Lack Of Efficacy Research Articles

Gemcitabine plus platinum-based chemotherapy in combination with bevacizumab for kidney metastatic collecting duct and medullary carcinomas: Results of a prospective phase II trial (BEVABEL-GETUG/AFU24)

BackgroundRenal medullary carcinoma (RMC) and collecting duct carcinoma (CDC) are rare entities with a poor outcome. First-line metastatic treatment is based on gemcitabine + platinum chemotherapy (GC) regimen but retrospective data suggest enhanced anti-tumour activity with the addition of bevacizumab. Therefore, we performed a prospective assessment of the safety and efficacy of GC + bevacizumab in metastatic RMC/CDC. MethodsWe conducted a phase 2 open-label trial in 18 centres in France in patients with metastatic RMC/CDC and no prior systemic treatment. Patients received bevacizumab plus GC up to 6 cycles followed, for non-progressive disease, by maintenance therapy with bevacizumab until progression or unacceptable toxicity. The co-primary end-points were objective response rates (ORRs) and progression-free survival (PFS) at 6 months (ORR-6; PFS-6). PFS, overall survival (OS) and safety were secondary end-points. At interim analysis, the trial was closed due to toxicity and lack of efficacy. ResultsFrom 2015 to 2019, 34 of the 41 planned patients have been enroled. After a median follow-up of 25 months, ORR-6 and PFS-6 were 29.4% and 47.1%, respectively. Median OS was 11.1 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 7.6–24.2). Seven patients (20.6%) discontinued bevacizumab because of toxicities (hypertension, proteinuria, colonic perforation). Grade 3–4 toxicities were reported in 82% patients, the most common being haematologic toxicities and hypertension. Two patients experienced grade 5 toxicity (subdural haematoma related to bevacizumab and encephalopathy of unknown origin). ConclusionOur study showed no benefit for bevacizumab added to chemotherapy in metastatic RMC and CDC with higher than expected toxicity. Consequently, GC regimen remains a therapeutic option for RMC/CDC patients.

TrkA Co-Receptors: The Janus Face of TrkA?

Larotrectinib and Entrectinib are specific pan-Trk tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in 2018 for cancers with an NTRK fusion. Despite initial enthusiasm for these compounds, the French agency (HAS) recently reported their lack of efficacy. In addition, primary and secondary resistance to these TKIs has been observed in the absence of other mutations in cancers with an NTRK fusion. Furthermore, when TrkA is overexpressed, it promotes ligand-independent activation, bypassing the TKI. All of these clinical and experimental observations show that genetics does not explain all therapeutic failures. It is therefore necessary to explore new hypotheses to explain these failures. This review summarizes the current status of therapeutic strategies with TrkA inhibitors, focusing on the mechanisms potentially involved in these failures and more specifically on the role of TrkA.

Intravenous ravulizumab in mechanically ventilated patients hospitalised with severe COVID-19: a phase 3, multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial

