Lacosamide Research Articles

The effect of lacosamide monotherapy on sleep architecture in patients with epilepsy: a preliminary evidence.

Lacosamide (LCM) is a third-generation antiseizure medication (ASM), and its effect on sleep architecture was supported by a few studies in patients with drug-resistant epilepsy in which LCM was used as an add-on treatment. To gather knowledge on ASMs effects on sleep, this study aimed at evaluating the effects of LCM monotherapy on sleep in patients with focal epilepsy. Ten patients diagnosed with epilepsy (mean age 58.00 ± 14.77, 60.0% female, mean monthly seizure frequency 1.20 ± 2.48) starting LCM as monotherapy were included. Sleep architecture was assessed through polysomnography at baseline and at the 6-month follow-up visit. A significant decrease was observed in seizure frequency (p = 0.004), being all patients seizure-free at follow-up. At baseline, eight patients had poor sleep efficiency (< 85%). Sleep efficiency increased at follow-up, with onlythree patients having an index < 85% (p = 0.022). From baseline to follow-up, a significant decrease was observed in sleep latency (p = 0.022) and wakefulness after sleep onset (p = 0.047). Moreover, a significant decrease was observed in the percentage of stage 1 (Md = 6.70 vs Md = 3.85, p = 0.005) and stage 3 (Md = 27.70 vs Md = 22.35, p = 0.01) of Non-REM sleep. This study suggests that LCM monotherapy may positively impact sleep architecture in patients with epilepsy. The sleep efficiency improvement and the decrease of sleep latency and wakefulness after sleep onset observed at follow-up highlight better sleep stability and continuity in patients treated with LCM. Notably, all patients were seizure-free at follow-up, and seizure freedom may also concur to sleep structure improvement.

Effectiveness and tolerability of lacosamide in children with drug resistant epilepsy

We retrospectively studied the efficacy and tolerability of lacosamide (LCM) in children with drug-resistant epilepsy in a tertiary care centre in the Netherlands, from 2013 till 2019, with a follow-up of two years. 79 children, aged<18years, were included. Retention rate, effectiveness, reason for termination, and side-effects were analysed. Furthermore, prognostic variables for discontinuation as well as the incidence of side-effects were determined. The LCM retention rate and effectiveness of response were analysed at three, twelve and twenty-four months. The retention rate of LCM was respectively 89.9%, 68.4% and 54.4%. LCM gave an effective response in 60.5%, 67.9% and 71.4% of the participants who were still using LCM at the three follow-up periods. Lack of efficacy was most frequently reported as a reason for discontinuation (58.3%). Side-effects occurred in 50.6% of the patients, somnolence (18.2%) being the most common, followed by behavioural changes (15.6%), headache (9.1%) and dizziness (9.1%). Use of≥1 sodium channel blocker (SCB) was associated with an increased risk (OR=4.038) of side-effects. An increasing number of anti-seizure medications (ASM) was associated with a reduced risk (OR=0.524) of stopping LCM. To conclude, LCM is an effective ASM with acceptable side-effects in children with drug-resistant epilepsy.

Use of lacosamide in children: experience of a tertiary medical care center in Brazil.

Lacosamide (LCM) is a third-generation anti-seizure drug approved in Europe and the United States, either as a monotherapy or adjunctive therapy, to treat partial-onset seizures in adults, adolescents, and children. In Brazil, LCM is licensed for treatment only in patients older than 16 years of age. To evaluate a cohort of children presenting with refractory epilepsy who received LCM as an add-on therapy and observe the response and tolerability to the LCM treatment. A retrospective cohort study conducted in a tertiary health care facility, which included 26 children, aged up to 16 years, who presented with refractory epilepsy and received LCM as an add-on treatment. The follow-up visits were scheduled every 3 months until 9 months of treatment with LCM. After 3 months of LCM administration, in 73.1% of the children, there was a reduction of > 50% in the frequency of seizures, and this clinical improvement was maintained in most patients (73.9%) for the following 9 months. Mild (such as, somnolence and behavioral changes) or severe (seizure worsening) adverse effects were observed in two and three children respectively. Among responders to LCM, there was a higher prevalence of males, fewer concomitant anti-seizure drugs, and lower percentage of patients using sodium channel blockers. Lacosamide should be considered as an early treatment option in pediatric patients with refractory epilepsy, mainly focal seizures.

Synergistic effects of the galanin analog 810-2 with the antiseizure medication levetiracetam in rodent seizure models.

