Labral Repair Research Articles

Preoperative Paralabral Cysts Predict More Significant Chondral Damage but Not 2-Year Functional Outcomes Following Arthroscopic Labral Repair

To investigate whether paralabral cysts identified incidentally on preoperative magnetic resonance imaging/arthrography predict 2-year functional outcomes after arthroscopic acetabular labral repair. Prospectively collected data for patients undergoing primary hip arthroscopy by a single surgeon from 2014 to 2020 were retrospectively reviewed. Included patients were ≥18 years and completed baseline patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) with additional follow-up at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months. Exclusion criteria were labral debridement, hip dysplasia, advanced hip osteoarthritis (Tönnis > 1), or previous ipsilateral hip surgery. Patients were stratified based on the presence of paralabral cysts identified on magnetic resonance imaging/arthrography. Primary outcomes were International Hip Outcome Tool and modified Harris Hip Score. Secondary outcomes included other PROMs and the visual analog pain scale. Outcomes were compared between cohorts using linear mixed-effects models and Fisher's exact tests. Sensitivity analyses accounted for preoperative PROMs, nonlinear improvement trajectories, and relevant baseline characteristics. Of the 182 included hips (47.8% female; mean ± standard deviation age, 36.9 ± 11.4), 30 (16.4%) had paralabral cysts. During the 2-year study period, there were no significant differences between patients with and without paralabral cysts in terms of International Hip Outcome Tool scores (weighted difference= 1.60; 95% confidence interval [CI],-5.09, 8.28; P= .64), modified Harris Hip Scores (weighted difference= 0.56; 95% CI,-4.16, 5.28; P= .82), or any secondary outcomes (except for HOS-Sports Subscale at 3 months [mean difference=-11.85; 95% CI,-22.85,-0.84; P= .035]). Furthermore, there were no significant differences in clinically meaningful outcomes (P > .05 for all), revision rates (P> .99), or conversion to total hip arthroplasty between cohorts (P> .99). These results held across all sensitivity analyses. Although preoperative paralabral cysts were associated with worse cam impingement and more severe chondral damage observed intraoperatively, they did not predict 2-year functional outcomes or clinically meaningful improvements, suggesting that incidentally discovered paralabral cysts are not a contraindication for arthroscopic labral repair. Level III, retrospective cohort study.

Favorable short-term outcomes of micronized allogenic cartilage scaffold for glenoid cartilage defects associated with posterior glenohumeral instability

To determine clinical outcomes associated with micronized allogenic cartilage scaffold use for treatment of posterior glenoid cartilage defects at 2 years. Case series. A retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data was performed on a consecutive series of patients who underwent arthroscopic treatment of a symptomatic posterior glenoid cartilage defect with micronized allogenic cartilage scaffold between January 2019 and December 2020. The primary outcome was subjective shoulder value (SSV) at latest follow-up. Secondary outcomes included visual analog scale (VAS), recurrence of instability, and range of motion (ROM). Seven patients, including 4 in the setting of primary posterior instability and 3 in the setting of recurrent symptoms after arthroscopic posterior glenohumeral stabilization, were included in the analysis with a mean follow up of 2.6 years (range, 2-3.7 years). Statistically significant improvements were seen in SSV (median= 40, interquartile range [IQR]= 40-50 before surgery; vs median= 85, IQR= 67.5-87.5 after surgery; P= .018) and VAS (median= 4, IQR= 4-6.3 before surgery; vs median=1, IQR= 0-1.5 after surgery; P= .010). No significant differences were seen in ROM. There were no cases of recurrent instability or reoperation. The use of micronized allogenic cartilage scaffold for glenoid cartilage defects is associated with clinical improvement at 2-year follow-up. This is the case when performed in conjunction with index posterior labral repair when there is a concomitant glenoid cartilage defect or when performed in the setting of persistent pain and mechanical symptoms after prior posterior labral repair. Level IV, therapeutic case series.

Isolated Arthroscopic Debridement of Acetabular Labral Tears: High Rates of Failure and Conversion to Total Hip Arthroplasty at 13-Year Minimum Follow-up