The complement pathway is a potential target for the treatment of severe COVID-19. We evaluated the safety and efficacy of ravulizumab, a terminal complement C5 inhibitor, in patients hospitalised with severe COVID-19 requiring invasive or non-invasive mechanical ventilation. This phase 3, multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial (ALXN1210-COV-305) enrolled adult patients (aged ≥18 years) from 31 hospitals in France, Japan, Spain, the UK, and the USA. Eligible patients had a confirmed diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 that required hospitalisation and either invasive or non-invasive mechanical ventilation, with severe pneumonia, acute lung injury, or acute respiratory distress syndrome confirmed by CT scan or x-ray. We randomly assigned participants (2:1) to receive intravenous ravulizumab plus best supportive care (BSC) or BSC alone using a web-based interactive response system. Randomisation was in permuted blocks of six with stratification by intubation status. Bodyweight-based intravenous doses of ravulizumab were administered on days 1, 5, 10, and 15. The primary efficacy endpoint was survival based on all-cause mortality at day 29 in the intention-to-treat (ITT) population. Safety endpoints were analysed in all randomly assigned patients in the ravulizumab plus BSC group who received at least one dose of ravulizumab, and in all randomly assigned patients in the BSC group. The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04369469, and was terminated at interim analysis due to futility. Between May 10, 2020, and Jan 13, 2021, 202 patients were enrolled in the study and randomly assigned to ravulizumab plus BSC or BSC. 201 patients were included in the ITT population (135 in the ravulizumab plus BSC group and 66 in the BSC group). The ravulizumab plus BSC group comprised 96 (71%) men and 39 (29%) women with a mean age of 63·2 years (SD 13·23); the BSC group comprised 43 (65%) men and 23 (35%) women with a mean age of 63·5 years (12·40). Most patients (113 [84%] of 135 in the ravulizumab plus BSC group and 53 [80%] of 66 in the BSC group) were on invasive mechanical ventilation at baseline. Overall survival estimates based on multiple imputation were 58% for patients receiving ravulizumab plus BSC and 60% for patients receiving BSC (Mantel-Haenszel analysis: risk difference -0·0205; 95% CI -0·1703 to 0·1293; one-sided p=0·61). In the safety population, 113 (89%) of 127 patients in the ravulizumab plus BSC group and 56 (84%) of 67 in the BSC group had a treatment-emergent adverse event. Of these events, infections and infestations (73 [57%] vs 24 [36%] patients) and vascular disorders (39 [31%] vs 12 [18%]) were observed more frequently in the ravulizumab plus BSC group than in the BSC group. Five patients had serious adverse events considered to be related to ravulizumab. These events were bacteraemia, thrombocytopenia, oesophageal haemorrhage, cryptococcal pneumonia, and pyrexia (in one patient each). Addition of ravulizumab to BSC did not improve survival or other secondary outcomes. Safety findings were consistent with the known safety profile of ravulizumab in its approved indications. Despite the lack of efficacy, the study adds value for future research into complement therapeutics in critical illnesses by showing that C5 inhibition can be accomplished in severely ill patients. Alexion, AstraZeneca Rare Disease.

Narrative Review: The FDA's Perfunctory Approach of Dietary Supplement Regulations Giving Rise to Copious Reports of Adverse Events.

Background: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) originated from the passage of the 1906 Pure Food and Drugs act aimed to rein in the long-standing abuse in the consumer product marketplace. The act was passed to prohibit interstate commerce of misbranded and adulterated foods, drinks, drugs. Thus, promoting the FDA's mission to protect the public health by regulating human and veterinary drugs, biological products, medical devices, food supply, cosmetics, and tobacco to ensure safety, efficacy, and security. Progressing further in 1994, the Dietary Supplement Health and Education Act (DSHEA) was established designating specific label requirements, providing regulatory framework, and authorizing the FDA to promulgate good manufacturing practices for dietary supplements. This act defined and classified "dietary supplements" and "dietary ingredients" as food requiring all over the counter products (OTC) products to consist of labeling that is easy to understand and meets the FDA quality, effectiveness, and safety standards. However, under the umbrella of OTC products, the FDA fell short in its regulation of the expansive dietary supplement market. The objective of this study is to discern how the lack of efficacy in the FDA's regulations of OTC dietary supplements inevitably inspired more harm than benefit. Methods: This review comprised of case studies including young adolescents and adult consumers who experienced adverse events from the use of dietary supplements. Products which showed highest prevalence in adverse event reports through the Food and Drug Administration CFSAN Adverse Event Reporting System (CAERS) included but not limited to; Vitamin E (vitamin derivative), Beta-sitosterol (plant sterol) Yohimbine, Kava Kava Kratom, Garcinia Cambogia, (herbal products) and OxyElite Pro (marketed weight loss product). The primary endpoint was evaluating the FDA's regulations on dietary supplement safety protocols. The secondary endpoint was assessing the actions of the FDA in response to these case events. Results: Overall, between 2004 to 2021, a total of 79,071 adverse events related to the use of dietary supplements were reported to the Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition. Vitamin E products for example, marketed for decades for their antioxidant benefits in turn have shown significant evidence of toxicity and an increased risk of bleeding outweighing its potential benefit. The FDA's response was simply implementing a label guideline update, yet this update had evidence of minimal effect as the number of cases gradually continued to increase. Likewise, herbal products such as Kava Kava, Yohimbine, Kratom, and Garcinia Cambogia, in addition to weight regulating products, such as OxyElite Pro and HydroxyCut, have been linked to organ failure, hepatic, renal, cardiac toxicity, and death respectively. The FDA merely responded through instating public consumer warnings of their effects with consumption and limited recalls of certain products. Conclusion: With the easy accessibility of these products, the general public is more inclined to its use without proper guidance and monitoring from their healthcare team, posing as a major concern for possible interactions, contraindications and unfavorable outcomes. With proper implementation of stringent regulations post findings from increased studies on efficacy and safety, cases of adverse events could have been reduced significantly or averted completely. The FDA's minimalistic efforts consisting of only post-marketing monitoring and retrospective actions of label modifying have time and time again shown flaws as seen in the growing series of reports. By emending the over-the-counter supplement review process to reflect that of prescription medication, the magnitude of adverse events can be diminished. The process should include preclinical research in addition to clinical research, FDA thorough examination of data prior approval and post marketing surveillance.

