Laparoscopic Resection For Colorectal Cancer Research Articles

Male Patients may be More Vulnerable to Acute Kidney Injury After Colorectal Surgery in an Enhanced Recovery Program: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis.

Although many reports have shown that enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) programs improve the perioperative outcomes of patients undergoing colorectal surgery, the prevalence of early acute kidney injury (AKI) after surgery in such patients requires attention. Protective roles of the female sex in terms of chronic kidney disease and progression of ischemic renal injury have been described in many studies. We thus explored whether a sex difference was evident in terms of postoperative AKI in a colorectal ERAS setting. From January 2017 to August 2019, 453 patients underwent laparoscopic colorectal cancer resection in an enhanced recovery program. Of these, 217 female patients were propensity score (PS)-matched with 236 male patients. Then, 215 patients of either sex were compared in terms of postoperative renal function and complications. Among the PS-matched patients, the incidence of AKI was significantly higher in male than female patients (24.2% vs. 9.8%, P < 0.001). Male patients also exhibited a greater reduction in the postoperative estimated glomerular filtration rate, compared with female patients. The male sex was associated with an approximately threefold increase in the risk of AKI. The rate of surgical complications was significantly higher in male than female patients. Caution must be taken to prevent postoperative AKI in patients (particularly males) participating in colorectal ERAS programs. The mechanism underlying the sex difference remains unclear. Additional studies are required to determine whether male patients require perioperative management that differs from that of females, to prevent postoperative AKI.

Totally laparoscopic simultaneous resection of colorectal cancer and synchronous liver metastases: a single-center case series.

The aim of the study is to analyze the feasibility, the safety and short- and medium-term survival of totally laparoscopic simultaneous resections (LSR) of colorectal cancer (CRC) and synchronous liver metastases (LM). This is a retrospective study of a single-center series. Patients ASA IV, ECOG ≥ 2, major hepatectomies (≥ 3 segments), symptomatic CRC as well as low rectal tumors were excluded from indication. The difficulty level of all liver resections was classified as low or intermediate according to the Iwate Criteria. Dindo-Clavien classification for postoperative complications evaluation was used. 15 Patients with 21 liver lesions were included. Laparoscopic liver surgery was performed first in every case. Median size of the lesions was 20mm (r 8-69). Major complications (Dindo-Clavien ≥ 3) occurred in 3 patients (20%); median hospital stay was 7days (r 4-35), and only one patient (6.6%) was readmitted upon the first month from the surgery. 90-day mortality rate was 0%. After a median follow-up of 24months (r 7-121), disease-free survival at 1, 2 and 3years was 58%, 36% and 24%, respectively; overall survival at 1, 2 and 3years was 92.3%. In selected patients, LSR of CRC and LM is technically feasible and has an acceptable morbidity rate and mid-term survival.

Preoperative Immunonutrition vs. Standard Dietary Advice in Normo-Nourished Patients Undergoing Fast-Track Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery.

Immunonutrition (IN) appears to reduce infective complications and in-hospital length of stay (LOS) after major gastrointestinal surgery, but its use in normo-nourished patients is still controversial. The primary aim of this comparative observational study was to evaluate if pre-operative IN reduces in-hospital stay in patients undergoing laparoscopic colorectal resection for cancer under an enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) program. The influence of IN on time to first bowel movements, time to full oral diet tolerance, number and type of complications, reasons of prolonged LOS and readmission rate was evaluated as secondary outcome. Patients undergoing ERAS laparoscopic colorectal resection between December 2016 and December 2019 were reviewed. Patients who have received preoperative IN (group A) were compared to those receiving standard dietary advice (group B). Mean in-hospital LOS was significantly shorter in patients receiving preoperative IN than standard dietary advice (4.85 ± 2.25 days vs. 6.06 ± 3.95 days; p < 0.0492). No differences in secondary outcomes were observed. Preoperative IN associated with ERAS protocol in normo-nourished patients undergoing laparoscopic colorectal cancer resection seems to reduce LOS.