Background: Historically, symptomatic hip labral lesions were treated with arthroscopic debridement. Hip labral repair has become the standard treatment for labral pathology; however, to date, there are limited long-term studies regarding the outcomes of isolated labral debridement. Purpose: To (1) evaluate the long-term patient-reported outcomes of isolated labral debridement, (2) report reoperation and arthroplasty rates, and (3) identify risk factors contributing to reoperation or poor clinical outcomes. Study Design: Case series; Level of evidence, 4 Methods: A retrospective review of a prospectively generated cohort of 59 hips in 57 patients from 1996 to 2010 who underwent hip arthroscopy with labral debridement was performed. Only patients with Tönnis grade <3 were included. Additionally, given the time period analyzed, resection of cam morphology was not performed, and the interportal capsulotomy was not repaired. The pre- and postoperative modified Harris Hip Score; Hip Outcome Score (HOS)-Activities of Daily Living and -Sports scores; and reoperation, conversion to total hip arthroplasty, and risk factors were analyzed. Results: In total, 48 hips in 47 patients (14 men, 33 women; mean age, 48.0 ± 12.9 years) met inclusion criteria and were followed for a mean of 17 ± 3 years (range, 13-27 years). The mean preoperative Tönnis grade was 1.3 ± 0.6 (range, 0-2), the mean chondral acetabular International Cartilage Regeneration & Joint Preservation Society (ICRS) grade was 1.7 ± 1.6 (range, 0-4), the mean chondral femoral ICRS grade was 0.9 ± 1.4, and the mean acetabular labral articular cartilage grade was 2.5 ± 1.2 (range, 0-4). At the final follow-up, mean the modified Harris Hip Score, HOS-Activities of Daily Living score, and HOS-Sports score were 82.2 ± 16.6, 81.9 ± 20.5, and 82.2 ± 20.5, respectively. Nineteen hips underwent subsequent reoperation at a mean of 5.5 ± 6.2 years (range, 0.5-21.2 years) postoperatively, including 16 hips (33% overall) being converted to total hip arthroplasty. Higher acetabular ICRS chondral grades at the time of surgery were observed in patients who went on to subsequent surgery compared with those who did not (2.3 ± 1.6 vs 1.1 ± 1.5; P = .02). In reoperation-free hips, Tönnis grade demonstrated a trend of increasing over time (1.4 preoperatively vs 1.7 at radiographic follow-up; P = .08). At the final follow-up, 19 hips (40%) had undergone reoperation, and 5 additional hips (10%) were rated as “abnormal” or “severely abnormal” in function, resulting in an overall clinical failure rate of 50%. Conclusion: Isolated labral debridement was found to result in high rates of failure and reoperation, with a third of patients being converted to arthroplasty and half of patients meeting criteria for reoperation or clinical failure. Of note, for patients remaining reoperation-free, satisfactory outcome scores were observed.

Long-Term Outcomes of Primary Hip Arthroscopy With Labral Repair for Femoroacetabular Impingement: Results at Minimum 9-Year Follow-up.

Hip arthroscopy continues to advance and become increasingly commonly performed. With the evolution of techniques and instrumentation, labral repair rather than debridement has emerged as the treatment of choice for labral pathology. There remains a lack of data on long-term outcomes after labral repair. To (1) evaluate long-term patient-reported outcomes of primary hip arthroscopy with labral repair for femoroacetabular impingement, (2) report achievement rates of Patient Acceptable Symptom State (PASS) and minimal clinically important difference (MCID), and (3) investigate rates of reoperation and progression to total hip arthroplasty (THA). Case series; Level of evidence, 4. Prospectively collected data were reviewed for patients who underwent primary hip arthroscopy with labral repair between 2010 and 2013. Patients' medical records were reviewed for demographic characteristics, intraoperative findings, reoperation, and progression to THA. Patients were assessed pre- and postoperatively using the following scales: visual analog scale (VAS) for pain; Tegner activity scale; modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS); 12-item International Hip Outcome Tool (iHOT-12); Hip Outcome Score-Activities of Daily Living (HOS-ADL); HOS-Sport-Specific Subscale (HOS-SSS); and Non-Arthritic Hip Score. Patients were also surveyed for satisfaction, subjective improvement, and level of function. A total of 32 patients (n = 24 women; n = 8 men) with a mean age of 27.7 years (range, 13.6-51 years) were evaluated for a mean of 9.4 years (range, 9-12.1 years). Patients achieved significant mean improvements in VAS pain at rest of 2 points, VAS pain with use of 1.9, mHHS of 19.9 points, iHOT-12 of 33.5 points, HOS-ADL of 17.4 points, and HOS-SSS of 29.5 points (P≤ .015 for all). Eleven patients (34.4%) underwent reoperation and 4 (12.5%) progressed to THA during the study period. At the final follow-up, the MCID achievement rate was ≥68%, the PASS achievement rates ranged from 39% to 65%, and the mean patient satisfaction was 8.1 on a 1 to 10 scale, with 10 denoting most satisfied. Patients demonstrated significant postoperative improvements in pain, mHHS, iHOT-12, HOS-ADL, and HOS-SSS scores at 9 years postoperatively. The all-cause reoperation rate was 34.4%, and 12.5% of patients progressed to THA.