Real-world, long-term evaluation of the tolerability and therapy retention of Epidiolex® (cannabidiol) in patients with refractory epilepsy

ObjectiveEpidiolex® (CBD) is FDA-approved for seizures associated with Lennox-Gastaut syndrome (LGS), Dravet syndrome (DS), and tuberous sclerosis complex (TSC). Phase III studies suggest that certain adverse effects (AEs), possibly linked to pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) interactions may be therapy-limiting. We sought to identify these factors that contribute to treatment success and retention of therapy. MethodsA single-center, retrospective review of patients with refractory epilepsy taking Epidiolex® was performed. Kaplan-Meier analysis was performed to describe Epidiolex® retention, as a measure of overall effectiveness. ResultsOne hundred and twelve patients were screened; 4 were excluded due to loss to follow-up or never starting Epidiolex®. Of 108 patients, mean age was 20.3 years (13.1, range 2 to 63), and 52.8% were female. Mean initial and maintenance doses were 5.3 mg/kg/day (1.3) and 15.3 mg/kg/day (5.8), respectively. At the final evaluation, 75% of patients remained on Epidiolex®. The 25th percentile for discontinuation was 19 months. 46.3% of patients experienced at least one treatment-emergent adverse effect (TEAE) with 14.5% d/c Epidiolex® due to treatment emerging adverse effects (TEAE). The most common reasons for discontinuation were lack of efficacy (37%), increased seizure activity (22%), worsened behavior (22%), and sedation (22%). One out of 27 discontinuations was due to liver function test (LFT) elevations (3.7%). At initiation, 47.2% were concurrently taking clobazam, and 39.2% of those patients had an initial clobazam dose decrease. 53% of patients were able to either discontinue or lower the dose of at least one other antiseizure medication. SignificanceEpidiolex® is generally well-tolerated and the majority continued long-term treatment. Patterns of adverse effects were similar to clinical trials, however gastrointestinal complaints, and significant LFT elevations were less common. Our data suggest most patients discontinue within the first several months of treatment and suggest that further studies designed to evaluate early identification and potential mitigation of adverse effects and including drug interactions are warranted.

Exploring the Potential of Iminosugars as Antivirals for Crimean-Congo Haemorrhagic Fever Virus, Using the Surrogate Hazara Virus: Liquid-Chromatography-Based Mapping of Viral N-Glycosylation and In Vitro Antiviral Assays.

