Laparoscopic Surgeons Research Articles

Efficacy, Safety and Outcomes of the Laparoscopic Management of Cesarean Scar Ectopic Pregnancy as a Single Therapeutic Approach: A Case Series.

A standardized consensus for the management of cesarean scar pregnancy (CSP) is lacking. The study objective is to evaluate the efficacy, safety and outcomes of the laparoscopic management of CSP as a single therapeutic surgical approach without being preceded by vascular pretreatment or vasoconstrictors injection. This is a retrospective bi-centric study, a case series. Eight patients with a future desire to conceive underwent the laparoscopic treatment of unruptured CSPs. Surgery consisted of "en bloc" excision of the deficient uterine scar with the adherent tissue of conception, followed by immediate uterine repair. The data collected for each patient was age, gestity, parity, number of previous c-sections, pre-pregnancy isthmocele-related symptoms, gestational age, fetal cardiac activity, initial β-human chorionic gonadotropin levels, intra-operative blood loss, blood transfusion, operative time and the postoperative complications, evaluated according to Clavien-Dindo classification. The CSP was successfully removed in all patients by laparoscopy. The surgical outcomes were favorable. All patients with histories of isthmocele-related symptoms reported postoperative resolution of symptoms. The median residual myometrium thickness increased significantly from 1.2 mm pre-operatively to 8 mm 3 to 6 months after surgery. The laparoscopic management seems to be an appropriate treatment of CSP when performed by skilled laparoscopic surgeons. It can be safely proposed as a single surgical therapeutic approach. Larger series and further prospective studies are needed to confirm this observation and to affirm the long-term gynecological and obstetrical outcomes of this management.

Surgical quality assessment for the prospective study of oncologic outcomes after laparoscopic modified complete mesocolic excision for nonmetastatic right colon cancer (PIONEER study).

The modified complete mesocolic excision (mCME) procedure for right-sided colon cancer is a tailored approach based on the original complete mesocolic excision (CME) methodology. Limited studies evaluated the safety and feasibility of laparoscopic mCME using objective surgical quality assessments in patients with right colon cancer. The objectives of the PIONEER study were to evaluate oncologic outcomes after laparoscopic mCME and to identify optimal clinically relevant endpoints and values for standardizing laparoscopic right colon cancer surgery based on short-term outcomes of procedures performed by expert laparoscopic surgeons. This is an ongoing prospective, multi-institutional, single-arm study conducted at five tertiary colorectal cancer centers in South Korea. Study registrants included 250 patients scheduled for laparoscopic mCME with right-sided colon adenocarcinoma (from the appendix to the proximal half of the transverse colon). The primary endpoint was 3-year disease-free survival. Secondary outcomes included 3-year overall survival, incidence of morbidity in the first 4 weeks postoperatively, completeness of mCME, central radicality, and distribution of metastatic lymph nodes. Survival data will be available after the final follow-up date (June 2024). The postoperative complication rate was 12.9%, with a major complication rate of 2.7%. In 87% of patients, central radicality was achieved with dissection at or beyond the level of complete exposure of the superior mesenteric vein. Mesocolic plane resection with an intact mesocolon was achieved in 75.9% of patients, as assessed through photographs. Metastatic lymph node distribution varied by tumor location and extent. Seven optimal clinically relevant endpoints and values were identified based on the analysis of complications in low-risk patients. Laparoscopic mCME for right-sided colon cancer produced favorable short-term postoperative outcomes. The identified optimal clinically relevant endpoints and values can serve as a reference for evaluating surgical performance of this procedure.