Risk Factors for Glenoid Bone Loss in the Setting of Posterior Glenohumeral Instability.

Posterior instability has been reported to account for up to 24% of cases of shoulder instability in certain active populations. However, there is a paucity of data available regarding the risk factors associated with posterior glenoid bone loss. To characterize the epidemiology of, and risk factors associated with, glenoid bone loss within a cohort of patients who underwent primary arthroscopic shoulder stabilization for isolated posterior-type glenohumeral instability. Cross-sectional study; Level of evidence, 3. This was a retrospective analysis of patients who underwent primary arthroscopic shoulder stabilization for posterior-type instability between January 2011 and December 2019. Preoperative magnetic resonance arthrograms were used to calculate posterior glenoid bone loss using a perfect circle technique. Patient characteristics and revision rates were obtained. Bone loss (both in millimeters and as a percentage) was compared between patients based on sex, age, arm dominance, sports participation, time to surgery, glenoid version, history of trauma, and number of anchors used for labral repair. Included were 112 patients with a mean age of 28.66 ± 10.07 years; 91 patients (81.25%) were found to have measurable bone loss. The mean bone loss was 2.46 ± 1.68 mm (8.98% ± 6.12%). Significantly greater bone loss was found in athletes versus nonathletes (10.09% ± 6.86 vs 7.44% ± 4.56; P = .0232), female versus male patients (11.17% ± 6.53 vs 8.17% ± 5.80; P = .0212), and patients dominant arm involvement versus nondominant arm involvement (10.26% ± 5.63 vs 7.07% ± 6.38; P = .0064). Multivariate regression analysis identified dominant arm involvement as an independent risk factor for bone loss (P = .0033), and dominant arm involvement (P = .0024) and athlete status (P = .0133) as risk factors for bone loss >13.5%. At the conclusion of the study period, 7 patients had experienced recurrent instability (6.25%). The findings of this study are in alignment with existing data suggesting that posterior glenoid bone loss is highly prevalent in patients undergoing primary arthroscopic stabilization for posterior-type shoulder instability. Our results suggest that patients with dominant arm involvement are at risk for greater posterior glenoid bone loss. Athlete status and dominant arm involvement were identified as independent risk factors for bone loss >13.5%.

Satisfactory Clinical Outcomes and Continuance of Sports After Hip Arthroscopic Labral Repair in Young Competitive Athletes at Minimum 8.5-Year Follow-Up

PurposeTo (1) evaluate long-term patient-reported outcomes and achievement rates of patient acceptable symptomatic state (PASS) in young athletes undergoing hip arthroscopy, and (2) report long-term sports continuance and reoperation. MethodsInclusion criteria consisted of age <24 years at surgery, femoroacetabular impingement undergoing primary hip arthroscopy with labral repair, and participation in sport with intent to return to sport after surgery. The enrollment period was from April 2009 to June 2014. Modified Harris Hip Scores (mHHS), Hip Outcome Score (HOS), HOS Activities of Daily Living (HOS-ADL), and HOS Sport (HOS-Sport) were collected preoperatively, 2 years’ postoperatively, and final follow-up. Patients were evaluated for PASS achievement, reoperation, and sports participation. ResultsForty-two hips in 37 patients (11 male, 26 female, age: 17.7 ± 2.1 years, range 13.6-23.0, body mass index 22.8 ± 2.9, range 17.6-33.7) met inclusion criteria and were followed for 10.0 ± 1.3 years (range 8.5-13.0) postoperatively. Mean mHHS, HOS-ADL and HOS-Sports outcome scores at minimum 8.5 years were 82.2 ± 12.9, 89.6 ± 10.9, and 81.8 ± 16.4, respectively, with significant (P < .001) postoperative improvements. Thirty survey respondents (83%) met PASS for mHHS, 27 (75%) for HOS-ADL, and 24 (67%) for HOS-Sports. At minimum 8.5-year follow-up, only 9 of 37 (24%) cited their hip as the reason for stopping sport. Of the remaining patients, 17 of 28 (61%), continued playing their initial sport. There was no difference in patient-reported outcomes between patients who endorsed sports continuance and patients who did not report sports continuance and did not cite their hip as a reason (P ≥ .229). At final follow-up, 4 hips (10%) had undergone subsequent surgical intervention at a mean of 4.8 ± 3.3 years (range 1.0-8.4) postoperatively. ConclusionsDurable mid-term outcomes and satisfactory PASS achievement rates are observed in young amateur athletes undergoing primary hip arthroscopy. At minimum 8.5-year follow up, approximately 1 in 4 patients discontinue their sports due to hip related reasons. Level of EvidenceLevel IV, case-series.

