Revision Knee Arthroplasty Research Articles

Cell-free Deoxyribonucleic Acid: A Potential Biomarker of Chronic Periprosthetic Knee Joint Infection

BackgroundThe correct diagnosis of a chronic periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is a major challenge in clinical practice, with the “gold standard” for diagnosis yet to be established. Synovial fluid analysis has been proven to be a useful tool for that purpose. Cell-free DNA (cf-DNA) levels have been shown to be increased in several conditions such as cancer, trauma, and sepsis. Therefore, this study was designed to evaluate the potential of synovial fluid cf-DNA quantification for the diagnosis of chronic periprosthetic infections following total knee arthroplasty. MethodsA prospective study with patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty revision surgery for any indication was performed. PJI diagnosis was defined according to the Second International Consensus Meeting on Musculoskeletal Infection (2018) criteria. The study cohort consisted of 26 patients classified as infected and 40 as noninfected. Synovial fluid cf-DNA direct quantification by fluorescent staining was made. Sensitivity, specificity, and receiver operating characteristic curve were calculated. ResultsThe cf-DNA levels were significantly higher in patients who had PJIs (122.5 ± 57.2 versus 4.6 ± 2.8 ng/μL, P < .0001). With a cutoff of 15 ng/μL, the area under the receiver operating characteristic, sensitivity, and specificity of cf-DNA were 0.978, 96.2%, and 100%, respectively. ConclusionThe present study has shown that cf-DNA is increased in synovial fluid of patients who have chronic PJIs. It is a promising biomarker for knee PJI diagnosis and further studies are needed to confirm its utility.

Bone defect classifications in revision total knee arthroplasty, their reliability and utility: a systematic review.

There are various classification systems described in the literature for managing bone defects in revision knee arthroplasty (RTKA). We analysed the reliability and usefulness of these classification systems. (1) To review and critique the various classification systems proposed for bone loss in RTKA. (2) Among all the proposed classifications which one is the most commonly used by surgeons to report their results. (3) What is the reliability of various bone defect classification systems for RTKA. In this review, we have assessed the studies validating those classifications with a detailed description of the limitations and the proposed modifications. This systematic review was conducted following PRISMA guidelines. Pubmed/Medline, CINAHL, EMBASE, Scopus, Cochrane databases and Web of Science databases were searched using multiple search terms and MeSH terms where possible. Studies meeting inclusion criteria were assessed for statistical parameters of reliability of a classification system. We found 16 classification systems for bone defects in RTKA. Six studies were found evaluating a classification system with reporting their reliability parameters. Fifty-four studies were found which classified bone loss using AORI classification in their series. AORI classification is most commonly reported for classifying bone defects. Type T2B and F2B are the most common bone defects in RTKA. The average kappa value for AORI classification for femoral bone loss was 0.38 (0.27-0.50) and 0.76 (0.63-1) for tibial bone loss assessment. None of the available classification systems is reliably established in determining the bone loss and treatment plans in RTKA. Among all, AORI classification is the most widely used system in clinical practice. The reliability of AORI Classification is fair for femoral bone loss and substantial for tibial bone loss.

Poor Knee-specific and Generic Patient-reported Outcome Measure Scores at 6 Months Are Associated With Early Revision Knee Arthroplasty: A Study From the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry.

