Knee Injury And Osteoarthritis Outcome Score Activities Of Daily Living Research Articles

Two-stage revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction reduces failure risk but leads to lesser clinical outcomes than single-stage revision after primary anterior cruciate ligament graft failure: a retrospective cohort study

BackgroundThere are no studies that compare the outcomes and complications of single-versus two-stage revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) after primary ACLR failure. This purpose of this study is to examine clinical and functional outcomes and complications associated with single and two-stage revision ACLR after primary ACLR failure.MethodsAll patients who underwent single or two-stage revision ACLR after primary ACLR failure between 2012 and 2021 with a minimum of a 2 year follow-up were included. Patients were excluded if they were not treated at our single academic institution, had inadequate follow-up, or had incomplete medical records. Revision intraoperative data, concomitant injuries, and complications were collected by chart review. Return to sport, numerical pain rating scale (NPRS) score, Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), and Veteran Rands 12-item health survey (VR-12 scores) were collected.ResultsThe final analysis included 176 patients. A total of 147 (83.5%) had a single-stage revision ACLR (87 male, 60 female), and 29 (16.5%) had a two-stage revision ACLR (13 male, 16 female). Two-stage revision ACLR was significantly associated with anterior knee pain [odds ratio (OR) 4.36; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.5 to 12.65; P = 0.007] but with lower failure rates (OR 0.12, 95% CI 0.02 to 0.9; P = 0.04). On multivariate analysis, a two-stage revision ACLR reduced the risk of graft failure by 85% (OR 0.15; 95% CI 0.02 to 1.17; P = 0.07). Two-stage revision ACLR was significantly associated with a lower KOOS pain score (OR −11.7; 95% CI −22.35 to −1.04; P = 0.031), KOOS symptoms score (OR −17.11; 95% CI −28.85 to −5.36; P = 0.004), KOOS Activities of Daily Living (ADL) score (OR −11.15; 95% CI −21.71 to −0.59; P = 0.039) and Veterans RAND 12-Item Health Survey (VR-12) physical component score (OR −9.99; 95% CI −15.77 to −4.22; P = 0.001).ConclusionsThe clinical outcomes and subjective patient scores significantly differed between the single-stage and two-stage revision ACLR after primary ACLR failure. Patients with a two-stage revision ACLR had a significantly reduced risk of revision graft failure but higher rates of postoperative anterior knee pain, lower pain scores, and lesser knee functional scores than single-stage revision patients.Study designRetrospective cohort study; level of evidence, 3

Factors Associated With a Successful Return to Performance After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Multiparametric Evaluation in Soccer Players.

Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) is highly recommended in patients with ACL deficiency who must perform at a high physical level. A combination of functional and psychological outcome measures is necessary to provide a comprehensive evaluation of functional status after successful return to sport after ACLR. To identify factors associated with higher functional outcomes among soccer players who had returned to full sports participation after ACLR. Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. A total of 168 out of 231 patients who underwent primary unilateral arthroscopic anatomic single-bundle ACLR were available at follow-up. Postoperatively, knee function, generic health outcomes, and psychological impact were assessed using the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC), the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), the Lysholm Knee Scoring Scale, the 12-item Short Form Health Survey (SF-12), and the ACL-Return to Sport after Injury scale. After a mean follow-up of 35.5 ± 22.6 months, 85% of soccer players returned to performance. Midfielder position was associated with a better SF-12 Physical Component Summary (PCS) score (P = .013), IKDC (P = .003), total KOOS (P < .001), KOOS Symptoms (P = .004), KOOS Pain (P = .029), KOOS Activities of Daily Living (ADL) (P = .044), KOOS Sport and Recreation (Sport/Rec) (P = .001), KOOS Quality of Life (QoL) (P < .001), and Lysholm score (P = .008). Playing only on natural grass was associated with lower SF-12 PCS scores (P = .003), total KOOS (P = .001), and KOOS Sport/Rec (P = .011). Playing only on artificial turf was associated with lower Lysholm score (P = .018) and total KOOS (P = .014). The contact mechanism was associated with higher IKDC (P = .044) and KOOS QoL (P = .048), and injury affecting the dominant limb was associated with lower SF-12 Mental Component Summary scores (P = .012). Playing at a nonprofessional level was associated with lower total KOOS (P = .028), KOOS Symptoms (P = .002), KOOS ADL (P = .033), and KOOS Sport/Rec (P = .016). Professional soccer players and the midfielder position are associated with better functional scores upon returning to the sport. A history of noncontact ACL injury and playing on a single type of surface are associated with lower functional outcomes upon returning to the sport. Lower mental health scores can be expected after injury of the dominant limb.

Tibial Baseplate Migration Is Not Associated with Change in Patient-Reported Outcome Measures and Clinical Scores After TKA: A Secondary Analysis of 5 Radiostereometric Analysis Studies with 10-Year Follow-up.