The revision hip arthroscopy complex: capsular deficiency, labral deficiency, femoral over-resection andadhesions can result ingood survivorship with revision hip arthroscopy.

To evaluate the patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and survivorship of combined arthroscopic hip labral reconstruction/augmentation, capsular reconstruction, femoral neck remplissage and lysis of adhesions. Patients ≥18 years old who underwent this combination of procedures during revision hip arthroscopy and were eligible for minimum 2-year follow-up were identified. PRO scores including Hip Outcome Score (HOS)-Activities of Daily Living scale, HOS-Sports scale, modified Harris Hip Score, Short Form 12, and Western Ontario & McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index, patient satisfaction and failure rates were analyzed. Seven patients (5 females and 2 males) with average age of 45.0 ± 5.2 (range: 40-54 years) met inclusion criteria. Patients had a median of 1 (range: 1-3) prior hip surgery at an outside institution. All patients had previously undergone femoral osteoplasty, and 85% (6/7) of patients had a labral repair performed. Four patients had no capsule closure performed in their prior procedures. Six patients were available for minimum 2-year follow-up. Two patients converted to total hip arthroplasty: one patient with four prior hip arthroscopies and the other had advanced osteoarthritis with outerbridge grade 3/4 defects requiring microfracture. Mean patient satisfaction was 7 (range: 2-9). At mean follow-up of 3 years, most patients who underwent the combination of labral reconstruction, capsular reconstruction, femoral neck remplissage and lysis of adhesions during revision hip arthroscopy demonstrated improved PROs. This salvage procedure has the potential to restore hip function in patients who have failed an initial hip arthroscopy procedure. In patients with these pathologies present and concomitant joint space narrowing, a total hip arthroplasty may be a more appropriate salvage option.

Effect of cam resection depth on clinical outcomes after primary hip arthroscopy.

The amount of resection or the starting point of the resection on the femoral head for cam lesions in femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) is controversial. The purpose of this study was to study the effect of postoperative resection depth, and resection arc ratio of cam lesion on the frequency of achieving substantial clinical benefit (SCB), patient acceptable state (PASS) in modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS) and Hip Outcome Score Activity of Daily Living (HOSADL), 2 years postoperatively. All patients who underwent first-time hip arthroscopy for FAI with a 2-year follow-up were included in this study. Patient-reported outcomes included the mHHS, HOSADL, and visual analogue scale for pain (Pain VAS). Radiological parameters such as alpha angletraditional (αT), alpha anglecartilage (αC), resection arc ratio (% alpha anglecartilage-alpha angletraditional/360°), resection depth (''D''mm) and resection depth ratio 'D%' (D/femoral head diameter %) were measured using the 45° Dunn view. We identified 26 patients (27 hips) with 2-year follow-up. There were 10 female and 16 male patients. The mean age of the patients was 33 ± 12 years.Higher frequency of achieving SCB threshold for mHHS was related to labrum repair (73% vs. debridement '27%' p = 0.03), lower preoperative αT (64° vs. 76°, p = 0.04), lower preoperative mHHS (54 vs. 81, p < 0.001) and higher preoperative VAS scores (8 vs. 7, p = 0.02). Higher frequency of reaching PASS threshold for mHHS was associated with lower αC (82°vs. 92° p:0.02), lower RA (8% vs. 11%, p = 0.03), lower D (2.8 mm vs. 4.5 mm p:0.03), lower D% (4.7% vs. 8.4% p = 0.04) and higher postoperative mHHS (97 vs. 82 p < 0.001). A higher frequency of achieving SCB for HOSADL was related to lower D% (5% vs. 10.5%, p = 0.04).Cam resection depth affects the frequency of achieving clinically meaningful scores and resection depth less than 6% of the femoral head diameter seems to be appropriate for optimal results. The starting point of resection on head cartilage needs to be <90° when alpha angle is used for reference.

Intra-articular soft arthroscopic Latarjet technique as a Bankart-plus procedure for type V superior labrum anterior-posterior lesion: lower rate of instability recurrence and better functional outcomes of a prospective cohort study.