The ability to identify which patients are at a greater risk of early revision knee arthroplasty has important practical and resource implications. Many international arthroplasty registries administer patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) to provide a holistic assessment of pain, function, and quality of life. However, few PROM scores have been evaluated as potential indicators of early revision knee arthroplasty, and earlier studies have largely focused on knee-specific measures. This national registry-based study asked: (1) Which 6-month postoperative knee-specific and generic PROM scores are associated with early revision knee arthroplasty (defined as revision surgery performed 6 to 24 months after the primary procedure)? (2) Is a clinically important improvement in PROM scores (based on thresholds for the minimal important change) after primary knee arthroplasty associated with a lower risk of early revision? Preoperative and 6-month postoperative PROM scores for patients undergoing primary knee arthroplasty were sourced from the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry (AOANJRR) and Arthroplasty Clinical Outcomes Registry National. Between January 2013 and December 2020, PROM data were available for 19,402 primary total knee arthroplasties; these data were linked to AOANJRR data on revision knee arthroplasty. Of these, 3448 procedures were excluded because they did not have 6-month PROM data, they had not reached the 6-month postoperative point, they had died before 24 months, or they had received revision knee arthroplasty before the 6-month PROMs assessment. After these exclusions, data were analyzed for 15,954 primary knee arthroplasties. Associations between knee-specific (knee pain, Oxford Knee Score, and 12-item Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score [KOOS-12]) or generic PROM scores (5-level EuroQol quality of life instrument [EQ-5D], EQ VAS, perceived change, and satisfaction) and revision surgery were explored using t-tests, chi-square tests, and regression models. Ninety-four revision procedures were performed at 6 to 24 months, most commonly for infection (39% [37 procedures]). The early revision group was younger than the unrevised group (mean age 64 years versus 68 years) and a between-group difference in American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) grade was noted. Apart from a small difference in preoperative low back pain for the early revision group (mean low back pain VAS 4.2 points for the early revision group versus 3.3 points for the unrevised group), there were no between-group differences in preoperative knee-specific or generic PROM scores on univariate analysis. As the inclusion of ASA grade or low back pain score did not alter the model results, the final multivariable model included only the most clinically plausible confounders (age and gender) as covariates. Multivariable models (adjusting for age and gender) were also used to examine the association between a clinically important improvement in PROM scores (based on published thresholds for minimal important change) and the likelihood of early revision. After adjusting for age and gender, poor postoperative knee pain, Oxford, KOOS-12, EQ-5D, and EQ VAS scores were all associated with early revision. A one-unit increase (worsening) in knee pain at 6 months was associated with a 31% increase in the likelihood of revision (RR 1.31 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.19 to 1.43]; p < 0.001). Reflecting the reversed scoring direction, a one-unit increase (improvement) in Oxford or KOOS-12 score was associated with a 9% and 5% reduction in revision risk, respectively (RR for Oxford: 0.91 [95% CI 0.90 to 0.93]; p < 0.001; RR for KOOS-12 summary: 0.95 [95% CI 0.94 to 0.97]; p < 0.001). Patient dissatisfaction (RR 6.8 [95% CI 3.7 to 12.3]) and patient-perceived worsening (RR 11.7 [95% CI 7.4 to 18.5]) at 6 months were also associated with an increased likelihood of early revision. After adjusting for age and gender, patients who did not achieve a clinically important improvement in PROM scores had a higher risk of early revision (RR 2.9 for the knee pain VAS, RR 4.2 for the Oxford Knee Score, RR 6.3 to 8.6 for KOOS-12, and RR 2.3 for EQ-5D) compared with those who did (reference group). Knee-specific and generic PROM scores offer an efficient approach to identifying patients at greater risk of early revision surgery, using either the 6-month score or the magnitude of improvement. These data indicate that surgeons can use single- and multi-item measures to detect a patient-perceived unsuccessful surgical outcome at 6 months after primary knee arthroplasty. Surgeons should be alert to poor PROM scores at 6 months or small improvements in scores (for example, less than 2 points for knee pain VAS or less than 10.5 points for Oxford Knee Score), which signal a need for direct patient follow-up or expedited clinical review. Level III, therapeutic study.

Partial or full component exchange in hip revision? : The relevance of off-label use and mix & match

Off-label use is frequently practiced in hip revision arthroplasty, as there may be indications for the application of implants for purposes outside the one the manufacturers intended (i.e. large bone and soft tissue defects, obesity). Patients may also benefit from selective application of mix & match in hip revision, when the exchange of one component only is necessary and the invasiveness of surgery can be reduced. Currently, there are no formal guidelines for these situations. Therefore, within arecent EFORT initiative, evidence- and consensus-based recommendations have been developed for the safe application of off-label use and mix & match in revision hip and knee arthroplasty.

