Laparoendoscopic Single-site Technique Research Articles

Ergonomic learning curves on gynecological laparoendoscopic single-site (LESS) surgery

BackgroundFew previous studies have introduced general techniques to overcome the “chopstick effect” in laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (LESS). We aim to investigate and highlight the key ergonomic methodologies for gynaecologic LESS based on the surgeon’s hands-on performance.MethodsThe first author surgeon A reviewed and analyzed the LESS procedures performed by herself and how she taught surgeon B from January 2021 to April 2022. The procedures were classified based on technical difficulty and learning periods, and the hands-on technical skills of LESS module were evaluated.ResultsSurgeon A conducted 580 LESS procedures, which were divided into the novice (n = 48) and intermediate (n = 33) periods, and the remaining cases were included in the routine period. We formed a special ergonomic LESS operating methodology: Maintain good LESS laparoscopic spatial sensation, keep hand-eye coordination, well cooperation between the main surgeon and the assistant; Experienced multiport laparoscopy surgery (MPS) skills, improve basic LESS technique: grasp, lift, transfer, place, blunt separating, coagulation and cutting. Coordination location, orientation, movements, and flexion or extension of shoulders, arms, elbow, wrist and finger joints; Maintain strength, tension and ambidexterity postures with joint and muscular efforts to control instruments. Surgeon B learned the above experiences by performing 39 LESS procedures under the guidance of surgeon A.ConclusionThis educational research sheds light on the common challenges faced in LESS and presents the importance of ergonomic hands-on performance skills in improving surgical outcomes, which could serve as a guide for future training and education in LESS.

Laparoendoscopic Single-Site Technique Contrasted with Conventional Laparoscopy in Cystectomy for Benign Ovarian Cysts

To compare the laparoendoscopic single-site (LESS) technique with conventional laparoscopy in cystectomy for benign ovarian cysts. A retrospective analysis was performed at Yixing People's Hospital from April 2020 until December 2021. Thirty-seven patients using the LESS technique were compared with a control group of 45 patients who underwent a traditional laparoscopic ovarian cystectomy. There was no statistically significant difference in the perioperative hemoglobin level changes, cyst rupture rate, postoperative recovery of exhausting time, or pain score at 24 hours after surgery between the 2 groups (P > 0.05). The mean operating time was significantly longer in the LESS group than that of the control group (88.38 ± 30.57 minutes vs 59.44 ± 24.22 minutes; P = 0.001). However, the length of postoperative hospital stay was significantly shorter in the LESS group (3.70 ± 0.57 days vs 4.38 ± 0.86 days; P = 0.001). In addition, total hospitalization expenses were higher in the LESS group (14,709.78 ± 1618.63 yuan vs 12,676.73 ± 1411.78 yuan; P = .001) and the satisfaction score was also significantly higher in the LESS group (z = -2.272; P = 0.023). After a follow-up time of 12 to 24 months, no patient in either group showed wound infection, umbilical hernia, or recurrent cysts. The LESS technique for benign ovarian cystectomy is safe, feasible, and equally effective compared with the multiport laparoscopic oophorocystectomy. Although it currently costs more, patients with benign ovarian cysts are highly satisfied with the LESS technique.

Retroperitoneoscopic debridement and internal fixation for the treatment of lumbar tuberculosis.

To describe the retroperitoneoscopic debridement technique and evaluate the clinical outcome of internal fixation for the treatment of lumbar tuberculosis.Twenty-eight patients were performed conventional laparoendoscopic technique (n = 17) or laparoendoscopic single-site technique (n = 11). Antituberculosis chemotherapy and thoracolumbosacral orthosis were given to all patients. The clinical outcomes were evaluated with preoperative and postoperative Visual Analog Scale, and radiographs with respect to sagittal angle and fusion status.Average time of the 28 procedures was 220.6 ± 50.9 min (180–365 min). The average intraoperative blood loss was 108.6 ± 95.3 mL (50–400 mL). All patients showed significant improvement of their Visual Analog Scale back pain score at follow-up and were classified as having a radiographic fusion in this study. The mean sagittal angle was 11.2 ± 3.6° before operation, significantly improved to 3.7 ± 2.4° after operation. There were no recurrent infections during the follow-up period. Complications included loosening of anterior fixation and temporary deficit of the sympathetic nerve.Retroperitoneal laparoscopic approach with CO2 insufflation technique is a challenging but safe and effective procedure for lumbar spine tuberculosis. Retroperitoneal laparoendoscopic single-site can be used for anterior lumbar spine surgery, offer exposure for L1 through L5.

