Laparoscopic Hysterectomy For Endometrial Cancer Research Articles

Vaginal lacerations during laparoscopic hysterectomy for endometrial cancer and local recurrence risk.

Vaginal lacerations during laparoscopic hysterectomy for endometrial cancer and local recurrence risk.

Intrauterine manipulator use during laparoscopic hysterectomy for endometrial cancer: association for pathological factors and oncologic outcomes

ObjectiveTo examine the association between intrauterine manipulator use and pathological factors and oncologic outcomes in patients with endometrial cancer who had laparoscopic hysterectomy in Japan.MethodsThis was a nationwide retrospective cohort...

Short-Term Outcome of Robotic versus Laparoscopic Hysterectomy for Endometrial Cancer in Women with Diabetes: Analysis of the US Nationwide Inpatient Sample.

This study investigated short-term outcomes of robotic versus laparoscopic hysterectomy for endometrial cancer (EC) in women with diabetes. We extracted the data of hospitalized females aged ≥18 years who were diagnosed with EC and diabetes and underwent robotic or laparoscopic hysterectomy from the US Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) 2005-2018. Associations between study variables and in-hospital outcomes, including complications, unfavorable discharge, length of stay (LOS), and hospital costs, were examined using logistic regression. A total of 5745 women (representing 28,176 women in the US) were included. Multivariable analysis revealed that robotic surgery was significantly associated with a decreased risk of unfavorable discharge (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 0.63, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.46, 0.85) than pure laparoscopic surgery. Women who underwent robotic surgery had a significantly shorter LOS (0.46 fewer days, 95% CI: -0.57, -0.35) but higher total hospital costs (6129.93 greater USD; 95% CI: 4448.74, 7811.12). Compared with pure laparoscopic surgery, robotic hysterectomy was associated with less unfavorable discharge among women aged ≥60 years (aOR = 0.60, 95% CI: 0.44, 0.80). For US women with EC and diabetes, robotic hysterectomy is associated with shorter LOS, decreased risk of unfavorable discharge, especially among older patients, and higher total costs than laparoscopic surgery.

Comparison of the effects of laparoscopic and open hysterectomy on surgical site wound infections in patients with endometrial cancer: A meta-analysis.

This meta-analysis aimed to compare laparoscopic hysterectomy (LH) and open hysterectomy (OH) in terms of surgical site wound infection, length of hospital stay, and postoperative complications in patients with endometrial cancer (EC). PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, VIP, and Wanfang databases were comprehensively searched for studies on OH and LH for EC published between 2008 and July 2023, in any language. The literature was screened according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, and the quality of the included case-control studies was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Data were collated and analysed using Stata 17.0 software. A total of 1245 articles were screened according to the search strategy, and ultimately 15 studies were included in this meta-analysis, with a total of 1606 patients with EC, of which 751 were treated with LH and 855 with OH. The results showed that the rate of postoperative wound infection was significantly higher (OR: 0.290; 95% CI: 0.169-0.496, p < 0.001), the length of hospital stay was significantly longer (SMD: -1.976, 95% CI: -2.669 to -1.283, p < 0.001), and the incidence of postoperative complications was significantly higher (OR: 0.366; 95% CI: 0.280-0.478, p < 0.001) in the OH group than in the LH group. This study showed that LH was superior to OH for the treatment of EC and is associated with a lower rate of wound infection, shorter length of hospitalisation, and a reduced risk of complications. Thus, our findings support the choice of LH over OH for EC.