The Hidden Cost of Revision Hip and Knee Arthroplasty

The Hidden Cost of Revision Hip and Knee Arthroplasty

An Enhanced Understanding of Culture-Negative Periprosthetic Joint Infection with Next-Generation Sequencing: A Multicenter Study.

The challenges of culture-negative periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) have led to the emergence of molecular methods of pathogen identification, including next-generation sequencing (NGS). While its increased sensitivity compared with traditional culture techniques is well documented, it is not fully known which organisms could be expected to be detected with use of NGS. The aim of this study was to describe the NGS profile of culture-negative PJI. Patients undergoing revision hip or knee arthroplasty from June 2016 to August 2020 at 14 institutions were prospectively recruited. Patients meeting International Consensus Meeting (ICM) criteria for PJI were included in this study. Intraoperative samples were obtained and concurrently sent for both routine culture and NGS. Patients for whom NGS was positive and standard culture was negative were included in our analysis. The overall cohort included 301 patients who met the ICM criteria for PJI. Of these patients, 85 (28.2%) were culture-negative. A pathogen could be identified by NGS in 56 (65.9%) of these culture-negative patients. Seventeen species were identified as common based on a study-wide incidence threshold of 5%. NGS revealed a polymicrobial infection in 91.1% of culture-negative PJI cases, with the set of common species contributing to 82.4% of polymicrobial profiles. Escherichia coli, Cutibacterium acnes, Staphylococcus epidermidis, and Staphylococcus aureus ranked highest in terms of incidence and study-wide mean relative abundance and were most frequently the dominant organism when occurring in polymicrobial infections. NGS provides a more comprehensive picture of the microbial profile of infection that is often missed by traditional culture. Examining the profile of PJI in a multicenter cohort using NGS, this study demonstrated that approximately two-thirds of culture-negative PJIs had identifiable opportunistically pathogenic organisms, and furthermore, the majority of infections were polymicrobial. Diagnostic Level II . See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

A Prospective, Longitudinal Study of the Influence of Obesity on Total Knee Arthroplasty Revision Rate: Results from the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry.

The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship of obesity with all-cause revision and revision for infection, loosening, instability, and pain after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) performed in Australia. Data for patients undergoing primary TKA for osteoarthritis from January 1, 2015, to December 31, 2020, were obtained from the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry (AOANJRR). The rates of all-cause revision and revision for infection, loosening, instability, and pain were compared for non-obese patients (body mass index [BMI], 18.50 to 29.99 kg/m 2 ), class-I and II obese patients (BMI, 30.00 to 39.99 kg/m 2 ), and class-III obese patients (BMI, ≥40.00 kg/m 2 ). The results were adjusted for age, sex, tibial fixation, prosthesis stability, patellar component usage, and computer navigation usage. During the study period, 141,673 patients underwent primary TKA for osteoarthritis in Australia; of these patients, 48.0% were class-I or II obese, and 10.6% were class-III obese. The mean age was 68.2 years, and 54.7% of patients were female. The mean follow-up period was 2.8 years. Of the 2,655 revision procedures identified, the reasons for the procedures included infection in 39.7%, loosening in 14.8%, instability in 12.0%, and pain in 6.1%. Class-I and II obese patients had a higher risk of all-cause revision (hazard ratio [HR], 1.12 [95% confidence interval (CI), 1.03 to 1.22]; p = 0.007) and revision for infection (HR, 1.25 [95% CI, 1.10 to 1.43]; p = 0.001) than non-obese patients. Class-III obese patients had a higher risk of all-cause revision after 1 year (HR, 1.30 [95% CI, 1.14 to 1.52]; p < 0.001), revision for infection after 3 months (HR, 1.72 [95% CI, 1.33 to 2.17]; p < 0.001), and revision for loosening (HR, 1.39 [95% CI, 1.00 to 1.89]; p = 0.047) than non-obese patients. The risks of revision for instability and pain were similar among groups. Obese patients with knee osteoarthritis should be counseled with regard to the increased risks associated with TKA, so they can make informed decisions about their health care. Health services and policymakers need to address the issue of obesity at a population level. Prognostic Level III . See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Manipulation Under Anesthesia Is Associated With an Increased Rate of Early Total Knee Arthroplasty Revision.

