subsequently, esophagojejunostomy was performed under laparoscopic guidance using a circular stapler.ResultsAmong patients undergoing esophagojejunal anastomosis with the new technique, postoperative complications included pneumonia or pleural effusion in 14 patients (17.5%), anastomotic stenosis in 3 patients (3.75%), abdominal infection in 2 patients (2.5%), and intestinal obstruction in 1 patient (1.25%). No instances of anastomotic leakage, anastomotic bleeding, or deaths were recorded. All patients experiencing complications improved with conservative treatment, without the need for secondary surgery.ConclusionThe catheter-guided stapler anvil insertion technique is demonstrated to be a safe and effective method for esophagojejunostomy, potentially reducing the occurrence of anastomotic leakage.

Considerations regarding a meta-analysis of laparoscopic total gastrectomy vs. laparoscopic-assisted total gastrectomy for gastric cancer.

Considerations regarding a meta-analysis of laparoscopic total gastrectomy vs. laparoscopic-assisted total gastrectomy for gastric cancer.

Modified reverse puncture technique for esophagojejunostomy during totally laparoscopic total gastrectomy for gastric cancer

Objective: To evaluate the value of implementing a modified reverse puncture procedure for esophagojejunostomy during totally laparoscopic total gastrectomy. Methods: This was a descriptive case series. Relevant clinical data, including the operative procedure, recovery, and pathological findings of 35 patients with gastric cancer who had undergone esophagojejunostomy with a modified reverse puncture technique during totally laparoscopic total gastrectomy in the Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Fujian Provincial Hospital, from June 2022 to January 2023, were prospectively collected and retrospectively analyzed. The age of all patients in the group was (64.9±8.0) years old, with 22 males (62.9%) and a body mass index of (23.2±2.4) kg/m2. The tumors were located in the upper and middle parts of the stomach in 24 cases (68.6%) and in the junction of the esophagus and stomach in 11 cases (31.4%). Important technical aspects of the modified reverse puncture procedure are as follows. (1) Site of the esophageal incision: a transverse incision is made across the right lateral wall of the esophagus at the expected site of esophageal disjunction. (2) Technique for inserting an anvil: after threading a silk thread through the tip of anvil, the end of the thread is knotted and fixed as the traction thread, after which an anvil is inserted into the esophagus through the esophageal incision, leaving the end of the traction line exposed. Next, a 60-mm linear cutter is placed through the right midclavicular trocar to straighten the opened esophagus vertically, after which the rod of the anvil is pulled out of a small incision that has been made in the esophagus by pulling the traction thread, thus completing anvil placement. (3) Jejunal binding: the jejunum on the central bar of the stapler is fastened with silk thread to the stump of the jejunum, and then tied to the output loop of the jejunum with a gauze strip. Results: All 35 surgeries were successful, with no mortality or conversion to laparotomy. The operation time, anvil insertion time, and digestive tract reconstruction time were (232.7±34.4), (8.5±1.4), and (40.5±4.8) minutes, respectively. The intraoperative blood loss was 100 (20-250) mL and the incision was (5.3±0.9) cm long. The upper surgical margin was negative in all patients and the mean distance between the upper and tumor margins was (3.5±1.2) cm. The mean number of lymph nodes dissected per patient was 33.9±7.1. The times to initial ambulation, initial passage of flatus , postoperative fluid intake, and length of postoperative hospital stay were (3.2±1.1), (3.7±1.5), (4.6±2.3), and (9.8±3.2) days, respectively. Postoperative complications occurred in five patients: one case of anastomotic leak, two of anastomotic stenosis, one of pulmonary infection, and one of incomplete intestinal obstruction, all of which were successfully managed conservatively. Conclusion: Esophagojejunostomy using a modified reverse puncture technique during totally laparoscopic total gastrectomy is safe and feasible for gastric cancer, requiring only a small incision and achieving higher upper esophageal resection margins and good postoperative recovery, and therefore warrants further implementation.

