Laparoscopic Total Gastrectomy Research Articles

OGC SO26 - Double tract reconstruction post total gastrectomy enables duodenal surveillance in familial polyposis: Case report

Abstract Background Familial polyposis syndromes such as Juvenille polyposis syndrome (JPS) and Familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) are associated with ∼21% and ∼11% lifetime risk of foregut carcinoma respectively. In patients effected, routine oesophago-gastro-duodenoscopy (OGD) is recommended every 1-3 years, in JPS from 15 years old and in FAP from 25 years old. In patients with malignant transformation traditional resection with Roux-en-Y reconstruction inhibits future duodenoscopy. Method Between April and July 2024 two patients presented requiring total gastrostomy with familial polyposis syndromes. In both cases laparoscopic total gastrectomy with double tract reconstruction was decided upon to enable future duodenal surveillance. Results Case 1: 45 year old female with JPS (germline SMAD 4 mutation). Surveillance detected a massive circumferential proximal gastric polyp comprising ∼30% of total gastric mucosa, too large for endoscopic therapy. Biopsies showed JPS polyps. Patient had no early complications following laparoscopic total gastrectomy and a post operative barium swallow showed clear passage of contrast down the double tract. Case 2: 61 year old male with FAP (germline APC mutation). Surveillance detected innumerable fundic gland polyps with histology demonstrating multifocal high grade dysplasia. Previous subtotal colectomy Planned for laparoscopic total gastrectomy with double tract reconstruction in July 2024 Conclusion Roux-en-Y reconstruction is the most common reconstruction following total gastrectomy. However, in patients with familial polyposis syndromes ongoing lifelong duodenal surveillance is critical. In such patients double-tract reconstruction instead of Roux-en-Y may be preferable allowing future duodenoscopy and acceptable remnant foregut function.

Identification and Categorization of Technical Errors and Hazard-zones of Robotic versus Laparoscopic total Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer: A Single Center Prospective Randomized Controlled Study.

The current research aimed to conduct a detailed analysis of intraoperative surgical performance, short-term outcomes, identify and categorize technical errors, and hazard-zones enacted during total gastrectomy performed robotically and laparoscopically by surgeons. Prospective research is needed to determine whether the technical advantages of robotic surgery translate to patient outcomes. Identify and process risk areas in robot-assisted total gastrectomy (RTG) and laparoscopic total gastrectomy (LTG) to get the best patient results. Patients undergoing RTG and LTG were recruited and randomized into the study. Six consultant/attending surgeons participated in this study and all surgical procedures were recorded. The unedited surgical video-recordings were handed over to third-party experts for granular analysis of the procedures using objective clinical human reliability analysis (OC-HRA) for the quality of intraoperative performance, technical errors, intraoperative complications. This study is a single center prospective randomized controlled trial. 82 patients were recruited and participated in this study with 40 cases undergoing RTG and 42 cases for LTG. RTG vs LTG. Determine whether RTG or LTG can provide the better intraoperative technical performance and identify the most hazardous zone (area) during total gastrectomy (TG). The technical errors enacted and identified in the RTG and the LTG were (46.11±5.63 VS 58.79±8.45, P＜0.001) respectively. The highest number of technical errors was identified during the dissection of the supra-pancreatic lymph nodes (Task Zones3, TZ3), including No.5, 7, 8a, 9, 11p, and 12a to complete the nodal clearance around the celiac artery and its trifurcation (7.29±1.88 VS 9.43±2.24, P <0.001) in both RTG and LTG. The number of lymph nodes harvested with RTG was higher than LTG (35.36±7.51 VS 30.54±6.95, P=0.016), especially in the upper margin of the pancreas (13.32±4.17 VS 9.36±3.81, P＜0.001). The total cost of hospitalization in the RTG group cost 3% more than LTG group ($15953.41±3533.91 VS $12198.26±2761.27, P＜0.001). This study offers compelling OC-HRA evidence demonstrating that RTG facilitates significantly superior technical performance compared to LTG. Whether examining short-term clinical outcomes or intraoperative operations, the robotic surgery system consistently outperforms laparoscopic surgery. Lymph node dissection in the supra-pancreatic region emerged as a major hazard zone in both procedures. chictr.org.cn: ChiCTR2000039193.