Manipulation under anesthesia (MUA) after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) frequently has been used as a first-line treatment to restore functional range of motion after unsuccessful physical therapy. Although there are studies reporting that MUA assisted in restoring range of motion, there is a paucity of literature on the influence of MUA on the risk of revision TKA. The goal of our study was to determine whether MUA was associated with an increase in the rate of revision TKA within 2 years of MUA. A total of 49,310 patients within a single institution who underwent primary TKA were identified from 1999 to 2019. Data were matched at a 1:3 ratio (TKA with and without MUA, respectively) based on age, sex, and body mass index. A matched comparison cohort was conducted, with the MUA cohort having 575 patients and the no MUA cohort having 1725 patients. A statistically significant increase in the rate of noninfectious etiology revision TKA was found in the MUA cohort (7.3%) compared with the no MUA cohort (4.9%; P=.034). The most common reason for revision TKA after MUA was persistent stiffness, including arthrofibrosis and ankylosis; however, aseptic loosening, ligamentous instability, and periprosthetic fracture were found to be responsible for 21.4% of revision TKA procedures. Although MUA is a commonly performed procedure for treating stiffness after primary TKA, the orthopedic surgeon should counsel patients on the association of increased rate of revision TKA after MUA, most commonly, persistent stiffness. [Orthopedics. 2022;45(5):270-275.].

Metaphyseal sleeves in revision total knee arthroplasties: Computational analysis of bone remodeling

BackgroundMetaphyseal sleeves help maintain long term stability and reduce revision rate for aseptic loosening in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) revision. However, their performance regarding bone remodeling is still poorly known for the long term. This study aimed to investigate the impact of metaphyseal sleeves on the bone remodeling of the tibia. MethodsFive finite element models of a female tibia with different implant configurations (regarding stem length and metaphyseal sleeve application) were developed. Loading conditions included joint reaction force, muscle, and tibia-fibula loads from 6 instances of the gait cycle. The bone remodeling model applied was adapted to the subject under analysis by selecting the bone remodeling parameters that best replicated the bone density distribution of the tibia estimated from the CT data. Changes in bone density after TKA were evaluated in 8 regions of interest. ResultsGlobal bone loss ranged from −31.16%, in 115 mm stemmed configurations, to −20.93%, in 75 mm stemmed configurations. Apart from the lateral and posterior regions in the proximal tibia, whose bone loss reduced and increased, respectively, due to the incorporation of a metaphyseal sleeve, changes in bone density were similar with and without a metaphyseal sleeve for each stem length. ConclusionThe results suggest that bone remodeling of the tibia is not critically affected by the incorporation of metaphyseal sleeves. Considering that sleeves are believed to present a favorable clinical outcome in stability and osseointegration, reducing the revision rate for aseptic loosening, their advantages seem to outweigh their disadvantages regarding bone remodeling.

Unsuspected Positive Cultures in Planned Aseptic Revision Knee or Hip Arthroplasty-Risk Factors and Impact on Survivorship.