The use of many antiseizure medications (ASMs) is limited due to pharmacoresistance and dose-limiting side effects, suggesting an unmet need for novel therapeutic approaches. The neuropeptide galanin reduces seizures in several preclinical seizure and epilepsy models, but its clinical utility is limited due to rapid metabolism and poor blood-brain barrier penetration. The lead galanin analog 810-2 is systemically bioavailable and reduces seizures when administered alone. Further development of this analog, with the potential for use as an add-on therapy in patients with epilepsy, requires a better understanding of the use of this analog in combination with approved ASMs. We sought to evaluate 810-2 in combination with commonly used ASMs in rodent models of seizures. The mouse 6-Hz seizure assay was used to test efficacy of 810-2 in combination with levetiracetam (LEV), valproic acid (VPA), or lacosamide (LCM) using a 1:1 dose ratio in isobolographic studies. Further characterization was performed for the combination of 810-2 and LEV in the mouse corneal kindling and rat 6-Hz assays. Whereas the combination of 810-2 with VPA and LCM yielded additive interactions, the combination of 810-2 with LEV demonstrated a synergistic interaction in the mouse 6-Hz assay. Supra-additive effects were also observed in the mouse corneal kindling and rat 6-Hz assays for this combination. The combination of 810-2 with LEV suggests the potential for this galanin analog to be further developed as an add-on therapy for patients with epilepsy, particularly when coadministered with LEV.

Psychobehavioural and Cognitive Adverse Events of Anti-Seizure Medications for the Treatment of Developmental and Epileptic Encephalopathies.

The developmental and epileptic encephalopathies encompass a group of rare syndromes characterised by severe drug-resistant epilepsy with onset in childhood and significant neurodevelopmental comorbidities. The latter include intellectual disability, developmental delay, behavioural problems including attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder and autism spectrum disorder, psychiatric problems including anxiety and depression, speech impairment and sleep problems. Classical examples of developmental and epileptic encephalopathies include Dravet syndrome, Lennox–Gastaut syndrome and tuberous sclerosis complex. The mainstay of treatment is with multiple anti-seizure medications (ASMs); however, the ASMs themselves can be associated with psychobehavioural adverse events, and effects (negative or positive) on cognition and sleep. We have performed a targeted literature review of ASMs commonly used in the treatment of developmental and epileptic encephalopathies to discuss the latest evidence on their effects on behaviour, mood, cognition, sedation and sleep. The ASMs include valproate (VPA), clobazam, topiramate (TPM), cannabidiol (CBD), fenfluramine (FFA), levetiracetam (LEV), brivaracetam (BRV), zonisamide (ZNS), perampanel (PER), ethosuximide, stiripentol, lamotrigine (LTG), rufinamide, vigabatrin, lacosamide (LCM) and everolimus. Bromide, felbamate and other sodium channel ASMs are discussed briefly. Overall, the current evidence suggest that LEV, PER and to a lesser extent BRV are associated with psychobehavioural adverse events including aggressiveness and irritability; TPM and to a lesser extent ZNS are associated with language impairment and cognitive dulling/memory problems. Patients with a history of behavioural and psychiatric comorbidities may be more at risk of developing psychobehavioural adverse events. Topiramate and ZNS may be associated with negative effects in some aspects of cognition; CBD, FFA, LEV, BRV and LTG may have some positive effects, while the remaining ASMs do not appear to have a detrimental effect. All the ASMs are associated with sedation to a certain extent, which is pronounced during uptitration. Cannabidiol, PER and pregabalin may be associated with improvements in sleep, LTG is associated with insomnia, while VPA, TPM, LEV, ZNS and LCM do not appear to have detrimental effects. There was variability in the extent of evidence for each ASM: for many first-generation and some second-generation ASMs, there is scant documented evidence; however, their extensive use suggests favourable tolerability and safety (e.g. VPA); second-generation and some third-generation ASMs tend to have the most robust evidence documented over several years of use (TPM, LEV, PER, ZNS, BRV), while evidence is still being generated for newer ASMs such as CBD and FFA. Finally, we discuss how a variety of factors can affect mood, behaviour and cognition, and untangling the associations between the effects of the underlying syndrome and those of the ASMs can be challenging. In particular, there is enormous heterogeneity in cognitive, behavioural and developmental impairments that is complex and can change naturally over time; there is a lack of standardised instruments for evaluating these outcomes in developmental and epileptic encephalopathies, with a reliance on subjective evaluations by proxy (caregivers); and treatment regimes are complex involving multiple ASMs as well as other drugs.Graphical Supplementary InformationThe online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40263-022-00955-9.

Effects of CYP2C19 genetic polymorphisms on the pharmacokinetics of lacosamide in Korean patients with epilepsy.

