Kinematically Aligned Total Knee Arthroplasty Research Articles

Kinematic and mechanical alignments in total knee arthroplasty: A meta-analysis with ≥1-year follow-up

BackgroundKinematic and mechanical alignment outcomes in total knee arthroplasty remain controversial. This study compared the clinical and radiological outcomes of total knee arthroplasty using kinematic and mechanical alignments. MethodsWe systematically searched PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases for randomized controlled trials and cohort studies published before November 2022. The data of interest were extracted and analyzed using Review Manager V.5.4. ResultsNineteen randomized controlled trials and cohort studies involving 880 kinematic alignment total knee arthroplasties and 965 mechanical alignment total knee arthroplasties were included. In this meta-analysis, the kinematic alignment group achieved better knee joint function scores, including the Oxford Knee Score, Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score, and Knee Society Score, and better flexion angles. No statistical differences were detected in the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index, extension angle, Forgotten Joint Score, European Quality of Life five-dimension measure, hip–knee–ankle angle, or complications between the kinematic and mechanical alignment groups. ConclusionThis meta-analysis indicated that kinematic alignment total knee arthroplasty provides clinical benefits in terms of the Oxford Knee Score, Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score, Knee Society Score (knee), Knee Society Score (function), and better flexion angles. In addition, kinematic alignment total knee arthroplasty led to similar clinical outcomes as mechanical alignment total knee arthroplasty without increasing complications. Systematic review registrationhttp://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/CRD42022373227.

Posterior cruciate ligament retention with medial ball-in-socket conformity promotes internal tibial rotation and knee flexion while providing high clinical outcome scores

BackgroundAlthough retaining the posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) is advantageous in unrestricted kinematically aligned TKA, it is often excised with a medial stabilized implant. The primary objectives were to determine whether PCL retention using an insert with ball-in-socket (B-in-S) medial conformity to maximize A-P stability promotes internal tibial rotation and flexion while providing high patient-reported outcome scores. MethodsTwo cohorts of 25 patients each were treated with unrestricted kinematically aligned (KA) TKA using a tibial insert with B-in-S medial conformity and a flat lateral articular surface. One cohort retained the PCL; the other had it excised. Patients performed deep knee bend and step-up exercises during fluoroscopic imaging. Following 3D model-to-2D image registration, anterior-posterior (A-P) positions of the femoral condyles and tibial rotation were determined. ResultsFor deep knee bend, mean internal tibial rotation with PCL retention was significantly greater at maximum flexion (17.7° ± 5.7° versus 10.4° ± 6.5°, p < 0.001) and significantly greater at 30°, 60°, and 90° flexion as well (p ≤ 0.0283). For step-up, mean internal tibial rotation with PCL retention was significantly greater at at 15°, 30°, and 45° flexion (p ≤ 0.0049) but was marginally not significantly greater at 60° (i.e. maximum) flexion (12.3° ± 4.4° versus 10.1° ± 5.4°, p = 0.0794). Mean flexion during active knee flexion with PCL retention was significantly greater (127° ± 8° versus 122° ± 6°, p = 0.0400). Both cohorts had high median Oxford Knee, WOMAC, and Forgotten Joint Scores that were not significantly different (p = 0.0918, 0.1448, and 0.0855, respectively) ConclusionSurgeons that perform unrestricted KA TKA should retain the PCL with an insert that has B-in-S medial conformity, as this maintains extension and flexion gaps while also promoting internal tibial rotation and knee flexion as well as providing high clinical outcome scores.