Anesthetic management of a morbidly obese patient with endometrial cancer during robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery

BackgroundThe number of robot-assisted surgeries being performed has increased in recent years, even in patients with risk factors, such as obesity, owing to advancements in medical technologies. We here report the anesthetic management of a morbidly obese woman who underwent robot-assisted surgery.Case presentationA 44-year-old woman (height, 165 cm; weight, 147 kg; body mass index, 54 kg/m2) was scheduled to undergo robot-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy for endometrial cancer. Preoperative weight loss and rehearsal of positioning during induction of anesthesia and surgical procedures greatly contributed to the surgical success. Monitoring of oxygen reserve index in combination with SpO2 was useful for appropriate airway and respiratory management. During anesthesia induction, the ramp position using a special commercially available cushion facilitated manual mask ventilation and tracheal intubation. Lung-protective ventilation using a limited tidal volume with moderate PEEP was applied during the robot-assisted surgical procedure.ConclusionWe successfully managed anesthesia without any complications.

Cesarean scar perforation in laparoscopic hysterectomy for endometrial cancer: a case report

Perioperative complications tend to increase when performing hysterectomy in patients with a history of caesarean section. Therefore, the laparoscopic hysterectomy procedure requires careful consideration. Herein, we report the case of a patient with a history of caesarean section who underwent total laparoscopic hysterectomy for endometrial cancer. A 59-year-old woman was diagnosed with stage IA endometrial cancer preoperatively, and she underwent laparoscopic hysterectomy, bilateral adnexectomy, and pelvic lymphadenectomy. During these procedures, the bladder was observed to tightly adhere to the scar of a previous caesarean section, and the uterine was perforated due to detachment near the uterus to avoid damage to the bladder. After 2 years, there were no symptoms of recurrence. Our findings further demonstrated that bladder adhesions should be considered in laparoscopic surgery for patients with endometrial cancer who have a history of caesarean section.

Preoperative quantitative sensory testing and robot-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy for endometrial cancer: Can chronic postoperative pain be predicted?

Objective: Chronic postoperative pain is prevalent after robot-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy for endometrial cancer. Preoperative Quantitative Sensory Testing (QST) has been utilized to identify patients at risk of developing chronic postoperative pain after a variety of surgical procedures. The aim of this prospective, observational study was to determine whether preoperative QST profiling could predict the development of chronic postoperative pain following robot-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy for endometrial cancer.

Robotic-assisted versus conventional laparoscopic hysterectomy for endometrial cancer.

ObjectiveThe safety and efficacy of robotic-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy (RALH) compared with conventional total laparoscopic hysterectomy (TLH) for surgical staging of endometrial cancer has not been clearly established. With the commencement of a robotic program at our institution, our objective was to evaluate and compare the surgical outcomes of RALH with TLH for endometrial cancer.MethodsA retrospective cohort study was performed on 39 patients who underwent RALH and 41 patients who underwent TLH for endometrial cancer at a tertiary care academic institution.ResultsIn the setting of endometrial cancer RALH is significantly longer to perform than TLH (mean operating time 133 min vs 107 min, p = 0.0001). There is higher estimated blood loss in TLH cases than RALH cases (78 mL vs 22 mL, p = 0.015). Women who underwent RALH had a shorter length of stay (1.3 days vs 1.8 days, p = 0.006) than TLH patients, and six cases (15 %) of the RALH group were discharged on the same day of surgery. There were no differences between the RALH and TLH groups in intraoperative or postoperative complications and there were no conversions to laparotomy.ConclusionRALH is safe and feasible for the treatment of endometrial cancer, with low morbidity, less blood loss and shorter length of stay than TLH. RALH is associated with longer mean operating times than TLH and this may improve with enlisting a consistent experienced team. Prospective randomised studies which include analysis of quality of life measures and long-term outcomes are required to further establish the role of RALH in the surgical staging of endometrial cancer.

Preoperative quantitative sensory testing and robot-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy for endometrial cancer: can chronic postoperative pain be predicted?