Crimean-Congo haemorrhagic fever virus (CCHFV) is a pathogen of increasing public health concern, being a widely distributed arbovirus and the causative agent of the potentially fatal Crimean-Congo haemorrhagic fever. Hazara virus (HAZV) is a genetically and serologically related virus that has been proposed as a surrogate for antiviral and vaccine testing for CCHFV. Glycosylation analysis of HAZV has been limited; first, we confirmed for the first time the occupation of two N-glycosylation sites in the HAZV glycoprotein. Despite this, there was no apparent antiviral efficacy of a panel of iminosugars against HAZV, as determined by quantification of the total secretion and infectious virus titres produced following infection of SW13 and Vero cells. This lack of efficacy was not due to an inability of deoxynojirimycin (DNJ)-derivative iminosugars to access and inhibit endoplasmic reticulum α-glucosidases, as demonstrated by free oligosaccharide analysis in uninfected and infected SW13 and uninfected Vero cells. Even so, iminosugars may yet have potential as antivirals for CCHFV since the positions and importance of N-linked glycans may differ between the viruses, a hypothesis requiring further evaluation.

A Study on Pharmacokinetic Functionalities and Safety Margins of an Optimized Simvastatin Nanoformulation.

A pharmaceutical formulation with favorable pharmacokinetic parameters is more likely to be efficacious and safe to overcome the failures of the drug resulting from lack of efficacy, poor bioavailability, and toxicity. In this view, we aimed to evaluate the pharmacokinetic functionalities and safety margin of an optimized CS-SS nanoformulation (F40) by in vitro/in vivo methods. The everted sac technique was used to evaluate the improved absorption of a simvastatin formulation. In vitro protein binding in bovine serum and mice plasma was performed. The formulation's liver and intestinal CYP3A4 activity and metabolic pathways were investigated by the qRT-PCR technique. The excretion of cholesterol and bile acids was measured to demonstrate the formulation's cholesterol depletion effect. Safety margins were determined by histopathology as well as fiber typing studies. In vitro protein binding results revealed the existence of a high percentage of free drugs (22.31 ± 3.1%, 18.20 ± 1.9%, and 16.9 ± 2.2%, respectively) compared to the standard formulation. The controlled metabolism in the liver was demonstrated from CYP3A4 activity. The formulation showed enhanced PK parameters in rabbits such as a lower Cmax, clearance, and a higher Tmax, AUC, Vd, and t1/2. qRT-PCR screening further proved the different metabolic pathways followed by simvastatin (SREBP-2) and chitosan (PPAR-γ pathway) in the formulation. The results from qRT-PCR and histopathology confirmed the toxicity level. Hence, this pharmacokinetic profile of the nanoformulation proved it has a unique synergistic hypolipidemic modality.

Poor Translatability of Biomedical Research Using Animals - A Narrative Review.

The failure rate for the translation of drugs from animal testing to human treatments remains at over 92%, where it has been for the past few decades. The majority of these failures are due to unexpected toxicity - that is, safety issues revealed in human trials that were not apparent in animal tests - or lack of efficacy. However, the use of more innovative tools, such as organs-on-chips, in the preclinical pipeline for drug testing, has revealed that these tools are more able to predict unexpected safety events prior to clinical trials and so can be used for this, as well as for efficacy testing. Here, we review several disease areas, and consider how the use of animal models has failed to offer effective new treatments. We also make some suggestions as to how the more human-relevant new approach methodologies might be applied to address this.

Commentary: Droopy kidneys and floppy airways: Keeping taut standards with surgical innovation

In the early 1900s, patients with abdominal pain began to be diagnosed with a condition known as nephroptosis.1 Before long, nearly 170 operations had been devised to reposition and stabilize the “movable kidney.” However, within a span of about 30 years, surgical procedures to fix nephroptosis peaked and then disappeared. Surgical history is littered with such operations with plausible anatomic rationale but lack of efficacy because the purported causal mechanism suffered from various logical fallacies (Figure 1).

Design of a Tumor Binding GMCSF as Intratumoral Immunotherapy of Solid Tumors.