Nutritional status of early oral feeding for gastric cancer patients after laparoscopic total gastrectomy: a retrospective cohort study

Nutritional status of early oral feeding for gastric cancer patients after laparoscopic total gastrectomy: a retrospective cohort study

Short-term outcomes depending on type of oesophagojejunostomy in laparoscopic total gastrectomy for gastric cancer: retrospective study based on a Korean Nationwide Survey for Gastric Cancer in 2019.

The study aimed to assess postoperative complication rates of different oesophagojejunostomy (EJ) techniques used in laparoscopic total gastrectomy for gastric cancer. A total of 1155 patients who underwent laparoscopic total gastrectomy were retrospectively selected from the data obtained from the Korean Nationwide Survey for gastric cancer in 2019. Morbidity rate was compared between patients who received intracorporeal or extracorporeal EJ using linear or circular staplers during laparoscopic total gastrectomy. The variables of the groups were balanced using the inverse probability of treatment weighting. Seven hundred and seventy-three patients received intracorporeal EJ using a linear stapler (IL), 137 received intracorporeal EJ using a circular stapler (IC), 134 received extracorporeal EJ using a linear stapler (EL) and 111 received extracorporeal EJ using a circular stapler (EC). The overall complication rates were lower in the extracorporeal group (EL: 13.4% versus EC: 12.6%) compared to the intracorporeal group (IL: 22.6% versus IC: 17.5%) (P = 0.006). Fewer major complications were observed in the extracorporeal group (EL: 1.4% versus EC: 1.8%) compared to the intracorporeal group (IL: 9.4% versus IC: 7.3%) (P = 0.004). There was no significant difference in EJ-related complications between the groups (P = 0.418 in EJ leakage and P = 0.474 in EJ stricture). Multivariable analysis showed that the IL method correlated with more overall and major complications than the extracorporeal method. The results of this study suggest that despite its widespread use, the IL method is a challenging procedure with higher complication rates than the extracorporeal method. Further high-quality studies are required to confirm the results.

Application of anterior esophageal wall full layer fixation and gastric tube guidance in total laparoscopic overlap method for intracorporeal esophagojejunostomy

Objective: To explore the application of anterior esophageal wall full layer fixation and gastric tube guidance in total laparoscopic overlap method for intracorporeal esophagojejunostomy. Methods: Overlap esophagojejunostomy with anterior esophageal wall full layer fixation and gastric tube guidance is suitable for patients with advanced gastric cancer (clinical stage: cT1b~4aN0~3M0) and esophageal invasion <3 cm, who underwent radical total gastrectomy+ overlap esophagojejunostomy. The main operation procedure was performed as follows: A titanium clip was used for fixation of the full anterior wall of esophagus before overlap esophagojejunostomy, and the side-to-side esophagojejunostomy was performed with the linear stapler under the guidance of gastric tube. Then the titanium clip was removed after confirming that the correct cavity was entered. Finally, the common outlet was closed by two barbed sutures. A descriptive case series study was conducted. The clinical data of patients who underwent laparoscopic radical gastrectomy and overlap esophagojejunostomy with anterior esophageal wall full layer fixation and gastric tube guidance in Guangdong Provincial Hospital of Chinese medicine and the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese medicine from May 2021 to June 2023 were retrospectively analyzed. Results: A total of 42 patients were collected, and all of them were successfully completed laparoscopic total radical gastrectomy without conversion to laparotomy or perioperative death. The esophagojejunostomy time, operative time, intraoperative blood loss was 17(5-25) minutes, (258.8±38.0) minutes and 50(20-200) ml, respectively. The incidence of esophageal false lumen was 0%, and there were no intraoperative complications. The time of gastric tube removal, initial fluid diet intake and the duration of postoperative hospital were 2(1-5) , 4(1-8) and 8(4-21) days, respectively. There were no postoperative anastomotic hemorrhage, anastomotic stenosis and other related complications. One patient (2.38%) developed a Clavien-Dindo IIIb complication, which was abdominal hemorrhage after operation. The second surgical exploration confirmed that the patient was bleeding due to gastroduodenal artery rupture. After intraoperative suture hemostasis, fluid expansion, blood transfusion and other treatments, the patient was discharged on the 15th day after the operation. Three patients (7.14%) developed Clavien-Dindo grade II complications, including anastomotic leakage, chylous leakage and pulmonary infection, and were discharged after conservative treatment such as anti-infection and prolonged retention of drainage tube. Conclusions: Laparoscopic overlap method for intracorporeal esophagojejunostomy with anterior esophageal wall fixation and gastric tube guidance can shorten the time of esophagojejunostomy and prevent the occurrence of false lumen, and do not increase anastomose-related complications.