Many pharmacokinetic studies of lacosamide (LCM) have been reported, but no large-scale clinical study has been conducted on genetic polymorphisms that affect the metabolism of LCM. Therefore, we designed a pharmacogenetic study of LCM to explore the effect of genetic polymorphisms on serum LCM concentration. We evaluated the pharmacodynamic characteristics of LCM, including clinical efficacy and toxicity. Adult patients with epilepsy who received LCM at Seoul National University Hospital were enrolled. Blood samples were obtained from 115 patients taking LCM for more than 1 month with unchanged doses and were used to analyze the serum LCM concentration, the concentration/dose (C/D) ratio and the single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) of the cytochrome P450 (CYP)2C9 and CYP2C19 genes. In addition, clinical information-including efficacy, toxicity, and concomitant drugs-was collected. The serum LCM concentration showed a linear correlation with the daily dose (r=.66, p < .001). In genetic analysis, 43 patients (38.7%) were extensive metabolizers (EMs), 51 (45.9%) were intermediate metabolizers (IMs), and 17 (15.3%) were poor metabolizers (PMs). In the group comparison, mean serum concentrations and the C/D ratio showed significant differences between the three groups (p=.01 and p < .001, respectively). The C/D ratios of IM (27.78) and PM (35.6) were 13% and 39% higher than those of EM (25.58), respectively. In the pharmacodynamic subgroup analysis, patients in the ineffective LCM group had significantly lower serum concentrations (6.39 ± 3.25 vs. 8.44 ± 3.68 μg/ml, p=.024), whereas patients with adverse events had higher serum concentrations than those without adverse events (11.03 ± 4.32 vs. 7.4 ± 3.1μg/ml, p < .001). Based on this, we suggest a reference range for LCM in the Korean population (6-9μg/ml). Genetic polymorphisms of the CYP2C19 gene affect the serum LCM concentration. Because efficacy and toxicity are apparently related to serum LCM levels, the genetic phenotype of CYP2C19 should be considered when prescribing LCM for patients with epilepsy.

Evaluation of anti-epileptic Lacosamide treatment on neural tube development: Chick embryo experimental model

Objective: Even if epileptic women can give birth to healthy babies, the rates of premature birth, low birth weight, fetal and neonatal death risk, congenital malformations and growth retardation in pregnant women who use the antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) are high compared to the population. The present study aimed to examine the effects of AED Lacosamide (LCM) during pregnancy on the fetus in terms of neuronal and embryonic development in 48-hour chick embryo model. Material and Methods: 40SPF fertilized eggs divided into 4 equal numbers. At the 28th hour, LCM was applied in the sub-blastoderm, and the experiment was terminated at the 48th hour. Embryos were evaluated morphologically by neural tube position, somite number, and cranio-caudal length. Histopathologically, hematoxylin-eosin, Caspase-3 immunohistochemistry, and TUNEL staining were performed and and assessed for cell death. Results: LCM adversely affected neural tube position in groups 3 and 4 compared to control. In addition, it regressed embryonic development by decreasing somite number and craniocaudal length in groups 3 and 4. When evaluated in terms of apoptotic cell death, LCM increased caspase-3 immunoreactivity and the number of TUNEL-positive cells in groups 3 and 4, respectively (p=0.002), (p≤0.001). Conclusion: LCM was caused to regression of embryonic development and impaired neural tube position in early chick embryo model, dose-dependent manner. It increased cell death and showed teratogenic effects in the early embryo model. The usage of LCM for pregnant women should be considered carefully. It is obvious that more preclinic studies are needed to demonstrate LCM effects comprehensively.

The high incidence and risk factors of levetiracetam and lacosamide-related skin rashes in glioma patients

ObjectiveAntiseizure drug (ASD)-induced skin rash remains the main side effect of seizure management in patients with glioma. New generations of ASDs, such as levetiracetam (LEV) and lacosamide (LCM) are associated with less frequent skin rashes than conventional ASDs. However, there are few reports regarding the incidence of skin rashes by LEV and LCM in patients with glioma. Therefore, the aim of this study was to investigate the incidence and risk factors of LEV- and LCM-associated skin rashes in patients with glioma. MethodsWe compared the incidence of ASD-associated skin rash between 353 patients with glioma and 125 patients with meningioma, who received LEV or LCM and underwent surgery between 2017 and 2019 at our institution. Furthermore, to evaluate the association between potential risk factors and ASD-associated skin rashes, univariate and multivariate analyses were performed. ResultsThe incidence of ASD-associated skin rash in patients with glioma was higher (11 %) than in those with meningiomas (1.6 %). The multivariate regression analysis showed that adjuvant treatment with radiotherapy (p = 0.023) and a history of drug allergy (p = 0.023) were significant risk factors for ASD-associated skin rash. The rate of ASD-related skin rashes in patients with glioma was also higher than the previously reported rates of 1–3 % in patients with epilepsy. ConclusionOur results indicate that adjuvant treatment with radiotherapy and a history of drug allergy correlated with a high incidence of ASD-related skin rashes in patients with glioma who receive LEV and LCM. Patients with these two factors should be carefully checked for skin rashes.

