L1-S1 Lumbar Lordosis Research Articles

The Implications of Sacralized Transitional Vertebra on Spinal Alignment.

Retrospective study of a multicentric prospective database. This study aimed to determine, in a cohort of healthy volunteers, the impact of sacralized lumbo-sacral transitional vertebra (LSTV) on spinal alignment according to its grade, particularly regarding lumbar lordosis magnitude and distribution, and the implications for spinopelvic parameters measurement. There is little data regarding spinopelvic alignment assessment in LSTV patients. This study included healthy volunteers with full-body stereoradiographs in free-standing position aged over 18. Castellvi grade, pelvic parameters (measured on S1 and L5), L1-S1 lumbar lordosis (LL) and segmental lordosis for each disc and vertebral body, thoracic kyphosis, cervical lordosis, lower limb, and global alignment parameters were assessed. Castellvi I and II were considered as Low-grade and Castellvi III and IV as High-grade LSTV. Alignment parameters between No-LSTV, Low- and High-grade LSTV were compared. Propensity score matching was used to match PI in No-LSTV and Low-grades. Spinopelvic parameters measured on S1 in No-LSTV group and on L5 in High-grade were compared. 713 subjects were included, of whom 23 Low-grades and 27 High-grades. Mean pelvic incidence was 51.0±11.0° and mean age was 37.5±16.2 years. LL distribution was different between groups, with an apex and inflexion point significantly higher in High-grade (P<0.001). Kyphosis in the LSTV segment was compensated for by a steeper increase of LL above L5 in the High-grades. Low-grades and PI-matched No-LSTV presented similar alignment parameters. There were minor differences in parameters measured on S1 in No-LSTV and no L5 in High-grades. Subjects with low-grade LSTV present similar alignment as PI-matched No-LSTV subjects, and S1 should be taken as reference to measure spinopelvic parameters. High-grade LSTV subjects have kyphotic L5-S1 segment with more cranial lumbar apex and thoracolumbar inflexion point. In these subjects, spinopelvic parameters should be measured on L5.

Does the Extent of Rod Bending and Actual Lumbar Lordosis Mismatch Affect Quality of Life?

BackgroundTo evaluate any mismatch between rod bending and actual lordosis during posterior lumbar instrumentation and its effects on the quality of life of patients. MethodsPatient records for posterior lumbar fusion in 2018-2023 were retrospectively reviewed. The radiological parameters consisted of pelvic incidence, sacral slope, L1S1 lumbar lordosis, lumbosacral angle, the distance between the posterior wall of the vertebra and the rod, lordosis of the rod. The postoperative quality of life of patients was assessed using Oswestry Disability Index. The patients were grouped postoperative into Group-1 (minimal/moderate disability) and Group-2 (severe disability/crippled/bed bound). ResultsTotal of 133 patients were included; 99 women, 34 men. The difference was significant for patients with diabetes to be presented in the more disabled Group-2. The distance between the posterior vertebral wall and the rod was found to be short in Group-2. Preoperative and postoperative sagittal lumbar Cobb angles were significantly higher in Group-2. The changing degree of pain was found to score high in Group-2. The postoperative visual analog scale was high in Group-2. The difference between the preoperative and postoperative lumbar sagittal Cobb and rod Cobb-angles was found to be high in Group-2. ConclusionThe results of our study confirm the importance of considering the preoperative actual lumbar lordosis during bending and maintaining it as much as possible. To our knowledge, this is the first study that evaluated the effect of rod bending on quality of life and supports that this might be affected in case of any mismatches.

Morphological description of sagittal lumbar spinal alignment using curve magnitude, span, and apex—the multiethnic alignment normative study (MEANS)

