Laparoscopic Surgery For Colon Cancer Research Articles

057. The Comparative Efficacy of Robot-Assisted Versus Laparoscopic Surgery for Rectal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background: Background: Total mesorectal excision (TME) is the gold standard surgical intervention for rectal cancer, associated with effective local recurrence management and improved overall survival rates. Laparoscopic surgery for colon cancer is primarily recognised as a curative treatment. Nonetheless, laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer presents technological limitations. Robot-assisted laparoscopic total mesorectal excision (TME) surgery for rectal cancer was established to address these technical difficulties. Our objective was to assess the clinical and oncological outcomes of robot-assisted surgery compared to laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer. Methods: We searched PubMed, ScienceDirect, and CENTRAL to identify studies and trials published between 2014 and 2023. The outcomes of our study encompass operational duration, duration of hospital admission, and intra-operative haemorrhage. We employed Revman 5.4.2 to do the meta-analysis. Results: Seven trials were analysed, encompassing 1,231 patients, including 545 patients who underwent robotic-assisted surgery and 686 patients who received laparoscopic surgery. Our results demonstrate that robot-assisted surgery significantly reduced operation time (MD 74.04, 95% CI [28.12, 119.97], p = 0.002), hospital stay (MD -1.86, 95% CI [-2.68, -1.05], p < 0.00001), and intra-operative blood loss (MD 36.83, 95% CI [23.55, 50.11], p < 0.00001). Our study identified robot-assisted surgery as a viable option for rectal cancer treatment. Conclusion: Our study revealed that robot-assisted surgery correlated with decreased intra-operative blood loss, operative duration, and length of hospital stay. Further research is needed to corroborate these findings

Clinical Effects of Laparoscopic Radical Colon Cancer Treatment with Complete Mesocolic Resection for Colon Cancer

Objective: This paper aims to evaluate the effect of laparoscopic complete mesocolic resection on the efficacy and survival of patients with colon cancer. Methods: 80 colon cancer patients were included in this study, 40 of whom were treated with traditional radical colon cancer surgery as the control group, and the other 40 were treated with laparoscopic complete mesocolic resection radical colon cancer surgery as the observation group. The study period lasted from April 2022 to April 2023, and the surgical indexes, postoperative recovery, quality of life, and the occurrence of complications of the two groups were monitored throughout the whole process and compared and analyzed. Results: The therapeutic effect of the observation group was better than that of the control group (P < 0.05). The operation time, bleeding volume and postoperative hospitalization time of the observation group were significantly lower than those of the control group, and the number of lymph node dissection was significantly higher than that of the control group, with highly significant differences (all P < 0.001). The postoperative recovery of the observation group (time of first anal defecation, time of first solid food intake, and time of wound healing) was significantly better than that of the control group (all P < 0.001). The quality of life of the observation group was significantly improved with a highly significant correlation (P < 0.001), and the complication rate was significantly lower than that of the control group (P < 0.05). Conclusion: Laparoscopic radical colon cancer surgery with complete mesocolic resection for colon cancer shows better clinical effects and advantages in the treatment of colon cancer, which is worth further promotion and application in clinical practice.

Minimally Invasive Surgery: Is It a Risk Factor for Postoperative Peritoneal Metastasis in pT4 Colon Cancer?

Performing laparoscopic surgery for T4 colon cancer remains controversial because of concerns about whether its oncologic outcomes are comparable to those of open surgery, and postoperative peritoneal metastasis (PM) has been reported to occur more frequently in laparoscopic colectomy for T4 colon cancer. We investigated whether minimally invasive surgery (MIS) demonstrated a higher PM rate than open surgery and analyzed the risk factors for PM in pT4 colon cancer. This study included 392 patients with pT4 colon cancer who underwent curative surgery at a referral hospital between January 2000 and December 2018. Patients with previous neoadjuvant therapy, synchronous malignancy, metastasis, or those who underwent hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy were excluded. The MIS group had fewer high-risk clinical features, such as tumors too large for endoscope admission or complications like perforation and fistula. The group also exhibited shorter operative time, intraoperative blood loss, multivisceral resection, hospital stay, fewer postoperative complications, smaller tumor size, lower pT4b ratio, and higher pN+ rates. Multivariate analysis revealed that high-risk clinical features, MIS, pT4b, pN+, tumor size < 5 cm, high histological grade, lymphovascular invasion, and postoperative complications were significant risk factors for PM. During the median 59-month follow-up, the 5-year cumulative incidence of PM was elevated in the MIS group (17.5% vs. 8.2%; P = 0.057). No significant differences were observed in the 5-year overall and disease-free survival rates. Minimally invasive surgery increases the risk of postoperative PM in patients with pT4 colon cancer. Surgeons may require thorough tumor staging and radical resection to prevent PM.

