Laparoscopic Catheter Research Articles

The Survival and Complication Rates of Laparoscopic Versus Open Catheter Placement in Peritoneal Dialysis Patients: A Meta-Analysis.

The objective of this meta-analysis was to compare the outcomes of laparoscopic insertion method with a conventional open surgery. A systematical search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library up to June 2014. Relative risks (RRs) and their 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were used as estimates. Four randomized-controlled trials and 10 cohort studies involving 2323 patients were identified. The pooled results showed that laparoscopic insertion technique significantly prolonged the 1-year survival (RR=1.23; 95% CI, 1.12-1.35) and 2-year survival (RR=1.36; 95% CI, 1.16-1.60). Meanwhile, laparoscopic insertion significantly decreased the probability of surgical intervention or catheter revision (RR=0.32; 95% CI, 0.15-0.69) and risk of migration (RR=0.31; 95% CI, 0.18-0.53) and obstruction (RR=0.43; 95% CI, 0.28-0.66). Thus, laparoscopic catheter placement may be superior to open surgery in peritoneal dialysis catheter placement.

Superiority of laparoscopy in the peritoneal dialysis catheter reset surgery.

Peritoneal dialysis catheter surgery has been used in clinical treatment for nearly 40 years, and open surgery under local anesthesia is the conventional method. However, catheter displacement after open surgery is still the thorny issue during our clinical practice. Then the reset surgery is often required to be taken again. Nowadays, laparoscopic peritoneal dialysis catheter draws our attention due to its advantages of accurate positioning, smaller incision, and less pain, and its clinical application has been limited. While laparoscopic surgery is recognized, there are few relevant studies on whether there is difference during the catheter reset process between the two surgical approaches. In this study, we mainly discussed the rate of secondary catheter migration, the incidence of complications after catheter reset for two surgical approaches and the hospital stay as well as the total clinical cost for the two surgical approaches. In this study, we retrospectively analyzed 25 cases of end-stage renal disease, who received catheterization for peritoneal dialysis and regular peritoneal dialysis in our hospital from March 2010 to December 2013, and had a medical history of catheter migration. We collected the relevant clinical data for all patients. Fifteen patients selected laparoscopic catheter reset, and 10 patients selected the traditional surgical method for catheter reset by themselves. For all patients enrolled, we analyzed the incidence of secondary catheter migration and postoperative complications, hospitalization time, and total cost for different methods of reset. Through the studies above, we found that laparoscopic peritoneal dialysis catheter surgery offered accurate catheter location and a small incision that was easy to heal. Besides, the incidence of postoperative complications for the laparoscopic surgery was lower than that for traditional surgical approach for catheter reset. The average hospitalization time for laparoscopic surgery was shorter than that for the traditional surgical approach. The total cost of laparoscopic surgery was more than that of the traditional surgery. Therefore, the rational application of a laparoscopic peritoneal dialysis catheter and reset surgery can increase the success rate of peritoneal dialysis, reduce the complications, shorten hospitalization time of patients, and thus enhance patient's confidence to stick it out.

A novel adaptation of laparoscopic Tenckhoff catheter insertion technique to enhance catheter stability and function in automated peritoneal dialysis

Automated peritoneal dialysis (APD) normally takes place overnight. Maintaining a stable PD catheter position, independent of body position, omental wrapping or catheter displacement secondary to bowel movements is essential in maintaining effective catheter function. We developed a new procedure of catheter placement through combining and adapting several previously described operative techniques including laparoscopic placement of a curled double cuff Tenckhoff catheter with subcutaneous tunneling superior to the rectus sheet, an oblique course through the abdominal wall, deep entry into the pelvic peritoneum and directed placement of the curled tip within the pouch of Douglas. Retrospective analysis of catheter function was conducted, evaluating catheter position, function, complication rate and catheter survival against findings for current insertion techniques described within literature. Between March 2009 and November 2011, 54 patients underwent PD catheter insertion. The observation period was an average of 343 ± 273 days. All patients received abdominal plain film showing optimal catheter position in 89 %. Reported catheter function was very good in 85.2 %, with no or few alarms per week during APD, moderate in 9.3 % with occasional minor dysfunctions (≤ 2 alarms per night), and poor in 5.6 %, with regular alarm disturbance. In one case, primary dysfunction led to catheter replacement. At completion, stable catheter function with occasional minor dysfunction was achieved in 52 of 54 cases. Catheter-related complications (leakage, hydrocele formation, infection and need for replacement) were observed in 14.8 %. At the end of the observation period, 55.6 % of catheters remained in use. Patient dropout occurred through death (18.5 %), renal transplantation (7.4 %), renal recovery (1.9 %), removal secondary to infection or dysfunction (9.3 %) and conversion to HD due to poor dialysis quality (7.4 %). The above technique combines and optimises previously described laparoscopic catheter implantation techniques, allowing increased catheter stability resulting in an undisturbed catheter function suitable for APD.