Radiostereometric analysis (RSA) provides highly accurate data about the migration of a total knee arthroplasty (TKA) component. However, patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) reflect the patients' perspective of their functional status, pain, and overall health after TKA. The aim of this study was to evaluate the association between tibial implant migration and change in postoperative PROMs and clinical scores, using data pooled from long-term follow-up RSA studies. Individual implant migration data were collected from 5 randomized RSA studies, including a total of 300 patients with 6 distinct TKA implant designs (all Stryker). Tibial implant migration (maximum total point motion [MTPM]) was evaluated with RSA at 3 months, 1 year, and 2, 5, 7, and 10 years postoperatively. The Knee Society Score (KSS)-Knee and KSS-Function and Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) subscales were collected in all studies at the same follow-up times. Linear mixed-effects models, with adjustment for TKA implant design and patient characteristics, were used to analyze the data. The 3-month follow-up visit was used as the baseline to assess the association between implant migration and PROMs across the 10-year follow-up. No association between tibial implant migration and change in KSS-Knee (p = 0.384), KSS-Function (p = 0.737), KOOS-Symptoms (p = 0.398), KOOS-Pain (p = 0.699), KOOS-Activities of Daily Living (p = 0.205), KOOS-Sport and Recreation (p = 0.702), or KOOS-Quality of Life (p = 0.368) was found across the entire follow-up. Similar results were found when using the 2-year follow-up as the baseline, after which both cemented and uncemented implants are expected to have stabilized. Tibial baseplate migration was not associated with postoperative worsening in PROMs or clinical scores in patients who underwent TKA. These findings suggest that implant migration, as measured with RSA, measures a different parameter (i.e., implant-bone fixation) than PROMs (i.e., patient perception) and clinical scores. Therefore, to assess the performance and safety of TKA implant designs, RSA and PROMs cannot be used interchangeably during the postoperative follow-up of patients and evaluation of the fixation of knee implants. Prognostic Level III . See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

The impact of an illness perception conversation on open-label placebo response in knee osteoarthritis: A randomised controlled trial

ObjectiveTo compare the effect of an illness perception conversation (IPC), relative to a research participation conversation (RPC), on 2-week changes in knee pain in patients with knee osteoarthritis. MethodThis was a randomised single-blind trial. Patients were randomised to two matched conversations. An Illness Perception (IP) conversation concerning the participant’s knee pain-related IP or a research participation conversation, concerning the participant’s motivation for participating in research. Both conversations were followed by an open-label intraarticular saline injection in the most symptomatic knee. The primary outcome was change in knee pain from baseline to 2 weeks follow-up on a 100 mm Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). Key secondary outcomes included the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) subscales: Activities of daily living (ADL) and Quality of life (QoL). Main analyses were based on the intention-to-treat population using repeated measures mixed effects linear models. Results103 patients were randomised to the IPC group (n = 52) and the RPC group (n = 51). VAS knee pain scores changed statistically significantly from baseline to end of treatment in both groups, -13.7 (SE: 3.2) in the IPC group and -13.0 (SE: 3.1) in the RPC group with an adjusted between-group difference of -0.7 (95% CI: -8.3 to 6.9; P= 0.85). Likewise, no group differences were seen in KOOS ADL and KOOS QoL. ConclusionA conversation concerning knee pain-related IP did not augment the pain-relieving effect of an open-label placebo injection, when compared to a similar control conversation concerning motivations for participating in research. TRIAL REGISTRATIONNCT05225480

Arthroscopic Partial Meniscectomy in Patients With Kellgren-Lawrence Grade 3 Osteoarthritis Shows Clinically Meaningful Improvement in Outcomes

To evaluate patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) following arthroscopic partial meniscectomy (APM) in patients with Kellgren-Lawrence (KL) grade 3 on preoperative knee radiographs and a symptomatic meniscal tear. This was a retrospective study design using prospectively collected data from a single institution. Patients were included if they had KL grade 3 osteoarthritis on preoperative radiographs of the knee and completed a trial of nonoperative treatment for at least 6 weeks prior to APM. Patients were excluded if they had inflammatory arthritis, incomplete preoperative and/or 1-year postoperative follow-up data, repeat knee arthroscopy, and concomitant ligamentous injury. Statistical analyses used PROMs, preoperatively and up to 2 years postoperatively, to assess improvement utilizing scales with previously established thresholds, including minimal clinically important difference (MCID) and substantial clinical benefit (SCB). Eighty-two patients met the eligibility criteria (49 women [60%], mean [SD] age, 53.1 [9.3] years). At the 1-year follow-up, most patients achieved MCID: 73% in Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) Pain, 66% in KOOS Symptoms, and 78% in KOOS Activities of Daily Living (ADL). These improvements were similar at the 2-year follow-up: 75%, 72%, and 79% in each subscale, respectively. SCB was also demonstrated 1 year postoperatively, with 56%, 73%, and 71% achieving SCB for the KOOS Pain, Symptoms, and ADL subscales, respectively. These results largely persisted at the 2-year follow-up. Visual analog scale scores for pain also improved at 1- and 2-year postoperative periods with mean improvements from baseline of 2.80 and 2.87 points, respectively. Marx Activity Score decreased on average from baseline to 1- and 2-year follow-up. At a minimum of 1-year follow-up, most patients with KL grade 3 and a meniscal tear achieved MCID and SCB in KOOS Pain, KOOS Symptoms, and KOOS ADL, indicating meaningful outcome improvement for these patients. Level IV, therapeutic case series.

Lysholm and KOOS QoL Demonstrate High Responsiveness in Patients Undergoing Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials.