Current definition of lumbar lordosis uses the L1-S1 angle. Prevailing classification of sagittal spinal morphology, derived from a young adult population, classifies the spine into four subtypes defined by their sacral slope (SS) and curve morphology. To describe physiological sagittal alignment of the lumbar spine across age groups using three main parameters that dictate the lumbar curve: angular magnitude, span, and apex. A large, multicenter, cross-sectional radiographic comparison study. Four hundred sixty-eight healthy, asymptomatic subjects aged 18 to 80 years from five countries (184 males, 284 females; 98 France, 119 Japan, 79 Singapore, 80 Tunisia, 92 USA, mean age 40.61±14.99 years). Sagittal lumbar profile subtypes clustered based on lumbar curve angular magnitude (ie, Cobb angle of the lumbar lordosis), span, and apex, and described by sagittal radiographic parameters. Subjects underwent whole-body low-dose EOS stereoradiographs. Comparisons between conventional L1-S1 lumbar lordosis (cLL) and true lumbar lordosis (tLL, defined by the inflection-S1 angle) were conducted. Using the K-means clustering algorithm, lumbar curve angular magnitude, span and apex were used to classify sagittal spinal morphology into subtypes, stratified across age groups. Further univariate and multivariate analyses were conducted to compare radiographic parameters across subtypes, and identify predictors for the lumbar curve's angular magnitude, span and apex. Mean cLL was -57.27±11.37°, and tLL was -62.62±10.76°. Using tLL, instead of cLL, to describe sagittal spinal morphology, we found significant differences in terms of angular magnitude of the lumbar curve, the median thoracolumbar inflection vertebral level and pelvic incidence-lumbar lordosis mismatch Multivariate analysis found a larger SS, more positive T9 tilt, and more kyphotic T4-T12 predictive for a more lordotic tLL, while a larger overhang distance predicted for a less lordotic tLL (p-values<.001). In addition, a larger T9 tilt, less lordotic L1-L5 and smaller PT were predictors of a more caudal thoracolumbar inflection and lumbar apical vertebral levels (p-values<.001). Sagittal lumbar profiles of subjects age<30 years, 30≤age<60 years and age≥60 years, could be classified into 4, 6, and 3 subtypes, respectively. Sagittal lumbar profile subtypes vary across age groups, with more homogenous morphologies at the extremes of ages. Improved understanding of the morphological evolution of sagittal spinal profiles with age in asymptomatic individuals will help guide future individualized surgical treatment.

Incidence and Risk Factors for Postoperative Ileus after Posterior Surgery in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis.

Postoperative ileus (POI) is a relatively common complication after spinal fusion surgery, which can lead to delayed recovery, prolonged length of stay and increased medical costs. However, little is known about the incidence and risk factors of POI after corrective surgery for patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). This study was performed to report the incidence of POI and identify the independent risk factors for POI after postoperative corrective surgery. In this retrospective cohort study, A total of 318 patients with AIS who underwent corrective surgery from April 2015 to February 2021 were enrolled and divided into two groups: those with POI and those without POI. The Student's t test, Mann-Whitney U test, and Pearson's chi-square test were used to compare the two groups regarding patient demographics and preoperative characteristics (age, sex and the major curve type), intraoperative and postoperative parameters (lowest instrumented vertebra [LIV], number of screws, and length of stay), radiographic parameters (T5-12 thoracic kyphosis [TK], T10-L2 thoracolumbar kyphosis and height [TLK and T10-L2 height], L1-S1 lumbar lordosis [LL], and L1-5 height). Then, a multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to identify independent risk factors for POI, and a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was performed to assess the predictive values of these risk factors. Forty-two (13.2%) of 318 patients who developed POI following corrective surgery were identified. The group with POI had a significantly longer length of stay, more lumbar screws, higher proportions of a major lumbar curve and lumbar anterior screw breech, and a lower LIV. Among radiographic parameters, the mean lumbar Cobb angle at baseline, the changes in the lumbar Cobb angle, and T10-L2 and L1-5 height from before to after surgery were significantly larger in the group with POI than in the group without POI. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that large changes in T10-L2 (odds ratio [OR] =2.846, P=0.007) and L1-5 height (OR=31.294, p=0.000) and lumbar anterior screw breech (OR=5.561, P=0.006) were independent risk factors for POI. The cutoff values for the changes in T10-L2 and L1-5 height were 1.885 cm and 1.195 cm, respectively. In this study, we identified that large changes in T10-L2 and L1-5 height and lumbar anterior screw breech were independent risk factors for POI after corrective surgery. Improving the accuracy of pedicle screw placement might reduce the incidence of POI, and greater attention should be given to patients who are likely to have large changes in T10-L2 and L1-5 height after corrective surgery.

Age- and Gender-based Global Sagittal Spinal Alignment in Asymptomatic Adult Volunteers: Results of the Multiethnic Alignment Normative Study (MEANS)