Next-generation cancer immunotherapies may utilize immunostimulants to selectively activate the host immune system against tumor cells. Checkpoint inhibitors (CPIs) like anti-PD1/PDL-1 that inhibit immunosuppression have shown unprecedented success but are only effective in the 20-30% of patients that possess an already "hot" (immunogenic) tumor. In this regard, intratumoral (IT) injection of immunostimulants is a promising approach since they can work synergistically with CPIs to overcome the resistance to immunotherapies by inducing immune stimulation in the tumor. One such immunostimulant is granulocyte macrophage-colony-stimulating factor (GMCSF) that functions by recruiting and activating antigen-presenting cells (dendritic cells) in the tumor, thereby initiating anti-tumor immune responses. However, key problems with GMCSF are lack of efficacy and the risk of systemic toxicity caused by the leakage of GMCSF from the tumor tissue. We have designed tumor-retentive versions of GMCSF that are safe yet potent immunostimulants for the local treatment of solid tumors. The engineered GMCSFs (eGMCSF) were synthesized by recombinantly fusing tumor-ECM (extracellular matrix) binding peptides to GMCSF. The eGMCSFs exhibited enhanced tumor binding and potent immunological activity in vitro and in vivo. Upon IT administration, the tumor-retentive eGMCSFs persisted in the tumor, thereby alleviating systemic toxicity, and elicited localized immune activation to effectively turn an unresponsive immunologically "cold" tumor "hot".

Advances in Intralesional Therapy for Locoregionally Advanced and Metastatic Melanoma: Five Years of Progress.

Locoregionally advanced and metastatic melanoma are complex diagnoses with a variety of available treatment options. Intralesional therapy for melanoma has been under investigation for decades; however, it has advanced precipitously in recent years. In 2015, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved talimogene laherparepvec (T-VEC), the only FDA-approved intralesional therapy for advanced melanoma. There has been significant progress since that time with other oncolytic viruses, toll-like receptor agonists, cytokines, xanthene dyes, and immune checkpoint inhibitors all under investigation as intralesional agents. Further to this, there has been exploration of numerous combinations of intralesional therapies and systemic therapies as various lines of therapy. Several of these combinations have been abandoned due to their lack of efficacy or safety concerns. This manuscript presents the various types of intralesional therapies that have reached phase 2 or later clinical trials in the past 5 years, including their mechanism of action, therapeutic combinations under investigation, and published results. The intention is to provide an overview of the progress that has been made, discuss ongoing trials worth following, and share our opinions on opportunities for further advancement.

‘I can’t draw, sing or dance to save my life!’: Educator and parent implicit theories of creativity

Creativity is recognised as a key facet of the suite of 21st century skills driving education worldwide. Understanding its existence outside of The Arts is vital for recognising young children’s creativity. However, what constitutes creativity and what it ‘looks like’ is not always clear. As a result, inconsistency and lack of efficacy when educators and parents attempt to encourage the development of young children’s creativity is possible. To investigate implicit theories of creativity relating to what creativity is and who is considered creative, parents and educators of four to eight-year-old children in four early learning contexts in Perth, Western Australia, were invited to complete a questionnaire. Findings suggest there may not be a strong tendency towards recognising creativity in The Arts but there may be an inclination to recognise eminent men’s creativity more than women’s. Additionally, there appears to be a lack of recognition of ‘daring’ as a creative behaviour.

Application of Design of Experiments in the Development of Self-Microemulsifying Drug Delivery Systems.