There have been a large number of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) used to assess outcomes after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction (ACLR). The purpose was to determine which PROMs are being commonly used in randomized clinical trials (RCTs) to assess patients undergoing ACLR and to compare the responsiveness between them. It was hypothesized that the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score would be the most commonly used and responsive PROM among patients undergoing ACLR. Meta-analysis. Level of evidence, 2. PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines were followed, and relevant studies were extracted from the PubMed/MEDLINE and Web of Science databases. The inclusion criteria were English-language RCTs reporting on PROMs after ACLR. For articles meeting our inclusion criteria for responsiveness analysis (≥2 PROMs reported, 1 year minimum follow-up, and reported pre- and postoperative PROM means and standard deviations), the responsiveness between PROMs was compared using effect size (ES) and relative efficiency (RE). A total of 108 articles met the inclusion criteria, comprising 9034 patients (mean age, 29.9 years; mean body mass index, 24.3; mean follow-up time, 36.1 months). There were 34 PROMs identified. The top 3 most commonly reported PROMs were the IKDC (n = 68; 63.0%), Lysholm (n = 65; 60.2%), and Tegner (n = 47; 43.5%) scores. The 2 PROMs with the highest ES were the ACL-Quality of Life (QoL) (3.37) and Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) QoL (2.07) scores. Compared with other PROMs, Lysholm and KOOS QoL scores had the greatest RE values. The Lysholm score had a greater RE than the KOOS Pain (RE, 1.17), KOOS Symptoms (RE, 1.22), KOOS Activities of Daily Living (ADL) (RE, 1.42), KOOS Sport/Recreation (RE, 1.55), KOOS QoL (RE, 1.41), and Tegner (RE, 2.89) scores. KOOS QoL had a greater RE than the IKDC (RE, 1.32), KOOS Pain (RE, 1.60), KOOS Symptoms (RE, 2.12), KOOS ADL (RE, 3.03), KOOS Sport/Recreation (RE, 1.27), and Tegner (RE, 2.06) scores. The IKDC score is the most commonly reported PROM in RCTs after ACLR; however, the Lysholm and KOOS QoL scores demonstrated the highest responsiveness in patients undergoing ACLR compared with other PROMs.

Responsiveness of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures After Large Knee Articular Cartilage Transplantation: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Background: Cartilage transplantation is commonly used to treat large (>4 cm2) articular cartilage defects of the knee. The 2 most common transplants are osteochondral allograft transplantation and autologous chondrocyte implantation. Several patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) have been used to determine the efficacy of treatment, but it is unknown which measures are the most effective. Purpose: To report the multiple PROMs used after large knee articular cartilage transplantation surgery and to compare the responsiveness between them. Study Design: Meta-analysis; Level of evidence, 4. Methods: Following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, a systematic search of the PubMed/MEDLINE and Web of Science databases was performed. A total of 181 articles met inclusion criteria. Patient and study characteristics were extracted, including pre- and postoperative means for PROMs. From the articles that met inclusion criteria for responsiveness analysis (2+ PROMs reported, 1-year minimum follow-up, reported pre- and postoperative means and standard deviations; n = 131), the authors compared the responsiveness between PROM instruments using effect size and relative efficiency (RE) if a PROM could be compared with another in ≥10 articles. Results: A total of 10,015 patients (10,093 knees; mean age, 34.8 years; mean body mass index, 26.1) were included in this study. The mean follow-up time was 58.3 months (range, 1.5-247.2 months), imaging findings were reported in 80 articles (44.2%), patient satisfaction was reported in 39 articles (21.5%), and range of motion was reported in 10 articles (5.5%). There were 58 unique PROM instruments identified, with the most used being the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score (n = 118; 65.2%), followed by Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) Pain (n = 58; 32.0%), KOOS Sport and Recreation (n = 58; 32.0%), KOOS Quality of Life (n = 57; 31.5%), KOOS Activities of Daily Living (n = 57; 31.5%), and KOOS Symptoms (n = 57; 31.5%). Overall, IKDC was found to have the greatest effect size (1.68) and the best responsiveness of the other PROMs, which include KOOS Pain (RE, 1.38), KOOS Symptoms (RE, 3.06), KOOS Activities of Daily Living (RE, 1.65), KOOS Sport and Recreation (RE, 1.44), Lysholm (RE, 1.76), and Tegner (RE, 1.56). Conclusion: The IKDC is the most responsive PROM after large knee articular cartilage transplantation surgery. The IKDC score is recommended for assessing outcomes after cartilage transplantation surgery.

Suture-Bridge Fixation of Osteochondral Fractures and Osteochondritis Dissecans in the Knee: Excellent Rates of Early Lesion Stability and Osseous Union.

Preservation of articular cartilage in the setting of acute or chronic injury in the adolescent and young adult knee is paramount for long-term joint health. Achieving osseous union, minimizing implant-related injury, and eliminating the need for reoperation for traumatic chondral and osteochondral lesions (OCLs) and osteochondritis dissecans (OCD) remain a challenge for the orthopaedic surgeon. To evaluate radiographic healing, patient-reported outcomes, and short-term complications after suture-bridge fixation of chondral fragments, osteochondral fractures, and OCD lesions in the knee. Case series; Level of evidence, 4. The study included consecutive patients (38 patients, 40 knees) treated within a single academic sports medicine institution who underwent suture-bridge fixation of an OCL or an OCD lesion of the knee from initiation of the technique in October 2019 through March 2021. The suture-bridge technique entailed bioabsorbable knotless anchors placed on the outside margins of the lesion with multiple strands of hand-tensioned absorbable (No. 0 or No. 1 Vicryl) or nonabsorbable (1.3-mm braided polyester tape) bridging suture. Healing was assessed by radiography and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), with MRI scans obtained on all OCD lesions and any chondral-only lesions. MRI scans were available for 33 of 40 (82.5%) knees within 1 year of surgery and were evaluated for lesion healing. Complications and rates and timing of return to sport were evaluated. Patient-reported outcomes in the OCD cohort were evaluated with the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) to determine early pain and functional improvement. In total, 33 (82.5%) lesions demonstrated full union, and no lesions failed treatment. MRI assessment of healing (mean, 5.8 months; range, 3-12 months) demonstrated 9 (64.3%) OCD lesions with full union, 5 (35.7%) OCD lesions with stable union, and no OCD lesions with nonunion. Of the OCLs, 17 (89.5%) had full union, 2 (10.5%) had stable union, and none had nonunion. The 7 bony OCLs without an MRI scan demonstrated complete radiographic union. In 30 (75.0%) lesions, patients returned to sports at a mean of 6.5 months (range, 3.8-10.2 months). KOOS Activities of Daily Living, Pain, Quality of Life, and Symptoms scores demonstrated significant improvement from baseline at 6 months and at 1 year. There were 2 (5%) complications, consisting of reoperation for marginal chondroplasty on an otherwise stable lesion, and re-operation for intial un-treated patellar instability, with no reoperations for failure or revision of the suture-bridge construct. In this series of OCLs and OCD lesions of the knee, suture-bridge fixation demonstrated excellent rates of MRI and radiographic union and good early outcomes with minimal short-term complications. This technique may be used for lesion salvage as an alternative to metallic and nonmetallic screw/tack constructs in the treatment of these challenging lesions. Longer term follow-up and investigation are warranted.

