We compared avian community structure and composition between 4 forested sites irrigated with wastewater (chlorinated sewage effluent) and 4 nonirrigated forested sites in central Pennsylvania during 1 breeding season and 2 winters. Compared to nonirrigated sites, irrigated sites had higher densities of all species combined and higher species richness (S) in the breeding season and in the winters. In the breeding season, 9 species were significantly (P < 0.05) more abundant on irrigated sites, whereas only 1 species was more abundant on nonirrigated sites. In winter, 4 species were more abundant on irrigated sites, but none was more abundant on nonirrigated sites. Because irrigation resulted in dense herbaceous growth, species that foraged or nested in vegetation near (<3 m) ground level were particularly abundant on irrigated sites. We conclude that community structure and composition of breeding and wintering avifauna were not negatively affected by wastewater irrigation, but breeding populations of species that forage or nest in leaf litter may be affected negatively by irrigation. J. WILDL. MANAGE. 54(3):493-500 Approximately 22 of 2,000 municipal sewage systems in the United States that apply treated wastewater directly on land do so in forests (W. E. Sopper, pers. commun.; Urie 1986). But this practice is expected to increase as small, localized facilities are needed in nonagricultural areas, on steeply sloping terrains, or where crop irrigation is not necessary (Nutter and Red 1986). Application of wastewater to land is attractive for several reasons (Sopper 1968); but irrigation of forest habitats, in particular, results in higher soil infiltration rates, less runoff and erosion, lower land acquisition costs, and fewer potential human health risks than irrigation of agricultural lands (U.S. Environ. Prot. Agency 1981, Burd 1986). Changes to forests irrigated with wastewater have been well-documented. Wastewater application alters the structure and species composition of forest understory plants, abundance of invertebrates, and occurrence of fruit-producing vegetation (Sopper and Kardos 1973, Lewis 1977, Mastrota et al. 1989). Thus, irrigation directly affects the resources (e.g., nesting sites, food, or cover) available to forest birds. Yet little is known about the effects of wastewater irrigation on community structure and omposition of forest birds (Rollfinke 1988). Three previous studies of breeding avian communities associated with wastewater irrigation (Savidge and Davis 1971, Snider 1974, Lewis and Samson 1981) were conducted on sma l forested plots within The Pennsylvania State University's (PSU) Wastewater Renovation System with irregular or partial-year irriga ion schedules (Rollfinke 1988). The PSU system was expanded from 40 to 200 ha and began using a year-round irrigation schedule in 1983. We compared community structure and composition of breeding and wintering birds on irrigated and nonirrigated forested sites after the expansion of this irrigation system. ' Present address: Friends School, 5114 N. Charles Street, Baltimore, MD 21210. This content downloaded from 207.46.13.120 on Wed, 14 Sep 2016 04:56:46 UTC All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms 494 IRRIGATED FORESTS * Rollfinke and Yahner J. Wildl. Manage. 54(3):1990 We thank E. D. Bellis and J. A. Kurland for comments on the manuscript. Our research was supported by the Pennsylvania Agriculture Experiment Station and the Max McGraw Wildlife Foundation.
Read full abstract