Knotless Suture Research Articles

Comparison of incisional bursting strength of a bidirectional absorbable knotless suture material versus a standard continuous absorbable suture material for closure of the equine linea alba.

To evaluate the use of bidirectional knotless barbed suture material for closure of the equine linea alba. Laboratory study. Adult light horse cadavers (n = 24). A 25 cm incision was made through the linea alba, and a 200 L polyurethane bladder was positioned within the abdomen. The linea alba was closed either using USP2/EP5 bidirectional polydioxanone barbed suture or USP2/EP5 standard polydioxanone suture in a simple continuous pattern. Closure time was recorded for each suture type. The bladder was air-insufflated at 40 L/min, and the pressure at body wall failure recorded. The length of suture used for wound closure and wound failure modes were recorded. Suture length, closure time, bursting pressure, and failure modes were compared using Welch-Aspin t-tests. The incisional bursting pressure was comparable between the two groups (p > .05). Less suture material (p < .01) was required with the barbed suture than the standard suture. Closure time was less for the barbed suture than the standard suture (p < .01). Suture failure was the main failure mode in both groups (83% cases). Closure of the equine linea alba using bidirectional barbed suture material reduced the amount of foreign material in the wound and decreased closure time without compromising incisional strength. Bidirectional barbed suture material could be considered as an alternative to standard suture materials for closure of the equine line alba.

Biomechanical Analysis Evaluating Meniscal Extrusion After Knotless Suture Anchor Fixation for Segmental Medial Meniscal Allograft Transplantation.

Segmental medial meniscal allograft transplantation (MAT) has been shown to restore knee biomechanics; however, stable fixation of the transplantation is critical to avoid extrusion and maximize healing. To evaluate the degree of meniscal extrusion and biomechanical function of segmental medial MAT performed with meniscocapsular sutures versus repair augmentation with knotless suture anchors. Controlled laboratory study. Segmental midbody medial meniscectomy and subsequent segmental medial MAT were performed on 10 fresh-frozen cadaveric knees. The knees were then loaded in a dynamic tensile testing machine to 1000 N for 60 seconds at 0°, 30°, 60°, and 90° of flexion, and 4 conditions were tested: (1) intact, (2) segmental defect, (3) inside-out segmental repair, and (4) anchor plus inside-out segmental repair of the medial MAT. Meniscal extrusion was measured using high-fidelity ultrasound imaging. The mean contact area and the mean and peak contact pressures were assessed with submeniscal pressure-mapping sensors. Data from testing conditions were compared with 2-way repeated-measures analysis of variance, with pairwise comparison using the Bonferroni method. At 90° of flexion, the segmental defect state showed a higher degree of meniscal extrusion compared with all other states (P ≤ .012). There was no difference in the degree of meniscal extrusion between the intact state and the inside-out repair or anchor plus inside-out segmental repair states at all knee flexion angles (P > .05). There was no significant difference in the mean and peak contact pressures among the 4 states at all flexion angles except that at 0° of knee flexion there was significantly lower peak contact pressure at the medial compartment after anchor plus inside-out segmental repair compared with the segmental defect state (P = .048). Meniscal extrusion was not significantly increased at any flexion angle after segmental resection. The addition of knotless anchors did not improve meniscal extrusion or contact pressures/area compared with capsular repair alone. The addition of knotless anchors did improve contact mechanics from the segmental defect state, but only at 0° of flexion. The addition of knotless suture anchors to segmental meniscal transplantation increased stabilization of the meniscus at full extension compared with repair with sutures alone. This increased stabilization may lead to better long-term outcomes.

Arthroscopic In Situ Biceps Tenodesis Using a Double Loop-and-Tack Knotless Suture Anchor

The long head biceps tendon is a common culprit of anterior shoulder pain and dysfunction that can be surgically treated with tenotomy or tenodesis. Many techniques exist for tenodesis. This article submits an arthroscopic technique using two loop-and-tack sutures and a knotless suture anchor to tenodese the long head biceps tendon in the proximal bicipital groove in situ. The advantage of this technique is that it maintains the biceps in its native position by performing tenodesis before tenotomy. Most other techniques attempt to restore native position of the biceps through approximation. The transverse humeral ligament is also released to decompress the bicipital groove. This technique can be used to treat isolated biceps pathology or combined with rotator cuff and labral procedures.