A case-series study of hepatic left lateral segment inversion for surgical field exposure in laparoscopic gastrectomy

PurposeRetraction of the hepatic left lateral segment (HLLS) is a crucial maneuver for surgical field exposure during laparoscopic gastrectomy with systematic lymphadenectomy. Though various methods of retraction are available, there is no perfect solution. Here, we report the results of our initial 42 cases with HLLS inversion method and discuss the feasibility, safety, effectiveness and technical aspects of this method.MethodsThe intraoperative and postoperative short-term outcomes of 42 patients who underwent HLLS inversion during laparoscopic total gastrectomy and proximal gastrectomy in our department September, 2023 to January, 2024 were reviewed. HLLS inversion was performed by mobilizing the HLLS and inverting it to the right supra-hepatic space through an incision at the falciform ligament.Results42 patients underwent HLLS inversion successfully with an average time of 13.9 min. 7 patients needed re-inversion due to slipping back of the HLLS during operation. Optimal exposure of the surgical field was achieved in all patients. No intra-operative complications occurred, except for 1 patient presented with mild intraoperative hepatic hemorrhage requiring electrocoagulation for hemostasis. Alanine aminotransferase and glutamine aminotransferase elevated in some patients on postoperative day 1(POD1), but declined to preoperative levels on the 7th postoperative day. There were no Clavien-Dindo II grade or higher digestive complications after surgery. In 5 patients with preservation the hepatic branch of the vagus nerve, the contractile function of the gall bladder was intact or slightly impaired 2 weeks after operation.ConclusionFor laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy (LPG) and laparoscopic total gastrectomy (LTG), HLLS inversion is a feasible method for optimizing visualization of the surgical field with preservation of the function of the hepatic branch of the vagus nerve. It is safe and acceptable as to the manipulation time. Re-inversion is easy and effective even in case of failure of inversion. HLLS inversion seems to be a promising technique for retraction of the liver during laparoscopic gastrectomy.

Esophagojejunostomy using a circular stapler vs. a linear stapler for gastric cardia cancer patients: impact of upper margin length and tumor size on the survival rate.

The incidence of gastric cancer is concomitantly rising with gastric cardia cancer worldwide. While the improvement of gastric cancer surgical techniques is glowing, this study assesses the impact of the upper margin length and tumor size on the survival rate for gastric cardia cancer patients who underwent total laparoscopic total gastrectomy(TLTG) or laparoscopic assisted total gastrectomy(LATG). A total of 63 patients with gastric cardia cancer who underwent laparoscopic total gastrectomy were retro-prospectively collected from January 2021 to May 2023. While assessing the impact of upper margin length and tumor size on the survival rate, esophagojejunostomy using a linear stapler has been compared to a circular stapler. The sixty-three patients met inclusion criteria; 32 (51%) underwent LATG and 31 (49%) underwent TLTG. Their mean age was 65 years (range, 45-77). The blood loss means in LATG and TLTG was 74.69 and 50.16 ml, respectively (p = 0.005), and surgery duration was higher in LATG than LATG with respective means of 247 min and 222.42 min. (p = 0.006). However, the tumor size means (p = 0.5), and upper margin length means (p = 0.052) were not significantly different in the LATG and TLTG groups, respectively. The number of resected and assessed lymph node was adequate in the LATG and TLTG groups. The current study still does not find an independent related risk from the upper margin length and tumor size to the survival rate according to the multiple regression analysis (p = 0.080). The upper margin length and tumor size do not have a relationship with the survival rate of the compared esophagojejunostomy (EJS) methods. The EJS using a linear stapler requires a shorter surgery duration and less blood loss than EJS using a circular stapler.

Short-Term Outcomes Analysis Comparing Open, Lap-Assisted, Totally Laparoscopic, and Robotic Total Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer: A Network Meta-Analysis.