Objectives Chronic postoperative pain is prevalent after robot-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy for endometrial cancer. Preoperative Quantitative Sensory Testing (QST) has been utilized to identify patients at risk of developing chronic postoperative pain after a range of surgical procedures. The aim of this prospective, observational study was to (1) determine the prevalence of chronic postoperative pain, (2) assess selected preoperative risk factors for chronic postoperative pain, and (3) evaluate if preoperative QST profiling could predict the development of chronic postoperative pain following robot-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy for endometrial cancer. Methods One-hundred and sixty consecutive patients were included and handheld pressure algometry, cuff pressure algometry, temporal summation of pain, conditioned pain modulation, and heat pain thresholds were assessed prior to surgery. Patients were asked to fill out a questionnaire concerning pain in the pre- and post-operative time period six months after surgery. Chronic postoperative pain was defined as persistent, moderate to severe pain (mean visual analogue scale (VAS)≥3) on a daily basis six months after surgery. Results The prevalence of chronic postoperative pain after robot-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy for endometrial cancer was of 13.6% (95% CI 8.4-20.4%). Patients that would develop chronic postoperative pain had a lower BMI (p=0.032), a higher prevalence of preoperative pelvic pain (p<0.001), preoperative heat pain hyperalgesia (p=0.043) and a higher level of acute postoperative pain (p<0.001) when compared to patients that would not develop chronic postoperative pain. A logistic regression model demonstrated that the presence of preoperative pelvic pain was a significant, independent predictive risk factor for development of chronic postoperative pain (OR=6.62, 95% CI 2.26-19.44), whereas none of the QST parameters could predict postoperative pain. Conclusions Preoperative QST assessment could not predict the development of chronic postoperative pain despite preoperative heat pain hyperalgesia in patients that would develop chronic postoperative pain.

A cesarean delivery sequela:: scar rupture and tumor spill during laparoscopic hysterectomy for endometrial cancer

A cesarean delivery sequela:: scar rupture and tumor spill during laparoscopic hysterectomy for endometrial cancer

Robotic-Assisted vs Conventional Laparoscopic Hysterectomy for Endometrial Cancer

Introduction The adoption of robotic surgery by Australian gynecologists has increased in the past seven years but remains dominated by the private sector. Robotic assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy (RALH) is associated with improved outcomes when compared with open surgery in women with endometrial cancer. However, the comparison of RALH with conventional laparoscopic hysterectomy (TLH) is met with conflicting data. Study Objective To evaluate the short-term operative outcomes of patients with endometrial cancer who underwent RALH and to compare these outcomes with those of a historical cohort who underwent TLH. Design Retrospective observational study. Setting Tertiary public hospital in New South Wales, Australia. Patients or Participants Outcomes of patients who underwent RALH for endometrial cancer by a single surgeon from June 2017 to November 2018 were compared with cases of TLH for endometrial cancer performed by the same surgeon from June 2013 to September 2018. Interventions N/A Measurements and Main Results Thirty-nine cases of RALH and 41 cases of TLH were performed for endometrial cancer. The cohorts were well-matched in age but women who underwent RALH were higher in BMI. RALH was associated with a longer total operative time (mean 132 minutes) than TLH (mean 107 minutes). There were no intra-operative complications and no conversions to laparotomy. Three minor post-operative complications occurred in each group. The average length of stay was significantly higher in the TLH group (1.78 days vs 1.26 days) than the RALH group. Six patients (15.4%) in the RALH group were discharged on the day of surgery. Majority of cases of RALH reported Conclusion The establishment of a robotic gynecological surgery program at our institution is safe and feasible. Complication rate and blood loss are low and patient recovery is excellent. Length of stay is reduced, and same-day discharge is achievable, allowing significant reductions in health care costs.

Chronic Postoperative Pain After Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Hysterectomy for Endometrial Cancer

Abstract Objective: Chronic postoperative pain poses a significant clinical challenge and is associated with a reduced quality of life and increased use of health services. The present study was co...