Unsuspected positive cultures (UPCs) may be found at the time of planned aseptic revision surgery and have previously been associated with decreased implant survival. However, reported rates vary greatly, and potential risk factors are widely unknown. This study investigates the rate of UPCs, implant survival, as well as potential risk factors for UPCs and revision. This is a retrospective, single-center study on 434 cases of total hip arthroplasty (THA 277) and knee revision arthroplasty (TKA 157) performed between 2010 and 2017. Microbiology culture results, revision-free survival (RFS) and infection-free (IFS) survival, and the potential impact of UPCs as well as patient- or procedure-related risk factors were investigated at a minimum follow-up of 24 months (median 41 months). A total of 37% of patients had a positive culture (160/434). 27% (119/434) had a solitary positive culture, and 9% (41/434) had ≥2 positive cultures of the same species. Most commonly, coagulase-negative staphylococci were cultured. Overall, 32% (13/41) of patients with ≥2 positive cultures underwent revision for infection compared with 6% (17/274) of patients with negative cultures. RFS and IFS were reduced if ≥2 cultures were positive. Single positive cultures had no impact on RFS or IFS. Male sex, elevated serum C-reactive protein, and obesity were independently associated with finding ≥2 UPCs in revision THA. Appearance of ≥2 UPCs in aseptic revision leads to reduced RFS and IFS. Males, obese patients, and patients with elevated serum C-reactive protein planned for THA revision should be considered for extended diagnostics to rule out periprosthetic joint infection.

Application of deep learning algorithm in automated identification of knee arthroplasty implants from plain radiographs using transfer learning models: Are algorithms better than humans?

AimIn preoperative planning of a revision knee arthroplasty, it can be challenging to identify an implant manufacturer type from a primary knee arthroplasty due to the inability to identify the implants in time. It has been shown that deep learning improves diagnosis with each iteration in the medical field. The problem of identifying the manufacturer and model of knee arthroplasty prostheses has been solved using automated deep learning models. In our study, we have developed deep learning algorithm to identify knee arthroplasty, implant manufacturer type. The current study also aimed to determine the best of the seven machine learning-based model for detecting knee implants according to different manufacturing types from plain radiographs based on their efficacy and accuracy. Material and methodsPlain radiographs of 521 knee arthroplasty implants of six different manufacturers were taken from the anteroposterior and lateral perspectives to train, validate, and test the implants. Among 521 radiographs images, 70% were used in the initial training process, 10% in testing the models, and 20% in determining the accuracy and validity of the models. The study explored the transfer learning technique to develop models. The advantage of transfer learning for knee implant detection is that if existing models are already trained on a large enough and general dataset, these models can be used to fulfil the study's objectives. In addition, to establish the efficacy of these knee implants, two orthopaedic consultants specialised in arthroplasty independently identified these manufacturers types. ResultsThe performance and network of the model resulted in high accuracy for identifying knee implant types out of seven models, five of which had more than 90% accuracy. After 20 training epochs on all seven models, based on the validation dataset, VGG-16 produces the best results with an accuracy of 95.5% and a precision of 98.4%. However, the study asserted that machine learning outperformed two human expert, who achieved an average accuracy of 78%. ConclusionThis study may lead to the development of an automated implant identification tool that could improve the accuracy and speed of decision made by healthcare professionals.

The Prevalence and Outcomes of Unexpected Positive Intraoperative Cultures in Presumed Aseptic Revision Knee Arthroplasty