Total gastrectomy (TG) is the cornerstone treatment for gastric cancer (GC). While open TG (OTG) with D2 lymphadenectomy remains the gold standard, alternative techniques such as lap-assisted TG (LATG), totally laparoscopic TG (TLTG), and robotic TG (RTG) have been reported with promising outcomes. The present analysis aimed to compare the short-term outcomes of different techniques for TG comprehensively in the setting of GC. A systematic review and network meta-analysis were performed. The primary outcomes were overall complications (OC), severe postoperative complications (SPCs), and anastomotic leak (AL). Pooled effect-size measures included risk ratio (RR), weighted mean difference (WMD), and 95% credible intervals (CrIs). Sixty-eight studies (44,689 patients) were included. Overall, 52.4% underwent OTG, 6.5% LATG, 39.2% TLTG, and 1.9% RTG. Both TLTG (RR 0.82; 95% CrI 0.73-0.92) and RTG (RR 0.75; 95% CrI 0.59-0.95) showed a reduced rate of postoperative OC compared to OTG. SPCs and AL RR were comparable across all techniques. Despite the longer operative time, LATG, TLTG, and RTG showed reduced intraoperative blood loss, time to first flatus, ambulation, liquid diet resumption, and hospital stay compared to OTG. Minimally invasive approaches seem to be associated with improved OC and functional outcomes compared to OTG.

Comparison of robotic versus laparoscopic total gastrectomy for gastric cancer: A single-center retrospective cohort study in a Japanese high-volume center

BackgroundRobotic-assisted surgery has become increasingly popular worldwide in recent years. This study aimed to compare the surgical outcomes of robotic total gastrectomy (RTG) and laparoscopic total gastrectomy (LTG) to figure out the advantages of RTG. MethodsThe eligible cases in this study were patients who underwent RTG or LTG for gastric adenocarcinoma at our hospital from January 2014 to December 2022. Propensity score matching (PSM) was employed to balance the underlying selection bias. Then, surgical outcomes of patients were analyzed to be compared. ResultsOverall, 255 patients (LTG: 178, RTG: 77) were included in this study. After PSM, 73 patients in each arm were assigned for analysis. Operation time was longer in the RTG than in the LTG (373 vs 336 min, p < 0.01). However, the RTG was associated with shorter postoperative hospital stays (8 vs 9 days, p = 0.04) and lower incidence of grade 3 or higher postoperative complications (1 % vs 11 %, p = 0.03). More lymph nodes were harvested in the RTG (59 vs 47, p < 0.01). ConclusionsAlthough RTG requires longer operation time, it has the potential to provide advantages to the patient such as quicker recovery, reduction in postoperative complication, or more yield number of lymph nodes. Regarding survival outcomes, further analysis with enough follow-up is needed.

Efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy combined with prophylactic intraperitoneal hyperthermic chemotherapy for patients diagnosed with clinical T4 gastric cancer who underwent laparoscopic radical gastrectomy: a retrospective cohort study based on propensity score matching

BackgroundClinical T4 (cT4) stage gastric cancer presents with frequent postoperative recurrence and poor prognosis. This study is to evaluate the oncological efficacy of laparoscopic radical total gastrectomy combined with postoperative prophylactic hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) in patients with cT4N + M0 gastric cancer who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy.MethodsWe reviewed the clinicopathological data of 174 patients with clinical T4 gastric cancer who underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by laparoscopic radical total gastrectomy between June 2017 and December 2021. Among them, 142 were included in the non-HIPEC group, and 32 in the HIPEC group. Patients in both groups were paired based on propensity score in a 2:1 ratio to assess disparities in tumor recurrence and long-term survival.ResultsAfter matching, there were no significant differences in the clinicopathological data between the two groups. The peritoneum (16.1%) and distant organs (10.9%) were the most frequent locations for recurrence. Prior to matching, the recurrence rates were similar at all sites for both groups. Compared with those in the non-HIPEC cohort, the recurrence rates at all sites, the lung, and the peritoneum were notably lower in the HIPEC cohort. Prior to matching, the 3-year overall survival and disease-free survival rates were similar between the two groups; following matching, the HIPEC group exhibited notably greater survival rates than did the non-HIPEC group. The disparities in survival rates between the groups became even more pronounced after conducting a stratified analysis among patients with stage III disease.ConclusionsNeoadjuvant chemotherapy combined with prophylactic HIPEC after laparoscopic radical gastrectomy can effectively reduce the rate of peritoneal metastasis in patients with cT4N + M0 advanced gastric cancer and significantly improve the prognosis of such patients, which is of great clinical value.

