In 1968–1969 a special committee elected by the Israel Medical Association prepared and submitted a report on the organization of health services in Israel. The committee recommended a broader definition of health and a comprehensive health-care approach for its implementation. In spite of the expectations of its compilers the report proved to be ineffective policy-wise and did not create even a forum of discussion. The report sufferes from some fundamental inconsistencies. The committee chose a comprehensive concept of health but abstained from examining the relationship between health, health services and socio-economic development. Isolating the health delivery system from the major system—the Israeli society—and proposing the solution to the crisis in the Israeli health system without specific discussion of the latter, the report inevitably created the impression that what was wrong in the health-care system was wrong within the health-care system itself, and not a reflection of the social milieu in which the health services function. By trying to be objective and strictly professional the committee adopted a neutral “medical model”; the result was that instead of generating change, the status quo was secured. The recommendations of the committee, if accepted, would have affected first of all the network of primary health care which has always been the domain of the Sick Fund (Kupat Holim) of the Labor Federation (Histadrut), dominated by the Labor Party. Introducing comprehensive health care would have meant replacing the solo Kupat Holim physician with a health team, giving to welfare and other agencies, represented in the team, a share in rights and duties. For such partition of power Kupat Holim was not ready. Reflecting the actual location of power, the medical profession lost its battle for redefinition of health and health services. The Mann Committee recommendations exemplify an attempt at innovation. The manner in which its conclusions were formulated and later “shelved” illustrates the way that many such attempts, not only in the health field, were dealt with. The case of the committee report indicates that significant changes in the health field cannot be expected without radical changes in Israeli society itself.
Read full abstract