Intra-articular soft arthroscopic Latarjet technique (in-SALT) involves augmentation of arthroscopic Bankart repair (ABR) with soft tissue tenodesis of long head of biceps to upper subscapularis. This study was conducted to investigate superiority of outcomes of in-SALT-augmented ABR over those of concurrent ABR and anterosuperior labral repair (ASL-R) in management of type V superior labrum anterior-posterior (SLAP) lesion. This prospective cohort study (conducted between January 2015 and January 2022) included 53 patients with arthroscopic diagnosis of type V SLAP lesion. Patients were allocated into 2 consecutive groups: group A of 19 patients managed with concurrent ABR/ASL-R and group B of 34 patients managed with in-SALT-augmented ABR. Outcome measurements included 2-year postoperative pain, range of motion, and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Standardized Shoulder Assessment Form (ASES) and Rowe instability scores. Failure was defined as frank/subtle postoperative recurrence of glenohumeral instability or objective diagnosis of Popeye deformity. The statistically matched studied groups showed significant postoperative improvement in outcome measurements. However, group B demonstrated significantly better 3-month postoperative visual analog scale score (3.6 vs. 2.6, P=.006) and 24-month postoperative external rotation at 0° abduction (44° vs. 50°, P=.020) and ASES (84 vs. 92, P<.001) and Rowe (83 vs. 88, P=.032) scores. Rate of postoperative recurrence of glenohumeral instability was relatively lower in group B (10.5% vs. 2.9%, P=.290). No Popeye deformity was reported. For management of type V SLAP lesion, in-SALT-augmented ABR yielded a relatively lower rate of postoperative recurrence of glenohumeral instability and significantly better functional outcomes compared with concurrent ABR/ASL-R. However, currently reported favorable outcomes of in-SALT should be validated via further biomechanical and clinical studies.

Modified Technique for Labral Reconstruction of Hip Joint Using Autologous Iliotibial Band (ITB)—Make Labral Reconstruction Stress-Free

Current treatments for labral tear include surgical debridement, arthroscopic repair, and labral reconstruction. Although labral debridement and labral suture repair are suitable for most patients, labral reconstruction is the first treatment option when there is extensive labral degeneration or defect. Often, however, the labral degeneration or defect is only detected intraoperatively; therefore, the surgeon should always have a backup plan. The current labral reconstruction technique has shortcomings such as long operation time, difficult autograft harvesting, cumbersome graft preparation, and the need for a large surgical incision and re-sterilization and draping. To address these problems, we developed a modified technique for draping and surgery. This technique ensures preparedness for labral reconstruction during each hip arthroscopic surgery. The method also simplifies the steps for autologous iliotibial band graft harvesting and shortens operative time. We have achieved satisfactory clinical results with use of this technique over the past 2 years. In this Technical Note, we describe our technique. This modified labral reconstruction technique greatly improves surgical efficiency and could be a promising surgical technique for hip labral reconstruction.

Medicaid Insurance Is Associated With More Complications and Emergency Department Visits but Equivalent 5-Year Secondary Surgery Rate After Primary Hip Arthroscopy

To compare 90-day complications, 30-day emergency department (ED) visits, and 5-year rate of secondary surgeries for patients with Medicaid vs commercial insurance undergoing primary hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement syndrome (FAIS) and/or labral tears using a large national database. The PearlDiver Mariner151 database was used to identify patients with International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision diagnosis codes for FAIS and/or labral tear who underwent primary hip arthroscopy with femoroplasty, acetabuloplasty, and/or labral repair between 2015 and 2021. Patients with Medicaid were matched 1:4 to a control group of commercially insured patients based on age, sex, body mass index, and Elixhauser Comorbidity Index. Rates of 90-day complications and 30-day ED visits were compared using multivariate regression models. Five-year rates of secondary surgeries-revision arthroscopy or total hip arthroplasty-were compared between cohorts by Kaplan-Meier analysis. A total of 2,033 Medicaid patients were matched with 8,056 commercially insured patients. Rates of adverse events were low; however, Medicaid patients were significantly more likely than commercially insured patients to experience any 90-day complication (2.12% vs 1.43%; odds ratio [OR], 1.2; P= .02). Medicaid patients also experienced more 30-day ED visits than commercially insured patients (8.61% vs 4.28%), and on multivariate logistic regression, insurance status was the strongest determinant of 30-day ED visits (relative to commercial, Medicaid OR, 2.02; P < .001). Despite these differences, 5-year rates of secondary surgeries were comparable between groups (6.1% vs 6.0%; P= .6). In this large national database study, Medicaid patients undergoing primary hip arthroscopy showed significantly greater odds of experiencing 90-day postoperative complications and 30-day ED visits compared to commercially insured patients. Nevertheless, both groups had similar survivorship rates at 5-year follow-up, similar to prior estimates irrespective of insurance. These results document encouraging secondary surgery rates in Medicaid patients.

Modified Loop Suture Technique in Arthroscopic Labral Repair of the Hip

Hip arthroscopy is rapidly increasing in case volume annually in the United States. However, it remains a challenging surgery with a steep learning curve. Labral repair is commonly performed to preserve the labrum rather than labral debridement or reconstruction. Many techniques have been described for labral repair. In this technical note, we describe our technique for a modified loop suture technique for arthroscopic labral repair of the hip.

