Knowledge Of National Guidelines Research Articles

Malaria frontline project: pre-intervention Malaria baseline assessment in Kano and Zamfara States, August 2016.

IntroductionIn 2016, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the Government of Nigeria initiated the Malaria Frontline Project in Kano and Zamfara States. The project goal is to improve the quality and coverages of malaria interventions adapting polio program strategy. We conducted a baseline assessment of malaria interventions.MethodsTwenty-four primary health centers per State were selected using probability sampling. Health workers (HW) were purposively sampled to assess their knowledge of national malaria control guidelines. Clients were selected for exit interview to assess health workers´ adherence to the national guidelines. WHO cluster methodology was used to survey heads of household and women of reproductive age on knowledge of malaria prevention, Long Lasting Insecticidal Net (LLIN) ownership and use.ResultsOf the 158 HW interviewed, 94.3% knew the correct criteria for malaria diagnosis, 86.1% reported using artemisinin-based therapy to treat uncomplicated malaria. About 45% of HW reported prescribing artemisinin-based combination therapy (ACT) for uncomplicated malaria in first trimester of pregnancy and 39% prescribed quinine. Only 73.9% of fever cases were referred to laboratory as recommended by the national guideline. Households with one LLIN per 2 persons (Kano: 27.1%; Zamfara: 30.0%), LLIN use (Kano: 70.8%; Zamfara: 81.6%) and IPTp1 (Kano: 38.6%; Zamfara: 33.3%).Conclusionmost clinicians have knowledge of national guidelines, but fewer adhere to guidelines in practice. Population LLIN ownership, LLIN use among pregnant women and IPTp are lower than the national targets of 58%, 83% and 75% respectively for 2016. We recommend improving health workers´ technical capacity and adherence to national malaria guidelines.

1644 Trainee Perspective in Sarcoma Care

AimSoft tissue sarcomas (STS) are rare and aggressive tumours. Appropriate multidisciplinary management requires robust knowledge of best practice and understanding of current guidelines. Plastic surgery trainees must therefore be proficient in the assessment, investigation, and treatment of patients with STS. We aimed to evaluate trainee education, confidence, and competence in managing patients with STS.MethodAll plastic surgery trainees in Wales completed an online questionnaire and written assessment. This was designed by the lead for STS and TPD. Formal training, knowledge of national guidelines and excision margins for different types of STS and skin cancer was assessed using short answer questions. A five-point Likert scale was used to assess trainee confidence in STS and skin cancer management and follow-up. Volume and type of teaching in sarcoma and skin cancer was also quantified.ResultsTrainees received less sarcoma training and were less confident in STS assessment and follow-up, in comparison to skin cancer. More senior trainees or those with formal sarcoma training were more confident in skin cancer management (mean confidence rating 4.4 vs 2.2) and performed better in the written assessment of excision margins (mean score 100% vs 61.45%)ConclusionsTrainees receive less training in sarcoma with a significant impact on their competence and confidence in sarcoma care. We believe this is consistent across the United Kingdom as evidenced by just two sarcoma webinars held during the COVID-19 pandemic. Formal national evaluation of sarcoma teaching should be carried out to inform ongoing efforts to improve educational resources on this important topic for trainees.

German Primary Care Doctors' Awareness of Osteoporosis and Knowledge of National Guidelines

With the aging of populations in industrialized countries, managing osteoporosis in the primary care setting becomes increasingly important. General practitioners (GPs) are in an ideal position to identify and manage patients who are at an increased risk of osteoporosis and fracture. In a cross-sectional survey we studied whether German GPs (1) are aware of osteoporosis as an urgent health problem, (2) felt competent to manage patients with osteoporosis, (3) knew and used the national guideline for osteoporosis treatment and if not, (4) which barriers prevented them from doing so. A representative random sample of German GPs were sent a 30-item standardized questionnaire by mail. Chi-square statistics and multiple logistic regression were used to detect associations between knowledge of guidelines and explanatory variables. Of 2,194 doctors addressed, 892 (41.1%) answered the questionnaire. The majority of doctors (82.7%) felt competent in osteoporosis management (95% confidence interval: 80.2 - 85.2) and only 11.2% (8.2 - 13.1) did not consider osteoporosis an important problem in their practice. About half (459/892) reported knowing the national osteoporosis guideline well (51.7%; 48.4 - 55.0), whereas 22.6% (19.9 - 25.4) admitted to not being familiar with it at all. Knowledge of the guideline was positively associated with being a female doctor (OR=1.36; 1.01-1.85), having Internet access (OR=1.40, 1.06 - 1.85), seeing institutionalized patients (OR=1.67; 1.03 -2.69), and caring for patients with osteoporosis at a higher frequency (OR=2.60; 1.93 - 3.50). Nearly 43% (39.7 - 46.2) used the guideline in their practice without problems. In free-text fields, GPs reported most frequently that budgetary restrictions preventing the prescription of appropriate medication represented a severe problem for osteoporosis management. Although most GPs are aware of osteoporosis as an important health problem and felt competent in the management of this disease, only half of the respondents knew and used the national guideline. This may explain deficits in diagnosis and therapy of osteoporosis in Germany. Since guideline knowledge and frequency of consultations for osteoporosis strongly correlate, proper dissemination of the guideline may further enhance awareness of, and evidence-based treatment for, osteoporosis.

A survey of non-consultant career grade doctors in genitourinary medicine: their knowledge of guidelines and their access to information technology 2001

Non-consultant career grade (NCCG) doctors in genitourinary medicine (GUM) perform a large proportion of the clinical work. To ensure quality of service delivery to patients, it is essential that these doctors keep up to date. Seven hundred questionnaires were sent to NCCGs in the UK to evaluate their knowledge of national guidelines and access to information technology. A summary of the 224 replies (31% response) is presented. Knowledge of guidelines (76%-86%) and access to the Internet at work (39%-44%) varied according to the number of sessions worked in GUM per week and by grade of doctor. Knowledge of relevant websites was poor, ranging from 40%-54% for the Medical Society for the Study of Venereal Diseases (MSSVD) website and 21%-39% for the Association of Genitourinary Medicine (AGUM) website. This survey highlights areas for concern, especially with regard to NCCGs who work three or less GUM sessions per week.