A Torn or Reconstructed Anterior Cruciate Ligament Does Not Adversely Affect Clinical Outcome Scores and the Incidence of Reoperation After Unrestricted Kinematically Aligned Total Knee Arthroplasty

BackgroundThere are no reports as to whether the condition of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) adversely affects the 2 to 3 year function and reoperation risk of a kinematically aligned (KA) total knee arthroplasty (TKA) performed with posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) retention and an intermediate medial conforming (MC) insert. MethodsA single surgeon’s prospective database query identified 418 consecutive primary TKAs performed between January 2019 and December 2019. The surgeon recorded the ACL condition in the operative note. Patients filled out the Forgotten Joint Score (FJS), Oxford knee score (OKS), and Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Scores for Joint Replacement at the final follow-up. There were 299 patients with an intact ACL, 99 with a torn ACL, and 20 with a reconstructed ACL. The mean follow-up was 31 months (range, 20 to 45). ResultsThe median FJS, OKS, and Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) of the reconstructed/torn/intact KA TKAs were 90/79/67, 47/44/43, and 92/88/80 points, respectively. The median OKS and KOOS of the reconstructed ACL cohort were 4 and 11 points higher than in the intact ACL cohort (P = .003, .04). One patient who had a reconstructed ACL underwent manipulation under anesthesia (MUA) for stiffness. The 5 reoperations in the intact ACL cohort were for instability (n = 2), revision after failed MUA for stiffness (n = 2), and infection (n = 1). ConclusionThese results suggest that patients who have a torn and reconstructed ACL can expect high function and a low risk of reoperation comparable to patients who have an intact ACL when treated with unrestricted, caliper-verified KA, PCL retention, and an intermediate MC insert.

Patient-Reported Outcomes of Kinematic vs Mechanical Alignment in Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is an effective treatment method for severe osteoarthritis of the knee. Poor alignment of a knee replacement has been associated with suboptimal clinical results. Traditionally, mechanical alignment (MA) has been considered the gold standard. In light of reports of decreased satisfaction with TKA, a new technique called kinematic alignment (KA) has been developed. The purpose of this study is to (1) review the results of KA and MA for TKA in randomized controlled trials based on the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index score, the Oxford Knee Score, and the Knee Society Scores, (2) perform a meta-analyses of the randomized controlled trials with baseline and follow-up values of these parameters, and (3) discuss other shortcomings of this literature from the perspective of study design and execution. Two independent reviewers performed a systematic review of the English literature using the Embase, Scopus, and PubMed databases searching for randomized controlled trials of MA vs KA in TKA. Of the initial 481 published reports, 6 studies were included in the final review for meta-analysis. The individual studies were then analyzed to evaluate for risks of bias and inconsistencies of methodology. A majority of studies demonstrated low risk of bias. All studies had fundamental technical issues by utilizing different techniques to achieve KA vs MA. There was no significant difference between KA and MA in these studies. There is no significant difference in any outcomes measured between KA and MA in TKA. Both statistical and methodological factors diminish the value of these conclusions.

Ball-in-socket medial conformity with posterior cruciate ligament retention neither limits internal tibial rotation and knee flexion nor lowers clinical outcome scores after unrestricted kinematically aligned total knee arthroplasty.

For a new tibial insert design with ball-in-socket (B-in-S) medial conformity (MC), posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) retention, and flat lateral articular surface (B-in-S MC + PCL), this study determined whether internal tibial rotation and knee flexion were limited and clinical outcome scores were lower during weight-bearing activities relative to an insert with intermediate (I) (i.e., less than ball-in-socket) medial conformity (I MC + PCL). Twenty-five patients were treated with bilateral unrestricted, caliper-verified kinematic alignment (KA) total knee arthroplasty (TKA) with an I MC + PCL insert and B-in-S MC + PCL insert in opposite knees. Each patient performed weight-bearing deep knee bend, step up, and chair rise under single-plane fluoroscopy. Analysis following 3D model-to-2D image registration determined internal tibial rotation. For each TKA, knee flexion was measured and patients completed clinical outcome scoring questionnaires. Internal tibial rotation did not differ between conformities during chair rise and step up (p = 0.3419 and 0.1030, respectively). During deep knee bend, internal tibial rotation between 90° and maximum flexion was 3° greater in the B-in-S MC + PCL group (18° vs 15°) (p = 0.0290). Mean knee flexion (p = 0.3115) and median Forgotten Joint Score (FJS), Oxford Knee Score (OKS), and Western Ontario and McMasters Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC) scores (p = 0.2100, 0.2154, and 0.4542, respectively) did not differ between conformities. An insert with ball-in-socket medial conformity, which maximizes anteroposterior (AP) stability, did not limit internal tibial rotation and knee flexion and did not lower patient-reported outcomes when implanted with unrestricted caliper-verified KA and PCL retention. Thehigh AP stability provided by the medial ball-in-socket might interest those surgeons exploring the treatment of theactive patient with a desire to return to high-level and athletic activities.