Laparoscopic vs open synchronous colorectal and hepatic resection for metastatic colorectal cancer

Laparoscopic vs open synchronous colorectal and hepatic resection for metastatic colorectal cancer

Strategy to Avoid Anastomotic Leakage in Laparoscopic Colorectal Resection Using the Indocyanine Green Fluorescence System

Purpose Anastomotic leakage (AL) in colorectal resections is often caused by insufficient blood flow to the stump. Injecting indocyanine green can help detect blood flow intraoperatively. In this study, we evaluated our original strategy using an indocyanine green fluorescence system to avoid AL. Methods We retrospectively evaluated 79 patients who underwent laparoscopic colorectal resection for colon cancer using a double-stapling technique. Blood flow in oral stumps was evaluated by measuring indocyanine green fluorescence time (FT). We investigated AL cases in detail and analyzed correlations between FT and risk factors for AL. Results Of the 79 patients, 7 (8.9%) developed AL. We divided patients by FTs: &amp;gt;60 seconds, 50 to 60 seconds, and &amp;lt;50 seconds. The AL rates were FT &amp;gt;60 seconds, 60%; FT 50 to 60 seconds, 10.3%; and FT &amp;lt;50 seconds, 2.2%. The AL rate of high-risk cases (with more than 2 risk factors) were calculated and we made our original strategy to avoid AL as the following. Further resection or diverting stomas were needed by the FT &amp;gt;60 seconds group, and by members of the FT 50 to 60 seconds group with ≥3 risk factors. The FT &amp;lt;60 seconds group needed no additional management. Conclusions Patients with delayed FT (&amp;gt;60 seconds, or 50–60 seconds with ≥3 risk factors) may need revision of the anastomosis (diverting stoma or additional resection) to avoid AL. Our original strategy may contribute to reduce AL in colorectal operations.

Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy of solitary metastatic colon adenocarcinoma to the pancreas

Introduction: Laparoscopic liver resection for metastatic colorectal cancer has demonstrated good long term survival outcomes. In order to achieve this, case selection is paramount. Blood borne metastasis to the pancreas are uncommon and rarely reported. We report 2 cases of laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy for metachronous solitary metastatic colon adenocarcinoma to the pancreas. Method: A retrospective analysis of consecutive patients undergoing laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy for solitary metastatic colon adenocarcinoma to the pancreas was performed. Operative characteristics, perioperative morbidity, and pathological data were described. Results: 2 patients underwent laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy for this indication. One was a 58 year old women, the other was a 59 year old man. Both had minimal other comorbidities. Mean LOS was 3.5 days. 1 patient developed a pancreatic fistula, which was treated successfully with an intra-abdominal drain. Both are alive and disease free at 22 and 23 months follow-up. Conclusion: We have demonstrated that laparoscopic surgery for isolated intrapancreatic metastasis is warranted and feasible in selected cases.

Effect of open-lung ventilation strategy on oxygenation-impairment during laparoscopic colorectal cancer resection