BackgroundThe prevalence and outcomes of unexpected positive intraoperative cultures (UPC) in presumed aseptic revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA) are unclear. The purpose of this study was to determine the prevalence of UPC and infection-free implant survival in this patient population. Secondly, we aimed to compare the infection-free implant survival between cohorts based on number of UPCs and antibiotic treatment. MethodsWe reviewed our institutional database from 2006 to 2019 for all TKA revisions (n = 1795) to identify all presumed aseptic TKA revisions with intraoperative culture(s). After exclusions, 775 revisions were eligible and those with UPC were included in the Kaplan-Meier analysis to determine infection-free implant survival for the cohorts. ResultsThe prevalence of UPC was 9.8%. The 2- and 5-year infection-free survival was 97.4% and 95.3%, respectively. The 5-year infection-free survival from the same microorganism as the UPC was 98.7%. Infection-free survival was similar for the 1 versus ≥2 UPC cohorts (P = .416), however was poorer for the cohort treated with antibiotics (P = .021). Only one of 3 subsequent PJI-related implant failures was caused by the same microorganism (polymicrobial) as the UPC. There were no subsequent infections in patients with a single UPC not treated with antibiotics. ConclusionsThe prevalence of UPC was 9.8% and the infection-free implant survival is excellent. Infection-free survivorship from PJI caused by the same UPC microorganism is outstanding. Comparisons between cohorts must be interpreted with caution due to study limitations. A single UPC in patents without other signs of infection does not require antibiotic treatment. Level of EvidenceIV.

Beneficial effect of a zirconium-nitride-coated implant in total knee arthroplasty revision for suspected metal hypersensitivity

IntroductionRevision of total knee arthroplasty (rTKA) for suspicion of metal hypersensitivity (MHS) may require hypoallergenic implants. Results for coated implants have not been reported. The aim of the present study was to assess short-term results and survival of rTKA for MHS using a multilayer implant coating. HypothesisMultilayer implant coating improves functional results in rTKA, with survival comparable to primary coated implants. Material and methodsA single-center retrospective observational study included 28 patients (30 knees) undergoing rTKA for MHS using a coated implant between May 2011 and November 2016. Exclusion criteria comprised implant malpositioning and history of infection in the affected knee. Clinical and radiological results were assessed on the International Knee Society (IKS) and SF-36 functional scores and Ewald radiological score. Survival was calculated on Kaplan-Meier estimation. ResultsMean follow-up was 3.8 years. Mean IKS score increased by 40.2 points (40%) [range, 28.1–52.3] (p<0.05). Mean range of motion increased by 17° [range, 9.5–24.5°] (p<0.05). Mean physical and mental SF-36 components were respectively 44.7 and 46.1. Survivorship was 93%. DiscussionThere was significant functional improvement after rTKA for MHS. There were no short-term complications related to the zirconium nitrate coating. However, studies with longer follow-up will be needed for confirmation. Level of evidenceIV; retrospective study.

Which Minor Criteria is the Most Accurate Predictor for the Diagnosis of Hip and Knee Periprosthetic Joint Infection in the Asian Population?

BackgroundThe aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic performance of minor criteria from the 2018 International Consensus Meeting (ICM) for the diagnosis of chronic periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) in an Asian population. MethodsWe retrospectively reviewed 76 patients who underwent a revision knee or hip arthroplasty at an academic institution between September 2018 and December 2019. All major and minor 2018 ICM criteria were available for all patients included. Cases with at least 1 major criterion or score ≥6 in minor criteria were considered as infected. The diagnostic performance was evaluated by a receiver operative characteristic curve analysis and area under the curve (AUC) for each minor criterion. An AUC value of more than 0.9 was considered outstanding and 0.8-0.9 as excellent. ResultsWhen using 2018 ICM threshold, the diagnostic performance ranked based on AUC was the following: alpha defensin (0.92), positive histology (0.83), leukocyte esterase (0.82), synovial white blood cell (0.81), serum erythrocyte sedimentation rate (0.78), synovial polymorphonuclear neutrophils (0.77), serum C-reactive protein (0.74), D-dimer (0.59), single positive culture (0.53), and positive intraoperative purulence (0.51). Alpha defensin was considered as an outstanding test among the 2018 ICM minor criteria. Positive histology, leukocyte esterase, and synovial white blood cell were considered as excellent tests. ConclusionBased on our findings, alpha-defensin has the best diagnostic performance in Asian population among the minor criteria of 2018 ICM.

Monitoring the lifetime risk of revision knee arthroplasty over a decade : a population-level analysis of Australian national registry data.