Evaluation of Cardiovascular Concerns of Intravenous Lacosamide Therapy in Epilepsy Patients.

ObjectiveVoltage-gated sodium channels (VGSCs) play an important role in neuronal excitability and epilepsies. In addition to the brain, VGSCs are also abundant enriched in cardiac tissues and are responsible for normal cardiac rhythm. Theoretically, sodium channel blocking antiseizure medications (SCB-ASMs) may have unwanted cardiac side effects. Lacosamide (LCM) is increasingly used in patients with status epilepticus (SE) due to the availability of intravenous formula. The concerns about the proarrhythmic effect are even higher due to the need for rapid administration of LCM. There were limited data on the cardiac safety of intravenous LCM. Hereby, we performed a study to observe the effect of intravenous loading of LCM in patients with seizures in our Neurological Intensive Care Unit (NICU).MethodsWe retrospectively reviewed the patients using parenteral LCM for seizures in NICU. A routine infusion time of 30 min was performed. The electrocardiogram (ECG) and blood pressure were recorded before and after LCM injection.ResultsWe retrospectively reviewed the clinical data of 38 patients using LCM for treating seizures. Two patients had cardiac side effects after LCM loading, one (3.0%) with new-onset first-degree AV block and the other (3.0%) with atrial premature complex. For the quantitative changes of ECG parameter analysis, there was no change in QRS complex, corrected QT intervals, and heart rate except that the PR interval was mildly increased. A mild decrease in the diastolic blood pressure and mean arterial pressure were also observed. None of the above-mentioned parameter alterations required clinical intervention.ConclusionWe evaluated the cardiac safety concern in real-world epilepsy patients requiring intravenous LCM. Near half of this cohort responded to LCM therapy and there was no life-threatening cardiac adverse effect. Intravenous LCM does have some effects on the ECG parameters and blood pressure but without clinical relevance. Despite the theoretical concern of cardiac adverse effects of LCM, the benefit of seizure control outweighed the risk in patients with status epilepticus or seizure clusters, such as hyperthermia, pulmonary edema, cardiac arrhythmias, or cardiovascular collapse.

Efficacy of Lacosamide Add-on Therapy on Refractory Focal Epilepsies in Children and Adolescents: An Open-Label Clinical Trial.

Epilepsy is a chronic neurological disorder that affects 0.5%-1% of children. 30%-40% of patients are resistant to current anti-epileptic drugs. Lacosamide (LCM) appeared to be effective, safe, and well tolerated in children and adolescents. This study was aimed to evaluate whether LCM could be an effective add-on therapy in children with refractory focal epilepsies. This study was conducted from April 2020 to April 2021 in Imam Hossein Children Hospital, Isfahan, Iran. We included 44 children aged 6 months to 16 years with refractory focal epilepsy (based on International League Against Epilepsy criteria). LCM was given in divided doses of 2 mg/kg/day, increasing by 2 mg/kg every week. The first follow-up visit was 6 weeks later, when all patients had reached the therapeutic dose. The average age of the patients was 89.9 months. 72.5% of children had focal motor seizures. Evaluation of percent change in seizure frequency and duration before and after treatment showed a 53.22% reduction in seizure frequency and 43.72% reduction in seizure duration after treatment. Our study group tolerated LCM well, with few side effects. Headache, dizziness, and nausea were common side effects. In line with other studies, none of the suspected risk factors could predict response to LCM treatment. LCM appears to be an effective, safe, and well-tolerated medication in children with uncontrolled drug-resistant focal epilepsy.

Levetiracetam Versus Levetiracetam Plus Sodium Channel Blockers for Postoperative Epileptic Seizure Prevention in Brain Tumor Patients.