The modification of bone cut angle and joint line obliquity did not change the tibiofemoral kinematics and stability of knee joint after total knee arthroplasty.

Previous reports using cadaveric knees and musculoskeletal computer simulation have shown that kinematically aligned (KA) total knee arthroplasty (TKA) provides more natural and physiological tibiofemoral kinematic patterns than mechanically aligned (MA) TKA. These reports suggested that the modification of joint line obliquity improve the knee kinematics. This study aimed to determine whether joint line obliquity change the intraoperative tibiofemoral kinematics in TKA candidates with knee osteoarthritis. Thirty consecutive knees with varus osteoarthritis that underwent TKA using a navigation system were evaluated. Two types of trial components were prepared: (1) MA TKA model: component trial in which articulating surface was parallel to the bone cut surface (2) KA TKA model: the femoral component trial, which mimicked the KA TKA method of Dossett et al. was designed 3° valgus and 3° internal rotation to the femoral bone cut surface, and the tibial component trial was designed 3° varus to the tibial bone cut surface. These two trials were set on the same knees during the operation, and the tibiofemoral rotational kinematics and varus-valgus laxity were measured from 0° to 120° of knee flexion using a navigation system. The joint gap was 20 ± 2mm and 3° ± 1° varus in extension and 20 ± 2mm and 3° ± 1°varus in flexion. The differences in femoral component rotation between KA TKA and MA TKA were not statistically significant for any knee flexion angle. The differences in varus-valgus laxity between KA TKA and MA TKA were also not statistically significant for any knee flexion angle. Although the degree of joint line obliquity varies widely in various KA TKA methods, this study, which mimicked the method of Dossett et al. showed that the modification of joint line obliquity did not change the tibiofemoral kinematics and stability of the knee joint in TKA candidates with knee osteoarthritis.

Postoperative clinical outcomes for kinematically, restricted kinematically, or mechanically aligned total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

BackgroundMechanically aligned total knee arthroplasty (MATKA) is a well-established procedure. Kinematically aligned TKA (KATKA) has been proposed to restore and preserve pre-arthritic knee anatomy. However, normal knee anatomy varies widely, and there have been concerns regarding restoring unusual anatomy. Accordingly, restricted KATKA (rKATKA) was introduced to reproduce constitutional knee anatomy within a safe range. This network meta-analysis (NMA) aimed to evaluate the clinical and radiological outcomes of the surgeries.MethodsWe performed a database search on August 20, 2022, which included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing any two of the three surgical TKA techniques for knee osteoarthritis. We conducted a random-effects NMA within the frequentist framework and evaluated confidence in each outcome using the Confidence in Network Meta-Analysis tool.ResultsTen RCTs with 1,008 knees and a median follow-up period of 1.5 years were included. The three methods might result in little to no difference in range of motion (ROM) between methods. In patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), the KATKA might result in a slight improvement compared with the MATKA (standardized mean difference, 0.47; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.16–0.78; very low confidence). There was little to no difference in revision risk between MATKA and KATKA. KATKA and rKATKA showed a slight valgus femoral component (mean difference [MD], -1.35; 95% CI, -1.95–[-0.75]; very low confidence; and MD, -1.72; 95% CI, -2.63–[-0.81]; very low confidence, respectively) and a slight varus tibial component (MD, 2.23; 95% CI, 1.22–3.24; very low confidence; and MD, 1.25; 95% CI, 0.01–2.49; very low confidence, respectively) compared with MATKA. Tibial component inclination and hip–knee–ankle angle might result in little to no difference between the three procedures.ConclusionsKATKA and rKATKA showed similar ROM and PROMs and a slight variation in the coronal component alignment compared with MATKA. KATKA and rKATKA are acceptable methods in short- to mid-term follow-up periods. However, long-term clinical results in patients with severe varus deformity are still lacking. Surgeons should choose surgical procedures carefully. Further trials are warranted to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and subsequent revision risk.