Oral delivery has become the route of choice among all other types of drug administrations. However, typical chronic disease drugs are often poorly water-soluble, have low dissolution rates, and undergo first-pass metabolism, ultimately leading to low bioavailability and lack of efficacy. The lipid-based formulation offers tremendous benefits of using versatile excipients and has great compatibility with all types of dosage forms. Self-microemulsifying drug delivery system (SMEDDS) promotes drug self-emulsification in a combination of oil, surfactant, and co-surfactant, thereby facilitating better drug solubility and absorption. The feasible preparation of SMEDDS creates a promising strategy to improve the drawbacks of lipophilic drugs administered orally. Selecting a decent mixing among these components is, therefore, of importance for successful SMEDDS. Quality by Design (QbD) brings a systematic approach to drug development, and it offers promise to significantly improve the manufacturing quality performance of SMEDDS. Furthermore, it could be benefited efficiently by conducting pre-formulation studies integrated with the statistical design of experiment (DoE). In this review, we highlight the recent findings for the development of microemulsions and SMEDDS by using DoE methods to optimize the formulations for drugs in different excipients with controllable ratios. A brief overview of DoE concepts is discussed, along with its technical benefits in improving SMEDDS formulations.

A Propensity-Matched Cohort Assessing Impact of a Neutralizing Monoclonal Antibody in Mild-to-Moderate Coronavirus Disease 2019.

Background: Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoaV-2) is responsible for the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. In randomized clinical trials, patients who were treated with the anti-spike monoclonal antibody bamlanivimab had fewer COVID-19-related hospitalizations or emergency department (ED) visits than the control group. Methods: A retrospective cohort was assembled across a multisite healthcare system between November 20, 2020 and March 31, 2021. Ambulatory COVID-19 patients treated with bamlanivimab (n = 209) were propensity score matched without replacement (1:1) to a pool of 1024 eligible control patients who received similar care without bamlanivimab. The primary endpoint was all-cause mortality or admission at 30 days. Secondary endpoints included hospitalization, critical care admission, oxygenation requirements, and infusion-related reactions. Propensity score matching (PSM) analysis was used to assess the effect of bamlanivimab infusion on the composite endpoint and secondary endpoints. Results: A total of n = 209 matched patients were included in each arm of the study. The absolute standardized difference (stddiff) was calculated and indicated a balance between the groups. Almost all variables had a stddiff of less than 0.10, except for respiratory rate (RR) (stddiff = -0.11). For the primary composite endpoint of the matched cohort, 10.1% (n = 21) of patients in the intervention group were hospitalized or deceased within 30-day postbamlanivimab infusion versus 27.8% (n = 58) in the control group (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 0.29, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.17 to 0.51, P < .001). Conclusion: Patients with ambulatory COVID-19 who received bamlanivimab in the outpatient setting had a statistically significant reduction on the odds of admission postinfusion. Despite bamlanivimab's lack of efficacy on newer SARS-CoV-2 variants, this study demonstrates that neutralizing monoclonal antibodies can be effective against specific variants. If variant identification becomes a more accessible tool in outpatient centers or EDs, more targeted therapeutic options may be considered.

Treatment of Dystonic Tremor of the Upper Limbs: A Single-Center Retrospective Study

Tremor is part of the phenomenological spectrum of dystonia. Treatments available for tremor in dystonia are oral medications (OM), botulinum neurotoxin (BoNT), and brain surgery (deep brain stimulation or thalamotomy). There is limited knowledge regarding the outcome of different treatment options, and evidence is especially scarce for the tremor of the upper limbs occurring in people with dystonia. In this single-center retrospective study, we evaluated the outcome of different treatments in a cohort of people with upper limb dystonic tremors. Demographic, clinical, and treatment data were analyzed. Dropout rates and side effects were specifically assessed, as well as the 7-point patient-completed clinical global impression scale (p-CGI-S, 1: very much improved; 7: very much worse) as outcome measures. A total of 47 subjects (46.8% female) with dystonic tremor, tremor associated with dystonia, or task-specific tremor were included, with a median age at onset of 58 years (7-86). A total of 31 subjects were treated with OM, 31 with BoNT, and 7 with surgery. Dropout rates with OM were 74.2% due to either lack of efficacy (n = 10) or side effects (n = 13). A total of 7 patients treated with BoNT (22.6%) had mild weakness, causing dropout in 2. P-CGI-S was ≤3 (improvement) in 39% with OM, compared to 92% with BoNT and 100% with surgery. These findings suggest good symptom control of the tremor of the upper limb in dystonia with BoNT and surgery, with higher rates of dropout and side effects with OM. Randomized controlled studies are needed to confirm our findings and provide further insight into better selecting suitable patients for BoNT or brain surgery.