Incisional hernias: minimally invasive surgical procedures

In recent years many new surgical techniques for minimally invasive treatment of ventral hernias have been developed and introduced. This review article presents these new minimally invasive surgical techniques, such as extended totally extraperitoneal (eTEP) repair, mini or less open sublay (MILOS), endoscopic-assisted linea alba reconstruction (ELAR), the ventral transabdominal preperitoneal patch (TAPP) technique, intraperitoneal onlay mesh (IPOM) plus and laparoscopic intracorporeal rectus aponeuroplasty (LIRA) and discusses recently published results. Modern minimally invasive techniques for the treatment of ventral hernias have the potential to reduce surgical site infections, lower postoperative pain and lead to a shorter duration of hospital stay compared to the classical open hernia repair; however, especially techniques with a retromuscular mesh position are technically challenging due to the preparation in a limited space and difficult to perform endoscopic sutures and necessitate detailed knowledge of the anatomy of the abdominal wall. The treatment of larger hernias in particular should therefore only be carried out under the prerequisite of extensive experience and case numbers. The new endoscopic and endoscopically assisted techniques for treatment of ventral hernias enable the experienced laparoscopic surgeon to primarily and secondarily treat ventral hernias with minimally invasive techniques.

A comparative study in learning curves of laparoscopic lateral suspension vs. laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy: preliminary results.

Determination of the learning curve of new techniques is essential to improve safety and efficiency. Limited information is available regarding learning curves of different techniques in laparoscopic pelvic floor surgery. The aim of this study was to compare the learning curve of two operative techniques, laparoscopic lateral suspension (LLS) and laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy (LSC). We conducted a prospective study to assess the learning curve of LLS and LSC by implementing a structured urogynecologic surgical training program with the use of pelvic trainers for our urogynecology fellow. The fellow was an experienced urogynecologic surgeon, but was laparoscopic suturing and dissection naive at the beginning of the study. She was required to assist in 20 laparoscopic urogynecologic surgeries and undertake laparoscopic suturing and knot tying training with mesh positioning on a laparoscopic trainer for 4 h/week during the trial period. After the completion of this structured training program, the fellow performed LLS and LSC under the supervision of an experienced subspecialist as the primary surgeon. Linear regression analysis was used to compare the data of LLS and LSC learning curves. Subjective pre- and post-operative evaluation of pelvic organ prolapse (POP) and pelvic floor disorders was undertaken preoperatively and 12 months postoperatively using the PFDI-20-Quality of Life validated questionnaire. Follow-up was scheduled 12 months after the surgery and performed by a skilled urogynecologist. Objective cure was defined as Pelvic Organ Prolapse-Qualification (POP-Q) stage <II in any compartment. The mean operative times of laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy and lateral suspension were 168.26 and 160.33 min, respectively. According to linear regression analysis after 43 procedures, the learning curve for laparoscopic lateral suspension was shorter than for laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy (OPTime 134.69 min). In both groups, there was a significant reduction in bothersome POP symptoms (p ≤ 0.005). Bladder injuries in two cases and lumbar pain in one case were recorded during the study. Overall objective success at 12 months was 90.7% for LSC and 89.1% for LLS. Laparoscopic lateral suspension could be an alternative to laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy in the treatment of POP with its good objective and subjective outcomes. Lateral suspension has a shorter learning curve, and it is technically less demanding than LSC. Procedure-dedicated training can accelerate the move from a novice to a master laparoscopic surgeon.

Myomectomy - Choosing the Surgical Approach

In patients who are desirous of future pregnancy and choose to preserve the uterus, myomectomy is the best surgical option where medical management is not suitable for the patient. Myomectomy was initially performed successfully in 1840 by Amussat and the procedure has evolved from open laparotomy to laparoscopy, hysteroscopy, VNOTES and robotic myomectomy. The surgical approach in doing myomectomy depends on the type and location of the myoma and the surgeon’s expertise. Minimally invasive surgery has been the preferred approach due to the benefit of shorter hospital stay, lesser postoperative pain, earlier recovery, minimal blood loss and the cosmetic appearance of the scar. The success of this procedure depends also on the incision technique, enucleation, blood loss prevention by employing hemostatic techniques as well as suturing techniques. Performing myomectomy for a large uterine myoma is a laparoscopic challenge; however, with the use of Lee-Huang point (midpoint between umbilicus and xiphoid) as the primary insertion and camera port, one can easily navigate thru the abdominal cavity in case the uterus is huge obscuring the umbilical port. Laparoscopic Myomectomy can be safely and efficiently performed by experienced laparoscopic surgeons regardless of myoma size, number, and location. Removal of large myoma specimen from the abdominal cavity through the laparoscope became a challenge after the use of power morcellator was abandoned. To overcome this problem, the large myoma is placed inside an Endo bag and its edges brought extracorporeally through the port site. The myoma is incised in a C-manner using a scalpel to reduce the size. Myoma can also be removed using in-bag morcellation. Fertility preservation is the long-term aim of doing myomectomy instead of hysterectomy in the management of leiomyoma aside from alleviating symptoms of abnormal uterine bleeding, urinary frequency, and abdominal pain. Thus, every procedure should perform under patient centered concept.