The "quadrant-sandwich" method in clockwise modular D2 lymph node dissection in laparoscopic total gastrectomy: a retrospective cohort study.

For patients who need laparoscopic radical gastrectomy, lymph node dissection (LND) and optimization of surgical procedures are particularly important. This study introduces the "quadrant-sandwich" method in clockwise modular D2 LND and evaluates the advantages and safety of this method. The clinical data of 108 laparoscopic total gastrectomy patients admitted to the Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University from January 2019 to January 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. Based on the different LND processes, 55 patients were allocated to the observation group, which underwent clockwise modular LND using the "quadrant-sandwich method", and 53 patients were allocated to the control group, which underwent traditional LND. The effectiveness and safety of the approach in terms of operation time, blood loss, lymph node yield, postoperative recovery and postoperative complications were observed in the two groups. There was no statistical difference between the baseline data of the two groups. In relation to the surgery, the observation group had an operation time of 227.0±48.5 minutes, and intraoperative bleeding of 100.0 mL [inter-quartile range (IQR), 30.0-200.0 mL], while the control group had an operation time of 247±41.5 minutes, and intraoperative bleeding of 180.0 mL (IQR, 130.0-245.0 mL). There were statistically significant differences between the two groups in terms of the operation time and intraoperative bleeding (P=0.001, P=0.020). In relation to the LND, there were no statistically significant differences between the two groups in terms of the total number of lymph nodes in each division, and the number of positive lymph nodes. In relation to the post-operative results, there were no statistically significant differences between the two groups in terms of the post-operative pathological stage, first postoperative oral feeding, post-operative hospitalization time, and post-operative complications. Clockwise modular D2 LND using the "quadrant-sandwich method" is potentially safe and feasible in laparoscopic total gastrectomy. It not only ensures the thoroughness of the LND, but also ensures and efficient and fast surgical process, shortens the operation time, and reduces the amount of intraoperative bleeding.

Surgical Approach to the Upper Side of the Gastrosplenic Ligament During Laparoscopic Total Gastrectomy for Proximal Gastric Cancer: Operative Techniques and Initial Results.

Background: Laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer has become widespread as minimally invasive surgical treatment, but use of laparoscopic total gastrectomy (LTG) remains limited because of the technical difficulty and complexity of lymphadenectomy at the splenic hilum. Surgical techniques and initial experiences with the surgical approach to the upper side of the gastrosplenic ligament during LTG are introduced. Materials and Methods: Between January 2019 and December 2022, 57 patients with proximal gastric cancer underwent LTG using this approach. Results: Regarding the extent of lymphadenectomy, D1+, D2, spleen-preserving D2 + 10, and D2 + 10 with splenectomy were performed in 31, 18, 4, and 4 patients, respectively. Operative time was 341 (192-724) minutes, and estimated blood loss was 30 (0-515) g. There were no conversions to laparotomy and no postoperative complications of Clavien-Dindo grade ≥III. Conclusions: The present procedure is safe and feasible and provides an excellent operative view at the splenic hilum, making it easier to determine exactly the extent of lymphadenectomy in accordance with cancer progression.

Long-term Oncologic Outcomes of Robotic Total Gastrectomy for Advanced Gastric Cancer.