This study aimed to describe the use of revision knee arthroplasty in Australia and examine changes in lifetime risk over a decade. De-identified individual-level data on all revision knee arthroplasties performed in Australia from 2007 to 2017 were obtained from the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry. Population data and life tables were obtained from the Australian Bureau of Statistics. The lifetime risk of revision surgery was calculated for each year using a standardized formula. Separate calculations were undertaken for males and females. In total, 43,188 revision knee arthroplasty procedures were performed in Australia during the study period, with a median age at surgery of 69 years (interquartile range (IQR) 62 to 76). In 2017, revision knee arthroplasty rates were highest for males aged 70 to 79 years (102.9 procedures per 100,000 population). Lifetime risk of revision knee arthroplasty for females increased slightly from 1.61% (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.53% to 1.69%) in 2007 to 2.22% (95% CI 2.13% to 2.31%) in 2017. A similar pattern was evident for males, with a lifetime risk of 1.43% (95% CI 1.36% to 1.51%) in 2007 and 2.02% (95% CI 1.93% to 2.11%) in 2017. A decline in procedures performed for loosening/lysis (from 41% in 2007 to 24% in 2017) and pain (from 14% to 9%) was evident, while infection became an increasingly common indication (from 19% in 2007 to 29% in 2017). Well-validated national registry data can help us understand the epidemiology of revision knee arthroplasty, including changing clinical indications. Despite a small increase over a decade, the lifetime risk of revision knee arthroplasty in Australia is low at one in 45 females and one in 50 males. These methods offer a population-level approach to quantifying revision burden that can be used for ongoing national surveillance and between-country comparisons. Cite this article: Bone Joint J2022;104-B(5):613-619.

Hybrid Cementation Technique Using the New Modular System for Aseptic Knee Arthroplasty Revision Surgery.

To evaluate the clinical and radiological outcomes of aseptic revision of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) using the Vanguard 360 Revision Knee System with the hybrid cementation technique. Between January 2014 and October 2016, nineteen aseptic revision TKAs were carried out with the Vanguard 360 Revision Knee System (Zimmer-Biomet, Warsaw, IN, USA) performed by two different surgeons. The patients were evaluated clinically and radiographically at one, six, and twelve months after surgery and yearly thereafter. Functional outcomes were assessed according to the range of motion (ROM), knee society knee score (KSKS) and knee society function score (KSFS). Radiological evaluations were performed using the hip-knee-ankle angle (HKA), weight-bearing anteroposterior view, latero-lateral view, Rosenberg x-rays of the knee and skyline patellar x-rays. A triple-phase technetium bone scan was performed on all the patients complaining of knee pain after one year from surgery. Clinical and radiological results including KSKS, KSFS, ROM and HKA angle improved after revision of TKA with a statistically significant difference (p <0.05). There were seven revisions of the CCK prosthesis due to persistent pain. Patients who underwent revision of TKA using the Vanguard 360 with the hybrid cementation technique had a failure rate of 36.8% at a mean time of 29 months due to aseptic loosening. Further studies are required to analyse the role of cementation in detail to prevent this complication.

Global Publication Trends and Research Hotspots of Revision Hip and Knee Arthroplasty: A 21-Year Bibliometric Approach.

As the number of primary hip and knee arthroplasties increases, revision cases correspondingly demonstrate high relative growth, gaining increasing attention. The present research aimed to investigate subject characteristics in revision hip and knee arthroplasty (RHKA) research using a bibliometric approach. Publications related to RHKA from 2000 to 2020 were searched in the Web of Science database. WPS Office, CiteSpace, VOSviewer, and Bibliometrix were used to analyze the results. Bibliometric analysis revealed 3290 records. Fifty-nine countries published manuscripts on RHKA. The United States contributed most and also had the highest number of international collaborations. The most relevant institution was the Mayo Clinic. Berry DJ and Parvizi J were the most productive and academic influential authors in RHKA, respectively. The most productive journal was the Journal of Arthroplasty. Co-occurrence analysis demonstrated "infection" to be the trend in RHKA. Thematic analysis displayed 16 keywords in hip arthroplasty and 14 keywords in knee arthroplasty. The present study observed an increasing trend of research papers in RHKA. Institutions and scholars from the United States were found to dominate the field. Periprosthetic joint infection was likely a potential development trend and hotspot of RHKA.