Right portal vein embolization by laparoscopic catheterization of the inferior mesenteric vein

Right portal vein embolization is often performed to prevent liver insufficiency after major hepatic resection. The procedure usually involves direct puncture of the portal vein, which requires hepatic hilum manipulation, and may be associated with liver injury, pneumothorax, and hemoperitoneum. This report describes a technique of laparoscopic insertion of a sheath into the inferior mesenteric vein followed by right portal vein embolization.

Laparoscopic Placement of “Self-Locating Catheter”: Our Experience and a Review of Literature

Among the available devices for peritoneal dialysis, the Di Paolo self-locating catheter (SLC) represents a milestone using to its ability to ensure a permanent reliable means of access to the peritoneum. Our experience included 20 laparoscopic peritoneal catheter placements from 2008 to 2011. We performed the laparoscopic surgical technique using 3 trocars: 2 10 mm and 1 5 mm. The technique allows catheter introduction into the pouch of Douglas under direct vision. Among 20 treated patients, 1 died due to causes unrelated to peritoneal dialysis; 1 underwent transplantation, and 1 was switched to hemodialysis because of ultrafiltration failure. The complications included 2 catheter displacements, only 1 of them needing repositioning by open laparotomy, and 1 case of peritonitis. No infection in the subcutaneous tunnel or obstruction and malfunction occurred among our patients. The Di Paolo SLC is similar to Tenckhoff catheter but includes a small tungsten cylinder at the tip that engenders continuous gravity in the peritoneal cavity, producing a reduced risk of dislocation. In a large series of cases, Di Paolo et al. reported a 0.8% dislocation rate after SLC placement compared with 12% using Tenckhoff catheters. They also demonstrated a reduced risk of other complications, such as peritonitis, infection, obstruction, and failure. These data have been confirmed by other authors with smaller case series. Thus, introduction of the SLC and improved surgical techniques result in better efficiency of peritoneal dialysis.

Dissociative Conscious Sedation, An Alternative to General Anesthesia for Laparoscopic Peritoneal Dialysis Catheter Implantation: A Randomized Trial Comparing Intravenous and Subcutaneous Ketamine

Laparoscopy is an effective method of implantation for peritoneal dialysis (PD) catheters. Use of the laparoscopic technique is increasing because of its potential advantages over other techniques. In most patients, selection for PD is based on negative criteria, and because of the need for general anesthesia, the laparoscopic technique can be life-threatening in these patients. On the other hand, local anesthesia is insufficient for laparoscopic catheter implantation. To avoid the need for general anesthesia and to achieve patient safety and satisfaction, we designed a type of conscious sedation (dissociative conscious sedation) and compared the efficacy of subcutaneous (SC) and intravenous (IV) ketamine added to narcotics in patients scheduled for laparoscopic implantation of a PD catheter. Our prospective randomized double-blind study enrolled 60 adult patients with chronic renal failure who were scheduled for laparoscopic implantation of a PD catheter. Patients were randomly assigned to one of two groups: one receiving IV ketamine, and the other receiving SC ketamine. In both groups, patients were premedicated with IV midazolam 0.015 mg/kg, fentanyl 1-2 μg/kg, and lidocaine 1.5 mg/kg. Patients then received 0.6 mg/kg ketamine either intravenously (IV group) or by subcutaneous injection at the anterior aspect of the forearm (SC group). If systolic blood pressure (BP) increased more than 20% from baseline or exceeded 170 mmHg, IV nitroglycerine (TNG) 50 μg was administered incrementally (repeated 50-μg doses). After a desirable level of conscious sedation was achieved, local anesthesia and nitrous oxide pneumoperitoneum were applied, and the PD catheter was implanted under laparoscopic guidance. Heart rate and BP were measured throughout the procedure. Adverse effects and recovery events were recorded. All patients tolerated the procedure well. Administration of TNG was significantly more frequent in the IV ketamine group. Pain intensity during the surgery was similar in both groups. Both groups were comparable with regard to heart rate, but patients in the SC ketamine group had a significantly lower systolic BP at the 2nd measurement and a lower rate-pressure product at the 2nd, 4th, and 5th measurements. All patients in the SC ketamine group were cooperative during surgery and experienced uneventful recoveries; mild hallucinations were observed in 5 patients in the IV ketamine group. In the IV ketamine group, 3 patients lost the ability to cooperate during surgery. All catheters were successfully placed. Dissociative conscious sedation is an acceptable alternative to general anesthesia in laparoscopic implantation of the PD catheter. Ketamine by the SC route is as effective as, but safer than, IV ketamine.