BackgroundBrain tumor patients tend to develop postoperative epileptic seizures, which can lead to an unfavorable outcome. Although the incidence of postoperative epileptic seizures and adverse events are improved with the advent of levetiracetam (LEV), postoperative epilepsy occurs at a frequency of 4.6% or higher. In brain tumor patients, the addition of sodium channel blockers (SCBs) to LEV significantly reduces seizures, though confirmed in a non-postoperative study. Thus, the combination of SCBs with LEV might be promising.ObjectiveIn this prospective randomized controlled trial we investigated the safety, evaluated by adverse events during one and two weeks after surgery, and the efficacy, evaluated by the incidence of early epilepsy, including non-convulsive status epilepticus (NCSE), of using LEV alone or SCBs added to LEV in patients who underwent craniotomy or biopsy for brain tumors or brain mass lesions.MethodsPatients with brain tumors or brain mass lesions undergoing surgical interventions, excluding endoscopic endonasal surgery (EES), with a diagnosis of epilepsy were eligible for this study. Patients are randomized into either Group A or B (B1 or B2) after the informed consents are taken; LEV alone in Group A patients, while LEV and SCBs in Group B patients (GroupB1, intravenous fosphenytoin plus oral lacosamide (LCM) and GroupB2, intravenous LCM plus oral LCM) were administered postoperatively. Fifty-three patients were enrolled during the first two and a half years of the study and four of them were excluded, resulting in the accumulation of 49 patients’ data.ResultsPostoperative epileptic seizures occurred only in three out of 49 patients during the first week (6.1%) and in seven patients within two weeks after surgery (14.3%, including the three patients during the first week). In Group A, epileptic seizures occurred in two out of 26 patients during the first week (7.7%) and in five patients within two weeks (19.2%) after surgery. In Group B, epileptic seizures occurred in one out of 23 patients during the first week (4.3%) and in two patients during the first two weeks (8.7%). Low complication grade of epileptic seizures was observed in Group B rather than in Group A, however, without significant difference (p=0.256). There was no difference in the frequency of adverse effects in each group.ConclusionAlthough not statistically significant, the incidence of epileptic seizures within one week after surgery was lesser in LEV+SCBs groups than in LEV alone. No hepatic damage or renal function worsening occurred with the addition of LCM, suggesting the safety of LEV+SCBs therapy.

Blood-brain barrier targeted delivery of lacosamide-conjugated gold nanoparticles: Improving outcomes in absence seizures

ObjectiveMost currently available antiepileptics are not fully effective in the prevention of seizures in absence epilepsy owing to the presence of blood-brain barrier (BBB). We aimed to test whether binding an antiepileptic drug, lacosamide (LCM), to glucose-coated gold nanoparticles (GNPs) enables efficient brain drug delivery to suppress the epileptic activity in WAG/Rij rats with absence epilepsy. MethodsIn these animals, intracranial-EEG recording, behavioral test, in vivo imaging of LCM and LCM-GNP conjugate distribution in the brain, inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry analysis, immunofluorescence staining of glucose transporter (Glut)− 1, glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP), and p-glycoprotein (P-gp) and electron microscopy were performed. ResultsLacosamide-GNP conjugates decreased the amplitude and frequency of spike-wave-like discharges (SWDs) and alleviated the anxiety-like behavior as assessed by EEG and elevated plus-maze test, respectively (p < 0.01). The in vivo imaging system results showed higher levels of fluorescein dye tagged to LCM-GNP in the brain during the 5-day injection period (p < 0.01). Immunofluorescence staining displayed decreased P-gp, Glut-1, and GFAP expression by LCM-GNP conjugate treatment predominantly in the cerebral cortex suggesting a potential functionality of this brain region in the modulation of neuronal activity in our experimental setting (p < 0.01). SignificanceWe suggest that the conjugation of LCM to GNPs may provide a novel approach for efficient brain drug delivery in light of the effectiveness of our strategy not only in suppressing the seizure activity but also in decreasing the need to use high dosages of the antiepileptics to reduce the frequently encountered side effects in drug-resistant epilepsy.

Lacosamide in monotherapy in BTRE (brain tumor-related epilepsy): results from an Italian multicenter retrospective study.

Lacosamide (LCM) is a third-generation anti-seizure medication (ASM) approved for focal onset epilepsy in patients aged ≥ 4.378 Previous studies have reported an efficacy of LCM as add-on treatment in brain tumor-related epilepsy (BTRE). To date, there are no studies in the literature focusing on lacosamide used in monotherapy to treat BTRE. In our retrospective study we investigated efficacy and tolerability of LCM in monotherapy in a multicenter national cohort of primary brain tumor patients. We collected from 12 Italian Centers 132 patients with primary brain tumors who were treated with LCM in monotherapy. For each patient we evaluated seizure freedom at 3 and 6months (primary endpoints), side effects and drop-out rate (secondary endpoints). Overall, LCM led to seizure freedom in 64.4% of patients at 3months and 55% at 6months. Patients who used two or more ASMs before LCM had a worse seizure control than patients in monotherapy with LCM as first choice. In 14 patients, we observed seizure control despite tumor progression on magnetic resonance (MRI). Multivariate analysis showed that gross-total resection at diagnosis was significantly associated with higher seizure freedom rate at 6months. Side effects were mainly mild (grade 1-2 according to CTCAE classification) and drop-out rate was low (1.5%). Main side effects were dizziness and somnolence. This is the first study showing a good efficacy and tolerability of LCM when used in monotherapy in BTRE. Further prospective studies are needed to confirm these preliminary data, investigating also quality of life and neurocognitive functions.