FDG PET/MRI in a Case of Isolated Abdominal Incisional Site Metastasis After Laparoscopic Surgery for Colon Cancer.

Abdominal-wall metastasis following laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer is rare. We describe FDG PET/MRI findings in a case of isolated abdominal incisional site metastasis after laparoscopic surgery for colon cancer. The abdominal-wall metastasis showed slight hyperintensity on T2-weighted fat-suppressed image and intense focal FDG uptake on PET. This case demonstrates the usefulness of FDG PET/MRI in detecting the atypical metastasis from colon cancer.

Comparison of robotic and laparoscopic surgery for sigmoid colon and rectal cancer: a single-center retrospective study on surgical outcomes and long-term survival.

Although the safety and short-term outcomes of robotic surgery for sigmoid colon and rectal cancer patients are well-documented, there is limited research on the long-term survival outcomes of robotic colorectal surgery. This is a retrospective study that includes 502 patients who underwent either laparoscopic or robotic anterior resection and abdominoperineal resection for rectal or sigmoid colon cancer between August 2016 and September 2021. All patients were diagnosed with rectal or sigmoid colon adenocarcinoma. Propensity score matching (PSM) was implemented to minimize selection bias. Perioperative outcomes, complication rates, and pathological data were evaluated and compared. The 5-year overall survival rate and disease-free survival rate were calculated and compared. Before matching, patients in the robotic group had earlier pathological T and N stages and were more likely to have received neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy compared to the laparoscopic group. After matching, most clinicopathological outcomes were similar between the two groups, but the robotic group had longer operative times and a lower conversion rate to open surgery compared with laparoscopic group. After matching for clinical factors, the 5-year DFS rates were 88.19% for the robotic group and 82.46% for the laparoscopic group (P = 0.122), and the OS rates were 90.5% and 79.5% (P = 0.342), showing no significant differences. In the stratified analysis, patients in the robotic surgery group had significantly higher 5-year DFS rates in the following subgroups: age < 65years, TNM stage I-II, received neoadjuvant therapy, and primary tumor located in the rectum. The safety and efficacy of robotic surgery for sigmoid colon and rectal cancer were validated compared to laparoscopic surgery, with both groups of patients exhibiting comparable long-term prognoses.

Screening and assessment of nutritional status and some related factors in patients who have laparoscopic surgery for colon cancer

Background: Preoperative malnutrition is a significant problem for cancer and colon cancer patients, so screening, monitoring, and supporting this condition becomes increasingly essential in the surgical field. In colorectal cancer, malnutrition is significantly associated with several consequences, including mortality and increasing the length of hospital stay after surgery. The NRS 2002 and SGA scores are practical malnutrition assessment tools widely used in clinical practice today. Materials and methods: A cross-sectional descriptive study was performed on 53 patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery due to colon cancer at Hue University of Medicine and Pharmacy Hospital and Hue Central Hospital. The NRS-2002 tool was used for risk screening, and the SGA was used to assess the patient’s nutritional status. Information about the disease and related factors are referenced from medical records combined with asking the patient. Results: The average age was 61.5±14.5, of which 50.9% were male. ASA 1 accounted for the majority at 66.0%. Complications of surgical site infection accounted for 11.3%. Two patients with subcutaneous emphysema accounted for 3.8%, and one with urinary retention accounted for 1.9% were treated with conservative treatment. One patient had early postoperative small bowel obstruction due to abdominal drainage and was successfully treated medically, accounting for 1.9%. There were no major complications requiring reoperation and short-term mortality. The average hospital stay was 7.4 ± 2.1 days. According to the 2002 NRS score, there were 19 (35.8%) cases of nutritional at-risk; the SGA rating had 1.9% SGA-C and 15.1% SGA-B cases. There was a relationship between NRS-2002 and the patient’s blood albumin concentration. Conclusion: The prevalence of patients at nutritional risk and malnutrition is quite common. It is necessary to carry out routine screening and nutritional risk assessment to support colon cancer treatment. Key words: malnutrition, colorectal cancer, NRS 2002, SGA score.

Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Laparoscopic versus Robotic-Assisted Surgery for Colon Cancer: Efficacy, Safety, and Outcomes-A Focus on Studies from 2020-2024.

Minimally invasive surgery in the treatment of colon cancer has significantly advanced over the years. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to compare the operative outcomes of robotic and laparoscopic surgery in the treatment of colon cancer, focusing on operative time, hospital stay, conversion rates, anastomotic leak rates, and total number lymph node harvested. Following PRISMA guidelines, we conducted a systematic search across four databases up to January 2024, registering our protocol with PROSPERO (CRD42024513326). We included studies comparing robotic and laparoscopic surgeries for colon cancer, assessing operative time, hospital length of stay, and other perioperative outcomes. Risk of bias was evaluated using the JBI Critical Appraisal Checklist. Statistical analysis utilized a mix of fixed and random-effects models based on heterogeneity. A total of 21 studies met the inclusion criteria, encompassing 50,771 patients, with 21.75% undergoing robotic surgery and 78.25% laparoscopic surgery. Robotic surgery was associated with longer operative times (SMD = -1.27, p < 0.00001) but shorter hospital stays (MD = 0.42, p = 0.003) compared to laparoscopic surgery. Conversion rates were significantly higher in laparoscopic procedures (OR = 2.02, p < 0.00001). No significant differences were found in anastomotic leak rates. A higher number of lymph nodes was harvested by robotic approach (MD = -0.65, p = 0.04). Publication bias was addressed through funnel plot analysis and Egger's test, indicating the presence of asymmetry (p = 0.006). The choice of surgical method should be individualized, considering factors such as surgeon expertise, medical facilities, and patient-specific considerations. Future research should aim to elucidate long-term outcomes to further guide the clinical decision-making.

Artificial intelligence algorithms for predicting post-operative ileus after laparoscopic surgery

ObjectiveBy constructing a predictive model using machine learning and deep learning technologies, we aim to understand the risk factors for postoperative intestinal obstruction in laparoscopic colorectal cancer patients, and establish an effective artificial intelligence-based predictive model to guide individualized prevention and treatment, thus improving patient outcomes. MethodsWe constructed a model of the artificial intelligence algorithm in Python. Subjects were randomly assigned to either a training set for variable identification and model construction, or a test set for testing model performance, at a ratio of 7:3. The model was trained with ten algorithms. We used the AUC values of the ROC curves, as well as accuracy, precision, recall rate and F1 scores. ResultsThe results of feature engineering composited with the GBDT algorithm showed that opioid use, anesthesia duration, and body weight were the top three factors in the development of POI. We used ten machine learning and deep learning algorithms to validate the model, and the results were as follows: the three algorithms with best accuracy were XGB (0.807), Decision Tree (0.807) and Neural DecisionTree (0.807); the two algorithms with best precision were XGB (0.500) and Decision Tree (0.500); the two algorithms with best recall rate were adab (0.243) and Decision Tree (0.135); the two algorithms with highest F1 score were adab (0.290) and Decision Tree (0.213); and the three algorithms with best AUC were Gradient Boosting (0.678), XGB (0.638) and LinearSVC (0.633). ConclusionThis study shows that XGB and Decision Tree are the two best algorithms for predicting the risk of developing ileus after laparoscopic colon cancer surgery. It provides new insight and approaches to the field of postoperative intestinal obstruction in colorectal cancer through the application of machine learning techniques, thereby improving our understanding of the disease and offering strong support for clinical decision-making.

Short-term and Long-term Outcomes After Laparoscopic Surgery for Pathological Stage T4a and T4b Colon Cancer.

Short-term and Long-term Outcomes After Laparoscopic Surgery for Pathological Stage T4a and T4b Colon Cancer.

