Laparoscopic Bariatric Surgery Research Articles

Concurrent laparoscopic hysterectomy and bariatric surgery for early-stage endometrial cancer and endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia: Lessons learned from an interdisciplinary prospective feasibility trial

Concurrent laparoscopic hysterectomy and bariatric surgery for early-stage endometrial cancer and endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia: Lessons learned from an interdisciplinary prospective feasibility trial

Perioperative intravenous lidocaine infusion for postsurgical pain management in bariatric surgery patients

IntroductionObesity is one of the biggest modern health issues worldwide. Owing to the failure of both behavioral and pharmacological measures, the surgical approach has been established as the main conduct to follow, with bariatric surgery being one of the most effective and safe procedures. One of the bases for the optimal analgesic strategy is the use of adjuvants during the perioperative period. One of the main drugs in use is lidocaine.AimTo evaluate postoperative pain after perioperative lidocaine infusion in patients undergoing bariatric surgery and describe the presence of nausea and vomiting during the first 24 h.MethodsThis was a retrospective study of patients who underwent laparoscopic bariatric surgery at ABC Medical Center. Two study arms were established: a group of patients who received lidocaine infusion and a control group. The presence of pain, nausea, or vomiting was evaluated upon admission to the recovery area and 1 h and 24 h after the intervention. The normal distribution of the data was first verified via the Shapiro–Wilk test. The data are presented as medians for quantitative variables and as frequencies for qualitative variables.ResultsA total of 50 surgeries were performed, with a significant correlation between lidocaine infusion and lower pain values at 1 h (p = 0.04). Similarly, there was a marked trend in the presence of nausea in control group 4 (18.6%) vs. 15 (53.5%).ConclusionsOur data suggest that the use of intraoperative lidocaine infusion is limited in postoperative pain management; nonetheless, it significantly improves the incidence of postoperative nausea.

Ultrasound-Guided Transversus Abdominis Plane Block as an Effective Path to Reduce Opioid Consumption After Laparoscopic Bariatric Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Effective postoperative pain management is essential to the patient's recovery. The use of opioids as the primary line of pain treatment has been known to increase rates of length of stay, pulmonary complications, paralytic ileus, and nausea and vomiting. Therefore, guidelines strongly recommend alternative paths to reduce opioid consumption through multimodal analgesia, and the transversus abdominis plane block(USG-TAP) has been considered to be one of these optimistic alternatives. A comprehensive systematic search was conducted in four databases until April 2024. We only considered for this analysis randomized controlled trials that assessed the USG-TAP as part of multimodal anesthesia in patients undergoing laparoscopic bariatric surgery. Eleven studies comprising 789 patients were included in the meta-analysis. Our results showed a significant decrease in opioid consumption after the first 24h of surgery (MD - 32.02mg; 95% IC - 51.33, - 12.71; p < 0.01) and fewer patients required extra-dose of opioid (OR 0.20; 95% IC 0.07, 0.62; p < 0.01). The pain score showed to be also improved with the TAP block (MD - 0.69; 95% IC - 1.32, - 0.07; p = 0.03). No difference concerning time to deambulate, nausea and vomiting, and time of surgery was observed among the studies. This study reinforces the benefits of the use of USG-TAP block as part of multimodal analgesia in patients undergoing laparoscopic bariatric surgery.

Effect of intraperitoneal lidocaine administration versus traditional analgesics only on postoperative pain control in laparoscopic bariatric surgeries.

Effect of intraperitoneal lidocaine administration versus traditional analgesics only on postoperative pain control in laparoscopic bariatric surgeries.