Extent of lymphadenectomy and postoperative major complications among women with endometrial cancer treated with minimally invasive surgery

In patients with endometrial cancer, sentinel lymphadenectomy is used to accurately prognosticate extent of disease, and has been proposed as a method to decrease the incidence of medical and surgical complications associated with more extensive lymphadenectomy. It is unknown whether patients who undergo traditional lymphadenectomy experience major postoperative complications at the same rates as those who undergo sentinel lymphadenectomy or those who do not undergo lymphadenectomy. The aim of this study was to compare the incidence of major postoperative complications among endometrial cancer patients undergoing total laparoscopic hysterectomy with traditional lymphadenectomy vs sentinel or no lymphadenectomy. Patients with endometrial cancer who underwent total laparoscopic hysterectomy recorded in the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database between 2015 and 2016 were identified using Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) and International Classification of Diseases (ICD) codes. Primary exposure was extent of lymphadenectomy. The primary outcome was major postoperative complications as defined by the Clavien-Dindo scale. Associations were examined with bivariable tests and multivariable logistic regression. A total of 3282 women with endometrial cancer who underwent total laparoscopic hysterectomy were identified; of these, 2049 (62.4%) did not undergo lymphadenectomy, 1089 (33.2%) underwent traditional lymphadenectomy, and 144 (4.4%) underwent sentinel lymphadenectomy. Traditional lymphadenectomy had the highest rate of major complications (3.6%) compared with sentinel lymphadenectomy (2.0%) and no lymphadenectomy (2.0%) (P= .03). Patients who underwent traditional lymphadenectomy also had the longest operating room times and procedures that were most surgically complex (171 minutes, 30.6 relative value units [RVU]) compared with patients who underwent sentinel lymphadenectomy (166 minutes, 24.9 RVU) or no lymphadenectomy (141 minutes, 15.0 RVU) (all P < .001). Patients who underwent traditional lymphadenectomy had nearly twice the odds of a major complication (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.8; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.2-2.9) and need for readmission (aOR, 2.2; 95% CI, 1.5-3.4) compared to those who underwent sentinel or no lymphadenectomy. The incidence of readmission after traditional lymphadenectomy was higher (4.6%) than after sentinel lymphadenectomy (1.4%) and no lymphadenectomy (2.2%) (P < 0.001). Sentinel lymphadenectomy among patients undergoing total laparoscopic hysterectomy for endometrial cancer was associated with a decreased incidence of major postoperative complications and need for readmission when compared with traditional lymphadenectomy.

Laparoscopic hysterectomy for endometrial cancer: impact of age on clinical outcomes

Introduction: Improvement in preoperative care for the ageing population has resulted in an increasing number of elderly patients to be considered for surgery. With an increased incidence of endometrial cancer, it is inevitable that a significant number of elderly patients are referred for surgery, despite the concerns over co‐morbid conditions and diminished cardiopulmonary reserves.Aim: To evaluate the clinical outcomes of laparoscopic hysterectomy for elderly women operated on for endometrial cancer with comparison to younger patients.Methods: A retrospective study of women who had undergone total laparoscopic hysterectomy for endometrial cancer at Ninewells Hospital between January 2015 and January 2017 was conducted. Patients were identified from the gynaecology oncology multidisciplinary team e‐case database and were categorised into younger and older group according to their age. Both groups were compared and analysed for demographics details, pre‐existing comorbidity, METS score, perioperative and postoperative data.Results: There were 100 women meeting the study criteria. Of these, 79 patients were aged ≤75 (Group A) and 21 patients were aged >75 (Group B). The mean age was 62.9 (age range 37–75) and 80.6 (age range 76–90) in Group A and Group B, respectively. Group A presented with higher mean BMI (̄ = 33.8) compared to Group B (̄ = 28.8). With the increase in patient’s age, reduced METS score was observed. No difference was found between the groups in the incidence of estimated blood loss and postoperative hospital stay. Fisher’s exact test was used to evaluate the postoperative complication in both groups. The two‐tailed p value (p = .1108) had illustrated that the observation was statistically insignificant between both groups. One patient in Group A (n = 79) was found to have pelvic haematoma after the procedure; while two patients in Group B (n = 21) developed port site haematoma. Otherwise, no other patients from both groups developed postoperative complication regardless of their pre-existing medical conditions. Only one patient in Group A (n = 79) required conversion to open surgery due to difficult access and large uterine fibroid.Conclusions: Total laparoscopic hysterectomy appears to be feasible and safe in elderly women with no significant difference between groups. Minimally invasive surgery has shown to extend considerable benefits to patient safety regardless of their age.