The Value of Minimal Clinically Important Difference, Substantial Clinical Benefit, and Patient-Acceptable Symptomatic State for Commonly Used Patient-Reported Outcomes in Recurrent Patellar Instability Patients After Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction and Tibial Tubercle Transfer

To identify the minimal clinically important difference (MCID), substantial clinical benefit (SCB) and patient acceptable symptomatic state (PASS) for commonly used patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in recurrent patellar instability patients after medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction (MPFLR) and tibial tubercle transfer (TTT), and to determine the impact of potential prognostic factors on the likelihood of achieving these values. From April 2015 to February 2021, patients who underwent MPFLR and TTT were retrospectively reviewed. PROs included Kujala, Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome (KOOS), Lysholm, International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) and Tegner score. Relevant anchor questions were provided. A distribution- or anchor-based method was adopted to determine the MCID, SCB and PASS. Minimal detectable change (MDC) was included to confirm the validity. Univariate regression analyses were conducted to determine the potential prognostic factors. 142 patients were included. The MCID were 9.1(Kujala), 11.1 (Lysholm), 0.9(Tegner), 9.9(IKDC), 9.0(KOOS-Pain), 10.8(KOOS-Symptoms), 10.0(KOOS-Activities of Daily Living (ADL)), 17.8(KOOS-Sports and Recreation (Sports/Rec)), and 12.7 (KOOS-Quality of Life (QoL)). The SCB were 14.5(Kujala), 12.5(Lysholm), 1.5(Tegner), 14.5(IKDC), 13.9(KOOS-Pain), 14.3(KOOS-Symptoms), 18.4(KOOS-ADL), 47.5(KOOS-Sports/Rec), 15.0(KOOS-QoL). The PASSs were 85.5(Kujala), 75.5(Lysholm), 3.5(Tegner), 73.2(IKDC), 87.5(KOOS-Pain), 73.2(KOOS-Symptoms), 92.0(KOOS-ADL), 77.5(KOOS-Sports/Rec), and 53.1(KOOS-QoL). All SCBs were valid except KOOS-QoL. All MCIDs were valid at the 95% confidence interval (CI) except KOOS scores, the majority of which were valid at the 90% CI. A younger age was an independent prognostic factor of reaching PASS for Lysholm, IKDC, Tegner and KOOS-ADL score. A higher baseline score was a negative prognostic factor for achieving MCID or SCB but had a slightly positive influence on the achievement of PASS. This study established the MCID, SCB, and PASS for commonly used PROs and confirmed their validity in recurrent patellar instability patients after MPFLR and TTT. Younger age and lower baseline scores were prognostic factors of achieving MCID and SCB, while patients with higher baseline scores were more likely to report satisfaction.

Particulated Costal Allocartilage With Microfracture Versus Microfracture Alone for Knee Cartilage Defects: A Multicenter, Prospective, Randomized, Participant- and Rater-Blinded Study.

Microfracture is the first-line treatment for cartilage defects; however, the suboptimal quality of the repaired cartilage remains an issue. The aim of this first in-human study was to compare the clinical efficacy and safety of a combination of particulated costal allocartilage and microfracture versus microfracture alone in treating knee cartilage defects. We hypothesized that the particulated costal allocartilage with microfracture would result in superior cartilage repair quality and better clinical outcomes at 48 weeks postoperatively. Randomized controlled trial; Level of evidence, 1. Patients with cartilage defects were allocated randomly to the treatment group (particulated costal allocartilage with microfracture) and control group (microfracture alone). Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) outcomes of cartilage repair (the primary outcome measure) were evaluated at the 48-week follow-up using the Magnetic Resonance Observation of Cartilage Repair Tissue (MOCART) score. Patient-reported clinical outcomes (visual analog scale [VAS] pain score, Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score [KOOS], and International Knee Documentation Committee score) and adverse events were evaluated at 12, 24, and 48 weeks postoperatively. Overall, 88 patients were included (44 patients each in the treatment and control groups). The total MOCART score at 48 weeks postoperatively was significantly higher in the treatment group than in the control group (P < .001). Among the 9 MOCART variables, 6 were significantly superior in the treatment versus the control group: degree of repair and defect filling (P < .001), integration to the border zone (P < .001), surface (P = .006), structure (P = .011), signal intensity of the repair tissue (P < .001), and subchondral lamina (P = .005). There were significant between-group differences in KOOS-Pain (P = .014), KOOS-Activities of Daily Living (P = .010), KOOS-Sports (P = .029), and KOOS-Symptoms (P = .039) at 12 weeks postoperatively and in VAS pain (P = .012) and KOOS-Pain (P = .005) at 24 weeks postoperatively. At 48 weeks postoperatively, clinical outcomes were comparable between the groups. Microfracture augmented with particulated costal allocartilage resulted in superior cartilage repair quality compared with microfracture alone in terms of MRI evaluation of the knee joint cartilage defect at the 48-week follow-up. Functional outcomes were favorable for both treatments at final follow-up. KCT0004936 (Clinical Research Information Service [CRiS] of the Republic of Korea).