OGBN P39 Feasibility and Safety of Laparoscopic Anti-Reflux Surgery at a District General Hospital: Matching National Standards and Improving Patient Quality of Life

Abstract Background Gastro-oesophageal Reflux Disease (GORD) affects a substantial proportion of adults in the UK, with surgery offering superior short-to-medium term benefits compared to medical management alone. However, there is significant variation in surgical practice nationwide. This study aimed to assess the feasibility and safety of laparoscopic anti-reflux surgery (LARS) at a District General Hospital (DGH) by aligning outcomes with the national standards set by AUGIS (Association of Upper Gastrointestinal Surgeons). Methods Prospective data from patients who underwent LARS between May 2022 and May 2023 were collected and recorded locally as well as on the National Hiatal Surgery Register (NHSR). Pre-operative symptoms and investigations, intraoperative findings, post-operative short and medium-term outcomes, and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) were analyzed. Quality of life (QoL) questionnaires, administered by the NHSR, were collected at 6 months to 1 year post-surgery. AUGIS standards, including a minimum of 5 procedures per year by 2 surgeons, conversion rate below 5%, 30-day return to theatre below 5%, and 30-day readmission rate below 10%, were utilized for comparison. Results In one year, two surgeons performed 41 LARS procedures: 31 Nissen, 4 Toupet, and 2 Dor wraps, with 2 redo surgeries. Minor complications occurred in 3 patients, requiring no intervention. One surgery was converted to open due to bleeding, and hiatal repair performed. Wrap migration led to re-do after 10 months. The 30-day return to theatre rate was 0%, readmission rate 2% (n=1, unremarkable CT scan). One patient discharged as a day case, average stay 4 days. Out of 23 eligible patients, 15 completed post-op questionnaires, showing significant QoL improvement. Additionally, 55% no longer needed anti-reflux meds at 6-month follow-up. Conclusions We significantly increased the number of LARS procedures performed while meeting the national standards set by AUGIS and we observed a significant improvement in our patients' quality of life following surgery. Experienced laparoscopic Upper GI surgeons can safely and effectively offer anti-reflux surgery in a DGH setting. Our commitment to prospective data collection for audit and research purposes has been a major strength. Future objectives include further consolidation of our work and expanding the range of procedures, such as magnetic sphincter augmentation (LINX), to improve day-case rates.

HPB P42 Case Report: Laparoscopic Cholecystectomies in patients with a Ventriculoperitoneal shunt: key considerations for surgeons

Abstract Background Laparoscopic surgery has evolved to become the preferred mode of access for intraperitoneal surgery and is the gold standard approach to cholecystectomy. With the high prevalence of laparoscopic procedures to definitively treat gallstones and their associated complications, an increasing number of patients with co-morbidities are undergoing these procedures, including patients with cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) shunts in situ. These shunts pose unique challenges due to the paucity of guidelines, research and data to optimally manage these patients. Methods We report a case of a patient who underwent a successful, but technically challenging laparoscopic cholecystectomy whilst having a Ventriculoperitoneal (VP) shunt present. Important considerations are necessary, including the additional risks of: shunt failure and impaired CSF drainage, retrograde insufflation leading to increased intracranial pressure and herniation, and the risk of bile leak which could result in ascending meningitis (thereby making intra-operative cholangiogram a relative contraindication). We will discuss what unique measures were implemented pre-operatively, peri-operatively and post-operatively to prevent these complications, in consultation with both the patient and the wider multidisciplinary healthcare team. Results A 39-year-old female with gallstone pancreatitis, underwent an ERCP, and was subsequently listed for elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy. From childhood, she had a VP shunt in place for an Arnold Chiari II malformation. A literature review was conducted and a CT scan was arranged. Her case was discussed with neurosurgery, radiology, microbiology and anaesthetics, with multiple safety recommendations proposed; including US guided marking of the shunt tubing on the skin, appropriate pre-operative antibiotics, lower than normal pneumoperitoneum pressures, no attempt at intra-operative cholangiogram or bile duct exploration, avoidance of gallbladder perforation, minimal washout, neuro-observations in the post-operative period and post-operative antibiotics. Conclusions Our report shows that with thorough pre-operative planning involving communication with multidisciplinary team and with informed consent, laparoscopic cholecystectomy can be performed in this patient sub-group with relative safety without the need for shunt manipulation or peri-operative intracranial pressure monitoring. It is however, technically challenging, and should be considered by experienced laparoscopic surgeons, and perhaps reserved for those with subspecialty biliary interests.