Although laparoscopic distal gastrectomy has rapidly replaced open distal gastrectomy, laparoscopic total gastrectomy (LTG) is less frequently performed owing to technical difficulties. Robotic surgery could be an appropriate minimally invasive alternative to LTG because it alleviates the technical challenges posed by laparoscopic procedures. However, few studies have compared the oncological safety of robotic total gastrectomy (RTG) with that of LTG, especially for advanced gastric cancer (AGC). Herein, we aimed to assess the oncological outcomes of RTG for AGC and compare them with those of LTG. We retrospectively reviewed 147 and 204 patients who underwent RTG and LTG for AGC, respectively, between 2007 and 2020. Long-term outcomes were compared using inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW). After IPTW, the 2 groups exhibited similar clinicopathological features. The 5-year overall survival was comparable between the 2 groups (88.5% [95% confidence interval {CI}, 79.4%-93.7%] after RTG and 87.3% [95% CI, 80.1%-92.0%]) after LTG; log-rank P=0.544). The hazard ratio (HR) for death after RTG compared with that after LTG was 0.73 (95% CI, 0.40-1.33; P=0.304). The 5-year relapse-free survival was also similar between the 2 groups (75.7% [95% CI, 65.2%-83.4%] after RTG and 76.4% [95% CI, 67.9%-83.0%] after LTG; log-rank P=0.850). The HR for recurrence after RTG compared with that after LTG was 0.93 (95% CI, 0.60-1.46; P=0.753). Our findings revealed that RTG and LTG for AGC had similar long-term outcomes. RTG is an oncologically safe alternative to LTG and has technical advantages.

Application of λ esophagojejunostomy in total gastrectomy under laparoscopy: a modified technique for post-gastrectomy reconstruction.

Common gastrectomy methods can significantly affect patients' postoperative quality of life. This study investigated the safety, feasibility, and short-term efficacy of λ-type esophagojejunostomy in total gastrectomy under total laparoscopy. We retrospectively analyzed the clinical and follow-up data of 50 patients with adenocarcinoma of the gastric/gastroesophageal junction who underwent total laparoscopic radical gastrectomy with λ-type esophagojejunostomy at the Beijing Friendship Hospital from January 2021 to July 2022. Data are reported as mean ± standard deviation. Patients comprised 27 males and 23 females, aged 42 to 76 (60.9 ± 5.6) years. There were 26 cases of gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma (16 Siewert type II and 10 Siewert type III) and 24 cases of adenocarcinoma of the proximal gastric body. All patients underwent radical total gastrectomy and D2 lymph node dissection with λ-type esophagojejunostomy for digestive tract reconstruction under total laparoscopy. The total operation time was 235-295 (249.4 ± 48.5) min, digestive tract reconstruction time was (48.2 ± 23.2) min, intraoperative blood loss was (63.4 ± 48.4) mL, recovery time of exhaust was (3.1 ± 2.2) d, first drinking or eating time was (4.1 ± 2.1) d, and hospital stay was (9.3 ± 4.4) d. Three patients had postoperative complications, including one with duodenal remnant leakage combined with abdominal infection. Anastomotic bleeding and postoperative inflammatory intestinal obstruction occurred in one patient each, all of whom were cured by conservative treatment. The Nutritional Risk Index of the whole group was 53.5 ± 8.4 preoperatively, 47.3 ± 5.6 one week postoperatively, 50.3 ± 5.6 six months postoperatively, and 52.4 ± 4.2 at 12 months postoperatively. Roux-en-Y stasis syndrome and bile reflux esophagitis occurred in one patient each (2.0%). There were no occurrences of recanalization of the closed end of the afferent loop of the esophagojejunostomy anastomosis, anastomotic stricture or obstruction, or tumor recurrence. λ-type esophagojejunostomy is safe and feasible for digestive tract reconstruction after total laparoscopic radical gastrectomy. This digestive tract reconstruction method not only maintains intestinal continuity but also simplifies surgical procedures, allowing patients to recover quickly with an excellent short-term effect.

Impact of the Aboral Pouch in Roux-en-Y Reconstruction after Laparoscopic Total Gastrectomy for Elderly Patients.