A biomechanical study to optimize superior capsular reconstruction operative technique

The goals of this study were to optimize superior capsular reconstruction by assessing the relative fixation strength of 4 suture anchors; evaluating 3 glenoid neck locations for fixation strength and bone mineral density (BMD); determining if there is a correlation between BMD and fixation strength; and determining which portal sites have optimal access to the posterosuperior and anterosuperior glenoid neck for anchor placement. Twenty cadaveric specimens were randomized into 4 groups: all-suture anchor (FiberTak), conventional 3.0-mm knotless suture anchor (SutureTak), 3.9-mm knotless PEEK (polyetheretherketone) Corkscrew anchor, and 4.5-mm Bio-Corkscrew anchor. Each specimen was prepared with 3 anchors into the glenoid: an anterosuperior anchor, superior anchor, and posterosuperior anchor. All anchors were inserted into the superior glenoid neck 5 mm from the glenoid rim. A materials testing system performed cyclic testing (250 cycles) followed by load-to-failure testing at 12.5 mm/s. Cyclic elongation, first cycle excursion, maximum load, and stiffness were recorded. Using custom software, BMD was calculated at each anchor location. This software was also used to assess access to the posterosuperior and anterosuperior glenoid neck from standard arthroscopic portal positions. There was no significant difference in cyclic elongation (P=.546), first cycle excursion (P=.476), maximum load (P=.817), or stiffness (P=.309) among glenoid anchor positions. Cyclic elongation was significantly longer in the PEEK Corkscrew group relative to the other implants (P≤.002). First cycle excursion was significantly greater in the FiberTak group relative to all other implants (P≤.008). For load-to-failure testing, the Bio-Corkscrew group achieved the highest maximum load (P≤.001). No other differences in cyclic or failure testing were observed between the groups. No differences in stiffness testing were observed (P=.133). The superior glenoid rim had the greatest BMD (P=.003), but there was no correlation between BMD and cyclic/load outcomes. The posterior portal (80% of specimens) and the anterior portal (60% of specimens) demonstrated the best access to the posterosuperior and anterosuperior glenoid neck, respectively. The 4.5-mm Bio-Corkscrew anchor provided the most robust fixation to the glenoid during superior capsular reconstruction as it demonstrated the strongest maximum load, had minimal elongation, had minimal first cycle excursion, and did not fail during cyclic testing. The superior glenoid neck had the highest BMD; however, there was no correlation between BMD or glenoid anchor location and biomechanical outcomes. The posterior portal and anterior portal provided optimal access to the posterosuperior glenoid neck and anterosuperior glenoid neck, respectively.

Concomitant Medial Meniscal Root Repair with Extrusion Repair (Centralization Technique).

Concomitant Medial Meniscal Root Repair with Extrusion Repair (Centralization Technique).

Poster 286: Biomechanical Analysis Evaluating Meniscal Extrusion Following Knotless Suture Anchor Fixation for Segmental Medial Meniscus Allograft Transplantation