Two-port laparoscopic placement of a peritoneal dialysis catheter with abdominal wall fixation

We devised a new laparoscopic technique for peritoneal dialysis catheter (PDC) placement to overcome the common problem of malfunction or migration of the catheter. Between March 2005 and August 2006, 38 patients underwent laparoscopic catheter placement with lower abdominal wall fixation. Using an abdominal scout film, we checked for catheter tip migration regularly. There was no leak in the immediate postoperative period. After follow-up of 21.5 months (range 6-34), all catheters were working properly, although tip migrations were found in the iliac fossa in three patients and in the right upper quadrant in one patient. A port site hernia developed in one patient and peritonitis developed in two patients. Only one remote migration (2.6%) occurred during the study period. Thus, our method of laparoscopic catheter insertion might be a feasible option.

Case–control comparison of laparoscopic and open washout for peritoneal dialysis-associated peritonitis

Peritonitis is the major complication of peritoneal dialysis (PD). Some 25-40 per cent of patients require surgical intervention, traditionally laparotomy, washout and removal of the PD catheter. The aim was to compare this open procedure with laparoscopic washout and catheter removal. In a case-control comparison, 20 patients who had laparoscopic washout for PD-associated peritonitis were matched by age and causative organism with 20 patients who had open washout. The groups were well matched for age, sex, causative organism, preoperative C-reactive protein level, white cell count and presence of bowel wall sclerosis. Laparoscopic surgery was quicker than open operation (mean(s.d.) 49(13) versus 73(30) min; P = 0.006) and postoperative morphine requirements were significantly lower (median 0 versus 27 mg; P < 0.001). Bowel function recovered more quickly in the laparoscopic group, as measured by time to first passage of flatus (mean(s.d.) 2(1) versus 5(4) days; P = 0.004) and resumption of free fluids (median 2 versus 4 days; P = 0.044). Reoperation rates and 30-day mortality were identical in the two groups. This study suggests that laparoscopic washout for PD peritonitis is as effective as open washout, but is quicker and less painful with earlier return of bowel function.

Laparoscopic-Assisted Lumboperitoneal Shunt Placement for Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension

Lumboperitoneal (LP) shunting is considered an effective method of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) diversion in patients with idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH). Confirmation of flow out of the distal portion of the catheter once in its final position can be difficult, especially in obese individuals. A new technique to improve placement of the peritoneal catheter involves laparoscopic catheter insertion. We performed laparoscopic-assisted LP shunt placement for IIH on four patients. Improvement in preoperative IIH symptomatology was noted in all patients. No laparoscopic-procedure-related complications were noted. No problems were noted in shunt functioning and none of the shunts have required revision surgery at last follow-up. LP shunt related complications were noted in two of the four patients. Complications included bilateral lower extremity lumbar radiculopathy in one patient that resolved with a short course of gabapentin, spinal headache in one patient that resolved with bed rest and fluids, and development of a small intracranial subdural hygroma without mass effect in one patient that is asymptomatic and being followed without clinical consequence. Laparoscopic insertion of the abdominal catheter is safe and effective and does not appear to independently cause an increased risk of complications.