Multicenter Cohort. Assess normative values of sagittal spinal and lower extremity alignment in asymptomatic volunteers stratified by age and gender. Our understanding of ideal sagittal alignment is still evolving. The Multiethnic Alignment Normative Study (MEANS) investigated skeletal alignment of the largest multiethnic cohort of asymptomatic adult volunteers. We aim to assess normative values of sagittal spinal and lower extremity alignment in asymptomatic volunteers stratified by age and gender. Asymptomatic volunteers between the ages of 18-80 years were enrolled prospectively and then analyzed retrospectively from six different centers. Volunteers included reported no significant neck or back pain, nor any known spinal disorder(s). All volunteers underwent a standing full-body or full-spine low-dose stereoradiograph. MEANS consisted of 468 volunteers with a mean age of 40.4±14.8 years. Thoracic kyphosis (TK) from T4 to T12 showed a mean of 37.4±10.9°. The average L1-S1 lumbar lordosis (LL) was -57.4±11.3°. LL did not show significant differences across the five age groups. TK showed a significant difference based on age ( P <0.0001). Sagittal vertical axis increased across age groups from -14.2mm in young adults to 17.0mm in patients >64. Similar trend was seen for T1 pelvic angle with a mean of 5.0° in young adults and 13.7° in those older than age 64. Knee flexion increased across age groups without a significant change in odontoid-knee distance which is a surrogate for the center of the head aligned over the knees. In asymptomatic volunteers, sagittal alignment parameters showed a slow and steady change across age groups exemplified by an increase in TK. However, LL did not show a significant decrease across age groups. Volunteers used compensatory mechanisms such as slight pelvis retroversion, knee flexion, and neck extension to maintain an aligned sagittal posture with their head centered over their knees (odontoid-knee). 3.

Age and Gender Based Spinopelvic and Regional Spinal Alignment in Asymptomatic Adult Volunteers: Results of the Multi-Ethnic Alignment Normative Study (MEANS).

Spinal alignment can have a significant impact on a patient's overall quality of life. Predicting the ideal sagittal spinal alignment of a specific individual is still a difficult task. The Multi-Ethnic Alignment Normative Study (MEANS) investigated skeletal alignment, including the spine and lower extremities, of the largest multi-ethnic cohort of asymptomatic adult volunteers. In this analysis, the authors aim to assess normative values of spinopelvic parameters and the regional cervical, thoracic, and lumbar spinal alignment in asymptomatic volunteers stratified by age and sex. Asymptomatic volunteers between ages 18 and 80 years were enrolled prospectively from centers in France, Japan, Singapore, Tunisia, and the United States. Volunteers included reported no significant neck or back pain (Visual Analog Scale ≤2), nor any known spinal disorder(s). All volunteers underwent a standing full-body or full-spine low-dose stereoradiograph. MEANS consisted of 468 volunteers with a mean age of 40.4±14.8 years. Mean cervical lordosis from C2 to C7 was -0.4±12.7°. The T1-slope averaged 23.0±7.9° and showed strong correlation ( r =0.87) with the C7-slope mean of 19.8±8.6°. Thoracic kyphosis (TK) from T4 to T12 showed a mean of 37.4±10.9°. Average L1-S1 lumbar lordosis (LL) was -57.4±11.3°. The mean pelvic incidence (PI) measured 52.0±10.7° and pelvic tilt was 12.5±7.3°. Sacral slope averaged 39.5±8.2°. The average PI-LL was -5.4±10.7°. Approximately 60% of volunteers met the PI-LL criteria within ±10°, 8.3% were ≥10°, while 32.1% were ≤-10°. LL showed moderate correlation with PI ( r =0.53) and TK ( r =0.50), while there was no correlation between TK and PI. Multiple linear regression including PI, TK, and age resulted in the following equation LL=14.6+0.57 (PI)+0.57 (TK)-0.2 (age) ( r =0.75). LL did not change with increasing age in asymptomatic volunteers. However, TK did increase with age leading to an increase in T1-slope and a compensatory increase in cervical lordosis. TK did not correlate with PI and was an independent variable in the prediction of LL. Level II-prospective cohort study.