Objectives: Segmental medial meniscus allograft transplantation (MAT) has been shown to restore knee biomechanics, however, stable fixation of the transplant is critical to avoid extrusion and maximize healing. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the degree of meniscal extrusion and biomechanical function of segmental MAT performed with meniscocapsular sutures versus repair augmentation with knotless suture anchors. Methods: Ten fresh frozen cadaveric knees underwent central midbody medial meniscectomy (15-mm defect) and subsequently segmental medial MAT. Knees were loaded in a dynamic tensile testing machine to 1000 N for 20 seconds at 0°, 30°, 60°, and 90° of flexion. Four conditions were tested: (1) intact, (2) segmental defect, (3) inside-out segmental repair, and (4) anchors plus inside-out segmental repair of the MAT. Meniscal extrusion was measured for each test state using high-fidelity ultrasound imaging by three independent observers. Submeniscal medial and lateral pressure-mapping sensors assessed the mean contact pressure, peak contact pressure, mean contact area, and pressure mapping. Assessment of inter- and intraobserver reliability of measurements were done using intraclass correlation coefficients. A two-way repeated measures ANOVA was computed in order to evaluate whether there is a significant interaction between meniscal states and knee flexion angles on the outcome variables. If the P value was ≤ 0.05, a pairwise comparison of the means was determined using the Bonferroni method. Results: At 0° of knee flexion, the segmental defect demonstrated the statistically significant higher degree of meniscal extrusion (2.08 mm ± 0.78 mm) compared with intact (1.02 mm ± 0.86 mm, P = 0.039) and anchor plus inside-out segmental repair (1.44 mm ± 0.76 mm, P = 0.044), but not for an inside-out segmental repair (1.55 mm ± 0.49 mm, P = 0.08). The segmental defect state also showed a higher degree of meniscal extrusion compared with all other states at 90° of knee flexion (P &lt; 0.01). There was no difference in the degree of meniscal extrusion between the intact state and the inside-out repair or anchor plus inside-out segmental repair in all knee flexion angles (P &gt; 0.05). Three observers showed good-to-strong intra-rater and moderate-to-strong inter-rater reliabilities for extrusion measurements. There was no significant difference in the mean contact pressure and peak contact pressure among four states in all knee flexion angles for both medial and lateral compartments except for that at 0° of knee flexion, there was a significantly lower peak pressure at the medial compartment after anchor plus inside-out segmental repair compared with the segmental defect state (P = 0.048). The medial contact area of the intact state was significantly higher than the other states at 0° of knee flexion (P &lt; 0.05). However, the lateral contact area after anchor plus inside-out repair showed no significant difference compared with the intact state (P = 0.13). Conclusions: Segmental meniscus transplantation mechanics may be improved at full extension (0° of knee flexion) with the addition of knotless anchors. However, in terms of meniscus extrusion, the knotless anchors provided limited benefit over inside-out repair. Overall, a robust repair is achieved of a segmental meniscus with sutures and knotless anchors. Although, additional work is needed to assess long-term in vivo results.

Surgical Technique for the Latarjet Procedure Using Non-Cannulated Screws

Background: The Latarjet procedure is effective for patients with anterior glenohumeral instability with substantial glenoid bone loss due to its triple blocking effect. Indications: Indications include high-risk patients with recurrent anterior glenohumeral instability with any glenoid bone loss or low-risk patients with 15% to 30% glenoid bone loss. Technique Description: An incision is made lateral to the coracoid and the deltopectoral interval is established. The pectoralis minor is released medially off the coracoid and the coracoacromial (CA) ligament is released close to the acromion. The coracoid is cut with a right-angle saw and the inferior coracoid is decorticated with a burr. Two holes are pre-drilled in the coracoid. The subscapularis is split between the upper two-thirds and lower one-third with the arm in external rotation. The capsule is split vertically at the joint line and the humeral head is retracted. The anterior glenoid is decorticated with a burr, and a hole is drilled inferiorly. The depth is measured and added to the depth of the inferior bone block hole. A fully threaded 3.5-mm solid stainless steel screw is placed in the inferior hole. Care is taken to ensure that the lateral border of the bone block is flush with the articular margin. This is repeated for the superior hole. A 1.8-mm knotless suture anchor is placed between the screws. The repair stitch is passed through the capsule and loaded onto the anchor and tensioned. The CA ligament is laid over the capsule and repaired. The subscapularis split is repaired side to side and the wound is closed in layers. Results: High return-to-sport rates, including at the same level of play, have been observed among young competitive athletes with significant glenoid bone loss who underwent a Latarjet, with similarly favorable results in older patients. Ninety-day complication rates have been reported around 9%, 5% of which constituted graft or hardware failures. Discussion/Conclusion: The Latarjet procedure is an effective option for indicated patients with anterior glenohumeral instability and may be enhanced with solid screws, proper anatomic technique, and capsulolabral repair augmentation. Patient Consent Disclosure Statement: The author(s) attests that consent has been obtained from any patient(s) appearing in this publication. If the individual may be identifiable, the author(s) has included a statement of release or other written form of approval from the patient(s) with this submission for publication.