Objective: After general anesthesia and mechanical ventilation for laparoscopic colorectal cancer resection, about 90% of patients would have different degrees of atelectasis. Authors speculated that an open-lung strategy (OLS) comprising moderate positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) and intermittent recruitment maneuvers (RM) can reduce atelectrauma and thus reduce the incidence of oxygenation-impairment during low-tidal-volume ventilation for laparoscopic colorectal cancer resection. The purpose of this study was to verify this hypothesis and provide a better intraoperative ventilation scheme for laparoscopic colorectal cancer resection. Methods: This was a prospectively randomized controlled clinical trial which was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University (2017ZSLYEC-002), and registered at the ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03160144). From January to July 2017, patients who underwent laparoscopic colorectal cancer resection, with age > 40 years, estimated pneumoperitoneum time ≥ 1.5 h, pulse oxygen saturation ≥ 92%, and risk grade for postoperative pulmonary complications ≥ 2 were prospectively enrolled. The patients with American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status ≥ IV, body mass index ≥ 30 kg/m(2), pneumonia, acute respiratory failure or sepsis within 1 month, severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, pulmonary bullae and progressive neuromuscular diseases, and those participating in other interventional clinical trials were excluded. The enrolled patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to the OLS group (with a PEEP of 6-8 cm H(2)O and intermittent RM), and the NOLS group (without using PEEP and RM). Partial pressure of arterial oxygen (PaO(2)) /fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO(2)) and shunt fraction (Q(S)/Q(T)) were calculated via arterial and central venous blood gas analysis performed at 0.5 h (T(1)), 1.5 h (T(2)) after pneumoperitoneum induction and at 20 min after admission to the recovery room. Driving pressure immediately before pneumoperitoneum induction (T(0)) and at T(2) were calculated via monitoring data. The primary outcome was oxygenation-impairment (PaO(2)/FiO(2) ≤ 300 mmHg) during mechanical ventilation. Results: In each group, 48 patients under general anesthesia and low-tidal-volume ventilation were included in the final analysis. During ventilation, the oxygenation-impairment occurred in 7 patients (14.6%) of OLS group and in 17 patients (35.4%) of NOLS group, whose difference was statistically significant between two groups (χ(2)=5.556, RR=0.31, 95%CI: 0.12 to 0.84, P=0.033). During ventilation, the patients in the OLS group had higher PaO(2)/FiO(2) [T(1): (427±103) mmHg vs. (366±109) mmHg, t=-2.826, P=0.006; T(2): (453±103) mmHg vs. (388±122) mmHg, t=-2.739, P=0.007], lower Q(S)/Q(T) [ T(1): (9.2±6.5) % vs. (12.6±7.7) %, t=2.322, P=0.022; T(2): (7.0±5.8)% vs.(10.9±9.2)%, t=2.408, P=0.019], and lower driving pressure [T(0): (6±3) cm H(2)O vs. (10±2) cm H(2)O, t=7.421, P<0.001; T(2): (13±3) cm H(2)O vs. (17±4) cm H(2)O, t=5.417, P<0.001] than those in the NOLS group, with stratistical differences in all comparisons. In recovery room, though PaO(2)/FiO(2) [(70.3±9.4) mmHg vs. (66.8±9.4) mmHg, P=0.082] was still higher and Q(S)/Q(T) [(18.6±8.3)% vs. (21.8±8.4)%, P=0.070] was still lower in the OLS group as compared to the NOLS group, the differences were not statistically significant (both P>0.05). Conclusion: The application of such an OLS during low-tidal-volume ventilation can greatly reduce the incidence of oxygenation-impairment in laparoscopic colorectal cancer resection, and such effect may last to the period of emergence from anesthesia.

Comparison of the continuation and discontinuation of perioperative antiplatelet therapy in laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer: A retrospective, multicenter, observational study (YCOG 1603).

AimThe present study aimed to examine the effect of continuing antiplatelet therapy in the perioperative period for patients undergoing laparoscopic resection for colorectal cancer who had received preoperative antiplatelet therapy.MethodsThis retrospective, multicenter, observational study included patients who underwent laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer between January 2011 and May 2020. The study population was limited to patients who used antiplatelet therapy preoperatively.ResultsA total of 214 colorectal cancer patients who received antiplatelet therapy preoperatively were included in the present study. Eighty‐nine patients underwent surgery under the continuation of antiplatelet therapy, and 125 patients underwent surgery under the discontinuation of antiplatelet therapy before surgery. There were no significant differences between the two groups with regard to intraoperative blood loss (P = .889), intraoperative blood transfusion (P = 1.000), and conversion to laparotomy (P = 1.000). There were no significant differences between the two groups in the incidence of postoperative hemorrhagic complications (Clavien‐Dindo Grade ≥II, P = .453; Grade ≥III, P = .572) or three‐point major adverse cardiovascular events (P = .268). However, there were two cases of postoperative non‐fatal stroke in the discontinued antiplatelet therapy group.ConclusionsThe present study revealed that there were no significant differences in the surgical outcomes and postoperative complications between colorectal cancer patients who underwent laparoscopic resection with the continuation of antiplatelet therapy in the perioperative period and those in whom antiplatelet therapy was discontinued during the perioperative period. From the viewpoint of cardiovascular and cerebrovascular risk, it may be better for patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer to continue antiplatelet therapy. This study was registered with the Japanese Clinical Trials Registry as UMIN000038707 (http://www.umin.ac.jp/ctr/index.htm).