Exercise Therapy for Knee Osteoarthritis: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis.

Exercise is an effective nonpharmaceutical therapy for knee osteoarthritis (KOA). To identify the most effective type of exercise therapy for KOA with regard to pain, stiffness, joint function, and quality of life. Systematic review; Level of evidence, 3. The PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases were searched, from inception to April 4, 2022. Included were randomized controlled trials that assessed the efficacy on KOA among 5 different exercise therapy groups (aquatic exercise [AE], stationary cycling [CY], resistance training [RT], traditional exercise [TC], and yoga [YG]) and compared with the control group. Outcomes among the groups were assessed with the Western Ontario and McMaster University Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), 6-minute walk test (6-MWT), visual analog scale (VAS) for pain, and Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS); weighted mean differences (WMDs) and 95% confidence intervals were calculated. Network meta-analyses comparing outcomes between all groups and with controls were performed, and group rankings were calculated using the surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA). A total of 39 studies (N = 2646 participants) were included. Most of the studies failed to blind participants and researchers, resulting in a high risk of performance bias. Significantly worse WOMAC-Pain scores were seen in controls compared with all exercise interventions except AE (WMD [95% CI]: CY, -4.45 [-5.69 to -3.20]; RT, -4.28 [-5.48 to -3.07]; TC, -4.20 [-5.37 to -3.04]; and YG, -0.57 [-1.04 to -1.04]), and worse scores were seen in controls compared with YG regarding WOMAC-Stiffness (WMD, -1.40 [95% CI, -2.45 to -0.34]) and WOMAC-Function (WMD, -0.49 [95% CI, -0.95 to -0.02]). According to the SUCRA, CY was the most effective for improving WOMAC-Pain (80.8%) and 6-MWT (76.1%); YG was most effective for improving WOMAC-Stiffness (90.6%), WOMAC-Function (77.4%), KOOS-Activities of Daily Living (72.0%), and KOOS-Quality of Life (79.1%); AE was the most effective regarding VAS pain (77.2%) and KOOS-Pain (64.0%); and RT was the most effective regarding KOOS-Symptoms (84.5%). All 5 types of exercise were able to ameliorate KOA. AE (for pain relief) and YG (for joint stiffness, limited knee function, and quality of life) were the most effective approaches, followed by RT, CY, and TC.

Internal Fixation of Unstable Osteochondritis Dissecans of the Knee: Long-term Outcomes in Skeletally Immature and Mature Patients

Background: Osteochondritis dissecans (OCD) is a disorder originating in the subchondral bone, leading to focal lesions with risk of fragmentation and secondary damage of the articular cartilage. It remains controversial if surgical treatment of such lesions is equally successful in skeletally immature and mature patients. Purpose: To determine (1) the long-term clinical success rate after internal fixation of unstable OCD in skeletally immature and mature patients based on physeal status, (2) if patient-specific and procedural variables influence the risk of failure, and (3) patient-reported outcome measures over time. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: A multicenter retrospective cohort study was conducted investigating skeletally immature and mature patients treated for unstable OCD lesions of the knee between 2000 and 2015. The healing rate was assessed by radiological imaging and clinical follow-up. Failure was defined as any definitive reoperation for the initially treated OCD lesion. Results: A total of 81 patients met inclusion criteria, including 25 skeletally immature patients and 56 patients with closed physes at the time of surgery. After a mean follow-up time of 11.3 ± 4 years, 58 (71.6%) patients had healed lesions, whereas the lesions failed to heal in 23 (28.4%) patients. No significant difference in risk of failure was observed based on physeal maturation status (hazard ratio, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.33-1.84; P = .56). Lateral versus medial condylar lesion location conferred an increased risk of failure (P < .05) for both skeletally immature and mature patients. Multivariate analysis of skeletal maturity status showed that a lateral femoral condylar location was an independent risk factor for failure (hazard ratio, 0.22; 95% CI, 0.1-0.5; P < .05). The mean patient-reported outcome scores (International Knee Documentation Committee [IKDC] score and Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score [KOOS]) increased significantly after surgery and remained high at the final follow-up (P < .05). The final scores (mean ± SD) at a mean follow-up of 135.8 months (range, 80-249 months) were IKDC, 86.6 ± 16.7; KOOS Pain, 88.7 ± 18.1; KOOS Symptoms, 89.3 ± 12.6; KOOS Activities of Daily Living, 89.3 ± 21.6; KOOS Sport and Recreation, 79.8 ± 26.3; and KOOS Quality of Life, 76.7 ± 26.3. Conclusion: The long-term results after internal fixation of OCD fragments show high rates of healing and sustainable subjective improvement of knee function and quality of life. A healing rate of 72% was noted at a mean follow-up of 11.3 years. The stage of skeletal maturity had no significant influence on the rate of failure. Lateral femoral condylar lesion location is an independent risk factor for failure in skeletally mature and immature patients.