Long-term outcomes of laparoscopic versus open total gastrectomy in patients with advanced gastric cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy: a retrospective cohort study

BackgroundThis study was conducted to investigate the long-term outcomes of laparoscopic total gastrectomy (LTG) versus open total gastrectomy (OTG) in patients with advanced gastric cancer (AGC) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT).MethodsPatients with AGC who received NACT before surgery were enrolled in either the LTG or OTG group. Propensity score matching (PSM) (1:2) was performed between the two groups based on the propensity score using a 0.15 calliper width. Three-year overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were compared between these two groups before and after PSM. OS and DFS rates were calculated by the Kaplan‒Meier method, and any differences in survival were evaluated with a log-rank test. Univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards analyses were used to estimate the simultaneous effects of prognostic factors on survival and the hazard ratio (HR) between LTG and OTG patients.ResultsA total of 144 patients completed the follow-up, with 24 patients in the LTG group and 120 patients in the OTG group. After a mean follow-up of 64.40 months, there were no significant differences in the 3-year OS or DFS rates between the two groups before (P = 0.453 and P = 0.362, respectively) or after PSM (P = 0.972 and P = 0.884, respectively). Multivariate Cox proportional hazards analysis indicated that ypN stage was an independent risk factor for worse OS (P = 0.013).ConclusionsThis study showed that LTG with D2 lymphadenectomy performed by an experienced surgical team resulted in comparable 3-year OS and DFS compared with OTG in patients with AGC after NACT.Trial registrationThis study is not registered.

Feasibility and value of modular splenic hilar lymphadenectomy technique in laparoscopic total gastrectomy: a retrospective-controlled research.

This study aims to investigate the feasibility and value of modular splenic hilar lymphadenectomy (MSHL) in LTG for advanced PGC located at the greater curvature. A retrospective-controlled research included 54 patients diagnosed with advanced PGC located at the greater curvature who underwent LTG combined with spleen-preserving hilar lymphadenectomy between January 2020 and December 2022 at the same treatment center. A total of 20 patients underwent classic splenic hilar lymphadenectomy (CSHL) using a medial approach (classic group), while 34 patients underwent MSHL (modular group). We summarized the technical points, caveats, and critical steps of the MSHL technique and observed and compared clinical indexes between the two groups. All operations were successful without conversion to laparotomy. The mean operation time, mean splenic hilar lymph node dissection (LND) time, median intraoperative blood loss, and blood loss from splenic hilar LND were all significantly lower in the modular group than in the classic group (p < 0.05). The amount of NO.10 lymph nodes (LNs) was significantly higher in the modular group than in the classic group (p < 0.05). In the classic group, one patient experienced intraoperative splenic vein injury, and one experienced spleen laceration, whereas no intraoperative complications occurred in the modular group. The median postoperative feeding time, exhaust time, defecation time, and postoperative stay were all significantly lower in the modular group compared to the classic group (p < 0.05). In the modular group, one patient experienced Clavien-Dindo I complication and one Clavien-Dindo II complication, while in the classic group, one patient experienced Clavien-Dindo II complication and one Clavien-Dindo IIIa complication. There were no patient was re-hospitalized within 30days after surgery. The modular splenic hilar LND technique can simplify complicated surgical procedures in SPSHL and reduce the risk of intraoperative bleeding and collateral damage.

Final results of a randomized controlled trial: comparison of the efficacy and safety between totally laparoscopic and laparoscopic-assisted total gastrectomy for advanced siewert III esophagogastric junction cancer and upper and middle third gastric cancer.