Intra-abdominal fibromatosis following laparoscopic surgery for sigmoid colon cancer: A case report

Introduction: Desmoid tumors, also known as aggressive fibromatosis, are rare, benign, non-inflammatory, and fibroblastic tumors. Characterized by their locally aggressive behavior and the potential for recurrence, these tumors do not metastasize. Intra-abdominal desmoid tumors comprise 8% of all desmoid tumors. Case Report: This paper presents a case of a 50-year-old male, highlighting the diagnostic challenge posed by the incidental discovery of an intra-abdominal mesenteric mass in a patient previously treated for stage I sigmoid colon cancer by laparoscopic proctocolectomy. Multidisciplinary consensus favored surgical intervention, successfully revealing and removing a benign desmoid-type fibromatosis. The occurrence of intra-abdominal desmoid tumors after laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer is exceptionally rare, underscoring the unique nature of this case. Conclusion: During post-operative follow-up for colon cancer, the discovery of an intra-abdominal mass is often initially regarded as a sign of cancer recurrence and metastasis. Radiologists and oncologists may not immediately consider alternative causes. The incidentally discovered desmoid-type fibromatosis emphasizes the necessity for vigilant monitoring and consideration of diverse pathologies during follow-up, especially in low-risk scenarios.

Accelerated enhanced recovery after colon cancer surgery with discharge within one day after surgery: a systematic review

BackgroundRecent studies have demonstrated that accelerated enhanced recovery after colorectal surgery is feasible for specific patient populations. The accelerated enhanced recovery protocols (ERP) tend to vary, and the majority of studies included a small study population. This hampers defining the optimal protocol and establishing the potential benefits. This systematic review aimed to determine the effect of accelerated ERPs with intended discharge within one day after surgery.MethodsPubMed (MEDLINE), Embase, Cochrane and Web of Science databases were searched using the following search terms: colon cancer, colon surgery, accelerated recovery, fast track recovery, enhanced recovery after surgery. Clinical trials published between January 2005 – February 2023, written in English or Dutch comparing accelerated ERPs to Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) care for adult patients undergoing elective laparoscopic or robotic surgery for colon cancer were eligible for inclusion.ResultsThirteen studies, including one RCT were included. Accelerated ERPs after colorectal surgery was possible as LOS was shorter; 14 h to 3.4 days, and complication rate varied from 0–35.7% and readmission rate was 0–17% in the accelerated ERP groups. Risk of bias was serious or critical in most of the included studies.ConclusionsAccelerated ERPs may not yet be considered the new standard of care as the current data is heterogenous, and data on important outcome measures is scarce. Nonetheless, the decreased LOS suggests that accelerated recovery is possible for selected patients. In addition, the complication and readmission rates were comparable to ERAS care, suggesting that accelerated recovery could be safe.

Usefulness of intraoperative ultrasound examination for laparoscopic right-side colon cancer surgery: a propensity score-matched study

Complete mesocolic excision (CME) with central vascular ligation (CVL) in laparoscopic surgery for right-sided colon cancer (RSCC) requires a precise understanding of the vascular anatomy. The efficacy of intraoperative ultrasound (IUS) in the identification of blood vessels for RSCC surgery was not evaluated. The aim of this study was to compare the intraoperative and short-term outcomes of CME with CVL with or without IUS by laparoscopic surgery for RSCC. We performed IUS on 26 patients of RSCC and compared with a total of 124 patients who underwent the surgery for RSCC at our institution. Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed to reduce the confounding effects to imbalances in the use of IUS. The IUS identified the main feeding artery and the accompanying vein in all 26 cases. After PSM, the amount of intraoperative blood loss in the IUS group was significantly lower than that in the conventional group (5 ml vs. 30 ml, p = 0.035) and no significant difference of the postoperative complications was observed. The IUS reduced the risk of bleeding in the surgery for RSCC. The IUS is a safe and feasible technique that help the surgeons for anatomical understandings under real-time condition in the laparoscopic surgery of RSCC.

Surgical quality assessment for the prospective study of oncologic outcomes after laparoscopic modified complete mesocolic excision for nonmetastatic right colon cancer (PIONEER study).