The number of elderly people with stomach cancer is increasing; therefore, minimally invasive surgical treatments are required. Elderly patients have multiple comorbidities and are prone to postoperative weight loss, nutritional disorders, Postgastrectomy syndrome (PGS), and decreased quality of life (QOL). Total gastrectomy is particularly associated with these complications, although aboral-pouch creation reportedly improves the condition by compensating for lost reservoir capacity. However, there is no consensus regarding its significance. This study aimed to investigate the impact of the aboral pouch on total gastrectomy outcomes in elderly patients. Thirty-six patients who met the eligibility criteria, defined as elderly patients aged ≥75 years, were retrospectively analyzed. The patients had undergone Roux-en-Y reconstructions with an aboral pouch in laparoscopic total gastrectomy procedures performed at Juntendo University from July 2016 to June 2022. The main outcomes were postoperative nutritional status, PGS, and QOL. The average postoperative period was approximately 1 year (12.0 vs. 13.5 months, P=0.536), for 14 elderly and 22 non-elderly patients, respectively. Elderly patients had more comorbidities (78.5% vs. 40.9%, P=0.041). The outcome of nutritional status demonstrated no differences in weight-loss rate (-5.3% vs. -8.6%, P=0.651) or prognostic nutritional status (-7.9% vs. -5.9%, P=0.243). There was no significant difference in PGS and QOL between elderly and non-elderly patients. Total gastrectomy with an aboral-pouch creation could be beneficial for elderly 43 patients from the perspective of postoperative nutritional status, PGS, and QOL.

Comparison of totally laparoscopic and laparoscopic-assisted approach in gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy for advanced gastric cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy: a retrospective comparative study.

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy is strongly recommended for advanced gastric cancer due to good local control and a high rate of R0 dissection with this strategy. Minimally invasive techniques such as laparoscopy-assisted or total laparoscopic approaches is becoming more and more acceptable in the treatment for gastric cancer. However, the safety and efficiency of total laparoscopic D2 gastrectomy (TLG) for advanced gastric cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy have not been well evaluated. A retrospective study in a single center from 2014 to 2016 was conducted. A total of 65 locally advanced gastric cancers were treated by laparoscopy-assisted gastrectomy (LAG) or TLG. Parameters which include operation time, blood loss, complications, hospital stay, 3-year overall survival, and 3-year disease-free survival were used for comparison. The time of operation in the TLG group was shorter than in the LAG group (P = 0.013), blood loss was less (P = 0.002) and time to first flatus was shorter (P = 0.039) in the TLG group than that in the LLG group. Intraoperative and postoperative complications were comparable in both groups. No significant difference was found in 3-year overall and disease-free survival. For patients with locally advanced gastric cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy, laparoscopic D2 gastrectomy can be considered as a safe and efficient alternative. A further multicenter prospective randomized controlled study is needed to elucidate the applicability of this technique for advanced gastric cancer.

Comparison of Totally Laparoscopic Total Gastrectomy and Laparoscopy-Assisted Total Gastrectomy on Short-Term Outcomes, Inflammatory Response Markers, and Glucose and Lipid Metabolism in Gastric Cancer Patients.

To investigate the therapeutic efficacy of totally laparoscopic total gastrectomy (TLTG) versus laparoscopy-assisted total gastrectomy (LATG) in gastric cancer (GC) treatment, as well as their effects on postoperative inflammation and glucose and lipid metabolic status. Clinical data of 68 individuals with GC who underwent LATG (n=31) and TLTG (n=37) from January 2020 to December 2022 were procured. This included intraoperative blood loss, operative time, incision length, number of lymph nodes dissected, postoperative complication rates, and recovery indicators, such as inflammation, glucose metabolism, and lipid metabolism. The TLTG cohort demonstrated significant advantages in intraoperative blood loss, operative time, and incision length compared to the LATG cohort. Furthermore, TLTG was superior in reducing the incidence of complications. Nevertheless, no substantial variation was observed in the quantity of lymph nodes dissected. Additionally, TLTG showed benefits in postoperative recovery, including better control of the inflammatory response, reduction of complication risks, shorter hospital stay, and alleviation of postoperative pain. TLTG also exhibited a reduced impact on inflammation and demonstrated greater effectiveness in improving postoperative glucose and lipid levels. TLTG surgery is associated with superior clinical outcomes in the treatment of GC compared to LATG, particularly in reducing surgical trauma and accelerating postoperative recovery. Furthermore, TLTG facilitates the resolution of postoperative inflammatory responses and the amelioration of metabolic disorders. The findings from this investigation advocate for the broader adoption of TLTG in the surgical treatment of GC.