Post-laparoscopy Epidermal Inclusion Cyst of Umbilicus

Background: Epidermal inclusion cysts can develop in the umbilicus following trauma or surgery. In this study, we aim to report cases of epidermal inclusion cysts occurring at the umbilicus in patients with a history of previous laparoscopic surgery.Methods: A retrospective study was conducted between January 2020 and May 2023 based on the medical records of patients who developed epidermal inclusion cysts in the umbilicus following laparoscopic surgery. Information regarding age, sex, symptoms, type of previous surgery, time elapsed from previous surgery to mass discovery, and postoperative complications was collected from a total of 15 patients.Results: Out of the 15 patients, 13 were female (86.7%) and two were male (13.3%). Symptoms such as discharge, redness, and tenderness were present in 12 patients (80.0%). Obstetric and gynecologic laparoscopic surgeries were performed on 10 patients (66.7%), whereas general surgical laparoscopic surgeries were performed on five patients (33.3%). The mean time from laparoscopic surgery to discovery of the umbilical mass was 43.5 months. Wound dehiscence occurred in one patient (6.7%) and seroma developed in another patient (6.7%) out of 15 patients.Conclusion: Achieving an ideal shape of the umbilicus after removal of epidermal inclusion cysts that occur at the umbilicus following laparoscopic procedures requires significant effort. Through this study, we aim to remind laparoscopic surgeons that epidermal inclusion cysts can develop at the umbilicus through laparoscopic interventions and thereby emphasize the importance of proper wound management.

Transition from laparoscopic to robotic approach in rectal cancer: a single-center short-term analysis based on the learning curve.

As a novel procedure becomes more and more used, knowledge about its learning curve and its impact on outcomes is useful for future implementations. Our aim is (i) to identify the phases of the robotic rectal surgery learning process and assess the safety and oncological outcomes during that period, (ii) to compare the robotic rectal surgery learning phases outcomes with laparoscopic rectal resections performed before the implementation of the robotic surgery program. We performed a retrospective study, based on a prospectively maintained database, with methodological quality assessment by STROBE checklist. All the procedures were performed by the same two surgeons. A total of 157 robotic rectal resections from June 2018 to January 2022 and 97 laparoscopic rectal resections from January 2018 to July 2019 were included. The learning phase was completed at case 26 for surgeon A, 36 for surgeon B, and 60 for the center (both A & B). There were no differences in histopathological results or postoperative complications between phases, achieving the same ratio of mesorectal quality, circumferential and distal resection margins as the laparoscopic approach. A transitory increase of major complications and anastomotic leakage could occur once overcoming the learning phase, secondary to the progressive complexity of cases. Robotic rectal cancer surgery learning curve phases in experienced laparoscopic surgeons was completed after 25-35 cases. Implementation of a robotic rectal surgery program is safe in oncologic terms, morbidity, mortality and length of stay.