The modified complete mesocolic excision (mCME) procedure for right-sided colon cancer is a tailored approach based on the original complete mesocolic excision (CME) methodology. Limited studies evaluated the safety and feasibility of laparoscopic mCME using objective surgical quality assessments in patients with right colon cancer. The objectives of the PIONEER study were to evaluate oncologic outcomes after laparoscopic mCME and to identify optimal clinically relevant endpoints and values for standardizing laparoscopic right colon cancer surgery based on short-term outcomes of procedures performed by expert laparoscopic surgeons. This is an ongoing prospective, multi-institutional, single-arm study conducted at five tertiary colorectal cancer centers in South Korea. Study registrants included 250 patients scheduled for laparoscopic mCME with right-sided colon adenocarcinoma (from the appendix to the proximal half of the transverse colon). The primary endpoint was 3-year disease-free survival. Secondary outcomes included 3-year overall survival, incidence of morbidity in the first 4 weeks postoperatively, completeness of mCME, central radicality, and distribution of metastatic lymph nodes. Survival data will be available after the final follow-up date (June 2024). The postoperative complication rate was 12.9%, with a major complication rate of 2.7%. In 87% of patients, central radicality was achieved with dissection at or beyond the level of complete exposure of the superior mesenteric vein. Mesocolic plane resection with an intact mesocolon was achieved in 75.9% of patients, as assessed through photographs. Metastatic lymph node distribution varied by tumor location and extent. Seven optimal clinically relevant endpoints and values were identified based on the analysis of complications in low-risk patients. Laparoscopic mCME for right-sided colon cancer produced favorable short-term postoperative outcomes. The identified optimal clinically relevant endpoints and values can serve as a reference for evaluating surgical performance of this procedure.

Short-term and long-term outcomes of single-incision plus one-port laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer: a propensity-matched cohort study with conventional laparoscopic surgery

BackgroundSingle-incision plus one-port laparoscopic surgery (SILS + 1) has been demonstrated to be minimally invasive while possessing better cosmesis and less pain compared with conventional laparoscopic surgery (CLS). However, SILS + 1 as an alternative to CLS for colorectal cancer is still controversial.MethodsA total of 1071 patients who underwent curative laparoscopic surgery for colon cancer between 2015 and 2018 were included. Of these patients, 258 SILS + 1 cases and 516 CLS cases were analyzed using propensity score matching. The baseline characteristics, surgical outcomes, pathologic findings and recovery course, morbidity and mortality within postoperative 30 days and 3-year disease-free and overall survival were compared.ResultsBaseline characteristics were balanced between the groups. The mean operating time was significantly shorter in SILS + 1 group, with less estimated blood loss. Tumor size, tumor differentiation, number of harvested lymph nodes, resection margin and pathologic T, N, TNM stage was similar between the groups. There was no significant difference in overall perioperative complications. Uni- and multivariate analyses revealed that SILS + 1 was not a risk factor for complications. Postoperatively, SILS + 1 group showed faster recovery than CLS group in terms of ambulation, bowel function, oral intake and discharge. The 3-year disease-free survival rates of SILS + 1 and CLS groups were 90.1% and 87.3%(p = 0.59), respectively and the 3-year overall survival rates were 93.3% vs. 89.8%(p = 0.172).DiscussionOur study revealed that SILS + 1 is safe, feasible, oncologically efficient, and may be considered as a surgical option for selected patients with colorectal cancer.

Long-term Outcomes of Robot-assisted Versus Laparoscopic Surgery for Colon Cancer: A Nationwide Register-based Cohort Study.