TROCAR SITE CLOSURE WITH OMENTAL PLUG INSERTION IN LAPAROSCOPIC BARIATRIC OPERATIONS: EFFICACY, SAFETY, AND OUTCOMES

Introduction:Trocar site herniation (TSH) remains a significant complication following laparoscopic bariatric surgery. Conventional closure techniques often prove challenging and may lead to inadequate closure, increasing the risk of TSH. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of a novel omental plug technique for closing trocar sites in laparoscopic bariatric surgery. Methodology:A retrospective study included 256 patients who underwent laparoscopic bariatric surgery (LSG, OAGB, or RYGB) between 2019 and 2023 at Armed Forces Hospital, Taif, Saudi Arabia. We used an innovative omental plug technique to close trocar sites ≥10mm. The primary outcome was the incidence of TSH within 12 months postoperatively, assessed clinically and with an ultrasonography examination. Secondary outcomes included wound infections, seroma formation, and reoperation for trocar site complications. Results:We observed no cases of TSH, indicating significant efficacy in preventing this complication. Other postoperative complications were minimal, with only one case (0.4%) of a superficial wound infection. Conclusion:In laparoscopic bariatric surgery, the omental plug technique demonstrated promising results in preventing TSH and reducing postoperative complications. Its ease of use, safety profile, and potential biological advantages suggest it may be a valuable alternative to traditional fascial closure methods. We warrant future larger, multicentric studies with longer follow-up to confirm these findings.

Positive end-expiratory pressure and emergence preoxygenation after bariatric surgery: A randomised controlled trial on postoperative oxygenation.

Positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) is important to increase lung volume and counteract airway closure during anaesthesia, especially in obese patients. However, maintaining PEEP during emergence preoxygenation might increase postoperative atelectasis by allowing susceptible lung areas to be filled with highly absorbable oxygen that gets entrapped when small airways collapse due to the sudden loss of PEEP at extubation. This study aimed to test the hypothesis that withdrawing PEEP just before emergence preoxygenation would better maintain postoperative oxygenation. Prospective, randomised controlled trial. Single centre secondary hospital in Sweden between December 2019 and January 2023. A total of 60 patients, with body mass index between 35 and 50 kg m -2 , undergoing laparoscopic bariatric surgery. Intraoperative ventilation was the same for all patients with a fixed PEEP of 12 or 14 cmH 2 O depending on body mass index. No recruitment manoeuvres were used. After surgery, patients were allocated to maintained PEEP or zero PEEP during emergence preoxygenation. The primary outcome was change in oxygenation from before awakening to 45 min postoperatively as measured by estimated venous admixture calculated from arterial blood gases. Both groups had impaired oxygenation postoperatively; in the group with PEEP maintained during awakening, estimated venous admixture increased by mean 9.1%, and for the group with zero PEEP during awakening, estimated venous admixture increased by mean 10.6%, difference -1.5% (95% confidence interval -4.6 to 1.7%), P = 0.354. Throughout anaesthesia, both groups exhibited low driving pressures and superior oxygenation compared with the awake state. Withdrawing PEEP before emergence preoxygenation, did not alter early postoperative oxygenation in obese patients undergoing laparoscopic bariatric surgery. Intraoperative oxygenation was excellent despite using fixed PEEP and no recruitment manoeuvres, but deteriorated after extubation, indicating a need for future studies aimed at improving the emergence procedure. www.clinicaltrials.gov , NCT04150276. Registration date: 4 November 2019. Principal investigator: Erland Östberg.

Interpersonal differences in postoperative pain scores after bariatric surgery: a systematic review

Background: Despite intensive and better multimodal pain management schemes during bariatric surgery, many obese patients still experience severe early postoperative pain. Furthermore, postoperative pain varies considerably between patients who undergo the same kind of surgery. The main purpose of this study is to investigate psychological and demographic predictors for interpersonal differences of acute postoperative pain after laparoscopic bariatric surgery. Methods: A search of Pubmed, Web of Science, Cochrane database, PsycARTICLES, Google Scholar from 2008 to 2023 was conducted with the following search criteria: psychological, psychometric, catastrophizing, anxiety, pain, fear, stress, depression, vulnerability, self-efficacy, somatization, perception, bariatric surgery and postoperative pain. Results: Younger age, higher ASA physical status, higher educational level, pre-existing anxiety, pre-existing depression and pre-existing alexithymia may contribute to interpersonal differences in acute postoperative pain scores after bariatric surgery. Conclusion: Limited evidence exists on demographic and psychological factors. Further research is warranted to clarify these demographic and psychological predictors of acute postoperative pain in bariatric surgery to provide a more effective intervention and perioperative care.