Laparoendoscopic Single-Site Hysterectomy: A Single Surgeon Experience in a Tertiary Hospital

Objective: To evaluate the clinical and surgical outcomes of the total hysterectomy cases performed with the laparoendoscopic single site surgery.Study Design: A total of 24 women who underwent total hysterectomy by the laparoendoscopic single site technique due to benign gynecological disorders were retrospectively evaluated. The duration of the operation, estimated blood loss, weight of the uterus, intra- and postoperative complications, pre- and postoperative day 1 hemoglobin and hematocrit levels, postoperative 6- and 24-hour visual analogue scale scores, duration of hospital stay, and postoperative complications were evaluated.Results: The mean total operation time was 112.1±24 minutes. The average time between the umbilical incision and starting the hysterectomy was 10±2.1 minutes. Estimated blood loss was 50±25 ml. The average duration of the hospital stay was 1.5±0.4 days. The mean uterus weight was 135 g. The mean difference between the pre- and postoperative hemoglobin values was 1.1 g/dl. The mean visual analogue scale scores were 4.1 (0-7) and 1.9 (0-4) in 6- and 24-hour postoperative periods. None of the women had an intraoperative complication. One patient (4.2%) had a port site hernia 6 months after the operation.Conclusion: The total hysterectomy with laparoendoscopic single site technique is a reasonable method in selected patients with similar safety and feasibility, especially for women who prefer a single incision in umbilicus. The patient should be informed before the operation about potential complications such as a port-site hernia.

Comparison of laparoendoscopic single-site (LESS) surgery and conventional multiport laparoscopic (CMPL) surgery for hysterectomy: long-term outcomes of abdominal incisional scar

There is scarcity of data about the long-term results such as port-site hernia, body image scale and cosmesis scale outcomes between laparoendoscopic single-site (LESS) surgery and conventional multiport laparoscopy (CMPL) for hysterectomy. Eighty women, who underwent total hysterectomy by the LESS (n = 40) and CMPL (n = 40) technique due to benign and malign gynecological disorders, were evaluated with a cosmesis and body image questionnaire in an age-matched cohort study.Median follow-up time was 25 (6–30) months in both groups. The mean age of the patients was 49.3 ± 6.3 years. The mean body image scale scores were 5.3 ± 0.6 and 5.5 ± 1.2 in the LESS and CMPL groups, respectively (p = 0.268). The mean cosmesis and scar scale scores were significantly higher in the LESS group compared to the CMPL group (p = .011 and p < .001, respectively). Port-site hernia was detected in two patients in the LESS group, but not in the CMPL group. There was no cuff dehiscence in the LESS nor in the CMPL group. The LESS technique provides better cosmesis when compared with the CMPL technique. The body image perceptions in the two groups were similar. Women who wish to undergo the LESS surgery should be informed about the risk of incisional hernia.Impact statementWhat is already known on this subject? Short-term results of LESS hysterectomy such as complication rates, additional port requirement, conversion to CMPL or laparotomy, pain score and analgesic use were evaluated in various studies. Several studies have been published on the safety and efficacy of single-port laparoscopic hysterectomy (LH); however, it has been unclear whether single-port LH offers benefits over multiport LH regarding long-term patient satisfaction and cosmetic satisfaction.What do the results of this study add? In this prospective cohort study, we aimed to compare long-term results (at least six months) of abdominal incisional scar between LESS and CMPL surgery for hysterectomy. The LESS technique provides better cosmesis when compared with the CMPL technique, although, the body image perceptions in the two groups were similar.What are the implications of these findings for clinical practice and/or further research? LESS technique can be offered as an option for hysterectomy since it provides better long-term cosmesis compared to CMPL.