Implementation of laparoscopic hysterectomy for endometrial cancer over the past decade

BackgroundLaparoscopic hysterectomy (LH) for the treatment of early-stage endometrial carcinoma/cancer (EC) has demonstrated to be safe in several randomized controlled trials. Yet, data on implementation of LH in clinical practice are limited. In the present study, implementation of LH for EC was evaluated in a large oncology network in the Netherlands.ResultsRetrospectively, a total of 556 EC patients with FIGO stage I-II were registered in the selected years. The proportion of LH gradually increased from 11% in 2006 to 85% in 2015. LH was more often performed in patients with low-grade EC and was not related to the studied patient characteristics. The introduction of TLH was frequently preceded by LAVH. Patients treated in teaching hospitals were more likely to undergo a LH compared to patients in non-teaching hospitals. The conversion rate was 7.7%, and the overall complication rates between LH and AH were comparable, but less postoperative complications in LH.ConclusionsImplementation of laparoscopic hysterectomy for early-stage EC increased from 11 to 85% in 10 years. Implementation of TLH was often preceded by LAVH and was faster in teaching hospitals.

Pelvic floor functional outcomes after total abdominal vs total laparoscopic hysterectomy for endometrial cancer

Pelvic floor functioning is an important concern for women requiring a hysterectomy for endometrial cancer. The incidence of pelvic floor symptoms has not been reported in women who have undergone a hysterectomy for early-stage endometrial cancer. We sought to evaluate pelvic floor function in women who have had surgical treatment for early-stage endometrial cancer as part of the multinational Laparoscopic Approach to Cancer of the Endometrium trial and to compare patients' outcomes who had total abdominal vs total laparoscopic hysterectomy. A multinational, phase III, randomized noninferiority trial compared disease-free survival of patients who had total abdominal hysterectomy vs total laparoscopic hysterectomy. This substudy analyzes the results from a self-administered validated questionnaire on pelvic floor symptoms (Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory) administered preoperatively, and at follow-up visits 6, 18, 30, 42, and 54 months postoperatively. Overall, 381 patients with endometrial cancer were included in the analysis (total abdominal hysterectomy, n= 195; total laparoscopic hysterectomy, n= 186). At 6 months postsurgery both groups experienced an improvement in Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory scores compared to presurgical pelvic floor well-being (total abdominal hysterectomy: mean change -11.17; 95% confidence interval, -17.11 to -5.24; total laparoscopic hysterectomy: mean change -10.25; 95% confidence interval, -16.31 to -4.19). The magnitude of change from baseline in pelvic floor symptoms did not differ between both treatment groups up to 54 months postsurgery. These findings suggest that pelvic floor function in terms of urinary, bowel, and prolapse symptoms are unlikely to deteriorate following abdominal or laparoscopic hysterectomy and are reassuring for women undergoing hysterectomy for early-stage endometrial cancer.

Incidence of Urinary Tract Injury and Utility of Routine Cystoscopy during Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy for Endometrial Cancer

Incidence of Urinary Tract Injury and Utility of Routine Cystoscopy during Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy for Endometrial Cancer

Intraperitoneal cytology after laparoscopic hysterectomy in patients with endometrial cancer: A retrospective observational study.