Specifics of the perioperative management of the patients undergoing surgery for malignant neoplasms during the COVID-19 pandemic

Background: The worse prognosis in cancer patients with COVID-19 infection in the context of the pandemic, compared to that in the general population, poses new challenges to ensure the perioperative safety.Aim: To reduce the risk of infection for cancer patients in the perioperative period and to prevent severe COVID-19.Materials and methods: During two months of the COVID-19 (from March to April 2020), we performed 158 surgical interventions: 49 for breast cancer, 31 for lung cancer (videothoracoscopic segmental and lobar resections), 12 for stomach cancer (8 distal and 1 proximal laparoscopic subtotal gastric resections, 3 gastrectomies), 16 laparoscopic resections for colorectal cancer, 29 resections with a reconstructive plastic for malignant skin tumors, 21 palliative and diagnostic operations (diagnostic thoracoscopy and laparoscopy, laparoscopic colostomy).Results: Preventive administration during preparation for surgery (interferon-al-pha2b and low molecular weight heparins) and for suspected infection (antibiotics, low molecular weight heparins and dexamethasone 12 mg/day intravenously) allowed for lower rates of the new coronavirus infection (1.3%) and its severe cases (0%) during surgical treatment of malignant tumors.Conclusion: Surgical treatment of cancer patients in the context of a new coronavirus infection pandemic should be carried out with strict adherence to anti-epidemic measures.

Effect of acupoint application therapy at different timing points on gastrointestinal function recovery and heart rate variability after laparoscopic resection of colorectal cancer

To observe the effect of acupoint application therapy at different timing points on the gastrointestinal function recovery and heart rate variability (HRV) after laparoscopic resection of colorectal cancer under the instruction of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS). A total of 105 patients for the selective laparoscopic resection of colorectal cancer were selected and randomized into a preoperative acupoint application group (35 cases, 3 cases dropped off), a postoperative acupoint application group (35 cases, 1 case dropped out) and a control group (35 cases, 2 cases dropped off). In the control group, ERAS interventions were provided, such as health education, fluid supplementation and multi-mode analgesia. On the base of the treatment as the control group, in the preoperative acupoint application group and the postoperative acupoint application group, 3 days before operation and 6 h after operation, the acupoint application therapy was given respectively. The acupoints were Zusanli (ST 36), Shangjuxu (ST 37), Sanyinjiao (SP 6), Neiguan (PC 6) and Xiajuxu (ST 39). The acupoint application was exerted for 6 h each time, once daily till the first postoperative exhaust and defecation presented. It was to observe the time of the first postoperative exhaust, defecation and food intake, the score of visual analogue scale (VAS) 1 to 3 days after operation, the total score of gastrointestinal symptom rating scale (GSRS) before and 1 week after operation, as well as the related indicators of HRV [standard deviation of NN intervals (SDNN) and the ratio of low-frequency power and high frequency power (LF/HF)] in the three groups successively. Besides, the adverse reactions were recorded during intervention in the three groups. Compared with the control group, the time of the first postoperative exhaust and the time of the first postoperative defecation were all earlier in the preoperative acupoint application group and the postoperative acupoint application group respectively (P<0.05), and VAS scores 1 to 3 days after operation and total GSRS scores 1 week after operation were all reduced (P<0.05); the time of first food intake was earlier after operation (P<0.05), and SDNN and LF/LF were increased 1 day and 3 days after operation in the preoperative acupoint application group (P<0.05). Compared with the postoperative acupoint application group, in the preoperative acupoint application group, the time of the first postoperative exhaust and the time of the first postoperative defecation were all earlier (P<0.05), VAS scores were reduced in 1 to 3 days after operation (P<0.05), and SDNN 1 day and 3 days after operation and LF/HF 1 day after operation were all increased (P<0.05). No adverse reaction was detected in patients of the three groups. Under the instruction of ERAS, the preoperative acupoint application effectively promotes the postoperative gastrointestinal function recovery, improves HRV and autonomous nerve function in the patients after laparoscopic resection of colorectal cancer. The therapeutic effect of this therapy is better than the postoperative acupoint application.