Influence of Umbelliferone on the Anticonvulsant and Neuroprotective Activity of Selected Antiepileptic Drugs: An In Vivo and In Vitro Study.

Umbelliferone (7-hydroxycoumarin; UMB) is a coumarin with many biological properties, including antiepileptic activity. This study evaluated the effect of UMB on the ability of classical and novel antiepileptic drugs (e.g., lacosamide (LCM), levetiracetam (LEV), phenobarbital (PB) and valproate (VPA)) to prevent seizures evoked by the 6-Hz corneal-stimulation-induced seizure model. The study also evaluated the influence of this coumarin on the neuroprotective properties of these drugs in two in vitro models of neurodegeneration, including trophic stress and excitotoxicity. The results indicate that UMB (100 mg/kg, i.p.) significantly enhanced the anticonvulsant action of PB (p < 0.01) and VPA (p < 0.05), but not that of LCM orLEV, in the 6-Hz test. Whether alone or in combination with other anticonvulsant drugs (at their ED50 values from the 6-Hz test), UMB (100 mg/kg) did not affect motor coordination; skeletal muscular strength and long-term memory, as determined in the chimney; grip strength; or passive avoidance tests, respectively. Pharmacokinetic characterization revealed that UMB had no impact on total brain concentrations of PB or VPA in mice. The in vitro study indicated that UMB has neuroprotective properties. Administration of UMB (1 µg/mL), together with antiepileptic drugs, mitigated their negative impact on neuronal viability. Under trophic stress (serum deprivation) conditions, UMB enhanced the neurotrophic abilities of all the drugs used. Moreover, this coumarin statistically enhanced the neuroprotective effects of PB (p < 0.05) and VPA (p < 0.001) in the excitotoxicity model of neurodegeneration. The obtained results clearly indicate a positive effect of UMB on the anticonvulsant and neuroprotective properties of the selected drugs.

Clinical impact of the dose and blood concentration of lacosamide in Japanese pediatric patients with epilepsy: A cohort study

PurposeThe relationship between treatment efficacy/tolerability and the dose/blood concentration of lacosamide (LCM) was investigated in a clinical cohort of Japanese pediatric patients with epilepsy. MethodsThis retrospective analysis reviewed the medical records of patients treated with LCM for >6 months at the Department of Pediatrics, Hiroshima University Hospital, from September 2017 to January 2021. The collected data included age, sex, epilepsy type, seizure type, seizure frequency before and after treatment initiation, adverse events leading to LCM discontinuation, dose at any evaluation point, serum concentration, and concomitant antiepileptic drugs (AEDs). ResultsThe study included 51 patients (31 male patients) between the ages of 2 and 19 years. All patients were Japanese. Epilepsy was classified as focal in 44 patients, generalized in six patients, and combined generalized and focal in one patient. The 50% responder rate for LCM treatment was 56.9%. Seven patients experienced complete seizure control (absence of seizures for 6 months before the follow-up visit). A relationship between dose and blood concentration was identified. Although the blood LCM concentration was higher in the responders than in the nonresponders (7.86 vs. 6.16 μg/mL; p = 0.028), there was no significant difference in dose between the two groups. Lacosamide showed efficacy at a dose >5 mg/kg/day in more than half of the 50% responders. The treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) included seizure aggravation in five patients, irritability in two patients, and somnolence and drug eruption in one patient each. In six patients with TEAEs, the TEAEs developed within 1 month after treatment initiation and led to LCM discontinuation. ConclusionIn Japanese pediatric patients with epilepsy, LCM treatment is effective, particularly at higher doses. The blood concentration may be related more to efficacy than to dose. Lacosamide is generally well-tolerated by pediatric patients, and should be used at the maximum tolerable dose (needed to be gradually increased) in patients with otherwise insufficient seizure control. As TEAEs leading to discontinue treatment likely occur in early phase, it is needed to monitor patients carefully if TEAEs would happen in that phase.