Evaluation of Quality of Life and Prognosis of Gastric Cancer Patients After Laparoscopic Subtotal Gastrectomy.

The clinical significance of laparoscopic subtotal gastrectomy (LsTG) with a small remnant stomach remains unclear in patients with gastric cancer, including at an advanced stage. The present study assessed postoperative quality of life (QOL) and survival after LsTG compared with laparoscopic total gastrectomy (LTG). We retrospectively analyzed consecutive patients with gastric cancer who underwent LsTG (n=26) or LTG (n=26). Surgical outcome, postoperative nutritional status, QOL, and prognosis were compared between the LsTG and LTG groups. The Postgastrectomy Syndrome Assessment Scale was used to evaluate postoperative QOL. Operating time was significantly shorter (p<0.01) and postoperative morbidity was significantly lower (p=0.04) in the LsTG than in the LTG group. The reduction in body weight after surgery was significantly greater in the LTG than in the LsTG group (p<0.01). The Postgastrectomy Syndrome Assessment Scale revealed that, compared with LTG, LsTG significantly improved postoperative QOL (p<0.05). There was no significant difference in relapse-free survival and cancer-specific survival between the two groups. Three patients in the LTG group died of pneumonia and overall survival was significantly longer in the LsTG group (p=0.01). This study demonstrated the efficacy of LsTG with a small remnant stomach to prevent a decline in postoperative QOL and non-cancer-related death.

Laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer: A single cancer center experience.

Laparoscopic gastrectomy (LG) was challenging to most surgeons due to the two-dimensional view, difficult manipulations of the instruments, ergonomic discomfort, and the associated muscular spasm and effort. Technological advances with improved surgical experience, have made LG a more feasible and favorable approach for gastric cancer (GC) patients. LG was performed in 44 patients with GC between July 2015 to June 2022, in the Department of Surgical Oncology, Oncology Center, Mansoura University, Egypt, and we assessed the surgical outcomes of this approach as an initial experience of a single cancer center. Twenty-seven patients underwent laparoscopic distal gastrectomy, and seventeen underwent laparoscopic total gastrectomy. Two cases had combined resection. Operative time was 339.2 ± 76.73 min, while blood loss was 153.86 ± 57.51 mL. The patients were ambulant on postoperative day 0, oral intake was started within three days (range 1-5 days) and the hospital stay was six days (range 3-9 days). LG for GC is a feasible approach for both early and advanced GC patients as it allows for adequate diagnosis of the peritoneal disease, meticulous dissection, and identification of the lymph nodes with minimal blood loss and decrease surgery-related problems and encourage the early patients' discharge from hospital and return to daily life activities.

Enhanced recovery after surgery in elderly gastric cancer patients undergoing laparoscopic total gastrectomy

Enhanced recovery after surgery in elderly gastric cancer patients undergoing laparoscopic total gastrectomy

Mucosa layer obtruding the oesophagojejunostomy: A rare complication after total laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer

The linear-stapled method of esophagojejunostomy is one of the most commonly used techniques to perform laparoscopic intracorporeal anastomosis after gastrectomy. We describe a case of total laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer. On the first postoperative day, our patient had vomited, so we decided to perform an endoscopy that showed a mucosa layer obtruding the esophagojejunostomy. The only way to solve the situation endoscopically was to perform endoscopic ultrasonography to find the right side to cut the layer, avoiding drilling the esophagus. After the procedure, gastroscopy and barium x-ray demonstrated a perfect resolution of the problem. An endoscopic control 30 months later showed a wide, easily transitable, and scarred esophagojejunostomy, and the patient had no discomfort or problems. We think that this type of anastomosis is safe and feasible. After the complication we described, we usually use a gastric tube to be sure that the mucosa layer was cut making the linear stapler anastomosis.