Fixation of the Proximal Hamstring Tendon Using an All-Suture Tensionable Knotless Technique

Proximal hamstring injuries are a common sports and recreational injury among the active patient population. Surgical fixation of the tendons of the hamstring muscle complex, as opposed to conservative treatment alone, has shown improved patient outcomes, prompting the evolution of the suture anchors utilized in these repairs. Previous studies investigating the biomechanical properties of hamstring repair anchors have focused on double-row knotless techniques, in which the fixation of the overall construct relies on each individual anchor to maintain fixation. While these constructs have demonstrated biomechanical strength and clinical durability, each suture anchor represents a potential point of failure for the entire construct due to the crossed stitch anchor configuration. To address this limitation, recent tensionable knotless all-suture anchor designs have been implemented with success due to their smaller size and biomechanical strength. The aim of this technical note is, thus, to describe a technique for proximal hamstring repair using a tensionable knotless all-suture anchor construct that has 5 independent mattress sutures and, in doing so, employs the biomechanical strength of knotless fixation but eliminates the potential single point of failure seen with current knotless suture anchor designs.

Posterior Labral Repair Using Knotless “All-Suture” Suture Anchors

Isolated posterior instability is well described but relatively uncommon, accounting for less than 10% of all shoulder instability cases. When nonoperative management fails, surgical outcomes demonstrate improved patient-reported outcomes with a high level of return to sport. Knotless suture anchor and “all-suture” suture anchor technology are now available and used for instability procedures in the shoulder. This technical description describes knotless “all-suture” suture anchor fixation for isolated posterior labral tears.

Clinical Results of Knot-tying Versus Knotless Suture Anchors in Arthroscopic Anteroinferior Labral Repair.

Background Arthroscopic repair of glenohumeral instability is becoming an increasingly common procedure. These repairs can be undertaken using knot-tying and knotless suture anchors; there is currently no clear consensus in the literature about what type of repair is most cost-effective and provides superior outcomes. The purpose of this study is to examine postoperative outcomes of patients undergoing arthroscopic anteroinferior labral repair (AALR) with either knot-tying or knotless anchors. Methods A single institution retrospective observational cohort study of 122 patients undergoing AALR from January 2014 to June 2021 was conducted. Univariate statistics were used to assess differences in demographics, operative characteristics, and postoperative outcomes between repair types; multivariate analysis was used to evaluate risk factors for recurrent instability and reoperation. Results Patients undergoing AALR with knotless anchors had a shorter case duration than those with knot-tying anchors (112.64 vs. 89.86 minutes, p<0.001). There were no significant differences between groups in the size of labral tear, presence of a glenoid bone defect, or Hill-Sachs lesion. After controlling for age, BMI,sex, glenoid bone defect, number of preoperative dislocations, and fixation type, only age (OR=0.896, p=0.010) and female sex (OR=5.341, p=0.008) were independent risk factors for recurrent instability and no factors were independent predictors of reoperation. Conclusion Patients undergoing AALR experienced similar rates of reoperation and recurrent instability regardless of whether a knot-tying or knotless repair was performed. The use of knotless suture anchors may improve cost-effectiveness due to decreased surgical time without diminishing postoperative outcomes.

Arthroscopic Anterior Cruciate Ligament Primary Repair With Synthetic Augmentation and Fixation With the Knotless Suture Anchor

An anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tear is one of the most common ligament injuries in athletes. The arthroscopic ACL reconstruction procedure is the gold standard for treatment. However, the improvement in injury classification and suture materials has subsequently made arthroscopic ACL primary repair an alternative surgical treatment option. This Technical Note describes an arthroscopic ACL primary repair with synthetic augmentation made of several high-strength sutures and fixation with the knotless suture anchor. The reinforced synthetic material acts as a structural tie to support the ACL while it heals.