Impact of preferred surgical modality on surgeon wellness: a survey of workload, physical pain/discomfort, and neuromusculoskeletal disorders

BackgroundWe compared surgeons’ workload, physical discomfort, and neuromusculoskeletal disorders (NMSDs) across four surgical modalities: endoscopic, laparoscopic, open, and robot-assisted (da Vinci Surgical Systems).MethodsAn electronic survey was sent to the surgeons across an academic hospital system. The survey consisted of 47 questions including: (I) Demographics and anthropometrics; (II) The percentage of the procedural time that the surgeon spent on performing each surgical modality; (III) Physical and mental demand and physical discomfort; (IV) Neuromusculoskeletal symptoms including body part pain and NMSDs.ResultsSeventy-nine out of 245 surgeons completed the survey (32.2%) and 65 surgeons (82.2%) had a dominant surgical modality: 10 endoscopic, 15 laparoscopic, 26 open, and 14 robotic surgeons. Physical demand was the highest for open surgery and the lowest for endoscopic and robotic surgeries, (all p < 0.05). Open and robotic surgeries required the highest levels of mental workload followed by laparoscopic and endoscopic surgeries, respectively (all p < 0.05 except for the difference between robotic and laparoscopic that was not significant). Body part discomfort or pain (immediately after surgery) were lower in the shoulder for robotic surgeons compared to laparoscopic and open surgeons and in left fingers for robotic surgeons compared to endoscopic surgeons (all p < 0.05). The prevalence of NMSD was significantly lower in robotic surgeons (7%) compared to the other surgical modalities (between 60 and 67%) (all p < 0.05).ConclusionsThe distribution of NMSDs, workload, and physical discomfort varied significantly based on preferred surgical approach. Although robotic surgeons had fewer overall complaints, improvement in ergonomics of surgery are still warranted.Graphical abstract

The relevance of reducing Veress needle overshooting

Safe insertion of the Veress needle during laparoscopy relies on the surgeons’ technical skills in order to stop needle insertion just in time to prevent overshooting in the underlying organs. To reduce this risk, a wide variety of Veress needle systems were developed with safety mechanisms that limit the insertion speed, insertion depth or decouple the driving force generated by the surgeon’s hand on the needle. The aim of this study is to evaluate current surgeons’ perceptions related to the use of Veress needles and to investigate the relevance of preventing overshooting of Veress needles among members of the European Association of Endoscopic Surgery (EAES). An online survey was distributed by the EAES Executive Office to all active members. The survey consisted of demographic data and 14 questions regarding the use of the Veress needle, the training conducted prior to usage, and the need for any improvement. A total of 365 members residing in 58 different countries responded the survey. Of the responding surgeons, 36% prefer the open method for patients with normal body mass index (BMI), and 22% for patients with high BMI. Of the surgeons using Veress needle, 68% indicated that the reduction of overshoot is beneficial in normal BMI patients, whereas 78% indicated that this is beneficial in high BMI patients. On average, the members using the Veress needle had used it for 1448 (SD 3031) times and felt comfortable on using it after 22,9 (SD 78,9) times. The average years of experience was 17,6 (SD 11,1) and the surgeons think that a maximum overshoot of 9.4 (SD 5.5) mm is acceptable before they can safely use the Veress needle. This survey indicates that despite the risks, Veress needles are still being used by the majority of the laparoscopic surgeons who responded. In addition, the surgeons responded that they were interested in using a Veress needle with an extra safety mechanism if it limits the risk of overshooting into the underlying structures.

Risk Factors and Management Approaches for Staple Line Leaks Following Sleeve Gastrectomy: A Single-Center Retrospective Study of 402 Patients.

Sleeve gastrectomy (SG) has gained ever-increasing popularity among laparoscopic surgeons involved in bariatric surgery. This single-institution, retrospective cohort study aims to evaluate the prevalence of postoperative staple line leakage (PSLL) after LSG and identify risk factors for its development. We included patient data that underwent LSG at our institution for a span of 17 years-starting in January 2005 and ending in December 2022. We set the investigation of correlations of patient-related factors (age, weight, BMI, smoking status, presence of diabetes mellitus) with the occurrence of postoperative leaks. A total of 402 patients were included in our study. Of them, 26 (6.46%) developed PSLL. In total, 19 (73%) patients underwent percutaneous drainage and 14 patients (53.8%) were treated with intraluminal endoscopic stenting. Finally, five patients (19.2%) were treated with endoscopic clipping of the defect. Operative management was required in only one patient. There were no statistically significant differences in patient age, mean weight at the time of operation, and mean BMI. Abnormal drain amylase levels were associated with earlier detection of PSLL. More consideration needs to be given to producing a consensus regarding the management of PSLL, prioritizing nonoperative management with the combination of percutaneous drainage and endoscopic stenting as the safest and most efficient approach.