This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of TLTG with the overlap technique to LATG in patients with advanced Siewert III Esophagogastric Junction Cancer and upper and middle third gastric cancer. This single-center RCT enrolled 292 patients with the mentioned cancers, randomly assigned to TLTG overlap (n=146) or LATG (n=146) groups. Data on demographics, pathology, intraoperative variables, postoperative complications, recovery parameters, and 3-year survival were collected. Main outcome: postoperative complications within 30 days. Secondary outcomes: 3-year disease-free and overall survival. TLTG versus LATG: TLTG had shorter incision, faster flatus/defecation, reduced analgesia, less opioid use, and shorter hospital stay. Similar operation time, anastomosis time, blood loss, and lymph node harvest. TLTG had lower overall post-op complication rate (P=0.047), no significant difference in serious complications (P=0.310). Variances in anastomotic stenosis occurrence at 3 months. No rehospitalization or mortality at 30 days. No significant differences in 3-month disease-free survival (P=0.058) or overall survival (P=0.236). Overlap method for anastomosis in TLTG is safe and feasible for advanced middle-upper-third gastric cancer, with positive short-term outcomes. This technique has potential as the preferred esophagojejunostomy approach in TLTG. This trial has been registered at Chinese Clinical Trial Registry: XXXXXXXX (registration date: September 4, 2019).

Safety and feasibility of “Pant-Shaped” anastomosis in laparoscopic-assisted total gastrectomy: Study of 210 cases at a single center

BACKGROUND: Advancements in laparoscopic technology have popularized laparoscopic total gastrectomy over traditional open surgery, yet postoperative complications like anastomotic leakage and stenosis persist, particularly in esophagojejunostomy. To address this, since 2017, the authors have introduced the “Pant-Shaped” esophagojejunostomy as an improvement over the classic Roux-en-Y method, especially beneficial for patients with small intestinal diameters or those with gastric body cancer or Siewert III. OBJECTIVE: To assess the viability and safety of employing ‘Pant-Shaped’ anastomosis following laparoscopic-assisted total gastrectomy. METHODS: A method of descriptive case study was used. In our department of the First Affiliated Hospital of Wannan Medical College, records of 210 patients who underwent laparoscopic-assisted total gastrectomy for gastric body cancer or adenocarcinoma at the junction of esophagus and jejunum with “Pant-Shaped” anastomosis between January 2017 and December 2022 were examined. Clinicopathological features and postoperative conditions were also examined and assessed. RESULTS: The mean age of the 164 male and 46 female research participants was 69.2 ± 8.3 years. There was a mean estimated blood loss of 63.4 ± 29.7 ml, an anastomosis time of 25.9 ± 3.0 minutes, an operation time of 208.2 ± 40.4 minutes, and a postoperative hospital stay of 12.2 ± 8.0 days. Nine patients (4.3%) experienced postoperative problems (Clavien-Dindo &gt; grade II), including two episodes of anastomotic leakage that were resolved with irrigation and drainage, anti-infection therapy, and nutritional assistance. After an unforeseen reoperation, two cases of duodenal stump leaking were resolved. Anastamotic hemorrhage was treated with hemostasis and blood transfusion, and the patient made a full recovery. Due to a Peterson’s hernia, one patient required emergent open surgery. three months subsequent to LATG. CONCLUSIONS: The “Pant-Shaped” anastomosis method after laparoscopic-assisted total gastrectomy is simple, easy to promote, and has fewer complications. It is a safe and feasible modified method for esophagojejunostomy, especially suitable for patients with poor intestinal dilation and contraction ability and small jejunal diameter.

Safety and Feasibility of Electro-Vaporization of Ligamentum Teres Hepatis in Totally Laparoscopic Gastrectomy.

Introduction: The ligamentum teres hepatis may block the field of vision during totally laparoscopic gastrectomy (TLG), especially in patients with obesity. Aim: We used electrocautery to increase the visual field of TLG by shrinking the ligamentum teres hepatis. This procedure is termed electro-vaporization of the ligamentum teres hepatis (EVLTH). Methods: Patients with body mass index (BMI) ≥24 who underwent total laparoscopic distal gastrectomy (TLDG) or total laparoscopic total gastrectomy (TLTG) between January 2020 and December 2023 were retrospectively enrolled. According to the scope of gastrectomy and whether the patients underwent EVLTH, the patients were divided into the TLDG-EVLTH, TLDG-NEVLTH, TLTG-EVLTH, and TLTG-NEVLTH groups. The clinical characteristics, surgical outcomes, and pathological features were compared between the TLDG-EVLTH and TLDG-NEVLTH groups and the TLTG-EVLTH and TLTG-NEVLTH groups. Results: This study included 65 patients who underwent TLDG (EVLTH: NEVLTH = 29:36) and 32 patients who underwent TLTG (EVLTH:NEVLTH = 15:17). There were no significant differences in clinical characteristics, surgical outcomes, and pathological features between the TLDG-EVLTH and TLDG-NEVLTH groups. However, the operation time in the TLTG-EVLTH group was significantly shorter than that in the TLTG-NEVLTH group, and the difference was statistically significant, although differences in other data were not statistically significant. Conclusions: EVLTH is a simple and safe procedure that reduces the operation time of TLTG in patients who are overweight and enhances the field of vision of TLG.