Comparative study of hybrid laparoendoscopic single-site (LESS) partial nephrectomy and conventional multiport laparoscopy

ObjectiveTo investigate the surgical and oncological outcomes of hybrid laparoendoscopic single-site (LESS) in partial nephrectomy with reusable components compared with multiport laparoscopy. Material and methodHybrid LESS technique with auxiliary 3.5mm trocar (n=20) was compared with conventional multiport laparoscopy (n=26) by a prospective, paired, nonrandomized, and comparative study in partially nephrectomized patients. ResultsFollow-up average was 31±18.6 months. In one case, LESS was converted to laparoscopy. No differences were found regarding age, sex, body mass index, laterality, localization, tumor size or use of double J stent. Dominance of Loop-I (P=0.09) and benign histology (P=0.05) were observed in the LESS group. Neither there were differences regarding operating time, ischemia time, use of hemostatic materials, estimated blood loss, postoperative hemoglobin levels, transfusion or other complications. In any case, to extend the skin incision for specimen extraction was not necessary. Drainage time (P=0.006) and hospital stay (P=0.003) were better in LESS patients. Concerning complications, no significant differences were observed according Clavien-Dindo scale. In laparoscopic group one patient died of pulmonary embolism after hospital discharge. No positive margins were observed in any case. During follow-up neither tumor recurrence nor disease progression were observed. ConclusionsRegarding surgical outcomes, partial nephrectomy by LESS technique does not imply improvements, excepting shorter hospital stay, probably due to accurate surgical hemostasis and/or selection of cases. No surgical and oncological risks are involved, as well as no improvement in ischemia time, blood loss or transfusion rate. We find no significant difference in cosmetic outcomes.

A Laparoendoscopic Single-site Surgical Approach to Laparoscopic Salpingectomy

Study ObjectiveTo demonstrate a laparoendoscopic single-site (LESS) surgical approach to salpingectomy. DesignA technical video showing step-by-step a LESS surgical approach to salpingectomy (Canadian Task Force classification level III). Institutional review board approval was not required for this study. SettingOf all gynecologic cancer types, ovarian cancer has the highest mortality rate and is the fifth leading cause of cancer deaths among women [1,2]. The leading theory of epithelial ovarian carcinogenesis indicates that serous, endometrioid, and clear cell ovarian carcinomas originated from the fallopian tube and endometrium and not directly from the ovary itself [1-10]. This has led to the use of prophylactic salpingectomy as a theoretical form of ovarian cancer risk reduction at the time of hysterectomy or as a means of tubal sterilization. Prophylactic salpingectomy does not appear to increase the risk of complications and appears to be safe [2]. Ovarian function does not seem to be compromised by salpingectomy based on serum markers or response rates with in vitro fertilization [11-16]. A LESS approach may reduce the morbidity associated with the placement of multiple ports and can improve cosmetic outcomes. Prophylactic LESS bilateral salpingo-oohorectomy was shown to be feasible and safe for high-risk patients for ovarian cancer [17]. InterventionsLaparoscopic salpingectomy at the time of hysterectomy or as a means of tubal sterilization using the LESS technique. ConclusionThis is a simple and reproducible technique for preventing major complications associated with LESS salpingectomy. This approach permits easier specimen retrieval because of the large solitary incision that is made. There is a significant improvement in cosmetic satisfaction when compared with a traditional laparoscopic approach in the setting of prophylactic risk reduction surgery [18].

Current status of robotic single-port surgery.

Robotic-assisted laparoscopic surgery in urology is an ever progressing field, and boundaries are constantly broken with the aid of new technology. Advancements in instrumentation have given birth to the era of robotic laparoendoscopic single-site technique (R-LESS). R-LESS however, has not gained widespread acceptance due to technical hurdles such as adequate triangulation, robotic arm clashing, decreased access for the bedside assistant, lack of wrist articulation, continued need for an axillary/accessory port, lack of robust retraction, and ergonomic discomfort. Many innovations have been explored to counter such limitations. We aim to give a brief overview of a history and development of R-LESS urologic surgery and outline the latest advancements in the realm of urologic R-LESS. By searching PubMed selectively for relevant articles, we concluded a literature review. We searched using the keywords: robotic laparoscopic single incision, robotic laparoendoscopic single-site, single incision robotic surgery, and R-LESS. We selected all relevant articles in that pertained to single-site robotic surgery in urology. We selected all relevant articles that pertained to single-site robotic surgery in urology in a table encompassed within this article. The development of the R-LESS procedures, instrumentations, and platforms has been an evolution in progress. Our results showed the history and evolution toward a purpose-built single-port robotic platform that addresses previous limitations to R-LESS. Even though previous studies have shown feasibility with R-LESS, the future of R-LESS depends on the availability of purpose-built robotic platforms. The larger concern is the demonstration of the definitive advantage of single-site over the conventional multiport surgery.

