Human movement behaviors have been distinguished by motor learning theorists based on spatiotemporal and kinesthetic relationships. Newell's conceptual framework of motor learning calls for the sequential assembly of information processed by the brain and manifested by the acquisition of the desired coordinated movement pattern, or “skill.” Visual, auditory, and kinesthetic modalities have been identified as preferences by which adults learn. Maximal force production (MFP) is considered a psychomotor skill in view of the fact that it involves, “assigning a maximal force to the muscles in a coordinated manner (Kelso, 1982).” Accordingly, since MFP is a skill, learning must occur in order for the skill to be attained. Isokinetic dynamometry is a widely used and accepted method of quantifying dynamic MFP. While isokinetic testing protocols address each of these learning modalities, reproducibility of torque curves as measured by coefficient of variation (COV) suggests that subsequent training sessions are necessary for the learning affect to occur. However, it has not been investigated if disparate learning preferences affect variability in acquiring the skill of reproducing MFP. PURPOSE Therefore, the purpose of this study was to determine if there is a relationship between learning preference and COV in isokinetic knee extension/flexion exercise. METHODS Thirty-two novice subjects (6 males, 26 females, age 38.0 ± 13.1 yrs, ht 172.8 ± 42.7 cm, wt 64.9 ± 18.1 kg) completed the Rezler and Rezmovic Learning Preference Inventory to determine learning preference levels. Subjects were introduced to isokinetic exercise through verbal description and demonstration of the movement to accommodate auditory and visual learning. They also performed gradient warm-up repetitions to facilitate kinesthetic learning. Subjects were instructed to perform 5 maximal reciprocal repetitions of dominant knee extension/flexion at 180 d/s. RESULTS Statistical analysis revealed a significant (p<0.05) correlation between visual learning score and COV (r=.38). CONCLUSIONS Within the limitations of this study, these results suggest that there may be an inverse relationship between desirable visual learning preference and COV. Therefore, practitioners should rely on multi-modal strategies when instructing novice subjects on an isokinetic dynamometer.