Revealing a Natural Model of Pre-Osteoarthritis of the Hip Through Study of Femoroacetabular Impingement.

Femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) is considered the mechanical cause of hip osteoarthritis (OA). Surgical intervention involves labrum repair and osteochondroplasty to remove the impingement, alleviating symptoms. Nevertheless, some patients progress to hip OA after surgery, indicating that factors other than mechanical abnormality are contributing to hip OA progression. This review article discusses our laboratory's studies on hip FAI and OA, undertaken to identify key molecular players in the progression of hip OA. Transcriptome analysis identified peroxisome proliferator activated receptor gamma (PPARγ) as a crucial molecule in early hip OA. PPARγ, widely expressed in chondrocytes, has a protective role in preventing OA, but its true mechanism remains unknown. We observed a dysregulation of DNA methyltransferase (DNMT) in the progression of hip OA, with high expression of DNMT1 and 3A and downregulation of DNMT3B. Moreover, we established that DNMT3A is the main molecule that is binding to PPARγ promoter CpG area, and hypermethylation of this area occurs during disease progression. This suggests that epigenetic changes are a main mechanism that regulates PPARγ expression. Finally, we developed a novel rabbit model of hip FAI and OA and are currently performing studies to validate our small-animal model to human FAI.

Portal Selection for Suture Anchor Placement During Hip Arthroscopic Labral Repair: A Study Based on 3-Dimensional Model Reconstruction.

Arthroscopic suture repair is the main treatment option for hip labral tears; however, anchor insertion and placement from arthroscopic portals is difficult. To quantitatively evaluate the safety of various arthroscopic portals for suture anchor placement during hip labral repair. Descriptive laboratory study. The computed tomography scans of 20 patients with normally developed hip joints were used to create 3-dimensional models. The distances from the anchor to the articular cartilage (DAC) and from the acetabular insertion point to the cortical bone (DCB) were measured in the anterolateral portal (AL), posterolateral portal (PL), midanterior portal (MAP), medial MAP, and 3 distal anterolateral accessory portals (DALAs): DALA-proximal, DALA-middle, and DALA-distal. Labral tears were divided into anterior (4, 3, and 2 o'clock), lateral (1, 12, and 11 o'clock), and posterior (10, 9, and 8 o'clock) acetabular zones, and the Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney U test were used to compare DAC and DCB in the zones. The success rate was defined as anchors placed with DAC ≥1 mm and DCB ≥15 mm. The DAC was significantly smaller in the AL at 1 o'clock (0.68 ± 0.32 mm; P < .001) and 12 o'clock (0.37 ± 0.30 mm; P < .001), and in the PL at 12 o'clock (-0.35 ± 0.38 mm; P < .001) and 11 o'clock (0.60 ± 0.24 mm; P < .001). The DCB was significantly smaller in the DALA-P at 3 o'clock (8.93 ± 2.12 mm; P < .001) and 11 o'clock (9.59 ± 2.84 mm; P < .001), the MAP at 12 o'clock (13.76 ± 3.89 mm; P < .001) and 11 o'clock (0.27 ± 0.27 mm; P < .001), and the MMA at 12 o'clock (5.96 ± 2.31 mm; P < .001) and 11 o'clock (0 mm; P < .001). Success rates were high for MAP and MMA between 4 o'clock and 1 o'clock, for DALA-proximal at 12 o'clock, for AL at 11 o'clock, and for PL between 10 o'clock and 8-o'clock. There were significant differences in the success rate of anchor placement using different portals during hip arthroscopic labral repair. MAP is recommended for labral repair between 4 o'clock and 1 o'clock, DALA-P is recommended between 2 o'clock and 12 o'clock, AL is suitable at 11 o'clock, and PL is suitable between 10 o'clock and 8 o'clock.

Acetabular Labral Reconstruction: Review of Techniques and Outcomes.

To analyze advances in labral reconstruction, and to discuss the literature relating to efficacy, outcomes, and technical considerations of labral reconstruction. The available evidence suggests that labral reconstruction is a safe and effective procedure that can improve pain and function in patients with severe and/or complex labral tears. The superiority of labral reconstruction over labral repair is uncertain, and it remains unclear what graft type and technique should be used in labral reconstructions. Labral reconstruction assists in restoring the function of the labrum of the hip. It consistently restores stability of the hip joint and demonstrates good clinical outcomes at follow-up. The optimal graft type, technique, and extent are still debated, and more research is needed. Ultimately, despite this uncertainty, labral reconstruction is proving to be a valuable tool for hip preservation specialists.

Trends inhip preservation surgery inJapan from 2014 to 2019 with a focus onhip arthroscopic surgery.