Surgical outcomes and prognosis of intracorporeal versus extracorporeal esophagojejunostomy after laparoscopic total gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a propensity score-matching study

This study compared the surgical outcomes and long-term prognosis of intracorporeal and extracorporeal esophagojejunostomy after laparoscopic total gastrectomy (LTG) for gastric cancer patients. In total 228 clinical stage I gastric cancer patients undergoing LTG were enrolled from January 2012 and December 2022. Each case in the totally laparoscopic total gastrectomy (TLTG) group was 1:1 propensity score-matched to control cases in the laparoscopy-assisted total gastrectomy (LATG) group. In total, 95 and 93 LATG and TLTG patients were included after propensity score matching (PSM). Clinicopathological features, surgical outcomes, and survival variables were compared, and risk factors for postoperative complications were analyzed. Patient characteristics were well balanced between the LATG and TLTG groups after PSM. The TLTG group showed less blood loss, decreased frequency of analgesic use, and shorter duration of analgesic use. The TLTG group had significantly lower rates of intestinal obstruction and surgical site infection. Larger tumor size and advanced pTNM stage were independent risk factors for postoperative complications. There was no significant difference in overall survival (OS). Compared with LATG, TLTG was associated with better surgical outcomes and fewer postoperative surgical complications in gastric cancer patients although there was no significant difference in OS.

Synchronous gastric and ovarian cancer successfully treated with FOLFOX therapy: a case report and review of the literature.

Synchronous gastric and ovarian cancer is extremely rare, and there have been no case reports. Here, we present the first case of synchronous gastric and ovarian cancer successfully treated with chemotherapy and surgery. A 72-year-old Japanese woman presented at our hospital with upper abdominal pain and vomiting. She was diagnosed with gastric cancer after undergoing upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. Simultaneously, ovarian cancer was also suspected based on imaging studies which showed a 9cm cystic lesion with a solid part on the right ovary. Since her gastric cancer was considered inoperable due to the extent of the lesion, she was treated with four courses of oxaliplatin, leucovorin, and 5-fluorouracil (FOLFOX therapy). Since both gastric and ovarian cancer lesions were found to be reduced in size, laparoscopic total gastrectomy (D1 dissection, with Roux-en-Y reconstruction), bilateral adnexectomy, and partial omentectomy were performed. Based on pathological and immunohistochemical findings, the diagnosis of synchronous cancer of poorly differentiated carcinoma of the stomach and endometrioid carcinoma of the ovary was made, and it became clear that FOLFOX therapy was effective especially against ovarian cancer. The patient is currently undergoing postoperative chemotherapy with FOLFOX + nivolumab. She remains alive 8 months after surgery, with no active lesions. This is the first report of a patient with synchronous gastric and ovarian cancer, suggesting that FOLFOX therapy may be effective as a first-line treatment of endometrioid carcinoma of the ovary.

Comparison of clinical efficacy between modified Kamikawa anastomosis in laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy and Roux-en-Y anastomosis in laparoscopic total gastrectomy