Selected best demonstrated practices in peritoneal dialysis access

Many burdensome interventions that adversely affect the utilization of peritoneal dialysis as renal replacement therapy and patient satisfaction with this treatment modality can be avoided by early peritoneal access placement with embedded catheters, implantation techniques that preempt common catheter complications, and the use of access devices that provide flexibility in exit site location. Catheter embedding consists of subcutaneously burying the external limb of the catheter tubing at the time of the insertion procedure. Interval exteriorization of the catheter is performed when dialysis is needed. Earlier commitment by patients to peritoneal dialysis can be achieved by elimination of catheter maintenance until dialysis is necessary. Catheter embedding is a practical strategy to avoid temporary hemodialysis with vascular catheters and reduces stress on operating room access by allowing more efficient scheduling as non-urgent procedures. Laparoscopic catheter placement enables proactive techniques not available to other conventional insertion methods. These techniques include rectus sheath tunneling to prevent catheter tip migration, selective prophylactic omentopexy to prevent omental entrapment, selective resection of epiploic appendages to prevent catheter obstruction, adhesiolysis to eliminate compartmentalization, and diagnosis and simultaneous repair of previously undiagnosed abdominal wall hernias. Both standard and extended 2-piece catheter systems are necessary to customize the peritoneal access to a variety of body configurations. Catheters should be able to produce lower abdominal, mid-abdominal, upper abdominal, and upper chest exit site locations that facilitate management by the patient without sacrificing deep pelvic position of the catheter tip or resulting in excessive tubing stress during passage through the abdominal wall.

Selective performance of prophylactic omentopexy during laparoscopic implantation of peritoneal dialysis catheters.

Omental entrapment of the peritoneal dialysis catheter remains a common cause of flow dysfunction. Prophylactic omentectomy during catheter implantation is still followed with an incidence of flow obstruction as high as 10%. We describe indications and a technique for selective performance of omentopexy during laparoscopic catheter implantation that resulted in only a 0.7% obstruction rate in 153 consecutive patients as compared with a 12.8% rate in a preceding group of 78 consecutive patients. Laparoscopic omentopexy was performed during 9.2% of implant procedures and only when the omentum was found to extend to the retrovesical space. The procedure is simple, quick, and inexpensive to perform. Employing selective criteria for omentopexy eliminates the performance of unnecessary procedures. Actuarial analysis demonstrates that an operative strategy of selectively performing omentopexy for redundant omentum significantly improves catheter survival free of flow dysfunction (P < 0.0001).

Laparoscopic Placement of PAP Catheters for Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy in Ovarian Carcinoma

Objective.To our report our experience with the laparoscopic placement of peritoneal access ports and to compare it to our experience with placement at laparotomy.Methods.Patients with advanced ovarian carcinoma were enrolled in a study to receive intraperitoneal paclitaxel in combination with intravenous cisplatin and cyclophosphamide as first- or second-line chemotherapy. Patients had a PAP catheter placed at primary laparotomy or by a separate laparoscopic procedure under general anesthesia.Results.In 13 patients a PAP catheter was placed during primary laparotomy, without complications. Thirteen patients had laparoscopic catheter placing, using routine Veress needle insufflation. After a bowel perforation at insertion of the umbilical trocar had occurred in one patient, due to extensive adhesions, we decided to use only an open laparoscopic procedure. No other procedure or catheter-related complications occurred.Conclusion.Laparoscopic-assisted placement of PAP catheters is feasible, but should preferably be performed by an open laparoscopic procedure in this patient population at risk for intraabdominal adhesions.

Laparoscopic introduction of a continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (capd) catheter by a two-puncture technique

We describe a laparoscopic two-puncture technique for the placement of a continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis catheter. With a mean follow-up period of 8 months the short-term results of the first 19 laparoscopic catheter insertions are evaluated and discussed. It appears to be a simple, safe, and viable procedure with a low morbidity and very good results in the short term. The same technique can also be used in catheter salvage in case of outflow obstruction or catheter migration, thus increasing catheter longevity.

Laparoscopic intra-arterial catheter implantation for regional chemotherapy of liver metastasis.

In patients with unresectable metastatic disease confined to the liver, intra-arterial regional chemotherapy with implantable systems in an attractive option. Since April 1992, laparoscopic colorectal resections have been performed in our institution. Within this series of patients, three cases with bilateral liver metastasis from colon cancer were observed and underwent laparoscopic intra-arterial catheter implantation in the gastroduodenal artery for regional chemotherapy. In two patients the metastases were synchronous, and in both cases a laparoscopic colon resection was also performed, for tumors located in the cecum and in the sigmoid colon, respectively. The laparoscopic surgical technique for intra-arterial catheter implantation is described in detail. In this limited experience the procedure, from a purely technical point of view, was not considered difficult and was completed in 70 min on average. No complications were observed and the patient with metachronous liver metastasis was discharged on 3rd postoperative day.