Secondary hip osteoarthritis due to hip dysplasia is common among Japanese populations. This study aimed to investigate the number of hip preservation surgeries performed in Japan and assess trends, by age and sex, from 2014 to 2019, focusing on hip arthroscopic surgery, based on the National Database of Health Insurance Claims and Specific Health Checkups of Japan (NDB). We downloaded the files 'Number of calculations by division, sex, and age group' under 'operation (code K)' from 2014 to 2019 from the NDB Open Data Japan database. Data on hip preservation surgeries were extracted, including the number for each surgical procedure and its incidence per year, calculated as the number of surgeries performed for each 10-year age group and by sex, regarding hip arthroscopic surgery. Overall, 14 891 hip preservation surgeries were performed in Japan over the study period, with pelvic osteotomy being the most common procedure. Although the incidence of hip preservation surgeries decreased from 2014 to 2019, there was a specific 1.54-fold higher incidence in hip arthroscopic procedures in 2019 compared to 2014. Hip arthroscopic labral repair was performed more frequently than synovectomy. The highest incidence of hip arthroscopic surgery was in the 40- to 49-years age group, with no difference in incidence between sexes (P = 0.951). In Japan, pelvic osteotomy was performed more often as a hip preservation surgery than hip arthroscopic surgery. Although hip arthroscopic surgery was developed in Japan, its use has not increased from 2017 to 2019.

Hip Arthroscopy with Acetabular Osteoplasty and Labral Repair

Hip arthroscopy with femoral neck or acetabular osteoplasty with or without labral repair can be used for treatment of femoroacetabular impingement. Patients may present with insidious onset of hip pain and mechanical symptoms and pain worse with activity and sitting. On physical exam hip flexion and internal rotation may be reduced and anterior impingement testing will produce groin pain in the majority of patients with femoroacetabular impingement. Imaging may demonstrate lesions responsible for Cam-type or Pincer-type impingement and MRI may demonstrate labral tear or cartilaginous lesions. Arthroscopic surgical treatment is indicated for patients who have failed conservative treatment.

Outcomes Following Combined Posterior Labral and SLAP Repair in Military Patients Younger Than 35 Years

Background: Members of the military are known to experience disproportionately high rates of both glenohumeral instability and superior labrum anterior-posterior (SLAP) tears when compared with civilian populations. Although the outcomes after simultaneous repair of Bankart and SLAP lesions have been well described, there is a paucity of literature available regarding the operative management of posterior instability with concomitant superior labral pathology. Purpose: To compare outcomes of combined arthroscopic posterior labral and SLAP repair with those of isolated posterior labral repair. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: All consecutive patients younger than 35 years who underwent arthroscopic posterior labral repair from January 2011 to December 2016 with a minimum follow-up of 5 years were identified. From this cohort of eligible patients, all individuals who had undergone combined SLAP and posterior labral repair (SLAP cohort) versus posterior labral repair alone (instability cohort) were then identified. Outcome measures including the visual analog scale score, Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE), American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, Rowe instability score, and range of motion were collected pre- and postoperatively and scores were compared between groups. Results: In total, 83 patients met the inclusion criteria for the study. All patients were active-duty military at the time of surgery. The mean follow-up was 93.79 ± 18.06 months in the instability group and 91.24 ± 18.02 months in the SLAP group (P = .5228). Preoperative SANE and ASES scores were significantly worse in the SLAP group. Both groups experienced statistically significant improvements in outcome scores postoperatively (P < .0001 for all), and there were no significant differences in any outcome scores or range of motion between groups. In total, 39 patients in the instability cohort and 37 in the SLAP cohort returned to preinjury levels of work (92.86% vs 90.24%, respectively; P = .7126), and 38 instability patients and 35 SLAP patients returned to preinjury levels of sporting activity (90.48% vs 85.37%, respectively; P = .5195). Two patients in the instability group and 4 patients in the SLAP group were medically discharged from the military (4.76% vs 9.76%; P = .4326), and 2 patients in each cohort had experienced treatment failure at the final follow-up (4.76% vs 4.88%; P > .9999). Conclusion: Combined posterior labral and SLAP repair led to statistically and clinically significant increases in outcome scores and high rates of return to active-duty military service that did not differ significantly from the results after isolated posterior labral repair. The results of this study indicate that simultaneous repair is a viable treatment option for the management of combined lesions in active-duty military patients <35 years of age.