Risk factors for L5 pedicle fractures after single-level posterior spinal fusion

BACKGROUND CONTEXTPedicle fractures are a rare but potentially devastating complication of posterior instrumented spinal fusion (PSF). Preoperative awareness of the possible risk factors may help prevent these fractures by modifying the surgical plan. However, the risk factors have not yet been identified. PURPOSETo determine the preoperative parameters associated with postoperative L5 pedicle fracture after L4/5 PSF. STUDY DESIGNCase control study. PATIENT SAMPLEPatients undergoing L4/5 PSF at a single academic institution between 2014 and 2020. OUTCOME MEASURESOccurrence of postoperative L5 pedicle fracture. METHODSOf 253 patients (female:male, 145:108) undergoing L4/5 PSF from 2014 to 2020, patients with postoperative L5 pedicle fractures were identified retrospectively as “cases” (n = 8, all female, age: 70 ± 10.7 years). As a control group all remaining patients with a follow-up of more than 12 months were allocated (n = 184, 104 females, age: 64.27 ± 13.00 years). In all but 16 cases, anterior support with transforaminal or posterior interbody fusion was performed. Demographic and clinical data (body mass index (BMI)), surgical factors, and comorbidities) were compared. Radiological assessment of spinopelvic parameters was performed using pre- and postoperative standing lateral radiographs. RESULTSThe overall incidence of L5 pedicle fractures after L4/5 spinal fusion was 3.16%, with a median time from index surgery to diagnosis of 25 days (range, 6–199 days) (75% within the first 32 days postoperatively). Patients with L5 pedicle fractures had higher pelvic incidence (PI) (71° ± 9° vs. 56° ± 11°; p=.001), sacral slope (SS) (45° ± 7° vs. 35° ± 8°; p=.002), L5 slope (30° ± 11° vs. 15° ± 10°, p=.001), L5 incidence (42° ± 14° vs. 26° ± 11°; p= .003), L1-S1 lumbar lordosis (LL) postop (57° ± 10° vs. 45° ± 11°; p=.006), and L4 -S1 LL postop (33° ± 7° vs. 28° ± 7°; p=.049) compared with the control group. Pelvic tilt and PI- LL mismatch were not significantly different. Female gender was a significant risk factor for L5 pedicle fractures (p=.015). BMI (kg/m2) was statistically equal in patients with or without pedicle fractures (28.37 ± 5.96 vs. 28.53 ± 16.32; p=.857). There was no significant difference between the groups for approximative bone mineral density assessment (Hounsfield units; 113 ± 60 vs. 120 ± 43; p=.396) using the L3 trabecular region of interest (ROI) measurement. The correlation analysis demonstrated that most of the identified risk factors except for the postoperative L4-S1 lordosis show significant positive associations among each other. All eight patients in the fracture group underwent revision surgery, and the instrumented fusion was extended to the sacrum, with the addition of sacral-alar-iliac or iliac screws, in six cases. CONCLUSIONSL5 pedicle fractures occurred in 3% of the patients after single level L4/5 PSF. Risk factors are female gender, higher PI, SS, L5 slope, L5 incidence, and LL postop but not high BMI. These findings can be used for surgical planning and decision of fusion levels.

Optimal Correction of Adult Spinal Deformities Requires Restoration of Distal Lumbar Lordosis.

Purpose The aim of this study is to analyze results according to postoperative pelvic incidence-lumbar lordosis (PI-LL) mismatch in the management of adult spine deformity (ASD) patients. Recently, it has been reported that in addition to lumbar lordosis amount, lordosis repartition between its proximal and distal parts was crucial. Methods We enrolled 77 consecutive ASD patients who underwent posterior spinal fusion and deformity correction between 2015 and 2018. On preoperative and 1-year follow-up radiographs, we analyzed different parameters such as L1-S1 lumbar lordosis, L1-L4 proximal lordosis (PLL), L4-S1 distal lordosis (DLL), pelvic tilt (PT), sagittal vertical axis (SVA), and PI-LL mismatch. Comparisons were performed according to postoperative PI-LL mismatch (defined as “aligned” when PI-LL was <10°). The relationship between lordosis distribution and postoperative alignment status was investigated. Results On the whole series, average lumbar lordosis, SVA, and PI-LL improved (28.2° vs.43.5°, 82 vs. 51 mm, and 26°vs. 14°, all p < 0.001, respectively). On the other hand, PT remained unchanged (30° vs. 28°, p > 0.05). 35 patients were classified as “aligned” and 42 as “not aligned.” Patients from the “aligned” group had a significantly lower PI than patients from the “not aligned” group (52° vs. 61°, p=0.009). Postoperative PLL was not different between groups (18° vs. 16° p > 0.05), whereas DLL was significantly higher in the “aligned” group (31° vs. 22°, p=0.003). PI-LL was significantly correlated to DLL (rho = 0.407, p < 0.001) but not with PLL (rho = 0.110, p=0.342). Conclusions Our results revealed that in ASD patients, postoperative malalignment was associated with a lack of DLL restoration. “Not aligned” patients had also a significantly higher pelvic incidence. Specific attention must be paid to restore optimal distal lumbar lordosis in order to set the amount and the distribution of optimal postoperative lumbar lordosis.

Degenerative changes of sagittal alignment in patients with Roussouly type 1.

