In an article published in Medium ?Evum in 1949, Neil Ker was the first to note the appearance of signed marginal notes in three eleventh-century manuscripts from Worcester.1 These notes carry a cryptic signature reading 'Coleman' when deciphered and identify the author as the man of that name who served as chancellor to St Wulfstan in 1089 and prior of the cell of Westbury-on-Trym in 1093 .2 Coleman and Thomas, prior of Worcester, died in 1113, Viri probitatis eximiae', according to the chronicle of John of Worcester.3 This is, of course, the Coleman who authored the lost vernacular life of Wulfstan II, Bishop of Worcester (d. 1095), used by William of Malmesbury in writing his own Latin life of that saint.4 In addition to these three signed notes, Ker attributed further annotations in Latin and Old English in the same manuscripts to Coleman, as well as marginalia found in two other eleventh-century Worcester manuscripts. The corpus of marginalia attributable to Coleman was expanded by Elizabeth Mclntyre in 1978/ and nearly forty years after Ker's article, William Stoneman published a follow-up, also in Medium AEEvum, in which he identified a further signed Old English note by Coleman.6 More recently, yet another Latin rubric was added to the growing list of Colemanian addenda by Rodney Thomson.7 What follows constitutes a further substantial contribution to the collection of identifiable traces which this churchman left in no less than eight manuscripts during the late eleventh and early twelfth centuries.8Oxford, Bodleian Library, MS Hatton 114Coleman's marginal rubrics in this manuscript comply with the palaeographical standard of those he added in its companion volume Hatton 113, in which Ker identified no fewer than four.9 In a footnote of his 1949 list, Ker already refers to MS Hatton 114, which contains the sentence 'Dis nis no well gesasd' in the margin of fol. 86r. The sentence parallels Coleman's signed annotation on the 'silent days' in CCCC 178, but by comparison to the few available minuscule samples of his in the vernacular it seems impossible to posit a reliable attribution to his hand.10 The list of notes in this bulky homiletic collection from Worcester was extended by Mclntyre by one note in Hatton 1 13 (fol. i34r 'Be t?am GITSERE')11 and three in Hatton 1 14 (fols ? i7v OF GALSCIPE', i3v 'BE WIGLUNGE.', and 25r 'BE ONBRYRp]NESSE.'), all of which are plausible ascriptions by the palaeographical norm of the notes identified by Ker and by correspondence in ink.12 The last of these notes occurs in a version of ^Ifric's homily In purificatione sanctae mariae where it marks the beginning of a lengthy passage on the forms and signs of remorse.13(a) 27v/21. Left margin (see Figure 1). A further, slightly faded note reading 'ANNA' can be found in this homily, accompanied by a rectangular frame with a concave semicircle in its corner. The rubric was written beside another marginal addition in a contemporary hand reading On \J?am/ .xl. dasge cristes gebyrtide brohte sancta maria crist gelacad to ðam godes temple.' Following the signe -de-renvoi this marginal sentence is meant to be inserted before 'þa com þae sum wuduwe seo wass anna gehaten' in the main text.14 Superscript to the first word 'þa' of this sentence stands a cross, indicating the beginning of the example of Anna to the reader, similar to many other cases in which Coleman adds a rubric.15 The supplementary sentence in the margin then provides a new introduction, which certainly indicates that the passage could be treated as an independent reading option. The section may have worked as a selfconsistent address to women, as the admonitory 'Behealde ge wif 7 understandao hu be hyre awriten is' later in the text suggests.16(b) 113r/8. Coleman tides 'BE DOMES Daege' in the right margin, again framed by an L-shaped frame showing a semicircle (see Figure 2). The rubric occurs in a homily Feria tertia de letania maiore at the beginning of an excursus on Judgement Day. …