International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) Is the Most Responsive Patient Reported Outcome Measure After Meniscal Surgery

To report the variability in outcome measures after meniscal surgery and to compare responsiveness between patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). A systematic search of the PubMed/MEDLINE and Web of Science databases was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis guidelines. A total of 257 studies met inclusion criteria. Patient and study attributes were extracted, including pre- and postoperative means for PROMs. Of the studies that met inclusion criteria for responsiveness analysis (2+ PROMs reported, 1-year minimum follow-up; n= 172), we compared the responsiveness between PROM instruments using effect size and relative efficiency (RE) if a PROM could be compared with another in at least 10 articles. In total, 18,612 patients (18,690 menisci, mean age= 38.6 years, mean body mass index= 26.3) were included in this study. Radiographic measures were reported in 167 (65.0%) studies, range of motion was reported in 53 (20.6%) studies, and 35 different PROM instruments were identified. The mean number of PROMs in each article was 3.6 and 83.8% reported 2 or more PROMs. The most used PROMs were Lysholm (74.5%) and IKDC (51.0%). IKDC was found to be more responsive than other PROMs, which include Lysholm (RE= 1.03), Tegner (RE= 3.90), and Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) Activities of Daily Living (ADL) (RE= 1.12). KOOS Quality of Life (QoL) was also more responsive than other PROMs, such as IKDC (RE= 1.45) and KOOS ADL (RE= 1.48). Lysholm was more responsive compared with KOOS QoL (RE= 1.14), KOOS ADL (RE= 1.96), and Tegner (RE= 3.53). Our study found that IKDC, KOOS QoL, and Lysholm were the most responsive PROMs. However, because of the previously reported risks of either floor effects (KOOS QoL) or ceiling effects (Lysholm), the IKDC may offer a more complete psychometric profile when quantifying outcomes after meniscus procedures. To improve clinical outcomes, surgical decision-making, and research methodology, it is important to determine which PROMs are the most responsive after meniscal surgery.

Patient-reported outcomes measurement information system physical function and knee injury and osteoarthritis outcome score relationship on performance measures in people undergoing total knee arthroplasty

Purpose Primary purpose was to identify relationships between performance-based measures onto both computerized adaptive testing [Physical Function-Computer Adaptive Testing (PF-CAT)] and joint-specific legacy [Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score-Activities of Daily Living (KOOS-ADL)] instruments pre- and 12-month post-TKA. Methods The PF-CAT and KOOS-ADL were identified as outcomes and performance on the 40-m fast-paced walking test, stair climb test and chair stand test were identified as predictors. Linear regression was used for all comparisons after adjusting for confounders. Results Sixty-eight people with TKA (56.7% male) were tested. Better scores on the 40-m fast-paced walking (KOOS-ADL, p = 0.02), stair climb (KOOS-ADL, p = 0.05) and chair stand (KOOS-ADL, p < 0.01) associated with better self-reported scores pre-TKA. Better scores on the 40-m fast-paced walking (PF-CAT, p = 0.05; KOOS-ADL, p = 0.01), stair climb (KOOS-ADL, p < 0.01), chair stand (PF-CAT, p < 0.01) and range of motion (KOOS-ADL, p = 0.02) were associated with better self-reported scores 12-month post-TKA. Decrease knee range of motion related to poorer 40-m fast-paced walking (p = 0.01) and stair climb (p = 0.03) scores pre-TKA. Quadriceps weakness related to poorer 40-m fast-paced walking (p = 0.04) score pre-TKA. Conclusion Self-reported instruments are a moderate, but inconsistent surrogate to performance-based measures pre- and post-TKA. Our findings indicate that both self-reported and performance-based measures are necessary to fully characterize physical function and should be used jointly to aid in the recovery analysis of people undergoing TKA. Implications for Rehabilitation Monitoring the trajectory of pre- to post-total knee arthroplasty (TKA) physical function is important as it directly relates to mortality, morbidity and poorer quality of life in older adults. Both self-reported and performance-based measures of physical function are used to determine progress in recovery for patients pre- and post- TKA. This study provides evidence that perceived physical function measures are a moderate, but an inconsistent, surrogate to objective physical function measures pre- and post-TKA. Joint specific deficits in knee range of motion and quadriceps strength were weakly associated with deficits in function measures pre-TKA, but no association was observed 12-month post-TKA. Our findings indicate that both self-reported and performance-based measures are necessary to fully characterize physical function and should be used jointly to aid in the complete recovery analysis of people undergoing TKA.

The Use of Five-Strand Hamstring Autograft to Increase the Graft Size in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction—A Prospective Cohort Study With Satisfactory Early Clinical Results

To report on the outcomes of using 5-strand hamstring autograft to increase the graft size for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction and to determine whether the clinical results are comparable to using conventional 4-strand graft. A prospective cohort study of patients with arthroscopic-assisted single-bundle ACL reconstruction using hamstring autograft from January 2019 to June2021.The patients were prospectively recruited to undergo ACL reconstruction with either 5-strand hamstring graft (group A) or 4-strand hamstring graft (group B). In total, 45 patients were included into the study. The mean diameter of the final graft was 8.9 ± 0.6 cm in the 5-strand group and 7.5 ± 0.8 cm in the 4-strand group (P < .001). Four-strand graft diameter measurements were taken intraoperatively in the 5-strand group before preparation of the 5-strand graft. The mean graft diameter of the 4-strand grafts was similar in both groups: 7.3 ± 0.3 mm in group A and 7.5 ± 0.8 mm in group B (P= .72). There was no statistically significant difference between the 2 groups of patients in terms of the Lysholm score, Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) Symptoms, KOOS Pain, KOOS Activities of Daily Living, KOOS Sports and KOOS Quality of Life scores. There were no postoperative complications of wound infection in both groups of patients. There was one case of graft rupture (4.8%) in the 4-strand group, which required revision reconstruction with patellar tendon graft 9 months postoperatively. There was no case of graft rupture in the 5-strand group (P= .29). The 5-strand hamstring graft technique provides a graft with significantly larger graft diameter than the quadrupled graft technique, with satisfactory short- to medium-term outcomes. The 5-strand graft is therefore a useful technique to increase the graft size when faced with the problem of small hamstring graft. Level II, prospective cohort study.