Repair of a Reverse HAGL: A 2-Portal Technique

Background: Glenohumeral joint stability is reliant on a combination of static and dynamic constraints. Humeral avulsion of the posterior band of the inferior glenohumeral ligament (HAGL) is an exceedingly rare injury. These injuries can be difficult to diagnose and can lead to continued pain, dysfunction, and recurrent instability. There is a paucity of literature regarding surgical management of reverse HAGL lesions. Indications: Many intrasubstance reverse HAGL lesions can be managed nonoperatively with rehabilitation focused on improving shoulder stability. Although the incidence of recurrent instability in patients with reverse HAGL lesions is unknown, the acute detached humeral lesions in athletes are often treated surgically to restore normal shoulder. Technique Description: The patient was placed in a standard beach chair position, and the standard portals were made for a diagnostic shoulder arthroscopy. The anterior portal was the primary viewing portal. Using the initial posterior skin incision, instruments were introduced through the defect from the retracted posterior band of the inferior glenohumeral ligament. Using a combination of the 30° and 70° arthroscope, the HAGL was mobilized from the infraspinatus musculature. Two knotless suture devices (1.8-mm suture anchor, 2.6-mm suture anchor) were used to reduce the reverse HAGL lesion to an anatomical position, and the posterior capsule was closed thereafter. Results: Only case studies and a single case series have been published pertaining to reverse HAGL repair techniques and related outcomes. When diagnosed and treated appropriately, arthroscopic repairs yield promising results with a high percentage of patients returning to prior level of activity or returning to prior participation level in sport. However, outcome data are limited given the rare occurrence of this injury pattern. Discussion/Conclusion: Reverse HAGL pathology can be treated effectively with arthroscopic surgical repair to restore the normal capsular anatomy and prevent recurrent instability and persistent posterior shoulder pain. Using a 2-portal approach with posterior capsular closure is a minimally invasive operation that allows for appropriate management of these rare injuries. Patient Consent Disclosure Statement: The author(s) attests that consent has been obtained from any patient(s) appearing in this publication. If the individual may be identifiable, the author(s) has included a statement of release or other written form of approval from the patient(s) with this submission for publication.

Arthroscopic Transtibial Repair of Acute Traumatic Posterior Medial Meniscus Root Tear

Background: The posteromedial meniscal root is a critical structure in maintaining balanced tibiofemoral contact stresses and joint stability. Studies have shown that posterior root tears are biomechanically equivalent to total meniscectomy and can lead to the rapid development of osteoarthritis. Our presentation focuses on the less common, acute, traumatic posteromedial meniscal root avulsion, although our technique is also applicable to the more common degenerative posteromedial meniscal root tears. Indications: Surgical indications include acute tears, as well as chronic or degenerative tears in patients without advanced osteoarthritis. Absolute surgical contraindications include subchondral bone collapse, substantial concurrent meniscal pathology, malalignment of &gt;5°, and advanced knee osteoarthritis. Technique Description: Once the tear is identified, the bone at the root insertion is prepared with a meniscal rasp. Two looped sutures are passed through the meniscal root in a cinch-type fashion using a knee scorpion. A tunnel is drilled at the root insertion using a specialized meniscal root repair guide. Approximately, 10 mm of bone are drilled in a retrograde fashion with a flip cutter deployed to 7 mm to decorticate the bone and enhance healing. The drill is then removed and a rubber tube with a retrieval suture is advanced through the drill guide into the joint. The loop suture is retrieved through the anteromedial portal and the repair sutures are passed through the retrieval loop. Under arthroscopic visualization, the root is then reduced to its anatomic insertion and the sutures secured to the tibia using a knotless suture anchor placed 1 cm distal to the transtibial tunnel. Results: Several recent studies have shown that meniscal root repair decreases rapid knee degeneration as gauged by meniscal extrusion, progression of Kellgren-Lawrence grade and rate of conversion to total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Discussion/Conclusion: Posteromedial meniscal root tears are increasingly being recognized as a distinct meniscal pathology that can lead to rapid arthritis if left unrepaired. Arthroscopic repair techniques continue to improve allowing orthopedic surgeons to more readily address this significant, but treatable pathology. Patient Consent Disclosure Statement: The author(s) attests that consent has been obtained from any patient(s) appearing in this publication. If the individual may be identifiable, the author(s) has included a statement of release or other written form of approval from the patient(s) with this submission for publication.