A Challenging Scenario in Laparoendoscopic Single-Site Total Extraperitoneal Hernia Repair After Peritoneal Tear: Single Center Experience

Purpose: Laparoendoscopic single-site (LESS) surgery has flourished in several fields of surgery and is viewed as a challenging surgery technique.1 Peritoneal tear during total extraperitoneal (TEP) hernia repair brings longer operation time and higher rate of conversion.2 Although there were several studies published to discuss the efficiency of LESS TEP hernia repair, they did not share the experience in the management and the result in LESS TEP hernia repair while the peritoneal tear happened.3–12 Here, we demonstrate and share our experience in management of the peritoneal tear while performing LESS TEP hernia repair. Materials and Methods: We demonstrate a 64-year-old male without history of operation who was diagnosed with bilateral inguinal hernia and admitted for scheduled LESS TEP hernia repair. A peritoneal tear was found while using the balloon dilator to create the preperitoneal space. The surgical technique is prescribed and explained in detail in the video. From January 2014 to August 2014, there were 30 patients receiving LESS TEP in our study and all are reviewed in this study. Patients were divided into two groups based on the peritoneal tear or not during the LESS TEP hernia repair. Preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative factors were all recorded. The patients were interviewed at outpatient clinics 1 week after discharge. Results: The total operation time was 90 minutes and there was no recurrence/seroma/hematoma noted during the outpatient clinics follow-up (first week and 3 months after operation). In the retrospective study, demographic data were comparable between the two groups. Eleven of the 30 enrolled patients had a peritoneal injury during operation. The mean operation time was longer in the peritoneal tear group (71.8 ± 27.0 minutes) than in the nonperitoneal tear group (56.2 ± 9.6 minutes) (p = 0.0485). There was no conversion to conventional laparoscopic surgery or open surgery in either group. Postoperative results were comparable between both groups in terms of analgesic requirement, pain score, complications, wound length, and hospital stay. Conclusions: The LESS technique is a feasible and safe technique when peritoneal tear happens during inguinal hernia repair in experienced hands. Although the peritoneal tear usually leads to longer operation time, it did not impair patient's convalescence. No competing financial interests exist. Runtime of video: 6 mins 48 secs

Análisis comparativo entre nefrectomía parcial LESS híbrida y laparoscópica convencional multipuerto

ObjectiveTo investigate the surgical and oncological outcomes of hybrid laparoendoscopic single-site (LESS) in partial nephrectomy with reusable components compared with multiport laparoscopy. Material and methodHybrid LESS technique with auxiliary 3.5mm trocar (n=20) was compared with conventional multiport laparoscopy (n=26) by a prospective, paired, nonrandomized, and comparative study in partially nephrectomized patients. ResultsFollow-up average was 31±18.6 months. In one case, LESS was converted to laparoscopy. No differences were found regarding age, sex, body mass index, laterality, localization, tumor size or use of double J stent. Dominance of Loop-I (P=0.09) and benign histology (P=0.05) were observed in the LESS group. Neither there were differences regarding operating time, ischemia time, use of hemostatic materials, estimated blood loss, postoperative hemoglobin levels, transfusion or other complications. In any case, to extend the skin incision for specimen extraction was not necessary. Drainage time (P=0.006) and hospital stay (P=0.003) were better in LESS patients. Concerning complications, no significant differences were observed according Clavien-Dindo scale. In laparoscopic group one patient died of pulmonary embolism after hospital discharge. No positive margins were observed in any case. During follow-up neither tumor recurrence nor disease progression were observed. ConclusionsRegarding surgical outcomes, partial nephrectomy by LESS technique does not imply improvements, excepting shorter hospital stay, probably due to accurate surgical hemostasis and/or selection of cases. No surgical and oncological risks are involved, as well as no improvement in ischemia time, blood loss or transfusion rate. We find no significant difference in cosmetic outcomes.

An AAGL Task Force Consensus Statement: A Standardized Approach to LESS Hysterectomy

Single incision gynecologic laparoscopy was first described in 1991, but did not really emerge until 2007 as an advanced laparoscopic approach. This approach is known my many different names and acronyms. Laparoendoscopic single site (LESS) surgery is the accepted acronym to describe this advanced approach. The feasibility of LESS for complex surgical procedures is no longer an issue; however, the generalizability of LESS has been questioned, given the above factors and need for advanced laparoscopic skills. More importantly, it may play an essential role in the reproducibility and diffusion of LESS. Information about training and education on LESS is scarce in the current literature. With the support of AAGL, a working group of expert LESS surgeons and educators developed and described a standardized consensus technique for LESS supracervical hysterectomy that can be easily understood, replicated, and is useful in learning the LESS technique.