Benefits of simultaneous laparoscopic colorectal surgery and liver resection for colorectal cancer with synchronous liver metastases: Retrospective case-matched study

IntroductionLaparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer and liver tumors are accepted as alternative procedure to open surgery. However, few studies reported outcomes of simultaneous laparoscopic surgery of these two procedures. The aim of this study was to compare short-term outcomes between laparoscopic and open approach. Materials and methodsBetween June 2010 to December 2019, simultaneous laparoscopic cases were retrospectively matched (1:2) to open cases. Peri-operative and short-term outcomes were compared between both groups. ResultsTwelve patients in laparoscopic group were matched to 24 patients in open group according to age, gender, body mass index, american society of anesthesiologists physical status, preoperative laboratory data, number and size of liver metastases and extent of colorectal and liver resection, Most patients in each group had left-sided colon or rectal cancer and underwent wedge liver resection. The mean number of liver metastases was 1.3 vs 1.5 and size of liver metastases was 2.2 ± 1.4 vs 2.7 ± 1.1 cm in laparoscopic compared to open group. Estimated blood loss and length of hospital stay were significantly lower in laparoscopic group. However, operative time was significantly longer in laparoscopic group. Peri-operative complication was not significant difference between both groups and there was no mortality. ConclusionSimultaneous laparoscopic colorectal surgery and minor liver resection is feasible and safe. Laparoscopic approach has better peri-operative outcome in term of shorter length of hospital stay compared to open approach.

Early detection of infectious complications using C-reactive protein and the procalcitonin levels after laparoscopic colorectal resection: a prospective cohort study

PurposeThe predictive values of the C-reactive protein (CRP) and procalcitonin (PCT) levels for postoperative infectious complications were investigated in patients who underwent elective laparoscopic resection of colorectal cancer.MethodsA total of 154 consecutive patients who underwent elective laparoscopic resection for colorectal cancer (CRC) were prospectively studied. The CRP and PCT levels on the first postoperative day (POD1) and the fourth postoperative day (POD4) were measured. Any correlations between the CRP and PCT levels on POD1 and POD4 with the occurrence of infectious complications were examined.ResultsInfectious complications occurred in 18 (11.7%) patients. CRP on POD1 and CRP and PCT on POD4 were significantly higher in patients who developed infectious complications than in those who did not. The areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves of CRP on POD1 and CRP and PCT on POD4 were 0.597, 0.763 and 0.768, respectively. The cut-off values of CRP and PCT levels on POD4 were 14.33 mg/dl and 0,264 ng/ml, respectively. Whereas the positive predictive value of an elevated CRP level was high, the negative predictive value of an elevated PCT was high.ConclusionThe CRP and PCT levels on POD4 are both considered to be useful for the early detection of infectious complications after laparoscopic resection of CRC.

The ACPGBI recommends pause for reflection on transanal total mesorectal excision.

The ACPGBI recommends pause for reflection on transanal total mesorectal excision.