Arthroscopic Onlay Biceps Tenodesis Utilizing 2 Knotless All-Suture Anchors

Background: Tenodesis is an effective surgical technique for the management of a pathologic long head of the biceps tendon. Tenodesis is performed with either an onlay (tendon opposed to cortical surface) or inlay (tendon docked into a reamed intra-cortical tunnel). Both techniques can be performed either from a subpectoral location, which is typically done through an open approach, or from a suprapectoral location, which is performed arthroscopically. The arthroscopic suprapectoral approach, when compared with its subpectoral counterpart, has been shown to report similar patient outcomes and complication rates. Indications: Arthroscopic suprapectoral biceps tenodesis is most commonly indicated in patients undergoing surgical treatment with anterior shoulder pain and biceps tendonitis, often associated with concomitant pathology. Less common indications include patients with superior labrum anterior and posterior tears as well as biceps tendon subluxation or dislocations. Patients with ruptured proximal biceps tendons are contraindicated, as the tendon is typically too distal for arthroscopic management. Technique Description: The biceps tendon is identified arthroscopically within the bicipital groove, just proximal to the pectoralis major tendon superior border. Suprapectoral tenodesis is then performed utilizing 2 knotless suture anchors for fixation. Results: Patient-reported outcomes following arthroscopic suprapectoral tenodesis in the literature have been found to be excellent with minimal complications. Despite current literature being inconclusive regarding the optimal site of fixation, the arthroscopic procedure minimizes the risk of infection, cosmetic deformity, and neurovascular injury that is seen in the open approach. In addition, the use of onlay fixation has traditionally avoided the risk of humeral fracture that is seen with inlay fixation. Discussion/Conclusion: This arthroscopic onlay suprapectoral tenodesis has the benefit of a time-efficient and easily reproducible technique that safely minimizes the risk of humeral fracture or neurovascular injuries. This technique historically has provided a strong fixation with excellent patient-reported outcomes. Patient Consent Disclosure Statement: The author(s) attests that consent has been obtained from any patient(s) appearing in this publication. If the individual may be identifiable, the author(s) has included a statement of release or other written form of approval from the patient(s) with this submission for publication.

Patellar Tendon Rupture with Transosseous Tunnel Repair

Background: Patellar tendon rupture is an injury most often occurring in adults and commonly caused by tensile overload to the extensor mechanism of the knee or direct trauma to the tendon. Early diagnosis and timely surgical repair lead to good functional outcomes and high rates of return to activity. Indications: In patients with impaired knee extensor mechanisms, inability to perform a straight leg raise, or evidence of complete tendon rupture on imaging, surgical tendon repair is indicated. Technical Description: The surgical technique demonstrated here presents a standard patellar tendon repair with transosseous tunnels of a 32-year-old man. Briefly, dissection was performed down to the retinacular layer, and the patellar tendon stump was identified. Any devitalized soft tissue was removed from the inferior pole of the patella and the proximal tendon stump by a rongeur. Two locking Krackow sutures were placed along the medial and lateral aspect of the patellar tendon. Then, a drill bit was used to create 3 transosseous tunnels in the patella and a nitinol basket was used to pass sutures through each tunnel. The retinacular layer was closed by figure-of-eight stiches, followed by layered closure of the subcutaneous layer, and finally, the skin. Results: Early surgical repair of the patellar tendon leads to good functional outcomes and return to sport rates. In a retrospective study of 38 knees, at average of 9.3 years follow-up, 96% of patients reported they were satisfied/very satisfied, with a 100% returning to work. High rates of return to sports have been reported from a retrospective study, with a 94.4% and 83.3% rate of return to sport and rate of return to sport at the same level, respectively. Discussion: In this surgical technique video, we review the common presentation, indications of surgical repair, key steps and technique pearls for a case of a ruptured patellar tendon. Furthermore, we review complications and postoperative rehabilitation guidelines, postoperative clinical outcomes, and return-to-sport rates existing in the literature. Finally, we assess key differences between 2 commonly used surgical techniques, knotless suture anchors versus transosseous tunnels, in patellar tendon repair. Patient Consent Disclosure Statement: The author(s) attests that consent has been obtained from any patient(s) appearing in this publication. If the individual may be identifiable, the author(s) has included a statement of release or other written form of approval from the patient(s) with this submission for publication.