Confronting new challenges: Faculty perceptions of gaps in current laparoscopic curricula in a changing training landscape

BackgroundOpportunities for residents to develop laparoscopic skills have decreased with the rise in robotic operations and the development of complex, subspecialized laparoscopic operations. Given the changing training landscape, this study aimed to identify laparoscopic surgeons' perceptions of gaps in current laparoscopic skills in general surgery, obstetrics-gynecology, and urology residency programs. MethodsLaparoscopic surgeons who operate with residents participated in semi-structured interviews. Questions addressed expectations for resident proficiency, deficits in laparoscopic surgical skills, and barriers to learning and teaching. Two authors independently coded de-identified transcripts followed by a conventional content analysis. ResultsFourteen faculty members from thirteen subspecialties participated. Faculty identified three main areas to improve laparoscopic training across specialties: foundational knowledge, technical skills, and cognitive skills. They also recognized an overarching opportunity to address faculty development. ConclusionsThis qualitative study highlighted key deficiencies in laparoscopic training that have emerged in the current, changing era of minimally invasive surgery. Key messageThis qualitative study identified laparoscopic educators' perceptions of deficiencies in laparoscopic training. Findings emphasized the importance of incorporating high quality educational practices to optimize training in the current changing landscape of laparoscopic surgery.

Design and ergonomic evaluation of a new adapted endoscope holder to reduce muscle pressure and discomfort during endoscopy.

Laparoscopic surgeons who regularly perform endoscopy are more likely to develop musculoskeletal disorders than other internal medicine specialists, a difference that attributed to repetitive movements, poor postures, and sub-optimal equipment design. This study aimed to design, build, and evaluate an endoscope holder for reducing the static load applied by the weight of the endoscope, in order to reduce musculoskeletal disorders risk factors in the surgeon's hand, shoulder and back issues regions. A new endoscope holder was designed according to ergonomic design principles. The designed holder was evaluated by surface electromyography (sEMG) and discomfort assessment including 15 laparoscopic surgeons. The results were analyzed with centrality statistics and compared with the independent t-test using SPSS version 22. The evaluation of the new endoscope holder shows a statistical significant decrease in the average electrical activity of biceps brachii, triceps brachii, lateral deltoid, T9 Thoracic erector spinae, L4 Lumbar erector spinae, and external oblique after using the holder (p < 0.05). The results shows that using the new endoscope holder is associated with a lower level of discomfort, as well as a lower induced muscle activity. The results also highlight the need to upgrade the holder to offer rotability in all directions (perpendicular to the ground) which will be included in the next design.

Comparison of senhance and da vinci robotic radical prostatectomy: short-term outcomes, learning curve, and cost analysis.

The Senhance® Robotic System is a new laparoscopy-based platform that has been increasingly used in radical prostatectomy (RP) procedures. The purpose of this study is to compare the outcome of Senhance RP (SRP) with da Vinci RP (DRP) cases. From August 2019 to April 2022, we prospectively recruited 63 cases of SRP. We compared the perioperative data, postoperative complication rates, short-term surgical outcomes (3-month postoperative undetectable prostate-specific antigen (PSA) and incontinence rates), learning curves, and cost analysis with data from 63 matched da Vinci Xi RP cases. There was no difference in BL (180 versus 180 ml, p = 0.86) and postoperative surgical complication rate (Clavient -Dindo grade I-IV, 25.3 versus 22.2%, p = 0.21) between the SRP cases and the DRP. Regarding the oncologic and continence function, there was no difference between positive margin rate (36.5% versus 41.3%, p = 0.58), rate of undetectable PSA level at postoperative 3 months (68.3 versus 66.7%, p = 0.85), and incontinence rate (14.3 versus 15.9%, p = 1.0) at postoperative 3 months between the two cohorts. The learning curve showed a quick downward slope for laparoscopic experienced surgeons. The median pocket cost for SRP patients in our hospital was $4170, which was lower than $7675 for the DRP patients. Safety and short-term outcomes are comparable between SRP and DRP. For experienced LRP surgeons, using the Senhance system to perform RP is straightforward. With a more affordable price as its biggest advantage, the Senhance system may serve as a safe and effective alternative for robotic RP.