Efficacy analysis on laparoscopic simultaneous resection of primary colorectal cancer and liver metastases

Objective: To investigate the short-term outcomes of laparoscopic simultaneous resection of primary colorectal cancer and liver metastases in patients with resectable synchronous colorectal liver metastases (SCRLM). Methods: A descriptive case series study was performed. Clinicopathological data of patients with SCRLM who underwent laparoscopic simultaneous resection of colorectal cancer and liver metastases in Zhongshan Hospital between December 2015 and September 2018 were retrieved from a prospective colorectal cancer database. Perioperative presentations and short-term outcomes were analyzed. Results: A total of 53 patients were enrolled with average age of(61.7±11.3) years. Among them, 32 were male (60.4%) and 21 were female (39.6%). Twenty-five patients (47.2%) were American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) grade I and 28 (52.8%) were grade II. All the patients completed laparoscopic simultaneous resection without conversion. The average operation time was (320.2±114.5) min. The estimated blood loss was 150.0 (45.0-2000.0) ml, and only 2 cases (3.8%) received intraoperative transfusion. Postoperative pathologic results revealed that the average primary tumor size was (5.4±1.9) cm; 4 cases (7.5%) were T1-2 stage and 48 cases (90.6%) were T3-4 stage; 40 patients (75.5%) had lymph node metastasis; 19 (35.8%) had vascular involvement; 24 (45.3%) had neural invasion. The median number of liver metastases was 1.0 (1-8), and the average size of largest liver metastases was (3.0±1.9) cm. The median margin of liver metastases was 1.0 (0.1-3.5) cm, and only 1 case was R1 resection. The average time to the first postoperative flatus was (67.9±28.9) h, and the average time to the liquid diet was (107.0±33.8) h. The average postoperative indwelling catheterization time was (85.6±56.4) h. The average postoperative hospital stay was (9.2±4.4) d, and the average cost was (82±26) thousand RMB. No death within postoperative 30-day was found. The morbidity of postoperative complication was 32.1% (17/53) and 3 patients developed grade III to IV complications which were improved by conservative treatment. The median follow-up period was 23.2 months. During follow-up, 19 patients (35.8%) developed recurrence or metastasis, and 4 (7.5%) died. The 1- and 2-year disease-free survival (DFS) rates were 68% and 47% respectively, and the 1- and 2-year overall survival rates were 95% and 86% respectively. Conclusions: Laparoscopic simultaneous resection of primary colorectal cancer and liver metastases is safe and feasible in selected patients with SCRLM. Postoperative intestinal function recovery is enhanced, and morbidity and oncological outcomes are acceptable.

Technological innovation and patent transformation in rectal cancer surgery

Surgery for rectal cancer has obtained quick improvement in techniques and concepts in recent years but still has challenging areas. Colorectal surgeons always seek to make operations clearer and easier, so that surgery can be safer and less time-consuming while guaranteeing surgical goals. With this purpose, our team have explored to make innovations in operations for rectal cancer and translate relevant patents from 2009. We summarize our achievements in this article as follows: (1) Reverse Miles operation (perineal operation first then laparoscopic abdominal operation) with two relevant patents-specialized instruments bag for laparoscopic operations (patent number ZL201520442331.0) and accessory spotlight for ultrasound scalpel (patent number ZL20102 0137689.X). (2) Laparoscopic sphincter-saving surgery for low rectal cancer through marker meeting approach with two patents-vacuum rectal drainage tube with functions of irrigation and ventilation (patent number ZL201520374385.8) and sterile sleeve cover of ultrasound scalpel handle (patent number ZL201920648102.2). (3) Laparoscopic radical resection of colorectal cancer and natural orifice specimen extraction. Different methods were designed according to the location of the tumor that classified as 20-40 cm, 10-20 cm and 5-10 cm to anus. Two relevant patents were specialized instruments for natural orifice specimen extraction (patent application number ZL2017101480141) and plastic film sleeve for natural orifice specimen extraction (patent application number ZL 201921169857.0). Reformation of surgical technique and innovation of surgical instruments should be conducted by surgeons with innovative thinking who always seek the way to translate ideas to patents and then real products to promote surgical treatment.