Postoperative pulmonary complications in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease undergoing primary laparoscopic bariatric surgery: an MBSAQIP analysis

BackgroundRecent research has shown beneficial effects of bariatric surgery (BaS) on the risk of developing acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). However, this patient population may be at increased risk of complications, especially postoperative pulmonary complications (PPC). ObjectivesTo analyze the incidence of PPC in patients with COPD undergoing BaS. SettingAcademic Hospital, United States. MethodsWe performed a retrospective analysis of the Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program database for patients aged ≥18 years undergoing laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass during 2015–2019. The primary outcome of the study was any PPC, defined as a composite variable including postoperative pneumonia, mechanical ventilation >48 hours and unplanned endotracheal intubation. A univariate analysis was performed to compare patients with and without COPD, and a multivariate logistic regression was performed to adjust for confounders. A subgroup analysis was performed to compare endpoints in patients with COPD with or without home oxygen requirements. ResultsA total of 752,722 patients were included in our analysis (laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy = 73.2%, Roux-en-Y gastric bypass = 26.8%). PPC occurred in 2390 patients, 0.3% without COPD versus 1.3% with COPD (P < .001). Multivariable analysis confirmed that COPD independently increases the risk of PPC (OR = 1.7, CI = 1.4–2.1). Subgroup analysis showed that patients who are oxygen dependent had a much higher risk for PPC (2.4% versus 1.1%, P < .001). ConclusionPPC are higher among patients with obesity and concomitant COPD. Oxygen dependency confers an even higher complication rate. The risk and benefits of BaS in this population must be carefully addressed.

Costs of Robotic and Laparoscopic Bariatric Surgery: A Retrospective Propensity Score-matched Analysis.

Robotic bariatric surgery has not shown significant advantages compared to laparoscopy, yet costs remain a major concern. The aim of our study was to assess costs of robotic and laparoscopic bariatric surgery. We retrospectively collected data of all patients who underwent either robotic or laparoscopic bariatric surgery at our institution. We retrieved demographics, clinical characteristics, postoperative data, and costs using a bottom-up approach. The primary endpoint was hospital costs in the robotic and laparoscopic groups. Data was analyzed using a propensity score matching. Out of the total 122 patients enrolled in the study, 42 were subsequently chosen based on propensity scores, with 21 patients allocated to each group. No difference in clinical characteristics and postoperative outcomes were noted. Length of hospital stay was 2.4 ± 0.7days vs. 2.6 ± 1.1days (p = 0.520). In the robotic and laparoscopic groups, total costs were USD 16,275 ± 4018 vs. 12,690 ± 2834 (absolute difference USD 3585, 95%CI 1416-5753, p = 0.002), direct costs were USD 5037 ± 1282 vs. 3720 ± 1308 (absolute difference USD 1316, 95% CI 509-2214, p = 0.002), and indirect costs were USD 11,238 ± 3234 vs. 8970 ± 3021 (absolute difference USD 2,268, 95% CI 317-4220, p = 0.024). Subgroup analyses revealed a decreasing trend in the cost difference in patients undergoing primary gastric bypass and revisional surgery. Overall hospital costs were higher in patients operated on with the robotic system than with laparoscopy, yet a clinical advantage has not been demonstrated so far. Subgroup analyses showed lesser disparity in costs among patients undergoing revisional bariatric surgery, where robotics are likely to be more worthwhile.