Initial experience with laparoscopic gastric bypass in an Australian general foregut surgery unit.

Laparoscopic gastric bypass (LGB) is an increasingly utilized approach to bariatric surgery in Australia. A high proportion of those procedures are revisional due to Australia's legacy of laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (LAGB), which is not the case internationally. The aim of this study was to compare post-operative outcomes in an Australian general foregut surgery unit against benchmarks published in the literature. This is retrospective cohort study of morbidly obese patients undergoing primary or revisional laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) or laparoscopic one anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB) with the two senior authors between 5 May 2015 and 27 June 2019. Perioperative data for the unit's first 100 cases were collected prospectively, stored on a unit database and analysed. Post-operative complications at 30 days, 90 days, mortality, length of hospital stay, and Defined Adverse Events were chosen as indicators of the perioperative outcome (as defined in the Monash Bariatric Surgery Registry). In this cohort, 35% of procedures were RYGB and 65% were OAGB. The majority (58%) were revisional procedures. Most patients (74%) were female. The median age was 50. The comorbidity profile of the population was similar to those published internationally. The median hospital stay was 4 days. There was no mortality. Early complications occurred in 9% of patients, with 3% occurring late. Outcomes of our first 100 cases are comparable with those recorded in the literature, notwithstanding a much higher proportion of revisional cases. LGB can be safely introduced in Australian general foregut surgery units by experienced laparoscopic surgeons.

Robotic Anterior Resection for Rectosigmoid Colon Cancer using Single Port Access.

Single-port laparoscopic surgery (SPLS) and a robotic surgical system have recently been included in contemporary colorectal surgical practice. 1-4 SPLS may result in better cosmetic outcomes, reduced postoperative incisional pain, fewer incisional hernias, minimal organ damage, and fewer wound complications. 2,5 However, SPLS for left-sided colorectal cancer is a challenging technique, even for experienced laparoscopic colorectal surgeons, owing to the difficulty of constructing instrument triangulation and using endo-staplers in the pelvic cavity from a single umbilical port with adequate distal margins. The Da Vinci Si Single-Site ® system (Intuitive Surgical, Sunnyvale, CA) was specifically developed to overcome SPLS limitations. Since the robotic instruments are crossed at the port site, but the software "reassigns" them to the surgeon's hand on the robotic console, the platform can easily create instrument triangulation while minimizing external robotic arm collisions. 6-8 Due to the lack of wrist articulation, the limited range of motion of the semi-rigid robotic instruments, and the limited choice of instruments, the Single-Site ® platform has not yet been widely utilized for colorectal diseases. A novel robotic technique, the da Vinci SP ® system (Intuitive Surgical, Sunnyvale, CA, USA), was designed for single-site surgery. This platform has a robotic arm with a high degree of freedom that is introduced directly into the peritoneal cavity through a single incision. The benefits of the single-port da Vinci robot platform include a holographic display of the instrument location, wristed articulation and flexible elbows, a console-controlled camera, and three-dimensional optics. This robotic system for single-port access can perform lymph node dissection around the inferior mesenteric artery using 4-arm wrist articulation while preserving the autonomic nerves during left-sided colorectal cancer surgery.