Third-Generation Antiseizure Medications for Adjunctive Treatment of Focal-Onset Seizures in Adults: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis.

BackgroundBrivaracetam (BRV), cenobamate (CNB), eslicarbazepine acetate (ESL), lacosamide (LCM) and perampanel (PER) are antiseizure medications (ASMs) approved for adjunctive treatment of focal-onset seizures. So far, no randomised controlled trial directly compared the efficacy and safety of these drugs.ObjectiveWe estimated the comparative efficacy and safety of these ASMs for the treatment of focal-onset seizures in adults with epilepsy using a network meta-analysis (NMA).MethodsWe systematically searched (June week 4, 2021) MEDLINE (accessed by PubMed), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), and the US National Institutes of Health Clinical Trials Registry (http://www.clinicaltrials.gov). There were no date limitations or language restrictions. Randomised, double-blinded, controlled, parallel-group, add-on studies that compared oral BRV, CNB, ESL, LCM, and PER versus any comparator over maintenance periods of at least 12 weeks and included adult patients with focal seizures uncontrolled by concomitant ASMs were identified. The efficacy outcomes were the proportions of patients with ≥ 50% and 100% reduction in baseline seizure frequency during the maintenance period. The tolerability outcomes were the proportions of participants who experienced at least one treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) and experienced at least one TEAE leading to discontinuation. Effect sizes were estimated by network meta-analyses within a frequentist framework. The hierarchy of competing interventions was established using the surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA).ResultsSixteen trials (BRV: n = 3, CNB: n = 1, ESL: n = 4, LCM: n = 4, PER: n = 4) were included, overall enrolling 4507 patients randomised to add-on active treatments (BRV = 803, CNB = 221, ESL =9 90, LCM = 1104, and PER = 1389) and 2246 to add-on placebo. Cenobamate was associated with a higher rate of ≥ 50% seizure frequency reduction than BRV [odds ratio (OR) 2.02, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.11–3.66], ESL (OR 1.93, 95% CI 1.07–3.48), LCM (OR 1.86, 95% CI 1.04–3.32), and PER (OR 2.07, 95% CI 1.16–3.70). There was a not statistically significant trend favouring CNB over ESL, LCM and PER for the seizure freedom outcome. Brivaracetam (OR 0.61, 95% CI 0.44–0.86) and LCM (OR 0.60, 95% CI 0.40–0.88) were associated with a lower proportion of participants experiencing TEAEs compared to ESL, and patients treated with PER were associated with a higher risk to experience at least one TEAE (OR 1.42, 95% CI 1.02–1.96) than BRV. According to SUCRA, CNB had the greatest likelihood of being the best option for the ≥ 50% and 100% seizure frequency reduction, and BRV and LCM had the highest probabilities of being the best-tolerated treatments.ConclusionsCenobamate ranked best for efficacy, and BRV and LCM were best tolerated over the other comparators. Although NMAs cannot replace direct comparisons, they may support physicians in clinical decision making.Supplementary InformationThe online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40265-021-01661-4.

Lacosamide-Related Arrhythmias: A Systematic Analysis and Review of the Literature.

Lacosamide (LCM) is a new antiepileptic drug used as an adjunctive treatment for partial seizures with and without secondary generalization. One of the modes of action is the enhancement of slow inactivation of voltage-gated sodium channels. Experimental studies and clinical trials suggest that LCM acts upon both neurons and the heart and may increase the risk of cardiac arrhythmias. A systematic review was conducted to investigate characteristics of arrhythmias related to the use of LCM for the treatment of seizures. The search terms “lacosamide”, “arrhythmias”, “AV block”, “atrial fibrillations/flutter”, “cardiac conductions defects”, “ventricular tachycardia”, “ventricular fibrillation were used. Case reports and retrospective studies were gathered by searching Medline/PubMed, Google Scholar, CINAHL (Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature), Cochrane CENTRAL (Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials), and Web of Science databases. Seventeen articles were selected for review. Ventricular tachycardia was the most reported LCM related arrhythmia (29.4%), followed by new-onset atrial fibrillation (17.6%), complete heart block (17.6%), Mobitz type 1 Atrio-ventricular block (11.8%), sinus pauses (11.8%), pulseless electrical activity (5.9%) and widening QRS complex (5.9%). Further research and clinical trials are needed to explore the etiopathogenesis and causative relationship between the use of LCM and arrhythmias.