Preoperative Atelectasis in Patients with Obesity Undergoing Bariatric Surgery: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Pulmonary atelectasis is present even before surgery in patients with obesity. We aimed to estimate the prevalence and extension of preoperative atelectasis in patients with obesity undergoing bariatric surgery and to determine if variation in preoperative Spo2 values in the seated position at room air is explained by the extent of atelectasis coverage in the supine position. This was a cross-sectional study in a single center specialized in laparoscopic bariatric surgery. Preoperative chest computed tomographies were reassessed by a senior radiologist to quantify the extent of atelectasis coverage as a percentage of total lung volume. Patients were classified as having atelectasis when the affection was ≥2.5%, to estimate the prevalence of atelectasis. Crude and adjusted prevalence ratios (aPRs) and odds ratios (aORs) were obtained to assess the relative prevalence of atelectasis and percentage coverage, respectively, with increasing obesity category. Inverse probability weighting was used to assess the total, direct (not mediated), and indirect (mediated through atelectasis) effects of body mass index (BMI) on preoperative Spo2, and to quantify the magnitude of mediation (proportion mediated). E-values were calculated, to represent the minimum magnitude of association that an unmeasured confounder with the same directionality of the effect should have to drive the observed point estimates or lower confidence intervals (CIs) to 1, respectively. In 236 patients with a median BMI of 40.3 kg/m2 (interquartile range [IQR], 34.6-46.0, range: 30.0-77.3), the overall prevalence of atelectasis was 32.6% (95% CI, 27.0-38.9) and by BMI category: 30 to 35 kg/m2, 12.7% (95% CI, 6.1-24.4); 35 to 40 kg/m2, 28.3% (95% CI, 17.2-42.6); 40 to 45 kg/m2, 12.3% (95% CI, 5.5-24.3); 45 to 50 kg/m2, 48.4% (95% CI, 30.6-66.6); and ≥50 units, 100% (95% CI, 86.7-100). Compared to the 30 to 35 kg/m2 group, only the categories with BMI ≥45 kg/m2 had significantly higher relative prevalence of atelectasis-45 to 50 kg/m2, aPR = 3.52 (95% CI, 1.63-7.61, E-value lower bound: 2.64) and ≥50 kg/m2, aPR = 8.0 (95% CI, 4.22-15.2, E-value lower bound: 7.91)-and higher odds of greater atelectasis percentage coverage: 45-50 kg/m2, aOR = 7.5 (95% CI, 2.7-20.9) and ≥50 kg/m2, aOR = 91.5 (95% CI, 30.0-279.3). Atelectasis percent alone explained 70.2% of the variation in preoperative Spo2. The proportion of the effect of BMI on preoperative Spo2 values <96% mediated through atelectasis was 81.5% (95% CI, 56.0-100). The prevalence and extension of atelectasis increased with higher BMI, being significantly higher at BMI ≥45 kg/m2. Preoperative atelectasis mediated the effect of BMI on Spo2 at room air in the seated position.

Optimizing esketamine administration for postoperative depression: a comprehensive study on laparoscopic bariatric surgery patients.