To investigate the short-term clinical efficacy of laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy with modified Kamikawa anastomosis and laparoscopic total gastrectomy with Roux-en-Y anastomosis. Retrospective cohort study was conducted. The clinicopathological data of 268 patients who underwent laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy for adenocarcinoma of esophagogastric junction and upper gastric adenocarcinoma from January 2016 to October 2022 were collected. Among 268 patients, 26 underwent laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy with modified Kamikawa anastomosis were assigned to Kamikawa group and 242 underwent laparoscopic total gastrectomy with Roux-en-Y anastomosis were assigned to Roux-en-Y group. The sex, age, BMI, preoperative albumin, maximum tumor diameter, histological grade, and pathological stage of patients in the Kamikawa group and the Roux-en-Y group were subjected to 1:1 propensity score matching. After matching, 16 patients in Kamikawa group and Roux-en-Y group were respectively included in this study. Outcome measures: (1) Intraoperative condition. (2) Postoperative recovery. (3) Follow-up information. The patients' nutritional status, reflux esophagitis and anastomotic stoma were investigated by outpatient and telephone follow-up. Nutritional status assessment comprising body mass index and Nutritional Risk Screening 2002 score. (1) Intraoperative condition. All patients successfully underwent laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy and total gastrectomy. Compared with Roux-en-Y group, the digestive tract reconstruction time in Kamikawa group was longer 93.0(74.0–111.0)min vs. 39.7(35.1–46.2)min, t = -2.001, P = 0.055., and the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05). There was no statistically significant difference in total operation time and intraoperative blood loss (P > 0.05). (2) Postoperative recovery. There was no statistically significant difference between Kamikawa group and Roux-en-Y group in first anal exhaust time, first postoperative liquid intake time, postoperative hospitalization time, and postoperative complications (P > 0.05). (3) Follow-up information. All patients were followed up. BMI and NRS 2002 scores in Kamikawa group were better than those in Roux-en-Y group at 6 and 12 months after surgery 22.9 ± 3.0 kg/m2 vs. 20.8 ± 2.2 kg/m2, t = 2.165, P = 0.038; 23.1 ± 3.0 kg/m2 vs. 20.3 ± 2.2 kg/m2, t = 3.022, P = 0.005 and 2 (1–2) vs. 2 (1–3), Z = -2.585, P = 0.010; 2 (1–2) vs. 2 (1–3), Z = -2.273, P = 0.023., the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference in GERD scale score and occurrence of ≥ Grade B reflux esophagitis at 6 and 12 months after surgery between Kamikawa group and Roux-en-Y group (P > 0.05). Anastomotic stenosis was not found in all patients by postoperative upper gastrointestinal angiography. Laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy with modified Kamikawa anastomosis is safe and feasible for the treatment of esophagogastric junction and upper gastric adenocarcinoma, and can achieve good anti-reflux effect. Besides, compared with traditional laparoscopic total gastrectomy, its postoperative nutritional status is better.

Dropped head syndrome suspected due to oxaliplatin used in adjuvant chemotherapy for gastric cancer: a case report

BackgroundDropped head syndrome (DHS) is caused by dysfunction of the cervical musculature. It is classified into two groups according to the cause: one is weakness of the neck extensors and the other is hypercontraction of the cervical flexors associated with Parkinson’s disease and other disorders. Although some drugs have previously been reported as suspected causes of DHS, we are unaware of any reports in which oxaliplatin was suspected. In this report, we describe a case of DHS during adjuvant chemotherapy for gastric cancer, along with a review of the relevant literature.Case presentationA 72-year-old man was diagnosed with gastric cancer, cT3N0M0 cStage IIB, and underwent laparoscopic total gastrectomy with D2 lymphnode dissection and Roux-en-Y reconstruction. The operative time was 311 min, intraoperative blood loss was 40 g, and he was discharged without any post-operative complications. The histopathological diagnosis was pT4aN2M0 pStage IIIA, and S-1 + oxaliplatin (SOX) therapy was started as adjuvant chemotherapy. On the 4th course of SOX, he complained of neck heaviness and a blood test revealed that his creatine kinase (CK) level was elevated to 2464 IU/L. After consultation with an orthopedic surgeon and a neurologist, DHS due to localized cervical extensor myositis was suspected. Therefore, the 6th course of SOX was postponed, and 30 mg of oral steroids were initiated. His symptoms improved, and his CK level decreased within 2 weeks. After resuming S-1 monotherapy and tapering off oral steroids, no recurrence of symptoms has been observed.ConclusionsWe experienced one case of DHS during adjuvant chemotherapy for gastric cancer. If DHS develops after starting oxaliplatin, involvement of the drug should be suspected, and discontinuation of chemotherapy and introduction of oral steroids should be considered.

Comparing the antireflux effect of laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy with double-flap technique reconstruction versus laparoscopic total gastrectomy with Roux-en-Y reconstruction for proximal early gastric cancer: study protocol for a multicentre, prospective, open-label, randomised controlled trial

IntroductionLaparoscopic proximal gastrectomy with double flap technique (LPG-DFT) reconstruction has been used for proximal early gastric cancer in recent years. However, its feasibility and safety remain uncertain, as only a...