To determine long-term survival in patients undergoing robot-assisted surgery (RAS) or laparoscopic surgery (LAS) for colon cancer. The potential long-term benefits of RAS compared with LAS for colon cancer are not well examined. Using a register-based approach, we aimed to compare these 2 surgical platforms in an analysis of long-term outcomes, including recurrence-free survival and all-cause- and colon cancer-specific mortality. A nationwide register-based cohort study of patients with Union for International Cancer Control stage I-III colon cancer undergoing planned RAS or LAS from 2010 through 2018. Patient demographic, clinical, and pathological data were retrieved from Danish national registers. Survival and recurrence rates were estimated by Cox proportional hazard multivariate regression analysis adjusting for baseline covariates. A total of 7565 patients [LAS=6905 (91%) and RAS=660 (9%)] were included in the complete case survival analysis. Patients undergoing LAS had a significantly increased risk of cancer recurrence [LAS=1178 (17.1%), RAS=82 (12.4%), P =0.002] with a mean follow-up time of 4.93 years (standard deviation 2.47). The survival analysis of recurrence-free survival favored RAS [hazard ratio adjusted =0.80, 95% CI (0.64-1.00), P =0.049]. No associations between the 2 surgical platforms were evident regarding all-cause [hazard ratio adjusted =0.98, 95% CI (0.82-1.17), P =0.783] or colon cancer-specific mortality [hazard ratio adjusted =0.89, 95% CI (0.67-1.18), P =0.405]. Adopting RAS for colon cancer was associated with improved recurrence-free survival. However, it did not cause a lower all-cause- or colon cancer-specific mortality.

Combined endoscopic and laparoscopic surgery (CELS) for early colon cancer in high-risk patients

BackgroundLocal excision of early colon cancers could be an option in selected patients with high risk of complications and no sign of lymph node metastasis (LNM). The primary aim was to assess feasibility in high-risk patients with early colon cancer treated with Combined Endoscopic and Laparoscopic Surgery (CELS).MethodsA non-randomized prospective feasibility study including 25 patients with Performance Status score ≥ 1 and/or American Society of Anesthesiologists score ≥ 3, and clinical Union of International Cancer Control stage-1 colon cancer suitable for CELS resection. The primary outcome was failure of CELS resection, defined as either: Incomplete resection (R1/R2), local recurrence within 3 months, complication related to CELS within 30 days (Clavien–Dindo grade ≥ 3), death within 30 days or death within 90 days due to complications to surgery.ResultsFifteen patients with clinical T1 (cT1) and ten with clinical T2 (cT2) colon cancer and without suspicion of metastases were included. Failure occurred in two patients due to incomplete resections. Histopathological examination classified seven patients as having pT1, nine as pT2, six as pT3 adenocarcinomas, and three as non-invasive tumors. In three patients, the surgical strategy was changed intraoperatively to conventional colectomy due to tumor location or size. Median length of stay was 1 day. Seven patients had completion colectomy performed due to histological high-risk factors. None had LNM.ConclusionsIn selected patients, CELS resection was feasible, and could spare some patients large bowel resection.

A 3 mm Port Reduces Postoperative Pain After Laparoscopic Colon Cancer Surgery: A Case-control Matched Study.

Recently, smaller-size trocars and instruments have been developed for laparoscopic colon cancer surgery; however, their effectiveness and safety have not been elucidated. This study aimed to investigate whether 3 mm trocars and instruments have benefits compared with conventional trocars and instruments. Patients with colon cancer who underwent laparoscopic anterior resection or right hemicolectomy were included. Patients who underwent combined resections of other organs and those with conversion to open surgery were excluded. In the 3 mm group, three 5 mm trocars were replaced by 3 mm trocars. The numeric rating scale (NRS) immediately postoperatively at 24, 48, and 72 hours, respectively, after surgery and the use of additional analgesics and perioperative outcomes were analyzed. Case-control matched analysis was used to reduce bias according to the type of surgery. A total of 207 patients (conventional: n = 158, 3 mm: n = 49) were included. Before matching, NRS 48 hours postoperatively ( P = 0.049), proportion of patients using additional intravenous (IV) analgesics ( P = 0.007), postoperative hospital stay ( P < 0.001), and blood loss ( P < 0.001) were lower in the 3 mm group. In multivariable analysis, trocar type significantly impacted the proportion of patients using additional IV analgesics (odds ratio: 0.330; 95% CI: 0.153-0.712; P = 0.005). After case-control matching, NRS immediately postoperatively ( P = 0.015) and 24 hours postsurgery ( P = 0.043), patients using additional IV analgesics ( P = 0.019), postoperative hospital stay ( P = 0.010), intraoperative blood loss ( P < 0.001), and postoperative complication rate ( P = 0.028) were significantly lower in the 3 mm group compared with the 5 mm group. The use of 3 mm trocars and instruments in laparoscopic colon cancer surgery can effectively reduce postoperative pain while maintaining perioperative safety.

Clinical outcomes of elective robotic vs laparoscopic surgery for colon cancer utilizing a large national database.