Previous studies have reported conflicting findings regarding the efficacy of esketamine in managing postoperative depression. While the positive effects of subanesthetic doses esketamine have been observed in treatment-resistant depression, the response to this medication in patients experiencing depression following surgery has not been consistent. Building upon the known impact of anesthesia on brain function, we have formulated a hypothesis suggesting that the timing of esketamine administration in relation to anesthesia may significantly affect its efficacy in managing postoperative depression. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of esketamine administered at different time points before and after anesthesia. Our randomized, double-blind, controlled study involved 120 patients undergoing laparoscopic bariatric surgery, randomly divided into three groups. Group Post- ESK received an intravenous injection of esketamine at a dose of 0.2mg/kg after anesthesia induction. Group Pre- ESK received the same esketamine dosage 2h prior to anesthesia induction. Group Placebo served as the control group and received a 0.9% saline solution after induction. The primary outcome measures of the study were depression scores as measured by Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) and plasma brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) levels. On the first postoperative day, the PHQ-9 scores, incidence and severity of postoperative depression in the Pre-ESK group were significantly lower than those in the Post-ESK and placebo groups (P < 0.05). Additionally, plasma BDNF levels in the Pre-ESK group were significantly higher than those in the Post-ESK and placebo groups (P < 0.05). Notably, there was a negative correlation between PHQ-9 scores and plasma BDNF levels. Our study supports the potential for subanesthetic dose esketamine to alleviate postoperative depression symptoms following laparoscopic bariatric surgery, and anesthetic drugs have a significant effect on its efficacy. The use of subanesthetic dose esketamine after anesthesia does not improve postoperative depression symptoms in patients undergoing laparoscopic bariatric surgery, while the use of sub-anesthetic dose esketamine before anesthesia can improve postoperative depression symptoms.

Positive end-expiratory pressure and postoperative pulmonary complications in laparoscopic bariatric surgery: systematic review and meta-analysis

BackgroundThis study compares the effect of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) on postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs) in patients with obesity undergoing laparoscopic bariatric surgery (LBS) under general anesthesia with mechanical ventilation.MethodsA comprehensive search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, China National Knowledge Internet, Wanfang database, and Google Scholar for studies published up to July 29, 2023, without time or language restrictions. The search terms included “PEEP,” “laparoscopic,” and “bariatric surgery.” Randomized controlled trials comparing different levels of PEEP or PEEP with zero-PEEP (ZEEP) in patients with obesity undergoing LBS were included. The primary outcome was a composite of PPCs, and the secondary outcomes were intraoperative oxygenation, respiratory compliance, and mean arterial pressure (MAP). A fixed-effect or random-effect model was selected for meta-analysis based on the heterogeneity of the included studies.ResultsThirteen randomized controlled trials with a total of 708 participants were included for analysis. No statistically significant difference in PPCs was found between the PEEP and ZEEP groups (risk ratio = 0.27, 95% CI: 0.05–1.60; p = 0.15). However, high PEEP ≥ 10 cm H2O significantly decreased PPCs compared with low PEEP < 10 cm H2O (risk ratio = 0.20, 95% CI: 0.05–0.89; p = 0.03). The included studies showed no significant heterogeneity (I2 = 20% & 0%). Compared with ZEEP, PEEP significantly increased intraoperative oxygenation and respiratory compliance (WMD = 74.97 mm Hg, 95% CI: 41.74-108.21; p < 0.001 & WMD = 9.40 ml cm H2O− 1, 95% CI: 0.65–18.16; p = 0.04). High PEEP significantly improved intraoperative oxygenation and respiratory compliance during pneumoperitoneum compared with low PEEP (WMD = 66.81 mm Hg, 95% CI: 25.85-107.78; p = 0.001 & WMD = 8.03 ml cm H2O− 1, 95% CI: 4.70-11.36; p < 0.001). Importantly, PEEP did not impair hemodynamic status in LBS.ConclusionsIn patients with obesity undergoing LBS, high PEEP ≥ 10 cm H2O could decrease PPCs compared with low PEEP < 10 cm H2O, while there was a similar incidence of PPCs between PEEP (8–10 cm H2O) and the ZEEP group. The application of PEEP in ventilation strategies increased intraoperative oxygenation and respiratory compliance without affecting intraoperative MAP. A PEEP of at least 10 cm H2O is recommended to reduce PPCs in patients with obesity undergoing LBS.Registration numberCRD42023391178 in PROSPERO.

Postoperative pain trajectory and opioid requirements after laparoscopic bariatric surgery: a single-centre historical cohort study.