Suture-Staple Fixation of Os Acetabuli: Description of a Novel Fixation Technique Using Linked Knotless Suture Anchors

Background: An os acetabuli is a bone fragment of the acetabular rim. Several stabilization techniques have been described in the literature including the use of canulated headless compression screws, sutures placed over screws, and knotted suture anchors; however, the use of screws near the joint could either lead to irritation or increased joint surface wear if placed improperly. Indications: Fixation of an os acetabuli is indicated when removal of the os would result in under-coverage of the femoral head which would in turn lead to a rapid onset of arthritis. Technique Description: This novel technique for os acetabuli fixation uses knotless suture anchors to create a “suture-staple” construct. Following the debridement of fibrous tissue and labral repair, reduction of the acetabular os is accomplished and confirmed on intraoperative fluoroscopy. Knottless FiberTak™ Suture Anchors are placed in the anterior and the posterior aspects of the os, and the anchor suture of one anchor is passed through the pass suture of the second anchor to create a “suture-staple” configuration. Results: Maintenance of reduction and pain-free motion of the hip was confirmed at 3-month clinic follow-up. The x-rays obtained at this time revealed no evidence of arthritis and appropriate coverage of the hip joint. Discussion/Conclusion: Outcomes of other methods of os fixation are largely lacking; however, outcomes using a knotted suture anchor technique in 3 patients with 1-year follow-up seem to indicate fully healed os fragments in all patients with improvement in patient-reported outcomes scores. Longer-term follow-up will be needed to ensure this similar technique produces similar outcomes. Patient Consent Disclosure Statement: The author(s) attests that consent has been obtained from any patient(s) appearing in this publication. If the individual may be identifiable, the author(s) has included a statement of release or other written form of approval from the patient(s) with this submission for publication.

Outcomes of a novel all-inside arthroscopic anterior talofibular ligament repair for chronic ankle instability.

This study aimed to introduce a novel all-inside arthroscopic anterior talofibular ligament (ATFL) repair for chronic ankle instability (CAI) with a knotless suture anchor technique-Hugging Repair, evaluate clinical outcomes, and analyze the associated risk factors. A total of 84 patients (42 males and 42 females, mean age: 36.1 ± 11.2years, range: 19-68years) who underwent Hugging Repair from January 1, 2016 to December 31, 2018, were enrolled in this retrospective study. The American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) score, Karlsson Ankle Functional Score (KAFS), Foot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS), Tegner score, and Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) were evaluated pre-operatively and at final follow-up. The potential risk factors such as age, body mass index (BMI), sex, post-injury duration (time from injury to surgery), follow-up time, number of anchors, concomitant injuries [e.g., osteochondral defects (OCD), sinus tarsi syndrome (STS), anterior ankle impingement (AAI)], first-time treatment, and number of ankle sprains were also analyzed through multiple regression analysis. There were 68 (81%) patients followed up for a mean time of 42 (range: 35-50) months. The median AOFAS score increased from 65 (35-72) to 90 (77-100), KAFS increased from 64 (38-71) to 90 (62-100), FAOS increased from 68 (50-70) to 97 (68-100), Tegner score increased from 1 (1-3) to 4 (2-7), and NRS increased from 3.5 (2-5) to 1 (0-3). No correlation was found between the functional scores and risk factors mentioned above. In the multivariate model, age was significantly negatively associated with KAFS, FAOS, and Tegner activity scale (P = 0.013; P = 0.002; P = 0.000); female was significantly associated with poorer Tegner activity scale (P = 0.004); and the presence of concomitant injuries was significantly negatively associated with AOFAS score (P = 0.033). The novel all-inside arthroscopic ATFL repair for CAI with a knotless suture anchor technique-Hugging Repair is a safe and suitable technique that achieves satisfactory clinical outcomes and provides an effective option for the treatment of CAI. Risk factors for patients who underwent all-inside ATFL repair were older age, female sex, and concomitant injuries.