Objective performance tests assess aspects of function not captured by self-report in knee osteoarthritis

ObjectiveKnee osteoarthritis (OA) can substantially limit function, which can be assessed both objectively and subjectively. We examined whether objective performance tests are associated with self-reported function. MethodsWe analyzed baseline data from the Osteoarthritis Registry of Biomarker and Imaging Trajectories (ORBIT) of participants ≥40 years old with symptomatic and radiographic knee OA. Subjects completed the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) Pain and Activities of Daily Living (ADL) scales and other assessments of pain and comorbidity. Subjects performed the timed single leg balance test (SLB), 30-s sit-to-stand (30s STS), Timed-Up-and-Go (TUG), and 40-m fast paced walk (40 ​m Walk). We used Pearson correlation coefficients to examine associations between performance and KOOS subscales. We adjusted for potential confounders using partial correlations. ResultsWe enrolled 101 subjects (mean age 63.7 (standard deviation (SD) 10.1), mean BMI 30.0 (SD 5.6), and 63% female). The mean (SD) values for the performance tests were: SLB 20.1 (18.9) seconds, 30s STS 11.7 (4.6) stands, TUG 9.4 (2.3) seconds, and 40 ​m Walk 27.6 (6.5) seconds. Correlations between performance tests and self-report measures did not exceed 0.39, with the absolute value of correlations between KOOS ADL and performance measures ranging from 0.24 to 0.39. Adjusted partial correlations were largely similar to the crude correlations. ConclusionsSelf-reported function in persons with knee OA had weak to modest correlations with objective function. Objective performance tests capture elements of physical function that self-report data do not and point to the potential value of including objective measures of functional status in OA trials.

Isolated Lateral Tibiofemoral Compartment Osteoarthritis: Survivorship and Patient Acceptable Symptom State After Lateral Fixed-Bearing Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty at Mean 10-Year Follow-up.

Lateral unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) is an excellent option to alleviate disability and restore function in patients with lateral compartment knee osteoarthritis (OA). The purpose of the present study was to determine the survivorship and long-term outcomes in both younger/middle-aged and older patients with lateral compartment OA following non-robotically-assisted, fixed-bearing lateral UKA and to determine if an acceptable symptom state can be achieved. All patients were managed with fixed-bearing lateral UKA by a single surgeon utilizing a lateral parapatellar approach without robotic assistance. The primary outcome variables were the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) Activities of Daily Living (ADL) and Sport subscale scores. In addition, the other KOOS subscores, the Lysholm score, the achievement of the Patient Acceptable Symptom State (PASS), and the Veterans RAND (VR-12) Physical Component Summary score (PCS) and Mental Component Summary score (MCS) were collected. Failure was defined as conversion to total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Patients were divided into 2 cohorts: younger/middle-aged patients (<60 years of age) and older patients (≥60 years of age). A cohort of 256 patients underwent medial (n = 193) or lateral (n = 63) UKA. Sixty-one patients met the inclusion criteria. At mean of 10 years (range, 4 to 17 years) of follow-up, there were no significant differences between the groups in terms of any patient-reported outcome measures (p > 0.05). The percentage of patients in whom PASS was achieved on the KOOS ADL and Sport subscores was 82% and 88%, respectively, in the younger cohort and 80% and 80%, respectively, in the older cohort. The mean survival estimate of the prothesis was 15.3 years (95% confidence interval [CI], 14.5 to 16.2 years) for the entire cohort. The estimated rate of implant survival in the younger cohort was 100% at 5 and 10 years, and the estimated rate of implant survival in the older cohort was 98% at 5 years and 96% at 10 years. Lateral fixed-bearing, non-robotic UKA for the treatment of isolated lateral compartment OA resulted in >80% of patients reaching an acceptable symptom state in terms of both activities of daily living and sporting activities. UKA provides an excellent option that provides longevity with high PASS rates and return to activities with a low risk of complications and failure. Therapeutic Level III . See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Single-stage repair of displaced bucket-handle meniscal tears with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction leads to good meniscal survivorship : a retrospective cohort study.