Non-oncologic Total Femoral Arthroplasty: A Case Report

As patient longevity continues to improve, the rate of lower limb revision arthroplasties will continue to increase as patients outlive the expiration of their implants. With continued bone loss and reduced stability, there is a limit to the number of revision operations that can be performed. Total femoral arthroplasty (TFA) is an increasingly popular limb-salvaging alternative that can restore some degree of daily function to patients. This report presents a 73-year-old male with multiple right lower-limb operations following two extreme motorcycle accidents in the last 22 years. Due to continued pain and poor femoral bone stock following multiple total knee arthroplasty (TKA) revisions, a TFA was performed. The procedure was successful and post-operative expectations were met despite setbacks in immediate rehabilitation. Overall, TFA is an effective alternative to lower limb amputation in the setting of aseptic, non-oncologic bone loss following multiple knee revisions. However, careful management is necessary to reduce the risk of infection and other complications.

Tibial Tubercle Screw Fixation on Custom Metaphyseal Cone: Surgical Tip in Severe Metaphyseal Tibia Bone Loss.

Tibial tubercle osteotomy (TTO) facilitates exposure in knee arthroplasty revision. However, it comes with complications, especially if it invades the intramedullary canal. Most revisions are characterized by compromised femur and/or tibia bone stock, and the use of metaphyseal cones or sleeves for implant fixation has become increasingly frequent. Several methods of fixation of the tibial tubercle have been proposed, such as screw fixation, cerclage wiring, and suture repair. Despite screws providing the strongest fixation for TTO, their placement around a tibial intramedullary stem or a metaphyseal tibial cone may be difficult. We described the use of a custom-made metaphyseal tibial cone with holes in its anterior surface that allow the surgeon to achieve accurate TTO fixation by screws.

Potential Blood Biomarkers for Diagnosing Periprosthetic Joint Infection: A Single-Center, Retrospective Study.

Background: Blood biomarkers are first-line tools for identifying periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). C-reactive protein (CRP) is currently recognized as the standard biomarker for PJI diagnosis. Other recently reported novel biomarkers, including plasma fibrinogen, platelet count, monocyte/lymphocyte ratio (MLR), neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio (NLR), and platelet count/lymphocyte ratio (PLR), have also shown promise in diagnosing PJI. This study aimed to evaluate whether these biomarkers were superior to CRP for identifying PJI. Methods: Patients who underwent revision hip or knee arthroplasty at our hospital from January 2008 to September 2020 were included consecutively and divided into infected and non-infected groups according to the 2013 International Consensus Meeting Criteria. Blood samples were collected preoperatively, and erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), CRP, interleukin-6, fibrinogen, platelet count, MLR, NLR, and PLR were analyzed. The diagnostic values of the tested biomarkers and their combinations were compared with CRP based on the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) using the z-test. Classification trees were constructed to explore more accurate combinations of the tested markers for identifying PJI. Results: A total of 543 patients were included, of whom 245 had PJI. Among the tested biomarkers, CRP with a cutoff of 7.39 mg/L showed the highest AUC, which gave a sensitivity of 79.1% and specificity of 86.0%. The AUCs of pairwise combinations of tested markers including CRP also were inferior to CRP itself, as were combinations derived from classification trees. Conclusions: Preoperative serum CRP with a low cutoff may be the best reliable blood biomarker for identifying PJI, and those traditional or novel available blood biomarkers could not further improve the diagnostic ability on the basis of CRP.