Safety and effectiveness of totally laparoscopic total gastrectomy vs laparoscopic-assisted total gastrectomy: a meta-analysis.

For gastric cancer with total gastrectomy, the usual laparoscopic surgical approaches are totally laparoscopic total gastrectomy (TLTG) and laparoscopic-assisted total gastrectomy (LATG). Due to its difficult anastomotic technique, the adoption of TLTG is limited. Therefore, surgeons prefer using LATG, which also led to TLTG being somewhat overlooked, so there is no clear conclusion today as to which surgical procedure is more favorable to the patient's recovery. This article aimed to compare the safety and short-term outcomes of the two surgical approaches. Studies comparing TLTG and LATG, published up to December 2022, were searched in PubMed, Web of Science, and Embase databases. The study outcomes, including operative time, blood loss, anastomosis time, number of retrieved lymph nodes, proximal and distal resection margins, time to first fluid and soft diet, hospitalization duration, time to first flatus, and postsurgical and anastomotic complications, were compared between these two different surgical procedures. Statistics were analyzed with RevMan 5.4 and Stata 13.1. Fifteen publications were included in this study. The total sample included 3023 cases. The meta-analysis revealed no significant difference in overall postoperative complications between the two surgical approaches ( P >0.05). Compared with LATG, TLTG led to reduced intraoperative blood loss ( P <0.0001), an increased number of lymphatic node dissections ( P <0.0001), and decreased hospitalization duration ( P =0.002). However, operative time, anastomosis time, pulmonary infection, resection margins, time to first fluid and soft diet, time to first flatus and anastomosis-related complications were no significant difference between TLTG and LATG groups ( P >0.05). TLTG did not lead to an increase in overall postoperative complications, which is a reliable surgical approach for treatment of gastric cancer. Moreover, it may reduce harm to patients and enable them to obtain better surgical outcomes.

Total laparoscopic total gastrectomy and distal esophagectomy combined with reconstruction by transhiatal esophagojejunal Roux-en-y mediastinal anastomosis for Siewert II AEG

PurposeThe optimal procedure is still controversial about Siewert type II AEG, We are attempt to explore the efficacy and feasibility of total laparoscopic total gastrectomy and distal esophagectomy combined with reconstruction by transhiatal esophagojejunal Roux-en-y mediastinal anastomosis for Siewert type II AEG.MethodData of patients with Siewert type II AEG who received total laparoscopic total gastrectomy and distal esophagectomy combined with reconstruction by transhiatal esophagojejunal Roux-en-y mediastinal anastomosis in the Hebei General Hospital were collected from October 2020 to October 2021, The operation time, surgical blood loss, the number of dissected lymph nodes, duration of drainage tube, the length of stay in ICU, the resume oral feeding time, the length of postoperative hospital stay, postoperative complications and other related indicators of the patients were collected to evaluate the safety and feasibility of this operation.ResultA total of 17 patients received total laparoscopic total gastrectomy and distal esophagectomy combined with reconstruction by transhiatal esophagojejunal Roux-en-y mediastinal anastomosisin the treatment of Siewert type II AEG were analyzed in our research. The mean operation time was 253 ± 24.8 min (196–347 min); The median surgical blood loss was 250 ml (20–2400 ml); The average number of dissected lymph nodes were 28 ± 4.6 (17–36); The median duration of drainage tube was 5 days (3–7days); The median length of stay in ICU was 18 h(10–34 h); The median time of resume oral feeding was 6 days (5–7days); The median postoperative hospital stay was 11 days (8–15 days). Among the all enrolled patients, one patient underwent the conversion to laparotomy due to the massive intraoperative bleeding, one patient developed anastomotic stenosis at jejunum side-to-side anastomosis on the first month after surgery, there was no case of death during the operation and postoperative anastomotic fistula. All patients achieved R0 resection with an average distance of 6 cm (4–8.5 cm) from the upper margin of the tumor to the resection margin.ConclusionThe operation of total laparoscopic total gastric and distal esophagectomy combined with reconstruction by transhiatal esophagojejunal Roux-en-y mediastinal anastomosis is technically feasible and sufficiently safe in the treatment of Seiwert type II AEG from our primary clinical experience. This procedure could be one of the alternatives for the radical treatment of Siewert type II AEG.

