Learned PublishingVolume 3, Issue 1 p. 19-25 ArticlesFree Access Refereeing Jane Smith, Jane Smith British Medical JournalSearch for more papers by this author Jane Smith, Jane Smith British Medical JournalSearch for more papers by this author First published: 01 January 1990 https://doi.org/10.1002/leap/30004AboutSectionsPDF ToolsRequest permissionExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShare Give accessShare full text accessShare full-text accessPlease review our Terms and Conditions of Use and check box below to share full-text version of article.I have read and accept the Wiley Online Library Terms and Conditions of UseShareable LinkUse the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues. Learn more.Copy URL Share a linkShare onFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditWechat References 1Fox, T. Crisis in communication. London: Athlone Press, 1965. 2Lock, S. P. A difficult balance: Editorial peer review in medicine. London: Nuffield Provincial Hospitals Trust, 1985. 3Booth, C. C. Medical communication: old and new. Development of medical journals in Britain. Br Med J 1982; 285: 105-8. 4Ziman, J. Public knowledge. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1968. 5Zuckerman, H., Merton, R. K. Patterns of evaluation in science: institutionalisation, structure, and functions of the refereeing system. Minerva 1971; 9: 66-100. 6Smith, J., Lock, S. P. Peer review at work. Scholarly Publishing 1986; 17: 303-16. 7Gordon, M. D. The role of referees in scientific communication. In: J. Hartley, ed. The psychology of written communication. London: Kogan Page, 1980; 2: 263-75. Volume3, Issue1January 1990Pages 19-25 ReferencesRelatedInformation