Pharmacovigilance on cannabidiol as an antiepileptic agent.

Introduction: Cannabidiol (CBD) is an active chemical contained in the plant Cannabis sativa. It is a resorcinol-based compound that crosses the blood-brain barrier without causing euphoric effects. CBD has a plethora of pharmacological effects of therapeutic interest. CBD has been authorized in the European Union as an anticonvulsant against serious infantile epileptic syndromes, but its safety profile is still not sufficiently described. Methods: With the goal of expanding information on the safety of CBD use as an antiepileptic agent beyond the most common side effects known through clinical studies, an analysis of serious case reports on suspected adverse reactions (SARs) to CBD licensed as an anti-epileptic drug found in the EudraVigilance database is reported in this article. EudraVigilance is a system purchased by the European Medicines Agency (EMA) for monitoring the safety of medicinal products marketed in Europe. Results: The most frequent serious SARs to CBD in EudraVigilance were epilepsy aggravation, hepatic disorders, lack of efficacy, and somnolence. Discussion: Based on our analysis, the following precautions should be adopted for appropriate monitoring of potential adverse effects, more attention towards possible CBD medical use as an antiepileptic: awareness of interactions with other drugs, epilepsy aggravation, and drug effectiveness.

Effectiveness and tolerability of calcipotriol/betamethasone aerosol foam in patients with psoriasis vulgaris in real‐life setting: A prospective, noninterventional, multicenter observational study in Austria

AbstractBackgroundFor the topical treatment of plaque psoriasis, vitamin D analogues and corticosteroids are used as a fixed combination, which is available in different galenic preparations.ObjectivesThe aim of this study was to investigate the effectiveness and tolerability of calcipotriol/betamethasone (Cal/BD) cutaneous foam in a real‐world setting.MethodsOverall, 107 adult patients with at least mild plaque psoriasis as measured by the Investigator Global Assessment (IGA) were included and treated for 4 weeks. Affected body surface area (BSA), plaque locations, and Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) were documented at baseline, after 4 weeks and at the end of the study. Pruritus, overall patient satisfaction, tolerability and convenience of use, as well as quality of life (DLQI) were also evaluated.ResultsIn total, 96% of the patients suffered from mild to moderate psoriasis vulgaris. Of all patients included, 76% had previously received topical therapy. Under treatment with Cal/BD aerosol foam, the mean IGA score was reduced from 2.49 to 1.28 points (p &lt; 0.001). The mean PASI score was reduced from 7.01 to 3.58 (p &lt; 0.001). BSA was improved from 9.92% to 4.19% (p &lt; 0.001) and the DLQI from 7.81 to 2.43 points (p &lt; 0.001). Over 88% (84/95 patients) were very satisfied or satisfied with Cal/BD aerosol foam. The treatment was described as soothing (63/89), cooling (70/89), and itch relieving (53/84). Lack of efficacy was documented as an adverse event (AE) in four of 107 patients. No other AEs were observed.ConclusionsThe treatment of psoriasis vulgaris with Cal/BD aerosol foam was demonstrated to be effective, well tolerated and associated with high patient satisfaction.