Feasibility and safety of pure single-incision laparoscopic total and proximal gastrectomy for early gastric cancer: propensity score-matched comparison to multiport totally laparoscopic approach.

There have been few studies regarding the feasibility and safety of pure single-incision laparoscopic total gastrectomy (SITG) or proximal gastrectomy (SIPG) for early gastric cancer (EGC). The purpose of this study was to analyze the surgical outcome of all consecutive SITG or SIPG cases compared with multiport laparoscopic total gastrectomy (MLTG) or proximal gastrectomy (MLPG) for EGC. We analyzed all consecutive SITG or SIPG cases with double-tract reconstruction for ECG, including the initial case, between March 2013 and December 2021. SITG/SIPG was performed on patients without significant systemic comorbidities through a 3-4cm vertical transumbilical incision. SITG/SIPG was matched to multiport laparoscopic total or proximal gastrectomy (MLTG/MLPG) cases performed in the same period using a 1:3 propensity score matching, including sex, body mass index (BMI), age and type of resection, year of operation, and institution as covariates. We compared perioperative clinicopathological characteristics and early postoperative morbidity within 1month after surgery between the SITG/SIPG and MLTG/MLPG groups. In total, 21 patients with SITG and 15 patients with SIPG were compared with those with MLTG (n = 264) and MLPG (n = 220). No conversion to an open or multiport approach occurred in the SITG/SIPG group. After matching, operation time was similar between SITG/SIPG and MLTG/MLPG (223.9 ± 63.5min vs 234.8 ± 68.7min, P = 0.402). Length of stay was not significantly different between SITG/SIPG and MLTG/MLPG (11.9 ± 15.4days vs 8.4 ± 5.0days, P = 0.210). The average number of retrieved lymph nodes was not significantly different between SITG and MLTG (53.1 ± 16.3 vs 63.2 ± 27.5, P = 0.115), but it was significantly higher in SIPG than MLPG (59.6 ± 27.2 vs 46.0 ± 19.7, P = 0.040). The overall complication rate (30.6% vs 25.9%, P = 0.666) and Clavien-Dindo grade III or higher complication rates (13.9% vs 6.5%, P = 0.175) were not significantly different between the SITG/SIPG and MLTG/MLPG groups. Cautious adoption of SITG/SIPG procedures for EGC is feasible and safe.

Comparison of short-term and long-term clinical effects of modified overlap anastomosis and conventional incision-assisted anastomosis in laparoscopic total gastrectomy

BackgroundTo compare short-term and long-term clinical effects of modified overlap anastomosis and conventional incision-assisted anastomosis for laparoscopic total gastrectomy.MethodsThis retrospective cohort study included patients with gastric cancer admitted to the Second Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University from January 2016 to March 2020. Quality of life, intraoperative and postoperative conditions were analyzed.ResultsCompared with the conventional assisted group, the modified overlap group showed a shorter auxiliary incision, milder postoperative pain, shorter time to the first postoperative anal exhaust, shorter time to the first postoperative liquid food intake, and shorter postoperative stay. There were no differences between the two groups regarding operation time, esophagus-jejunum anastomosis time, intraoperative blood loss, number of lymph nodes dissected, and length of the upper incision margin. There were no differences between the two groups regarding postoperative early and late complications. There were no differences between the two groups regarding the QLQ-C30 scale three years after the operation. The scores of the QLQ-STO22 scale 3 years after the operation showed significantly lower scores for dysphagia and feeding limit in the modified overlap group than those in the conventional assisted anastomosis group. There was no recurrence in the modified overlap group but one patient in the conventional assisted group.ConclusionsPatients undergoing totally laparoscopic total gastrectomy with modified overlap anastomosis have better minimal invasiveness and faster post-operative recovery than conventional incision-assisted anastomosis.