Effects of Depth of Anesthesia Monitored by IoC on Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Radical Resection of Colorectal Cancer

Index of consciousness (IoC) consisting of IoC1 and IoC2, is a new analgesia monitoring indicator in anesthesia evaluation in the laparoscopic radical resection of colorectal cancer. Although the precise anesthetic dosage adjusted by IoC1 has been confirmed to enhance the recovery and reduce the complications of anesthesia, the most appropriate range of IoC2 during anesthesia remains unclear. To investigate the correlation between IoC2 and peri-operative indicators of patients during laparoscopic radical resection of colorectal cancer, the current randomized, controlled, and single-blinded clinical trial was performed. Participants were divided randomly into three groups with different anesthesia depth monitored by IoC2 during their laparoscopic radical resections. Primary outcomes included the dosage of remifentanil. Secondary outcomes included other physiological indexes and complications. The remifentanil dosage and the awakening time increased as IoC2 decreased. The incidences of hypotension and hypoxemia decreased with the elevated IoC2, but the risk of intra-operative awareness also increased. The impact caused by anesthesia to the immune system and health-related life quality of the patients descended with reduced anesthetic level. The IoC2 range of 35–45 could represent the most appropriate anesthetic depth during laparoscopic radical resection, which provides a new perspective for the clinical treatment of colon cancer.

Laparoscopic Partial Resection of the Urinary Bladder for Colorectal Cancers With Suspected Urinary Bladder Invasion

Introduction Although partial cystectomy has been performed by laparoscopy in patients with benign disease, there have only been a few reports regarding the laparoscopic partial resection of urinary bladder–adherent colorectal cancer. This study was conducted to evaluate the short-term surgical outcomes of laparoscopic partial resection of urinary bladder–adherent colorectal cancer. Case presentation Between April 2014 and February 2017, 6 patients with colorectal cancers that were adherent to the urinary bladder underwent laparoscopic colorectal cancer resection combined with partial cystectomy. Their surgical outcomes were reviewed retrospectively. The primary colorectal cancer was located in the sigmoid colon in 5 patients and the upper rectum in 1 patient. None of the patients required conversion to open surgery. The median duration of surgery was 411 minutes, and the median amount of intraoperative blood loss was 284 mL. In the patients with sigmoid colon cancer, the bladder was primarily closed under direct visualization via the small lower abdominal incision used to remove the tumor. In the patient with upper rectal cancer, the bladder was primarily closed laparoscopically. None of the patients demonstrated urinary leakage on retrograde cystography or anastomotic leakage, and there were no cases of perioperative mortality or morbidity. None of the patients developed recurrence of cancer at the median follow-up of 21 months. Conclusion Laparoscopic partial resection of urinary bladder–adherent colorectal cancer produces good short-term outcomes without increasing morbidity. Performing bladder closure under direct visualization via a small lower abdominal incision might be useful in selected patients.

A comparative study of total laparoscopic and laparoscopic-assisted simultaneous resection for colorectal cancer liver metastasis

Objective: To compare the safety and outcome between total laparoscopic and laparoscopy-assisted synchronous resection for colorectal cancer patients with liver metastases. Methods: The data of patients who underwent total laparoscopic or laparoscopy-assisted simultaneous resection of primary colorectal cancer and liver metastases in our hospital between December 2008 and December 2016 were collected and analyzed. The total laparoscopic surgery patients were matched 1∶2 to the laparoscopy-assisted surgery patients based on the propensity score. 22 patients were classified in the total laparoscopic group and 44 patients were classified in the laparoscopy-assisted group. The intraoperative conditions and postoperative outcomes of the two groups were compared. Results: There was no difference in the preoperative baseline data between the two groups (P>0.05). The median operative time were 317.50 and 267.50 minutes in the total laparoscopic group and the laparoscopy-assisted group, respectively, and the median intraoperative blood loss were 100 and 200 ml, both with no statistically significant differences (P>0.05). There were 1 case of intraoperative blood transfusion in the total laparoscopic group and 5 cases in the laparoscopy-assisted group, with no statistically significant difference (P=0.650). The median postoperative hospital stay in the two groups were 11.0 and 10.0 days, the median postoperative defecation time were 4.0 and 4.0 days and postoperative complication rates were 13.6% and 20.5%, and none of these differences were statistically significant (P>0.05). However, no Clavien-DindoⅡ level and above complications occurred in total laparoscopic group. The median disease-free survival (DFS) were 15.0 and 15.7 months in the total laparoscopic group and the laparoscopy-assisted group, the overall survival (OS) were 25.9 and 37.6 months, respectively, with no statistically significant differences (P>0.05). Conclusion: Laparoscopy-assisted approaches are similar, so the appropriate approach should be chosen according to the clinical condition and surgeon's experience.