Prior studies have shown comparable outcomes between laparoscopic and robotic approaches across a range of surgeries; however, these have been limited in size. This study investigates differences in outcomes following robotic (RC) vs laparoscopic (LC) colectomy across several years utilizing a large national database. We analyzed data from ACS NSQIP for patients who underwent elective minimally invasive colectomies for colon cancer from 2012 to 2020. Inverse probability weighting with regression adjustment (IPWRA) incorporating demographics, operative factors, and comorbidities was used. Outcomes included mortality, complications, return to the operating room (OR), post-operative length of stay (LOS), operative time, readmission, and anastomotic leak. Secondary analysis was performed to further assess anastomotic leak rate following right and left colectomies. We identified 83,841 patients who underwent elective minimally invasive colectomies: 14,122 (16.8%) RC and 69,719 (83.2%) LC. Patients who underwent RC were younger, more likely to be male, non-Hispanic White, with higher body mass index (BMI) and fewer comorbidities (for all, P < 0.05). After adjustment, there were no differences between RC and LC for 30-day mortality (0.8% vs 0.9% respectively, P = 0.457) or overall complications (16.9% vs 17.2%, P = 0.432). RC was associated with higher return to OR (5.1% vs 3.6%, P < 0.001), lower LOS (4.9 vs 5.1days, P < 0.001), longer operative time (247 vs 184min, P < 0.001), and higher rates of readmission (8.8% vs 7.2%, P < 0.001). Anastomotic leak rates were comparable for right-sided RC vs LC (2.1% vs 2.2%, P = 0.713), higher for left-sided LC (2.7%, P < 0.001), and highest for left-sided RC (3.4%, P < 0.001). Robotic approach for elective colon cancer resection has similar outcomes to its laparoscopic counterpart. There were no differences in mortality or overall complications, however anastomotic leaks were highest after left RC. Further investigation is imperative to better understand the potential impact of technological advancement such as robotic surgery on patient outcomes.

The impact of laparoscopic, open, extended right, and left colectomy on clinical outcomes of splenic flexure colon cancer: A meta-analysis.

Surgical intervention is the recommended line for the management of colon cancer. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of different surgical techniques (laparoscopic, open, extended right, and left colectomy) on clinical outcomes such as mortality, postoperative complications, operation and hospitalization time, and oncological factors. A total of 15 studies have been included in the current study. The outcomes of these studies were analyzed using a random-effect model and it was used to calculate the mean difference with 95% confidence intervals to quantify the impact of open, laparoscopic, extended right, and left colectomy. Inclusion criteria included studies in which subjects undergo splenic flexure colon cancer surgery with 2 comparable different surgical techniques. Laparoscopic splenic flexure colon cancer surgery showed a significant beneficial impact on the length of hospital stay (P < .001), the volume of blood loss during surgery (P < .001), postoperative complications (P < .001), and time to an oral diet (P < .001). On the other hand, there was no significance regarding anastomotic leakage, infection of the surgical site, and operation time. Regarding the comparison between extended right colectomy (ERC) and lift colectomy (LC), analysis findings showed a significant (P = .001) higher efficacy of ERC in harvested number of lymph nodes compared with LC. On the other hand, there was no significant difference for the rest of the parameters. The neoadjuvant therapy as an influencing factor on postoperative outcome showed a beneficial impact regarding the overall survival rate. Laparoscopic splenic flexure colon cancer surgery showed a significant beneficial impact compared with open surgery as proved by clinical outcomes. On the other hand, ERC and LC resulted in similar findings except for harvested lymph nodes, results were in favor of ERC.

Novel mobilization of the medial approach without changing the position for robotic right hemicolectomy.

Conventional laparoscopic or robotic surgery for right-sided colon cancer often requires intraoperative repositioning and removal of the bowel. Changing positions during robotic surgery can be troublesome and robotic removal of the small intestine carries a risk of unexpected injury because robotic devices have a strong grasping force and no sense of touch. Herein, we introduce a novel mobilization of the medial approach without changing the position for robotic right hemicolectomy. Using this technique, mobilization is performed in counterclockwise succession, allowing all mobilizations and bowel removal to be completed sequentially, without positional change.