During spermiogenesis, a plasma membrane remodeling step facilitates formation of zona pellucida and hyaluronic acid(HA) binding sites in sperm. Thus, diminished maturity sperm, which contain surplus cytoplasm and show consequential abnormal morphology, are unable to bind to HA. We have tested the hypothesis that there will be an improvement in the proportion of sperm with normal Kruger strict morphology in HA-bound sperm fractions of semen samples, similar to the 4.2x increase reported by the Tygerberg, South Africa (TSA) group for zona pellucida bound sperm fractions of teratozoospermic specimens (Mol. Repr. Dev., 1991). Strict sperm morphology was determined in semen and in their respective HA-bound fractions in 30 men (Sperm conc. range: 7.4-115x106/mL, motility: 45.6±3.1%) by three independent investigators. Two readers were from the USA (US1 and US2) and the third, TSA, who was blinded to the A and B surface of slides, was from South Africa. METHODS: For sperm evaluation, a two-chamber version of the HBA slide (MidAtlantic Diagnostics) was used. An aliquot of semen was smeared on the uncoated A side. In another aliquot, the sperm were allowed to bind to the HA-coated surface of B side, to determine HA-binding score. After Diff-Quik staining, 200 sperm were evaluated for strict morphology by each investigator on the A and B sides. The sperm maturity markers, CK-activity (cytoplasmic retention) and HspA2 chaperone were assessed, as published previously. Statistical analysis by paired T-test, Wilcoxon ranked sum test, and Spearman correlations were by Sigma Stat (Jandel). All values are mean±SEM. Comparing the three readers, US1 and US2 used stricter criteria than TSA. The % normal scores by the three investigators for A semen and the respective B HA-bound sides were: US1: 6.6±0.7% (range:14.7) and 13.5±1.4% (range: 33.2): US2: 8.9±0.9 (range:20.7) and 14.5±1.4 (range:29.8); TSA: 11.0±1.1 (range: 23) and 26.5±2.1 (range: 50), A vs. B p<0.003 in all readers. There were similar variations in Kruger strict morphology score improvements from the A to B sides: US1: 2.2x, US2:1.8x and TSA: 3.1x. However, despite the differences in “strictness,” the evaluations were internally consistent among USA1, USA2, and TSA between r=0.38 and 0.66 (p=0.039 - <0.001). The rationale for the morphology improvements is supported by the relationships between HA-binding scores and sperm maturity markers: HA-binding vs. CK activity: r= -0.56, p=0.004; HA-binding vs. HspA2 levels: r=0.55, p=0.005. Most revealing are the % increase in sperm with normal morphology bound to HA from the 19 teratozoospermic (<14% normal) samples: 226% and 194% for the stricter US1 and US2. However, TSA found a 376% improvement, a value nearly identical to the 420% improvement found in zona pellucida-bound sperm by the TSA group in 1991. CONCLUSIONS: Consistent with our hypothesis, there was a significant improvement in normal strict morphology scores in the HA-bound vs. semen sperm fractions. The improvement was comparable to those reported earlier for zona pellucida-bound sperm. The relationships between sperm maturity, HA-binding and normal morphology are further supported by the HA-binding scores and sperm maturity markers. This selection/separation method holds promise for semen evaluation and ICSI programs, as mature normal forms are highly selected.
Read full abstract