Concerns around delayed emergence and opioid-induced ventilatory impairment in bariatric surgery can lead to intraoperative reliance on short-acting opioids and avoidance of long-acting analgesics with potential sedative effects. Nevertheless, an overly-conservative intraoperative analgesic strategy may result in significant pain at emergence and higher opioid requirements in later phases of care. We sought to establish the pattern of intraoperative analgesic use in bariatric surgical patients as well as their postoperative pain trajectory and opioid requirements. We undertook a single-centre historical cohort study. We explored associations between intraoperative analgesic interventions and pain scores and opioid requirements in postanesthesia care units (PACUs), and associations between the quality of analgesia at emergence and subsequent pain and patient-centred recovery outcomes. We extracted perioperative data for 939 patients who underwent bariatric metabolic surgery between January 2018 and October 2019. Only 39% of patients received long-acting opioids intraoperatively and there was minimal use of nonopioid analgesic adjuncts. Nearly 80% of patients reported moderate-to-severe pain on PACU arrival; 97% of patients received intravenous opioids for rescue analgesia (mean dose, 31mg oral morphine equivalents). Lower pain scores at PACU admission and discharge were associated with subsequent lower inpatient pain scores, lower opioid requirements, shorter time to ambulation, and shorter length of hospital stay. In bariatric surgical patients, effective intraoperative analgesic strategies that improve early pain control may have an impact on recovery and pain experience. Judicious use of intraoperative opioids coupled with opioid-sparing multimodal analgesic techniques should be considered and balanced against concerns regarding opioid-related adverse effects in this patient population.

Safety and Efficacy of Barbed Sutures Compared to Non-barbed Sutures in Bariatric Surgery: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Mastering intracorporeal suturing is challenging in the evolution from conventional to laparoscopic bariatric surgery. Among various techniques competing for superiority in overcoming this hurdle, we focus on exploring the potential of barbed sutures through a meta-analysis that compares outcomes to those of conventional non-barbed sutures in bariatric surgery. We conducted a comprehensive search on PubMed, Scopus, and Embase to identify studies comparing barbed sutures with non-barbed sutures in bariatric surgeries, focusing on outcomes such as operative time, suturing time, postoperative complications, and hospital stay. The statistical analysis was carried out using RStudio version 4.3.2. Heterogeneity was assessed using the Cochrane Q test and I2 statistics. Incorporating data from 11 studies involving a total of 27,442 patients, including 3,516 in the barbed suture group across various bariatric surgeries, our analysis demonstrates a significant reduction in suturing time (mean difference -4.87; 95% CI -8.43 to -1.30; p < 0.01; I2 = 99%) associated with the use of barbed sutures. Specifically, in Roux-en-Y gastric bypass, we observed a significant decrease in operative time (mean difference -12.11; 95% CI -19.27 to -4.95; p < 0.01; I2 = 93%). Subgroup analyses and leave-one-out analyses consistently supported these findings. Furthermore, we found that the mean body mass index did not significantly predict the mean difference in operative time outcome. No significant differences emerged in hospital stay or postoperative complications, including leak, bleeding, stenosis, and bowel obstruction (p > 0.05). Our study findings address barbed sutures as a potential alternative for laparoscopic intracorporeal suturing in bariatric surgery.

Effect of modified opioid sparing anaesthesia on postoperative quality of recovery in patients undergoing laparoscopic bariatric surgery: protocol for a monocentre, double-blind randomised controlled trial – the MOSA study

IntroductionObesity patients undergoing laparoscopic bariatric surgery (LBS) are frequently encountered perioperative adverse events related to opioids-based anaesthesia (OBA) or opioids-free anaesthesia (OFA). While modified opioid-sparing anaesthesia (MOSA) has been shown...

Comparison of sevoflurane and propofol in combination with remifentanil on the quality of postoperative recovery in patients undergoing laparoscopic bariatric surgery.