Arthroscopic Labral Repair and Pancapsular Shift With Knotless All-Suture Anchors in the Setting of Multidirectional Instability of the Shoulder

In the management of multidirectional type of shoulder instability (MDI), arthroscopic surgical stabilization is a preferred treatment option after failed conservative therapy regimens because of the ability to easily access all aspects of the capsule with one surgical procedure. As arthroscopic techniques have evolved, factors critical to postoperative success have been elucidated. Currently, optimal arthroscopic treatment of MDI involves circumferentially restoring labral integrity, a tailored, patient-specific surgical reduction of capsular volume, and adequately managing potential lesions of the biceps anchor. The purpose of this article and accompanying video is to present our technique for arthroscopic circumferential labral repair and pancapsular shift using knotless all-suture anchors in the setting of MDI with a concurrent type II SLAP lesion.

Poster 171: Does the addition of remplissage to arthroscopic labral repair result in decreased patients’ perception of their shoulder function and clinical outcome?

Objectives: Recurrent anterior shoulder instability after arthroscopic labral repair surgery particularly in young athletes is a concerning problem occurring in approximately 9 - 18 % of patients with subcritical bone loss. The addition of an arthroscopic remplissage procedure has been shown to decrease recurrence rates. Moreover, the recent literature suggests that the recurrence rates of arthroscopic labral repair with remplissage approach that of the open Latarjet procedure. This has led some to suggest that remplissage supplementation should be considered for all labral repairs when a Hill Sachs lesion is present. However, critics are concerned that the remplissage procedure is associated with increased pain, decreased function, and loss of range of motion due to the non-anatomic attachment of the infraspinatus, potentially over-constraining the glenohumeral joint. The purpose of our study was to determine if patients perceive a difference in their clinical results based upon patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) between those undergoing isolated labral repair surgery (IL) and those undergoing labral surgery with remplissage (LR). Methods: Patients who underwent arthroscopic anterior labral repairs were selected from the Surgical Outcomes System (SOS) registry between January 2011 and July 2020. Further eligibility requirements included anterior instability, primary repair (excluding revisions), presence of a Hill Sachs lesion, and verification of whether remplissage was performed or not. The patients were stratified into two groups: isolated labral repairs (IL) and labral repairs with remplissage (LR). This analysis assessed PROMs using the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) Index, Pain Visual Analog Scale (VAS), the Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE) scores, as well as the Veterans RAND 12-item health survey (VR- 12) at pre-treatment, and 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years postoperatively. VAS had additional data points at 2 and 6 weeks. Statistical Analysis was performed using two-tailed student t-tests and chi-square tests for non-parametric data. A post hoc power analysis was performed. This study was approved by the Salus IRB. Results: 722 patients met the inclusion criteria for the study: isolated labral repairs (IL) without remplissage (n=416) and labral repairs with remplissage (LR) (n=306). The ASES 2-year post hoc power analysis for a type II error was 4.7%. There was no statistical difference in the demographics between the groups other than the LR having a greater number of preoperative dislocations than the IL group, (p&lt;0.0001) (Table 1). Both IL and LR showed statistically significant improvement from pre-treatment ASES (means, 68.62 ± 19.22 and 70.79 ± 19.22, respectively) to 2 years post-operative ASES (means, 91.61 ± 11.66 and 91.14 ± 13.75, respectively, (p &lt;.05). The preoperative PROM measures were statistically similar (p&gt;.05) except for the VR-12. The mean VR12 preoperative scores were 42.93 ± 8.96 and 44.60 ± 8.36 (p=0.0251) for the IL and LR, respectively. There was no statistical difference between the groups at all postoperative time points in the VAS, VR-12, ASES, and SANE scores (p&gt;0.05) except for the ASES score at 3 months (p=.0098) and the SANE score at 2 years (p=.0064). At 3 months, the ASES IL score was 80.28 ± 14.72 and the LR score was 76.73 ± 15.83 (p=0.0098); this did not reach MCID of 8.5 points. The 2-year SANE scores for IL and LR were 84.85 ± 17.67 and 77.48 ± 25.65 (p=0.0064), respectively; this similarly did not reach MCID of 14.5 points. Additionally, in the early postoperative period, 2 and 6 weeks, there was no difference in VAS scores between the groups (p&lt;.05) (Figures 1, 2, 3). Conclusions: Both labral repairs and labral repairs with remplissage resulted in excellent clinical outcomes based on PROMs. Remplissage supplementation was not clinically inferior to labral repair alone, using PROMs and applying MCID, for VAS, ASES, VR-12, and SANE scores at any time points up to 2-years post-operatively. Clinical Significance: The addition of arthroscopic remplissage to decrease recurrent instability does not result in lower patients’ perceived clinical outcomes. Therefore, remplissage supplementation should be given strong consideration in patients undergoing labral repairs with Hill Sachs lesions to potentially reduce recurrences. Level of Evidence: Therapeutic, Retrospective analysis of prospectively collected PROMs, Level III. [Table: see text]