Combinatorial therapy with BAR502 and UDCA resets FXR and GPBAR1 signaling and reverses liver histopathology in a model of NASH

Non-alcoholic steatosis (NAFLD) and steatohepatitis (NASH) are two highly prevalent human disorders for which therapy remains suboptimal. Bile acids are signaling molecules acting on two main receptors the Farnesoid-x-receptor (FXR) and G protein coupled receptor GPB AR1. Clinical trials have shown that FXR agonism might result in side effects along with lack of efficacy in restoring liver histopathology. For these reasons a multi-targets therapy combined FXR agonists with agent targeting additional molecular mechanisms might have improved efficacy over selective FXR agonists. In the present study we have compared the effects of BAR502, a dual FXR/GPBAR1 ligand) alone or in combination with ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) in a model of NAFLD/NASH induced by feeding mice with a Western diet for 10 weeks. The results demonstrated that while BAR502 and UDCA partially protected against liver damage caused by Western diet, the combination of the two, reversed the pro-atherogenic lipid profile and completely reversed the histopathology damage, attenuating liver steatosis, ballooning, inflammation and fibrosis. Additionally, while both agents increased insulin sensitivity and bile acid signaling, the combination of the two, modulated up top 85 genes in comparison of mice feed a Western diet, strongly reducing expression of inflammatory markers such as chemokines and cytokines. Additionally, the combination of the two agents redirected the bile acid metabolism toward bile acid species that are GPBAR1 agonist while reduced liver bile acid content and increased fecal excretion. Together, these data, highlight the potential role for a combinatorial therapy based on BAR502 and UDCA in treating of NAFLD.

Advances in Alzheimer's disease's pharmacological treatment.

Alzheimer's disease (AD) is the most common type of dementia in the elderly. Several hypotheses emerged from AD pathophysiological mechanisms. However, no neuronal protective or regenerative drug is available nowadays. Researchers still work in drug development and are finding new molecular targets to treat AD. Therefore, this study aimed to summarize main advances in AD pharmacological therapy. Clinical trials registered in the National Library of Medicine database were selected and analyzed accordingly to molecular targets, therapeutic effects, and safety profile. The most common outcome was the lack of efficacy. Only seven trials concluded that tested drugs were safe and induced any kind of therapeutic improvement. Three works showed therapeutic effects followed by toxicity. In addition to aducanumab recent FDA approval, antibodies against amyloid-β (Aβ) showed no noteworthy results. 5-HT6 antagonists, tau inhibitors and nicotinic agonists' data were discouraging. However, anti-Aβ vaccine, BACE inhibitor and anti-neuroinflammation drugs showed promising results.

Examining the Long-Term Efficacy and Tolerability of Netarsudil as an Adjunctive Glaucoma Medical Therapy

Background and Hypothesis:Glaucoma is a group of progressive optic nerve neuropathies that commonly cause vision loss or blindness. The most prevalent of these neuropathies is known as primary open-angle glaucoma. POAG is caused by increased intraocular pressure (IOP) in the anterior chamber of the eye, due to increased resistance to outflow of aqueous humor. Netarsudil is a recently developed novel medication for lowering intraocular pressure. The aim of this study is to assess the long-term efficacy and tolerability of netarsudil as an adjunctive therapy in patients with POAG.&#x0D; Methods:In this study data was collected through a retrospective chart review of patients being treated for POAG. Efficacy was measured by using the difference in intraocular pressure over the course of treatment. Tolerability was assessed using a Kaplan-Meier estimator, measuring the time to failure of treatment. Failure in this case is defined as either a termination in treatment due to adverse effects, or termination in treatment from lack of efficacy in lowering IOP. Data was separated into groups of either 2nd, 3rd, or 4th line treatments. In patients where both eyes were treated, one eye was randomly selected to be followed for measurements.&#x0D; Results:Probability of failure curves, based on the tolerability and efficacy of netarsudil treatment, were constructed for each group. IOP reduction (mmHg) was found to be: 3.00 (3.09 95% CI) for 2nd line, 7.05 (4.65 95% CI) for 3rd line, and 5.31 (1.38 95% CI) for 4th line.&#x0D; Conclusion and Impact:These results give context to netarsudil as a therapy in terms of its long-term implications. As the drug was only approved for use in late 2018, there is limited data on its long-term efficacy and tolerability, and this information helps to give clinicians a better idea of whether it will be a helpful treatment for patients.