This study aimed to evaluate and compare the effects of sevoflurane + remifentanil (Sev + Rem) and propofol + remifentanil (Pro + Rem) on the postoperative recovery quality of patients undergoing laparoscopic bariatric surgery to determine which anesthesia regimen provides a better overall recovery experience. Sixty patients were divided into two groups based on the treatments they underwent: Sev + Rem (n = 30) and Pro + Rem (n = 30). The Sev + Rem group received sevoflurane inhalation (0.5%, increasing to 0.5-4%) and remifentanil via target-controlled infusion. The Pro + Rem group received propofol [4-8 mg/(kg·h)] and remifentanil via target-controlled infusion. Anesthesia depth was maintained at a bispectral index of 40-60 in both groups. Perioperative data, hemodynamic parameters, and postoperative recovery quality were assessed. Compared to the Pro + Rem group, the dose of remifentanil in the Sev + Rem group was significantly lower (1693.67 ± 331.75 vs. 2,959 ± 359.77, p < 0.001), the proportion of patients used norepinephrine was markedly higher [16 (53.33) vs. 8 (26.67), p = 0.035], and the time of extubation was earlier (356.33 ± 63.17 vs. 400.3 ± 50.11, p = 0.004). The Hemodynamic results showed the HR in the Sev + Rem group was faster than that in the Pro + Rem group at the beginning of surgery and 1 h post-surgery (67.37 ± 4.40 vs. 64.33 ± 4.44, p = 0.010, 69.07 ± 4.23 vs. 66.40 ± 5.03, p = 0.030). In regard to the assessment of postoperative recovery quality, the emotional state scores in the Sev + Rem group were significantly lower than the Pro + Rem group (36.83 ± 2.79 vs. 39.50 ± 4.64, p = 0.009). The two anesthesia modalities (Sev + Rem and Pro + Rem) have their advantages and disadvantages for patients undergoing laparoscopic bariatric surgery and have comparable effects on postoperative recovery quality.

Robotic-Assisted and Laparoscopic Bariatric Surgeries Still Have Clinically Comparable Outcomes

PurposeBariatric surgery is considered the main treatment option for patients with severe obesity. The objective of our study is to compare intra- and postoperative outcomes between the robotic and laparoscopic approaches within the sleeve gastrectomy (SG), duodenal switch (DS), and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB).Materials and MethodsThe data from the MBSAQIP were collected for patients who underwent SG, DS, and RYGB between 2015 and 2021. The postoperative and procedural outcomes including 30-day morbidity and mortality as well as operation length were analyzed using regression models.ResultsOur analysis included 1,178,886 surgeries with SG comprising the majority (70%) followed by RYGB (28%) and DS (1%). Other than a higher adjusted risk of unplanned reoperation for robotic RYGB (relative risk (RR) 1.07) and a statistically significant higher rate of postoperative wound disruption in robotic SG for robotic surgery (RR 1.56), there were no statistically significant between-approach differences including infection, wound disruption, death, or reoperation for DS, RYGB, or SG. Our data showed no significant difference in anastomotic leak rate between laparoscopic and robotic approaches in either the DS (p = 0.521) or RYGB (p = 0.800) procedures. Across our study period, the median operation lengths decreased significantly per year for both the robotic SG and DS.ConclusionsRobotic and laparoscopic bariatric surgical procedures have statistically similar 30-day patient outcomes. Robotic bariatric procedures do have significantly longer median operative times than laparoscopic procedures. The decision to use a robotic approach or laparoscopic approach should be made based upon surgeon experience and possibly cost.Graphical

Fast-track Effectiveness in Abdominal Surgery (Literature Review)

The study aimed to evaluate the literature on fast-track laparoscopic bariatric surgery (LRYGB and LAGB) to determine its feasibility and safety. Articles from PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library discussing next-day discharge for LRYGB and same-day discharge for LAGB were analyzed. The review included 13 studies with evidence levels of 3b or 4, comprising seven studies on LAGB, five on LRYGB, and one on both. The next-day discharge rate for LRYGB ranged from 81% to 100%, and the same-day discharge rate for LAGB ranged from 76% to 98%. Complication, readmission, and mortality rates were comparable to conventional care. The results indicate that fast-track management of LRYGB and LAGB is feasible with careful patient selection and preparation in high-volume centers, potentially offering cost benefits. However, further studies are needed to confirm the safety and cost-effectiveness of this approach outside specialized bariatric units.