A cross-sectionalradiologicalstudy. We aimed to examine the degenerative changes of sagittal alignment in patients with Roussouly type 1. Roussouly type 1 is unique in shape, characterized by short lumbar lordosis (LL) with the apex at L5 and thoracolumbar kyphosis (TLK). Because of the unique shape of sagittal alignment and the small pelvic incidence (PI) in Roussouly type 1, the degenerative changes of sagittal alignment may differ. A total of 145 patients with Roussouly type 1 were recruited and distributed into three age groups; Group I (N = 40) were young patients (20-40years of age), Group II (N = 47) were middle-aged patients (45-60years of age), and Group III (N = 48) were elderly patients (>65years of age). Sagittal parameters including sagittal vertical axis (SVA), PI, pelvic tilt (PT), L1S1 LL, L4S1 LL, thoracic kyphosis (TK), and TLK were measured using Surgimap® software. The occurrence of lumbar retrolisthesis was also examined. The SVA, PI, PT, L1S1 LL, L4S1 LL, TK, and TLK in group I were - 25.9° ± 23.4mm, 37.1° ± 5.3°, 10.3° ± 5.5°, 42.7° ± 8.8°, 35.5° ± 6.9°, 29.5° ± 23.5°, and 9.7° ± 5.9°, respectively. Among the Groups I, II, and III, there was a stepwise increase in the SVA, PT, TLK, and lumbar retrolisthesis (all P < 0.001). The PI, L4S1 LL, and TK were identical among the three groups. Degenerative changes of Roussouly type 1 include increase in the SVA, PT, TLK, and lumbar retrolisthesis, while the PI, L4S1 LL, and TK remain unchanged. Level IV.

Towards a new 3D classification for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Retrospective analysis of consecutive cases. To identify clinically relevant three-dimensional (3D) sub-groups for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). Classifications for AIS are developed to assist surgeons in surgical planning and therapeutic management. However, current systems are based on two-dimensional (2D) parameters that do not completely describe the 3D deformity. Hence, variations in surgical results based on pre-operative 2D classifications may be attributed to the lack of 3D description. Subjects from a multicenter database of AIS patients were included in this study. All patients had bi-planar radiographs and 3D reconstruction of the entire spine. A clustering algorithm based on fuzzy c-means was utilized to identify sub-groups based on the following ten parameters measured on 3D reconstructions of the spine: Cobb angle, orientation of the plane of maximum curvature of the proximal thoracic, mid-thoracic (MT) and thoracolumbar (TLL) levels, axial rotation of the apical vertebra of the MT and TLL segments, T4-T12 thoracic kyphosis, and L1-S1 lumbar lordosis. Da Vinci views were also generated and analyzed for each patient in the study. A panel of four experienced spine surgeons from the SRS 3D Scoliosis Committee reviewed and evaluated each group to determine if cluster groups were clinically distinct from each other. The clustering algorithm was able to detect 11 sub-groups. The population size for each cluster varied from 11 to 290. Statistically significant differences were seen between the parameters for each group. Four spine surgeons reviewed the three most representative cases of each group and unanimously agreed that each cluster group represents a sub-group that was not defined in current classifications. This study presents a new method of classifying AIS based on a fuzzy clustering algorithm using parameters describing the 3D characteristics of the deformity. Further clinical validation is needed to confirm the usefulness of this classification system. IV.

Prospective Evaluation of Spino-Pelvic Parameters with Clinical Correlation in Patients Operated with an Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion.

Study DesignProspective study.PurposeThe goal of this study was to evaluate the impact of anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) on L5–S1 level for restitution of distal segmental lordosis and to investigate its consequences on spino-pelvic parameters and the global sagittal balance.Overview of LiteratureLumbar surgery must be adapted to the spinal morphology in order to restore an adequate relation between pelvic and spinal parameters and especially to the pelvic incidence.MethodsAn observational, prospective study was conducted between January 2013 and May 2017. Eighty-six patients were treated by L5–S1 ALIF procedure regardless of disc replacement above L5–S1 level. Thirty-seven patients were included and subset analyses were performed on 25 patients operated on an isolated ALIF L5–S1 (group 1), and 12 patients with hybrid surgery consisting of an L5– S1 ALIF procedure and a L4–L5 lumbar disc replacement (group 2). Clinical parameters were analyzed using Visual Analog Scale (VAS) and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) at M0 (preoperative) and M12 (12 months). Lumbo-pelvic parameters were assessed on a standingfull-spine X-ray, preoperatively and at M12 after surgery.ResultsWe observed a significant evolution of L1–S1 lumbar lordosis (p <0.001) with a significant increase of the distal arch L4–S1 lordosis (p <0.001) and decrease of the proximal arch lordosis (p =0.03). Preoperatively, 27% of the patients were unbalanced. Significant variation in sagittal balance parameters was observed, with a decrease of the sagittal vertebral axis (p <0.001). VAS and ODI improved significantly but no correlation was found. An evolution in the same direction was found in the two subgroup analyses.ConclusionsALIF procedure on L5–S1 level allowed a reconstruction of lumbosacral segmental lordosis, modification of global lordosis, without variation of spino-pelvic parameters except an improvement in sagittal balance.