Pediatric Varicocelectomy: A Comparative Study of Conventional Laparoscopic and Laparoendoscopic Single-Site Approaches

Laparoscopy is a common approach to manage varicoceles in both the adult and pediatric population. The purpose of this study is to report our experience and compare outcomes between conventional laparoscopy and laparoendoscopic single-site (LESS) surgery for varicocelectomy in the pediatric population. A retrospective cohort study was performed of all patients who underwent conventional laparoscopic varicocelectomy (LV) and laparoendoscopic single-site varicocelectomy (LESSV) at a single pediatric institution from December 2007 to March 2012. Patient demographics, intraoperative details, narcotic use, and complications were reviewed. LV was performed in 32 patients and LESSV in 11 patients. None had conversion to open surgery. Median age was 16 years for LV (range 12-23) and 15 years for LESSV (range 12-20), P=0.061. Median operative time was 55 minutes for LV (range 28-90) and 46 minutes for LESSV (range 33-59), P=0.037. Nine (81.8%) patients in the LESSV group and 10 (31.2%) patients in the LV group were administered narcotics in the recovery room, P=0.005. One (3.1%) patient in the LV group was administered ketorolac in the recovery room, P=1. Five patients in each group, LESSV (45.5%) and LV (15.6%), received acetaminophen in the recovery room, P=0.092. All procedures were performed on an outpatient basis except for one because of a concomitant procedure. Median follow-up was 22 months in LV and 15 months in LESSV, P=0.015. One (3.1%) postoperative hydrocele was noted after LV and 1 (9.1%) after LESSV, P=0.451. All varicoceles were clinically resolved in both groups. LESSV is comparable to LV in the pediatric population. Our initial experience indicates that the LESS approach may be more painful in the immediate postoperative period than conventional laparoscopy. The LESS technique warrants further evaluation to determine if one approach is clearly more advantageous.

LaparoEndoscopic Single Site Orchidopexy for Intra-Abdominal Testes in the Pediatric Population with a Multichannel Single Port and Flexible Tip Laparoscope

To assess the outcomes of pediatric LaparoEndoscopic Single Site (LESS) orchidopexy using a commercially available multi-channel single port (MCSP) and flexible tip laparoscope (FTL). A retrospective cohort study was performed of children who underwent LESS orchidopexy by a single surgeon at a pediatric institution. A commercially available MCSP was utilized at the umbilicus. A 5 mm FTL and 3 mm and 5 mm instruments were used for the dissection. Follow-up visits were performed 2-4 weeks and 6-12 months after surgery to assess position and size of the testes. A total of 17 patients were identified. Median age was 11 months (range 3-43). Sixteen patients underwent primary orchidopexy, including two bilateral procedures and five primary Fowler-Stephens (FS) procedures. One patient underwent a staged FS orchidopexy, with the LESS technique utilized during the second stage. Median laparoscopic dissection time for each testis was 35 minutes (range 22-40). There was no blood loss or intraoperative complications. All testes were noted to be in the scrotum without testicular atrophy. Our initial experience with this technique was favorable with excellent outcomes. LESS orchidopexy is facilitated with a MCSP and FTL.

Laparoendoscopic single-site concomitant surgery for gallstones and a giant ovarian teratoma

Laparoendoscopic single-site (LESS) technique has gained popularity in several fields of surgery. Our patient had multiple gallstones and a left ovarian mature cystic teratoma 12 cm in diameter. She underwent concomitant laparoscopic cholecystectomy and adnectomy using LESS technique. Using a transient gasless technique resulted in the extraction of a giant ovarian tumor through the umbilical incision with no leakage into the abdominal cavity. Concomitant LESS surgery is feasible and has many benefits both for patients and doctors - cosmetics, possibly less pain, avoidance of multiple surgeries and cost-effectiveness. LESS technique is also useful for extracting a giant tumor with the transient gasless technique. This novel method might be applied to the removal of a tumor suspicious for malignancy.