341 Safe and Effective Delivery of Anti-Reflux Surgical Standards at a District General Hospital

Abstract Aim Up to 20% of adults in UK suffer from Gastro-oesophageal Reflux Disease (GORD). Surgery offers better short-to-medium term benefit compared to sole medical management. However, practice varies significantly nationwide. The volume of cases performed in our district general hospital (DGH) has increased from one in 2015, to 24 in 2022. We aimed to establish feasibility and safety of laparoscopic anti-reflux surgery (LARS) at a DGH, by matching our outcomes with the AUGIS national standards. Method Data from patients undergoing LARS between January - December 2022 have been collected prospectively and recorded both locally and on National Hiatal Surgery Register (NHSR). Pre-operative symptoms and investigations, intraoperative findings and post-operative short and medium-term outcomes were analysed. Average follow up was 6 weeks. Results 24 laparoscopic anti-reflux procedures were performed (21 Nissen and 3 Toupet), including 6 paraoesophageal hernia repairs. All patients underwent primary repair and fundoplication. Average length of hiatus hernia preoperatively was 4.1cm for sliding, and 7.6cm for para oesophageal. 23/24 patients were inpatients, 1 was a day case. Mean length of stay was 4 days. Conversion to open rate was 0%. 22 patients had no complications. One patient experienced a mediastinal collection, another patient had post-operative hypotension, both not requiring intervention (Clavien-Dindo 2). 30-day return to theatre rate was 0%, as was 30-day readmission rate. Conclusions At our DGH, we significantly increased the volume of LARS performed whilst achieving AUGIS national standards. Anti-reflux surgery can be offered safely and effectively by experienced laparoscopic Upper GI surgeons in a DGH.

Achieving Critical View of Safety via a New Technique: The Triple One (111) Technique.

Misidentification of anatomical structures is one of the most common causes of bile duct injury following laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Achieving Critical View of Safety (CVS) is a standard step in conducting safe cholecystectomy all over the world. In our institute, we achieve CVS via a unique technique called Triple One or 111 and find it very helpful and easy to achieve CVS. Moreover, the rate of conversion has also decreased while achieving CVS via this technique. The unique aspect of the Triple One technique is that by following this method, even new laparoscopic surgeons can achieve CVS very easily in difficult cases and, hence, it decreases the chances of vasculobiliary injury (VBI). This study aimed to determine how effective the Triple One technique is in achieving CVS as well as in lessening the chances of VBI. A total of 545 patients were admitted through the outpatient department, ranging in age from 30 to 70 years, with a mean of 50 years. The study comprised patients with American Society of Anaesthesiologists (ASA) I & II, acute and chronic cholecystitis, and symptomatic cholelithiasis. The study excluded patients with co-morbidities, prior abdominal procedures, and suspected complications. On the second postoperative day, all patients received their discharge papers and on the seventh postoperative day, follow-up was completed. Successful gallbladder extraction using the Triple One technique was achieved in 540 (99%) cases. The other five (1%) cases converted to open cholecystectomy because of the difficult gallbladder anatomy and extensive scarring. No VBI or bile duct injury was noted. No mortality was recorded during the study period. By incorporating CVS using the Triple One technique into our policies and curriculum, we may encourage safe cholecystectomy practices and prevent bile duct injuries.

Exploring Laparoscopic Surgery Training Opportunities in the College of Surgeons of East, Central, and Southern Africa region

The resource-limited environment in Sub-Saharan countries, with a lack of expert trainers, impedes the progress of laparoscopic training. This study aimed to identify the opportunities and limitations of laparoscopic surgery training in the College of Surgeons of East, Central, and Southern Africa (COSECSA) countries. A multicountry online survey was conducted from January 2021 to October 2021 in COSECSA-accredited training hospitals within 16 countries. Available resources and challenges faced in order to set up well-structured laparoscopic training programs were explored. Ninety-four surgeons answered the questionnaire. The average resources reported per hospital were 3 trained laparoscopic surgeons, 2 laparoscopic towers, and 2 sets of laparoscopic instruments. The training of the majority of these surgeons has been in local institutions (53%), a further 37% within African countries and only 10% outside Africa. Approximately 45% of them declared that laparoscopic modules were planned within the University Curricula, while only 18% of surgeons recognized that laparoscopic modules are only planned within the COSECSA program. About 57% of participants reported that at the end of residency training, graduating surgeons were not able to perform basic laparoscopic procedures. The quoted barriers included: limited laparoscopic equipment, absence of simulation lab, lack of qualified trainers, lack of training programs and time for teaching by skilled doctors, and lack of institutional support. The well-structured set up of laparoscopic training programs in the COSECSA region is hindered due to the lack of qualified personnel and insufficient resources for the acquisition of equipment and simulation laboratories. Ongoing efforts to set up laparoscopic programs through the development of adaptive curricula, innovative strategies for reduction of equipment cost and adequate training of surgeons are crucial for patient safety and the development of laparoscopy.