Multi-segmental lumbar spinal stenosis treated with Dynesys stabilization versus lumbar fusion in elderly patients: a retrospective study with a minimum of 5 years’ follow-up

Middle- and long-term outcomes of multi-segmental lumbar spinal stenosis treated with Dynesys stabilization (DS) have rarely been reported. Older age and multi-segmental degeneration may be positive factors in achieving satisfactory outcomes following DS. The present study aimed to compare the middle- and long-term outcomes of DS with lumbar fusion for treatment of multi-segmental lumbar spinal stenosis (ms-LSS) in elderly patients. This study retrospectively analyzed patients with ms-LSS treated by DS or lumbar fusion from January 2011 to April 2013. Twenty-two patients were included in the Dynesys group, and 44 patients treated by lumbar fusion and rigid fixation were included in the fusion group. Clinical outcomes were assessed by VAS and ODI. Radiological outcomes were measured by range of motion (ROM) of stabilized segments and the proximal adjacent segment, intervertebral disc height (DH) and L1-S1 lumbar lordosis angle (LL). Modified Pfirrmann grade score was used to access disc degeneration. The mean follow-up time of the Dynesys group and fusion group was 68.50 ± 6.40 and 70.14 ± 7.26months, respectively. Baseline data were similar between the two groups. There were no significant differences between the two groups in terms of improvement of clinical outcomes (VAS and ODI). DS preserved a certain degree of ROM (3.74 ± 2.00) of surgical segments. ROM of proximal adjacent segment underwent an increase in both groups at the final follow-up. The DH of the surgical segments and proximal adjacent segment in both groups was significantly lower than that before surgery (P = 0.000). LL of both groups improved (P = 0.000), and there was no significant difference between the two groups. The modified Pfirrmann score of proximal adjacent segment of both groups increased at the final follow-up. The fusion group underwent a more significant increase (P = 0.000), whereas the inter-group difference showed no significance (P = 0.090). DS is a safe and effective surgical treatment of multi-segmental lumbar spinal stenosis in the elderly population. DS preserves a certain degree of mobility of surgical segments.

Preoperative Sagittal Spinal Profile of Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis Lenke Types and Non-Scoliotic Adolescents: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Systematic review and meta-analysis. This study aims to determine the differences in sagittal spinopelvic parameters between adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) Lenke types and non-scoliotic controls through a systematic review and meta-analysis of the available literature. AIS classification mainly focuses on frontal curve differences; however, the variations in the sagittal spinopelvic alignment in the current classification system is not fully established. Following preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses guidelines, searches were performed for sagittal spinal and pelvic parameters of Lenke types and non-scoliotic controls in PubMed, Scopus, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases. Selection criteria were: (1) age range 10 to 21 years; (2) Lenke types 1-6 (for AIS group) or non-scoliotic adolescents (for the control group); (3) preoperative data for T5-T12 thoracic kyphosis (TK), L1-S1 lumbar lordosis (LL), pelvic incidence (PI), sacral slope (SS), and sagittal vertical axis (SVA). (4) Written in English language. PI-LL mismatch was calculated from the weighted average of PI and LL. Publication bias between studies and within studies quality were assessed. A meta-regression compared each measured variable between groups. Thoracic (Lenke1 and 2) and thoracolumbar/lumbar (Lenke 5 and 6) scoliosis were combined and statistically compared with the control group. Meta-analysis, including 81 AIS and 18 control studies, showed no significant differences in sagittal parameters between Lenke types and controls for LL, PI, PI-LL mismatch, SS, and SVA (P > 0.05). Publication bias was significant in Lenke 1 TK, Control LL, and Lenke 1, and 5 SVA. Stratification based on deformity region (thoracic vs. thoracolumbar/lumbar) showed no significant differences in sagittal spinopelvic parameters (P > 0.05). No definitive difference was found between non-scoliotic adolescents and Lenke types in sagittal spinal and pelvic parameters. Future studies on developing a sagittal classification specific to AIS patients with a goal to improve surgical planning and outcome prediction are highly encouraged. 4.