Laparoendoscopic single site adrenalectomy: initial results of cosmetic satisfaction and the potential for postoperative pain reduction

BackgroundRecent reports have suggested that laparoendoscopic single site (LESS) surgery is technically feasible. The aim of this study was to describe our initial experience with LESS adrenalectomy for benign adrenal tumors, focusing the attention about cosmetic satisfaction and reduction of postoperative pain.MethodsMedical records of consecutive patients undergoing LESS adrenalectomy were analyzed. All procedures were performed through a single multichannel port. Demographic and operative data were assessed. A visual analog scale (VAS) was used with a 10-point scale for an objective assessment of incisional pain and incisional cosmesis.ResultsBetween January 2010 and July 2012, 14 consecutive patients with benign adrenal tumors underwent LESS adrenalectomies. Of the planned LESS adrenalectomies, 12 (86%) were completed with a single-port, whereas two required an additional port placement. Mean operating time was 128.1 ± 31.5 min and mean blood loss 10.5 ± 12.1 ml. Mean pain scores using the VAS on postoperative days 1, 3, and 14 were 2.3, 1.0, and 0.3 points, respectively. The rate of analgesic use was also lower within 12 hours after surgery (14%). The patient was highly satisfied with the single small wound procedure, and mean cosmesis scores of postoperative days 3 and 14 were 9.4 and 9.8 points, respectively. The postoperative course was uneventful with no morbidity within one month of follow-up.ConclusionsLESS adrenalectomy is a safe and technically feasible procedure for patients with benign adrenal tumors, and offers cosmetic benefit and the potential for postoperative pain reduction. However, surgeons with lack of experience as LESS surgery should be comprehended that the assistance of the needlescopic instrument does not compromise the cosmetic outcomes for difficult cases and the obese patients may not always be suitable candidates for pure LESS technique.

Laparoendoscopic single-site nephroureterectomy for upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma: outcomes of an international multi-institutional study of 101 patients

To report a large multi-institutional series of laparoendoscopic single-site (LESS) nephroureterectomy (NU). Data on all cases of LESS-NU performed between 2008 and 2012 at 15 institutions were retrospectively gathered. The main demographic data and perioperative outcomes were analysed. The study included 101 patients whose mean (SD) age was 66.4 (9.9) years and mean (SD) body mass index was 24.8 (4) kg/m², and of whom 29.7% had undergone previous abdominal/pelvic surgery. The mean (SD) operating time was 221.4 (73.7) min, estimated blood loss 231.7 (348.0) mL. A robot-assisted LESS technique was applied in 25.7% of cases. An extra trocar was inserted in 28.7% of cases to complete the procedure. Conversion to open surgery was necessary in three cases (3.0%). There was no bladder cuff excision in 20.8% of cases, and excision was carried out using a variety of techniques in the remaining cases. Six intra-operative complications occurred (5.9%). The mean (SD) length of hospital stay was 6.3 (3.5) days. The overall postoperative complication rate was 10.0%, and most of the complications were low grade (Clavien grades 1 and 2). The mean tumour size was 3.1 (1.9) cm. Pathological staging was pTis in two patients, pTa in 12 patients, pT1 in 42 patients, pT2 in 20 patients, pT3 in 23 patients and pT4 in two patients. Pathological grade was high in 71 and low in 30 patients. At a mean follow-up of 14 months, six patients (5.9%) had died. Disease recurrence (including distant and bladder recurrence) was detected in 22.8% of patients, with a mean time to recurrence of 11.5 months. This study reports the largest multi-institutional experience of LESS-NU to date. Peri-operative outcomes mirror those of published standard laparoscopy series. Despite encouraging early findings, longer follow-up is needed to determine the oncological efficacy of the procedure.

Laproendoscopic single site oesophageal diverticulectomy

Epiphrenic divericula are uncommon disorders of the lower oesophagus, which are symptomatic in only 15–20% of cases. The optimum treatment modality for such cases remains an oesophageal diverticulectomy with long myotomy with or without an antireflux operation. Recently, this is increasingly being done through the laparoscopic approach. Here we describe the first reported case of oesophageal diverticulectomy through the laparoendoscopic single site approach. A 57-year-old man presented to us with 6 months history of dysphagia and regurgitation. Patient was investigated with upper gastrointestinal (UGI) endoscopy, barium swallow, CECT chest and abdomen, oesophageal manometry and 24 hour pH study. He was diagnosed to have lower oesophageal diverticulum with mildly elevated pressure readings in manometric studies with normal peristalsis. Based on his symptoms, he was taken up for surgery. A laparoscopic transhiatal oesophageal diverticulectomy with myotomy was done through laparoendoscopic single site technique. The procedure lasted 160 min. There was no intraoperative complication. Gastrograffin study was done on postoperative day 2 following which he was started on liquids. He made an uneventful recovery and was discharged on fourth day. He remained asymptomatic on follow up. Oesophageal diverticulectomy is possible through laparoendoscopic single site approach if necessary expertise is available.