Fixation devices for anterior shoulder instability

PurposeOver the past 40 years, advances in the development of anchors and sutures have contributed to the improvement in surgical outcomes for treatment of shoulder instability. Important choices in surgery when treating instability include the use of knotless versus knotted suture anchors, and bony versus soft tissue reconstruction techniques.MethodsA literature review was conducted to evaluate the history of instability of the shoulder and the results of specific fixation techniques including bony and soft tissue reconstructions as well as knotted and knotless suture anchors.ResultsAs knotless suture anchors have continued to grow in popularity since their development in 2001, many studies have compared this newer technique to that of the standard knotted suture anchors. In general, these studies have demonstrated no difference in patient-reported outcome measures between the two options. Additionally, the choice of bony versus soft tissue reconstructions is patient specific as it depends on the specific pathology or combination of injuries.ConclusionIn each surgery performed for shoulder instability, it is vitally important that we try to restore normal anatomy. The normal anatomy is best established by knotted mattress sutures. However, loop laxity and tear through by the sutures in the capsule can eliminate this restoration, increasing risk of failure. Knotless anchors may allow better soft tissue fixation of the labrum and capsule to the glenoid, but without complete restoration of normal anatomy.

EFFICACY AND SAFETY OF KNOTLESS BARBED SUTURES IN CAPSULAR CLOSURE FOLLOWING DISTAL FEMUR FRACTURE FIXATION.

Good wound closure is an important step in management of distal femur fracture to prevent infection and faster rehabilitation. Knotless barbed sutures can save time and distribute wound tension evenly. However, its role in terms of functional outcome, closure time, and postoperative complications has not been studied in a distal femur fracture. A total of 47 patients aged more than 18 years of distal femur fracture treated with distal femur locking plate were randomized either into either barbed or traditional suture groups. in the barbed group, capsular wound closure was carried out with 2-0 bidirectional barbed knotless sutures (Quill SRS® PDO, Angiotech, Vancouver, BC, Canada). In patients assigned to group B, capsular closure was done with 1-0 Vicryl® (Ethicon inc. Somerville, NJ) and 5-0 Ethibond® alternatively. The mean flexion at the knee joint was 105.7±15.6 degrees in the study group while it was 110.4±13.7 in the control group (p= 0.2133). Mean estimated closure time was significantly shorter in the study group as compared to the control group (p<0.05). Cases of needle prick injury were higher in traditional suture group. Patients developed stitch abscess and superficial infection in both groups. However, the difference in incidence between the two was not statistically significant. Barbed suture is an efficient method of wound closure. It reduces wound closure time with similar complication rate as with use of conventional sutures. Evidence Level II; Randomized Clinical Trial.

Transosseous Repair With Nice Knot Augmentation Versus Knotless Suture Anchor Repair With Suture Tape for Quadriceps Tendon Rupture: A Cadaveric Study.

Quadriceps tendon rupture is typically repaired using either transosseous tunnels or suture anchors. Recent literature has suggested that suture anchor repair is biomechanically superior to the use of transosseous tunnels. Augmentation of the transosseous technique with Nice knots may result in improved biomechanical properties as compared with a suture anchor construct. To compare biomechanical properties of a novel transosseous quadriceps tendon repair technique with Nice knot augmentation to those of knotless suture anchor repair, an artificial quadriceps tendon rupture was created in 10 matched pairs of cadaveric knees (n=20). Each cadaver was subjected to biomechanical testing to calculate the average ultimate load to failure, repair site gapping after early and late cyclic loading, and stiffness. Transosseous repair augmented with Nice knots as compared with knotless suture anchor repair had greater load to failure (mean±SD, 1489.5±297.6 N vs 717.7±191.4 N, P<.001), decreased gapping after early and late cyclic loading (cycles 1-20: mean±SD, 0.59±0.4 mm vs 2.1±1.2 mm, P=.008; cycles 21-250: mean±SD, 1.2±0.7 mm vs 3.9±1.7 mm, P=.002), and greater construct stiffness (mean±SD, 80.7±15.7 N/mm vs 44.4±13.4 N/mm, P=.001). The transosseous quadriceps tendon repair technique with Nice knot augmentation is biomechanically better than knotless suture anchor repair with regard to ultimate load to failure, gap formation after cyclic loading, and construct stiffness in cadaveric specimens. [Orthopedics. 2023;46(3):135-140.].