Sagittal Spinopelvic Alignment After Posterior Spinal Fusion in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

A systematic review and meta-analysis. The aim of this study was to determine the differences in the sagittal spinopelvic parameters between the nonscoliotic controls, preoperative, and different time points postoperative in Lenke 1 and 5 adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). The postoperative changes in the sagittal profile of Lenke 1 and 5 AIS at varying time points after posterior spinal fusion (PSF) has not been rigorously demonstrated; studies performed have had conflicting results. Sagittal spinal and pelvic parameters, T5-T12 thoracic kyphosis (TK), L1-S1 lumbar lordosis (LL), pelvic incidence (PI), sacral slope (SS), and sagittal vertical axis (SVA), for Lenke 1 and 5 preoperatively, at immediate, less than 2-year, and more than 2-year postoperatively, and for nonscoliotic adolescents were searched. Differences in the sagittal spinopelvic parameters between preoperative and the follow-ups and between the nonscoliotic and pre- and postoperative AIS subtypes were calculated through meta-analysis. A total of 22 studies on Lenke1 (1229 patients), 13 studies on Lenke5 (437 patients), and 18 studies on controls (1636 patients) were reviewed. Among all the measured variables, only PI in Lenke1 was significantly different between the final follow-up and controls, P < 0.05. In Lenke 1, SVA was significantly more anterior at the immediate postoperative than preoperative, but continued moving posteriorly up to 2-year postoperative resulting in no significant difference in the SVA position between the final follow-up and preoperative, P > 0.05. In Lenke 5, SVA was significantly more posterior at the immediate postoperative and more anterior at the final follow-up than the preoperative measurements, p < 0.05. Continuous changes in the sagittal spinal parameters should be expected after PSF. Normalization of the sagittal spinal parameters appears to be the rule after PSF, and watchful waiting appears to be appropriate in this population when viewing the lateral X-ray postoperatively. 4.

Lumbar lordosis does not correlate with pelvic incidence in the cases with the lordosis apex located at L3 or above.

To test the hypothesis that the relationship between PI and L1-S1 lumbar lordosis (LL) is always positive, even in cases with different lumbar sagittal profiles. Standing whole-spine sagittal alignment was measured with EOS system in 100 healthy adults (46 men, 54 women, mean age 40.9years). The apex of lumbar lordosis was defined as the most anterior lumbar vertebra or intervertebral disk from the gravity line determined by a force plate measurement. Subjects were stratified into three groups: the upper group with an apex between L1 and L3 (UppA, n = 19), the middle group with an apex from L3/4 to L4/5 (MidA, n = 67), and the lower group with an apex at L5 or below (LowA, n = 14). PI, PT, SS, thoracic kyphosis (TK), LL, SVA, T1 pelvic angle, and knee flexion angle were compared between the groups. The correlation between LL and PI in each group was also compared. PI and SS differed significantly between the three groups, and LL was significantly different between LowA and MidA and UppA. TK and KF did not differ significantly between groups. LL and PI were significantly positively correlated in the MidA and LowA groups, but not in the UppA group. Contrary to the hypothesis, the correlation coefficient between PI and LL was not significant in the cases with apex above L3, suggesting that the relationship between PI and LL is not always constant, and whole sagittal alignment should be taken into account. These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material.

A new classification system for degenerative spondylolisthesis of the lumbar spine.

There is no consensus for a comprehensive analysis of degenerative spondylolisthesis of the lumbar spine (DSLS). A new classification system for DSLS based on sagittal alignment was proposed. Its clinical relevance was explored. Health-related quality-of-life scales (HRQOLs) and clinical parameters were collected: SF-12, ODI, and low back and leg pain visual analog scales (BP-VAS, LP-VAS). Radiographic analysis included Meyerding grading and sagittal parameters: segmental lordosis (SL), L1-S1 lumbar lordosis (LL), T1-T12 thoracic kyphosis (TK), pelvic incidence (PI), pelvic tilt (PT), and sagittal vertical axis (SVA). Patients were classified according to three main types-1A: preserved LL and SL; 1B: preserved LL and reduced SL (≤5°); 2A: PI-LL ≥10° without pelvic compensation (PT<25°); 2B: PI-LL ≥10° with pelvic compensation (PT≥25°); type 3: global sagittal malalignment (SVA ≥40mm). 166 patients (119 F: 47 M) suffering from DSLS were included. Mean age was 67.1±11years. DSLS demographics were, respectively: type 1A: 73 patients, type 1B: 3, type 2A: 8, type 2B: 22, and type 3: 60. Meyerding grading was: grade 1 (n=124); grade 2 (n=24). Affected levels were: L4-L5 (n=121), L3-L4 (n=34), L2-L3 (n=6), and L5-S1 (n=5). Mean sagittal parameter values were: PI: 59.3°±11.9°; PT: 24.3°±7.6°; SVA: 29.1±42.2mm; SL: 18.2°±8.1°. DSLS types were correlated with age, ODI and SF-12 PCS (ρ=0.34, p<0.05; ρ=0.33, p<0.05; ρ=-0.20, and p=0.01, respectively). This classification was consistent with age and HRQOLs and could be a preoperative assessment tool. Its therapeutic impact has yet to be validated. 4.