Anti-inflammatory properties of lacosamide in an astrocyte-microglia co-culture model of inflammation

PurposeUnderstanding the effects of antiepileptic drugs on glial cells and glia-mediated inflammation is a new approach to future treatment of epilepsy. Little is known about direct effects of the antiepileptic drug lacosamide (LCM) on glial cells. Therefore, we aimed to study the LCM effects on glial viability, microglial activation, expression of gap-junctional (GJ) protein Cx43 as well as intercellular communication in an in vitro astrocyte-microglia co-culture model of inflammation. MethodsPrimary rat astrocytes co-cultures containing 5% (M5, “physiological” conditions) or 30% (M30, “pathological inflammatory” conditions) of microglia were treated with different concentrations of LCM [5, 15, 30, and 90 μg/ml] for 24 h. Glial cell viability was measured by MTT assay. Immunocytochemistry was performed to analyze the microglial activation state. Western blot analysis was used to quantify the astroglial Cx43 expression. The GJ cell communication was studied via Scrape Loading. ResultsA concentration-dependent incubation with LCM did not affect the glial cell viability both under physiological and pathological conditions. LCM induced a significant concentration-dependent decrease of activated microglia with parallel increase of ramified microglia under pathological inflammatory conditions. This correlated with an increase in astroglial Cx43 expression. Nevertheless, the functional coupling via GJs was significantly reduced after incubation with LCM. ConclusionLCM has not shown effects on the glial cell viability. The reduced GJ coupling by LCM could be related to its anti-epileptic activity. The anti-inflammatory glial features of LCM with inhibition of microglial activation under inflammatory conditions support beneficial role in epilepsy associated with neuroinflammation.

COT-31 Risk Factors for the Development of Skin Rash with Levetiracetam and Lacosamide in Patients with Glioma

Introduction: Seizure control of in glioma patients is essential for quality of life. The new generation anti-seizure drug (ASD) is represented by lacosamide (LCM) and levetiracetam (LEV), and is said to have few side effects of eruption. We retrospectively analyzed the incidence of rash and related factors of the ASD, evaluated the safety of patients with glioma, and conducted a comparison with the evaluation of patients with meningioma. Method: We calculated the incidence of rash in patients who underwent glioma resection at our Hospital from January 2017 to December 2019 and were prescribed LEV or LCM, and compared it with the same incidence in meningioma patients. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to analyze the risk factors for the ASD-related eruption. Result: The subjects were 353 gliomas and 125 meningiomas who received LEV or LCM.The median ages are 44 ± 14.8 and 58 ± 13.2, respectively, and the male-female ratio is 203/150 and 53/72. There was no difference in the incidence of eruptions between the two groups, LEV and LCM, and the incidence of ASD-related eruptions was 11% (39/353) for gliomas, significantly higher than 1.6% (2/125) for meningiomas (p = 0.006). The incidence of ASD-related eruptions in glioma patients was not significantly different between the LEV group (10% (21/216)) and the LCM group (13% (20/154)) (p = 0.53). In a multivariate analysis of risk factors for eruption, chemoradiotherapy (p = 0.01), history of drug allergy (p = 0.039) was significantly higher. Conclusion: The incidence of LEV and LCM eruptions in glioma patients was higher than that in meningioma patients, and it was speculated that the treatment course specificity was more important than the disease-specific factors. Patients with glioma, especially those who have undergone chemoradiotherapy or have a history of drug allergies, require careful confirmation of the eruption.

Effectiveness of lacosamide in children and young adults previously treated with other sodium channel blockers

PurposeThis multicenter study examined the effectiveness and tolerability of lacosamide (LCM) for children and young adults with epilepsy, particularly in patients who had previously been treated with other sodium channel blockers (SCBs) and the difference in effectiveness and tolerability when using other concomitant SCBs. MethodsWe retrospectively studied the clinical information of patients aged <30 years given LCM to treat epilepsy. The effectiveness and adverse events (AEs) of LCM and the other SCBs were investigated. Factors related to the effectiveness and AEs of LCM, such as the number of antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) tried before LCM and concomitantly used SCBs, were also studied. ResultsWe enrolled 112 patients (median age = 11 years). One year after starting LCM, 29% of the patients were seizure free, and 50% had a ≥50% seizure reduction. Of the patients, 17% experienced AEs, the most common being somnolence. A ≥50% seizure reduction was observed for LCM in 30% of patients in whom other SCBs had not been effective. Lacosamide produced a ≥50% seizure reduction in 35% of the patients taking one concomitant SCB. By contrast, no patients had ≥50% seizure reduction, and 33% developed AEs, when LCM was administered concomitantly with two SCBs. ConclusionsLacosamide was effective in 30% of children and young adults in whom other SCBs had not been effective. The effectiveness of LCM may differ from that of other SCBs, and it is worth trying in patients with epilepsy resistant to other AEDs.