Laparoendoscopic single-site nephrectomy using standard laparoscopic instruments: our initial experience.

To report our initial experience with laparoendoscopic single-site (LESS) nephrectomy using a GelPOINT single port and standard laparoscopic instruments. Laparoendoscopic single-site transperitoneal nephrectomy was done for 6 adult patients with a poorly functioning small or hydronephrotic kidney. The procedure was done with the GelPOINT system, which consisted of a wound retractor (Alexis) and GelSeal cap. Standard laparoscopic instruments were used and the renal pedicle was controlled with 10-mm Hem-o-Lok clips. The participants were 3 men and 3 women with the median age of 29.5 years. Laparoendoscopic single-site nephrectomy was successfully done in all the patients without any major complications. Median operation time was 110 minutes (range, 90 to 130 minutes). There was no need for blood transfusion in any patient. The recovery phase was uneventful and all the patients were discharged after a median hospital stay of 2.5 days (range, 2 to 3 days). Renal function remained stable in all the patients after the operation. The incision site healed well on postoperative follow-up. Our initial experience with LESS nephrectomy was successful with the use of a GelPOINT single port and standard laparoscopic instruments. This report may remove barriers to further work with the LESS technique and may offer a strategy to help surgeons gain experience with this novel technology.

Umbilical Laparoendoscopic Single-Site Technique for Complete Excision of Urachal Remnant

Infected urachal remnant is an uncommon benign disease but is generally symptomatic and commonly recurs. The standard of care for this disease is complete resection of all anomalous tissue including a bladder cuff to avoid recurrence. Recent minimally invasive laparoscopic techniques can effectively manage this disease, but multiport laparoscopic techniques are reported to still leave scars outside the umbilicus. A novel technique of umbilical laparoendoscopic single-site (LESS) surgery for 2 patients with symptomatic urachal remnant is presented in this study. In both cases, the entire urachal tissues from the umbilicus to the anterior bladder dome were successfully excised by the umbilical LESS technique without any extra ports or needlescopes. An articulating needle holder enabled water-tight bladder closure, resulting in early removal of the indwelling catheter. Without any signs of infection, the wound healings were completed 4 weeks after surgery in both cases. The patients had no complaints of symptoms at 6 months and 4 months, respectively, after surgery,and they were quite satisfied with their cosmetic results. We propose that the umbilical LESS technique is a promising surgical option for patients with a symptomatic urachal remnant and that this technique provides satisfactory cosmetic results.

Laparoendoscopic single site in pelvic surgery.

Laparoendoscopic single site (LESS) has recently gained momentum as feasible techniques for minimal access surgery. Our aim is to describe the current status of laparoendoscopic single site (LESS) in pelvic surgery. A comprehensive revision of the literature in LESS pelvic surgery was performed. References for this manuscript were obtained by performing a review of the available literature in PubMed from 01-01-01 to 30-11-11. References outside the search period were obtained selected manuscript΄s bibliography. Search terms included: pelvic anatomy, less in gynecology, single port colectomy, urological less, single port, single site, NOTES, LESS and single incision. 314 manuscripts were initially identified. Out of these, 46 manuscripts were selected based in their pelvic anatomy or surgical content; including experimental experience, clinical series and literature reviews. LESS drastically limit the surgeon's ability to perform in the operative field and the latter becomes hardened by the lack of space in anatomical location like the pelvis. Potential advantages of LESS are gained with the understanding that the surgical procedure is more technically challenging. Pelvic surgical procedures related to colorectal surgery, gynecology and urology have been performed with LESS technique and information available is mostly represented by case reports and short case series. Comparative series remain few. LESS pelvic surgery remain in its very beginning and due to the very specific anatomical conditions further development of LESS surgery in the mentioned area can be clearly be facilitated by using robotic technology. Standardization ad reproducibility of techniques are mandatory to further develop LESS in the surgical arena..