Spino-pelvic alignment influences disc hydration properties after AIS surgery: a prospective MRI-based study.

To analyze the disc hydration and volumetric changes of the intervertebral disc after scoliosis surgery depending on the sagittal spino-pelvic organization. We conducted a prospective MRI study in 45 patients with surgically treated adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) with a minimum 2-year follow-up. Fusion ended at L1 (n = 13), L2 (n = 14), L3 (n = 11) or L4 (n = 7). Total disc (Vd) and nucleus volumes (Vn) were extrapolated from 3D reconstruction using a custom-made image processing software (Biomechlab, Toulouse, France). Nucleus and external disc contours were semi-automatically detected on turbo spin echo T2-weighted sequence joined 3-mm sagittal cuts. Disc hydration was extrapolated from the nucleus-disc volume ratio (Vn/Vd). Radiographic sagittal parameters were measured pre- and post-operatively on full spine standing views (pelvic incidence, sacral slope, L1S1 lumbar lordosis). Lumbo-pelvic congruity was calculated by the ratio LL/SS according to Stagnara. Mean PI of the cohort was 55° (34°-85°). After surgical correction, lumbar lordosis was slightly increased by 3° (p = 0.02) decreasing lumbo-pelvic congruity from 1.37 to 1.27 (p < 0.01). When pelvic incidence was less than 55° (mean PI 46°), nucleus volumes have increased on average by 30 % compared to the preoperative status in the unfused lumbar discs, while the total disc volumes has remained stable. Five-year follow-up (n = 13) confirmed the constant improvement of the disc hydration ratio. When PI was high (mean PI 64°), volumetric changes were very mild and significant changes in nucleus volumes and disc hydration ratio concerned only the intermediate lumbar levels (L2L3, L3L4 and L4L5). This prospective MRI study showed a significant and sustainable improvement in T2 hypersignal of the disc, indirectly indicating improvement of disc hydration content after AIS surgery. Analysis of disc volumetric changes according to the pelvic incidence suggests that these changes are under the influence of the sagittal spino-pelvic alignment. PI seems to play a key role in the homeostasis of the discs under fusion and should be taken into account for preoperative planning. The restoration of the lumbo-pelvic congruence may help to limit early degenerative changes in the free-motion segment discs after AIS surgery. Hydration content was less sensitive to surgery when PI was high, suggesting higher shear stress in the lower discs. Longer follow-up is required to confirm this hypothesis.

Sacropelvic Fixation With Iliosacral Screws

Retrospective radiographic and clinical review. To determine the feasibility of iliosacral screw fixation in adult spinal deformations. Pelvic fixation is one of the most challenging instrumentation problems. The poor bone quality frequently found within the sacrum and the large lumbosacral loads with cantilever pullout forces across this region explain its frequent failure. Fourteen adult patients undergoing pelvic fixation using iliosacral screws with a minimal follow-up of 24 months were analyzed for radiographic outcomes. Radiographic data included the localization of the spinal deformity, the Cobb angle, T4-T12 thoracic kyphosis, L1-S1 lumbar lordosis, the T9 tilt, the pelvic parameters, and the POA. Mechanical and infectious complications were also noted. The lumbo-pelvic correction was performed with a large reduction of the POA in every case. The frontal and sagittal corrections obtained with this procedure were considered as being effective. There were no mechanical complications due to failure of the instrumentation, loss of sacral fixation, or loss of lumbar lordosis at the time of the last follow-up. One patient experienced local infection on the left iliosacral screw without any residual functional sequel. Iliosacral screwing can offer a pelvic fixation reliable enough to allow restoration of 3-dimensional trunk balance. This technique has a quite short learning curve and adequately permits frontal and sagittal corrections, increases stability, and decreases instrumentation-related complications. Our observations suggest that it is applicable to pelvic fixation in adult surgery.