Laparoscopic Completion Total Gastrectomy for Remnant Gastric Cancer Compared to Laparoscopic Total Gastrectomy in Short- and Medium-Term Results.

Introduction: The incidence of remnant gastric cancer is increasing in recent years. The advantages of minimally invasive surgery for gastric cancer are well established. However, laparoscopic completion total gastrectomy for remnant gastric cancer harbors difficulties due to adhesions, changed configuration of the anatomical organs, and changes on the lymphatic flow. We aim to investigate the feasibility, safety, and the short-term outcomes of laparoscopic completion total gastrectomy compared to laparoscopic total gastrectomy. Materials and Methods: All patients who underwent total gastrectomy from January 2018 to December 2021 at Shamir Medical Center were included in the study. Patients were divided into two groups-completion gastrectomy and total gastrectomy. The groups were compared for demographics, operative, and clinical outcomes. Results: Overall, 22 patients were included in the study. Eight were completion gastrectomy following subtotal gastrectomy for malignancy and 14 were primary total gastrectomy. All operations were performed by minimal invasive surgery technique. Average age was 64 years, with no differences in gender. Two major intraoperative complications were noted in completion group (25% versus 0%, P = .12). Both length of surgery (3:03 versus 3:40, P = .049) and length of stay (7 days versus 9 days, P = .5) were shorter in completion group. There were fewer postoperative complications (12.5% versus 28.5%, P = .61). Average number of harvested lymph nodes was significantly lower in completion group (10 versus 33, P = .002). Conclusion: Laparoscopic completion total gastrectomy for remnant gastric cancer is safe and feasible having comparable oncological surrogate's parameters and recurrence profile. Clinical Registration Number: 0015-22-ASF.

A Modified Purse-String Stapling Technique for Intracorporeal Circular Stapled Esophagojejunostomy During Laparoscopic Total Gastrectomy: Comparison with Extracorporeal Reconstruction Technique.

Background: Intracorporeal esophagojejunostomy (EJ) in the context of laparoscopic total gastrectomy remains a complex and technically demanding procedure. We have previously introduced a novel method of intracorporeal circular stapled EJ utilizing a conventional purse-string suture instrument. Since May 2018, we have refined this technique, and the aim of this study was to assess its safety and efficacy. Methods: Between May 2018 and June 2022, we enrolled 92 patients who underwent laparoscopic total gastrectomy with the modified intracorporeal reconstruction method. In addition, between March 2014 and June 2022, we enrolled 121 patients who underwent the procedure with the extracorporeal reconstruction method. We retrospectively collected and compared the clinical data of these 2 patient cohorts. Results: Intracorporeal reconstruction group experienced lower postoperative pain scores (2.7 ± 1.3 versus 4.5 ± 1.4, P = .032), reduced administration of analgesics (3.1 ± 2.2 versus 5.0 ± 3.5, P = .041), and shorter postoperative hospital stays (4.9 ± 2.3 versus 6.3 ± 3.5, P = .045) compared with the extracorporeal reconstruction group. In addition, anastomotic time and postoperative pain score were not increased in the overweight patients in the intracorporeal reconstruction group. Anastomotic leakage occurred in 2 (2.2%) patients in the intracorporeal reconstruction group and 4 (3.3%) patients in the extracorporeal reconstruction group. Anastomotic stricture occurred in 1 (1.1% and 0.8%) patient in each group. There was no significant difference in the overall postoperative complication rate between the 2 groups. Conclusions: The modified intracorporeal purse-string stapling technique for EJ during laparoscopic total gastrectomy is a safe and viable option, exhibiting less invasiveness and comparable outcomes to the extracorporeal reconstruction method, especially suitable for obese patients.