Effect of Intraoperative Lung Recruitment and Transversus Abdominis Plane Block in Laparoscopic Bariatric Surgery on Postoperative Lung Functions: A Randomized Controlled Study

Abstract Background Morbid obesity may cause a restrictive condition. general anesthesia (GA) and supine posture both result in a decrease in lung capacity and Functional residual capacity (FRC), encouraging the development of atelectasis, altering the ventilation/perfusion ratio and raising the pulmonary shunt. This study evaluated the impact of recruitment maneuver (RM) and Transversus Abdominis Plane (TAP) block performed during laparoscopic bariatric surgery on spirometry, oxygenation, hemodynamic variables, opioid requirements and pain score assessed after surgery. Methods This pilot prospective randomized controlled study included 80 patients scheduled for elective laparoscopic bariatric surgeries (e.g., laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy, and laparoscopic gastric bypass) under GA. Patients were divided into four equal groups. All patients had received standardized postoperative analgesia regimen, group I (control group), group II received TAP block after intubation and before surgical incision, group III received RM after intubation and after pneumoperitoneal exsufflation, and group IV received RM after intubation and after pneumoperitoneal exsufflation and TAP block after intubation and before surgical incision. Results Forced Vital Capacity “FVC”, Forced Expiratory Volume “FEV1” were found to be significantly higher after operation in group IV compared to other groups. FEV1/FVC was insignificantly different among the four groups before and after operation. Intraoperative PaO2, PaO2/FiO2 were significantly higher in group III and IV compared to other groups. Numerical rating scale (NRS) at 1, 2, 4, 6 and 12hr had significantly decreased in group II and IV compared to other groups. Heart rate (HR) and mean arterial blood pressure (MAP) were insignificantly different among the four groups. Morphine consumption was significantly lower in group II and IV compared to other groups. Conclusions TAP block combined with RM group exhibited better postoperative pulmonary function tests (PFTs). Intraoperative oxygenation was higher in RM groups. NRS and opioid consumption were lower in TAP groups in postoperative period.

Robotics in bariatric surgery: Benefits, limitation, and challenges

The greatest long-term alternative for treating obese people is now bariatric and metabolic surgery, a relatively new surgical technique. Mason and Ito used Roux-en-Y gastric bypass techniques to accomplish the first bariatric surgery, RYGB, in 1967. Evidence since then has indicated stable weight loss, correction of obesity-related comorbidities, and low rates of morbidity and death. With perioperative benefits for patients, including shorter hospital stays, less discomfort, and faster recovery times, laparoscopy has emerged as the gold standard for the majority of bariatric surgery operations. However, there are technological limitations to traditional laparoscopy, including space restrictions and a thick abdominal wall. Metabolic syndrome is frequently present in obese people, and can complicate anesthesia and increase the risk of complications following surgery. According to recent studies, laparoscopic bariatric surgery can have complication rates of up to 20% and leakage rates of up to 5.1%. The clinical results of bariatric surgery may be improved by new technology. Robotic devices can help patients heal more quickly, experience less pain, spend less time in the hospital, and manipulate tissue more precisely and deftly in hard-to-reach areas. This study intends to examine the existing data supporting the use of robots in bariatric surgery in comparison to traditional laparoscopy, as well as the accompanying expenses and learning curve. For patients who are obese, robotic surgery is a viable option since it promotes faster recovery, less pain, and shorter hospital stays. Robotic surgery can lead to a quicker recovery, less pain, and more dexterity and accuracy in difficult-to-reach anatomical regions.