Role of intraoperative oliguria in risk stratification for postoperative acute kidney injury in patients undergoing colorectal surgery with an enhanced recovery protocol: A propensity score matching analysis.

The enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol for colorectal cancer resection recommends balanced perioperative fluid therapy. According to recent guidelines, zero-balance fluid therapy is recommended in low-risk patients, and immediate correction of low urine output during surgery is discouraged. However, several reports have indicated an association of intraoperative oliguria with postoperative acute kidney injury (AKI). We investigated the impact of intraoperative oliguria in the colorectal ERAS setting on the incidence of postoperative AKI. From January 2017 to August 2019, a total of 453 patients underwent laparoscopic colorectal cancer resection with the ERAS protocol. Among them, 125 patients met the criteria for oliguria and were propensity score (PS) matched to 328 patients without intraoperative oliguria. After PS matching had been performed, 125 patients from each group were selected and the incidences of AKI were compared between the two groups. Postoperative kidney function and surgical outcomes were also evaluated. The incidence of AKI was significantly higher in the intraoperative oliguria group than in the non-intraoperative oliguria group (26.4% vs. 11.2%, respectively, P = 0.002). Also, the eGFR reduction on postoperative day 0 was significantly greater in the intraoperative oliguria than non-intraoperative oliguria group (-9.02 vs. -1.24 mL/min/1.73 m2 respectively, P < 0.001). In addition, the surgical complication rate was higher in the intraoperative oliguria group than in the non-intraoperative oliguria group (18.4% vs. 9.6%, respectively, P = 0.045). Despite the proven benefits of perioperative care with the ERAS protocol, caution is required in patients with intraoperative oliguria to prevent postoperative AKI. Further studies regarding appropriate management of intraoperative oliguria in association with long-term prognosis are needed in the colorectal ERAS setting.

Impact on operative outcomes of laparoscopic simultaneous resection of colorectal cancer and synchronous liver metastases.

The efficacy of laparoscopic simultaneous resection of primary colorectal cancer and synchronous colorectal liver metastases (SCRLM) remains unclear. We retrospectively evaluated data from 258 patients who had undergone simultaneous curative resection of the primary tumor and SCRLM from 2006 to 2017. We compared surgical outcomes between open, hybrid (laparoscopic colorectal resection and open hepatectomy), and pure laparoscopic approaches. Surgical outcomes were also evaluated between the open hepatectomy (OH) group (ie, open/hybrid surgery) and the laparoscopic hepatectomy (LH) group (ie, pure laparoscopic surgery) in 141 patients later in the study period (2013-2017), when the clinical indications for laparoscopic hepatectomy were restricted to simple wedge resection and/or left lateral sectionectomy in our center. The pure laparoscopic approach was associated with significantly less intraoperative blood loss and a significantly shorter postoperative hospital stay than the open and hybrid approaches. Late in the study period, operative outcomes in the LH group (n = 37) were more favorable than for the OH group (n = 104) in terms of intraoperative blood loss and postoperative hospital stay. In patients with rectal cancer, however, earlier postoperative recovery in the LH group did not differ significantly from the OH group. Laparoscopic simultaneous resection of SCRLM with the primary tumor by simple hepatectomy is safe and may enhance patients' postoperative recovery, especially in patients with colon cancer.