The best surgical strategy for the management of displaced bucket-handle (BH) meniscal tears in an anterior cruciate ligament (ACL)-deficient knee is unclear. Combining meniscal repair with ACL reconstruction (ACLR) is thought to improve meniscal healing rates; however, patients with displaced BH meniscal tears may lack extension. This leads some to advocate staged surgery to avoid postoperative stiffness and loss of range of motion (ROM) following ACLR. We reviewed the data for a consecutive series of 88 patients (mean age 27.1 years (15 to 49); 65 male (74%) and 23 female (26%)) who underwent single-stage repair of a displaced BH meniscal tear (67 medial (76%) and 21 lateral (24%)) with concomitant hamstring autograft ACLR. The patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) EuroQol visual analogue scale (EQ-VAS), EuroQol five-dimension health questionnaire (EQ-5D), Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), International Knee Documentation Committee score (IKDC), and Tegner score were recorded at final follow-up. A Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was performed to estimate meniscal repair survivorship. Analyses were performed with different cut-offs for meniscal and ACL injury-to-surgery time (within three weeks, three to ten weeks, and more than ten weeks). Meniscal repair survivorship at a median final follow-up of 55 months (interquartile range (IQR) 24 to 91) was 82% (95% confidence interval 70 to 89). A total of 13 meniscus repairs failed (12 requiring meniscectomy and one requiring a further meniscal repair). At final follow-up, median PROMs were: EQ-VAS 85 (IQR 75 to 90), EQ-5D Index 0.84 (IQR 0.74 to 1.00), KOOS Pain 89 (IQR 80 to 94), KOOS Symptoms 82 (IQR 71 to 93), KOOS Activities of Daily Living 97 (IQR 91 to 100), KOOS Sport and Recreation 80 (IQR 65 to 90), KOOS Quality of Life 69 (IQR 53 to 86), IKDC 82.8 (IQR 67.8 to 90.8), and Tegner 6 (IQR 4 to 7). Two patients underwent revision ACLR following further injuries. One patient had an arthroscopic washout for infection at 11 days post-BH meniscal repair/ACLR. Four patients (4.5%) required a further procedure for stiffness, reduced ROM, and pain, and all were operated on within three weeks of meniscal injury. There was no difference in the interval between meniscal injury and surgery between repairs that failed and those that survived. These data suggest that concomitant ACLR with repair of displaced BH meniscal tears, even if they have been displaced for some time, appears to afford satisfactory PROMs and good survivorship. Repairs within three weeks of meniscal injury may be associated with higher rates of postoperative reintervention for stiffness. Cite this article: Bone Joint J2022;104-B(6):680-686.

Reliability and Validity of the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score in Patients Undergoing Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty

BackgroundThe Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) was developed to document outcomes from knee injury, including the impact of osteoarthritis on knee function. The purpose of this study is to determine the reliability and validity of the KOOS subscales for evaluating outcomes following unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA). MethodsKOOS Pain, Activities of Daily Living (ADL), Sport, Symptoms, and Quality of Life (QoL) scores collected from 172 patients who underwent UKA were used in the analysis. KOOS subscales were tested for reliability and validity of scores through a Rasch model analysis. ResultsKOOS Sport, KOOS ADL, and KOOS QoL had good evidence of reliability with acceptable person reliability, person separation, and item reliability. For overall scale functioning, KOOS Pain, Symptoms, and ADL all had 1 question that did not have an acceptable value for infit or outfit mean square value. Questions in KOOS Sport and QoL all had acceptable values. There was a positive, linear relationship between the Short-Form 12 Physical Component Summary and the KOOS subscales which indicated good evidence of convergent validity. These associations were also seen when the cohort was separated in medial and lateral UKA. ConclusionTwo of the 5 KOOS subscales (KOOS Sport and KOOS QoL) were considered adequate in measuring outcomes, as well as reliability. The KOOS ADL had borderline values; however, it had adequate infit and outfit values. The KOOS Pain and Symptom score performed poorly in this analysis. For documenting outcomes following UKA, this study supports the use of KOOS ADL, Sport, and QoL.

Pre-Arthritic/Kinematic Alignment in Fixed-Bearing Medial Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty Results in Return to Activity at Mean 10-Year Follow-up.

The optimal alignment strategy in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) is debated. Recent studies have suggested that kinematic alignment may lead to improved biomechanics and outcomes. The aim of the present study was to determine if pre-arthritic/kinematic alignment of knees would result in sustained long-term restoration of function, without conversion to total knee arthroplasty (TKA), following non-robotically assisted, fixed-bearing medial UKA. A total of 236 UKAs were performed from 2000 to 2015. Of these, a total of 150 medial UKAs met the inclusion criteria and were included in the study. There were 76 UKAs performed in female patients. The mean age was 65 ± 10 years and the mean body mass index was 28.6 ± 5 kg/m2. Patients with ≥15° of varus alignment preoperatively were excluded. Varus deformity was evaluated with use of the hip-knee-ankle angle (HKAA). Pre-arthritic/kinematic alignment was estimated with use of an arithmetic HKAA (aHKA, calculated as the medial proximal tibial angle minus the lateral distal femoral angle). We defined pre-arthritic/kinematic alignment as a postoperative HKAA within 3° of the aHKA. The primary outcome measures were the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) Activities of Daily Living and Sport subscales, including the percentage of patients who met the patient acceptable symptom state (PASS) for these measures. Failure was defined as conversion to TKA. The mean follow-up was 10 years (range, 4 to 20 years), with a mean survival time estimate of 18.3 years (95% confidence interval [CI], 17.8 to 18.8). The rate of conversion to TKA was 3% (5 of 150 UKAs). Postoperatively, 127 (85%) of 150 knees were pre-arthritic/kinematically aligned, and 23 knees (15%) were not. Patients with compared to those without pre-arthritic/kinematically aligned knees had significantly longer mean survival (18.6 years; 95% CI, 18.2 to 19) compared with 15.4 years; 95% CI, 13.4 to 17.5, respectively; p = 0.008) and higher KOOS Activities of Daily Living (92 compared with 74; p < 0.001) and Sport subscale scores (74 compared with 36; p < 0.001). A greater proportion of knees in the pre-arthritic/kinematically aligned cohort met the PASS for the KOOS Activities of Daily Living (85%, 106 of 125 knees) and Sport subscales (109 of 125, 87%) compared with the non-pre-arthritic/kinematically aligned cohort (28% and 57%, respectively; p < 0.01). Pre-arthritic/kinematically aligned knees in this non-robotically assisted fixed-bearing medial UKA cohort had superior outcomes, including the KOOS Activities of Daily Living and Sport subscales and achievement of the PASS for these measures, compared with non-pre-arthritic/kinematically aligned at an average of 10 years after UKA. Knees that fell within 3° of a simple aHKA measurement on a 3-foot (1-m)-long standing radiograph had greater longevity and return to activities. Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.