The aim of this study was to evaluate the dissemination of cancer cells at laparoscopic hysterectomy according to the intraperitoneal cytology.Patients with endometrial cancer underwent total laparoscopic modified radical hysterectomy. Peritoneal wash cytology was performed on entering the peritoneal cavity before surgical preparation and just after hysterectomy.Seventy-eight patients underwent laparoscopic hysterectomy for endometrial cancer. Among the 15 patients who had positive intraperitoneal cytology on entering the peritoneal cavity, 10 converted to negative intraperitoneal cytology after hysterectomy. In contrast, among the 63 patients who had negative intraperitoneal cytology on entering the peritoneal cavity, 2 converted to positive intraperitoneal cytology after hysterectomy.While surgery can reduce the number of cancer cells in the peritoneal cavity, leakage can occur, as seen in some cases of hysterectomy. Careful washing must be performed after hysterectomy.

Classification of Postoperative Complications in Robotic-assisted Compared With Laparoscopic Hysterectomy for Endometrial Cancer

Study ObjectiveTo compare intraoperative and postoperative surgical complications and outcomes between robotic-assisted and laparoscopic surgical management of endometrial cancer using a standardized classification system. DesignA retrospective cohort study (Canadian Task Force classification II-2). SettingAn integrated health care system in Northern California. PatientsOne thousand four hundred thirty-three women with a diagnosis of complex atypical hyperplasia and endometrial cancer managed by minimally invasive hysterectomy and surgical staging from January 2009 to January 2014. InterventionsSeven hundred forty-five robotic-assisted and 688 laparoscopic hysterectomies were evaluated. Measurements and Main ResultsThe primary outcome was intraoperative and postoperative complications within 30 days. All complications were categorized using the Clavien-Dindo classification system. Secondary outcomes included total operative time, estimated blood loss, transfusion rates, length of stay, conversion to laparotomy, and number of pelvic and para-aortic lymph nodes retrieved. The modality of hysterectomy was not associated with either overall intraoperative complications or major postoperative complications (p > .1). However, there were significantly fewer minor postoperative complications with robotic surgery (16.6% vs 25.6%, p < .01). Statistically significant differences were also noted in the following outcomes: decreased median operative time, length of stay, estimated blood loss, conversion to laparotomy, and median number of lymph nodes retrieved in the robotic group when compared with the laparoscopic group. ConclusionThere was no difference in the rate of major complication between robotic and laparoscopic surgery using the Clavien-Dindo system of categorizing surgical complications; however, there were clinically significant differences favoring the robotic approach, including a lower rate of minor complications and conversion rate to laparotomy.

The safety of same-day discharge after laparoscopic hysterectomy for endometrial cancer

ObjectiveTo determine factors influencing discharge patterns after laparoscopic hysterectomy for endometrial cancer and to evaluate the safety of same-day discharge during the 30-day postoperative period. MethodsUsing the American College of Surgeons' National Surgical Quality Improvement Project's database, patients who underwent hysterectomy for endometrial cancer from 2010 to 2014 were identified and categorized by their hospital length of stay. Statistical analyses were performed to assess the relationship between hospital stay and demographics, medical comorbidities, intraoperative surgical factors and postoperative outcomes. ResultsA total of 9020 patients had laparoscopic hysterectomies for endometrial cancer and of these, 729 patients (8.1%) were successfully discharged on the day of surgery. These patients were younger and had lower body mass indexes and fewer medical comorbidities than patients who were admitted after their procedure. The same-day discharge group underwent surgical procedures of less complexity than the hospital admission group based on shorter operative times and fewer relative value units (RVUs). There was a lower rate of surgical site infections in the same-day discharge group, and no difference in rates of other postoperative complications including hospital readmissions and reoperations. ConclusionsRates of laparoscopic hysterectomy for endometrial cancer are gradually increasing but the rates of same-day discharge have increased at a much slower rate. Same-day discharge has been successful despite differences in preoperative demographics, medical comorbidities and intraoperative surgical complexity. Overall postoperative complication rates were equivalent despite length of hospital stay, demonstrating the safety and feasibility of same-day discharge after laparoscopic hysterectomy for endometrial cancer.