Ground kinematically aligned total knee arthroplasty: new personalized technique which enables a stable knee with deep flexion

PurposeThis study aimed to evaluate kinematically aligned total knee arthroplasty (KA-TKA) targeting the neutral ground mechanical axis (MA) (hip-to-calcaneus axis), the line from the hip centre to the bottom of the calcaneus, (ground KA-TKA) in terms of its comparison with tibia-restricted modified KA-TKA (modified KA-TKA).MethodsThis retrospective cohort study included 106 consecutive patients who underwent unilateral KA-TKA for varus osteoarthritis (OA) (60 modified KA-TKAs and 46 ground KA-TKAs). After 1:1 propensity score matching, 60 patients (30 pairs) were matched between the groups with comparable demographic data. The hip-knee-ankle (HKA) angle, coronal femoral component alignment (FCA), and coronal tibial component alignment (TCA) were compared between groups. Intraoperative soft tissue balance, including the joint component gap and varus/valgus balance, was also compared between the groups. One year postoperatively, the clinical outcomes, including the range of motion and 2011 Knee Society Score, were compared between groups.ResultsThe HKA angle and FCA/TCA were not significantly different between groups. Whereas the varus/valgus balance showed no significant differences between groups, smaller joint component gaps were found throughout the range of motion in the ground KA-TKA group than in the modified KA-TKA group. Despite no difference in clinical scores between groups, a significantly deeper postoperative flexion angle was achieved in the ground KA-TKA group than in the modified KA-TKA group (p < 0.05).ConclusionTargeting neutral ground MA in KA-TKA for patients with varus OA has the potential to provide a better flexion angle with stable intraoperative soft tissue balance.

DOES KINEMATICALLY ALIGNED TOTAL KNEE ARTHROPLASTY RESTORE NATIVE JOINT LAXITY BETTER THAN MECHANICAL ALIGNMENT? A CADAVERIC STUDY

Mechanical alignment (MA) in total knee arthroplasty (TKA), although considered the gold standard, reportedly has up to 25% of patients expressing post-operative dissatisfaction. Biomechanical outcomes following kinematic alignment (KA) in TKA, developed to restore native joint alignment, remain unclear. Without a clear consensus for the optimal alignment strategy during TKA, the purpose of this study was to conduct a paired biomechanical comparison of MA and KA in TKA by experimentally quantifying joint laxity and medial collateral ligament (MCL) strain.14 bilateral native fresh-frozen cadaveric lower limbs underwent medially-stabilised TKA (GMK Sphere, Medacta, Switzerland) using computed CT-based subject-specific guides, with KA and MA performed on left and right legs, respectively. Each specimen was subjected to sensor-controlled mediolateral laxity tests. A handheld force sensor (Mark-10, USA) was used to generate an abduction-adduction moment of 10Nm at the knee at fixed flexion angles (0°, 30°, 60°, 90°). A digital image correlation system was used to compute the strain on the superficial medial collateral ligament. A six-camera optical motion capture system (Vicon MX+, UK) was used to acquire kinematics using a pre-defined CT-based anatomical coordinate system. A linear mixed model and Tukey's posthoc test were performed to compare native, KA and MA conditions (p&lt;0.05).Unlike MA, medial joint laxity in KA was similar to the native condition; however, no significant difference was found at any flexion angle (p&gt;0.08). Likewise, KA was comparable with the native condition for lateral joint laxity, except at 30°, and no statistical difference was observed. Although joint laxity in MA seemed lower than the native condition, this difference was significant only for 30° flexion (p=0.01). Both KA and MA exhibited smaller MCL strain at 0° and 30°; however, all conditions were similar at 60° and 90°.Medial and lateral joint laxity seemed to have been restored better following KA than MA; however, KA did not outperform MA in MCL strain, especially after mid-flexion. Although this study provides only preliminary indications regarding the optimal alignment strategy to restore native kinematics following TKA, further research in postoperative joint biomechanics for load bearing conditions is warranted.

Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes of Inversed Restricted Kinematic Alignment Total Knee Arthroplasty by Asia Specific (Huang's) Phenotypes, a Prospective Pilot Study.

Inverse restricted kinematic alignment (irKA) was modified from restricted kinematic alignment for total knee arthroplasty (TKA). This prospective single-center study aimed to evaluate the outcomes of irKA-TKA on all knee subtypes classified by Asia specific (Huang's) phenotypes. A total of 96 knees that underwent irKA-TKA at one hospital between January 2018 and June 2020 were included, with 15 knees classified in Type 1, nine in Type 2, 15 in Type 3, 47 in Type 4, and 10 in Type 5 by Huang's phenotypes. Outcomes were knee alignment measures and patient-reported satisfaction evaluated by the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC) and traditional Chinese version of the Forgotten Joint Score-12 (FJS-12). Follow-up was one year. Type 4 knee was most significantly corrected in all angles by irKA-TKA, followed by Type 2 and 3 knees. Type 5 and 1 knee were only significantly corrected in some angles. The correlation between FJS-12 and WOMAC was good at 6 months (Pearson correlation coefficient (r) = 0.74) and moderate at 6 weeks, 3 months, and 12 months during follow-up (r = 0.37~0.47). FJS-12 and WOMAC displayed comparable hip-knee-ankle angle cut-off value (4.71° vs. 6.20°), sensitivity (70.49% vs. 67.19%), specificity (84.00% vs. 85.71%), and Youden index (54.49% vs. 52.90%) in prediction of good prognosis. In conclusion, irKA-TKA corrects knee alignment in all knee types with increasing satisfaction for one-year follow-up. Knees with presurgical varus deformity are most recommended for irKA-TKA. Both presurgical scores of the traditional Chinese version of FJS-12 and WOMAC predict the prognosis of irKA-TKA.

An early clinical comparative study on total knee arthroplasty with kinematic alignment using specific instruments versus mechanical alignment in varus knees.

The kinematic alignment technique, as one of the alignment options for total knee arthroplasty, has attracted increasing attention from orthopedic surgeons and has been increasingly performed in the most populous countries in the world. The purpose of this study is to explore and compare the early clinical outcomes of total knee arthroplasty with KA using specific instruments vs. mechanical alignment in our nation. A retrospective analysis was performed on patients who underwent unilateral total knee arthroplasty for knee osteoarthritis with varus deformity. Depending on the alignment method, patients were divided into a kinematically aligned total knee arthroplasty (KA-TKA) group and a mechanically aligned total knee arthroplasty (MA-TKA) group. The hip-knee-ankle (HKA) angle before and after surgery, the knee joint clinical score (KS-C), the knee joint functional score (KS-F) and the forgotten joint score (FJS) at 3months and 2 years after surgery were recorded and statistically analyzed. A total of 126 patients were enrolled, including 65 in the KA-TKA group and 61 in the MA-TKA group. The mean follow-up period was 30.8 months. The postoperative HKA angle was not significantly different at the 2-year follow-up between the two groups (P > 0.05). The KS-C, KS-F and FJS scores in the KA-TKA group were higher than those in the MA-TKA group at 3 months after surgery, and the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05). At the 2-year follow-up, the KS-C, KS-F and FJS scores in the KA-TKA group were higher than those in the MA-TKA group, and the difference in the KS-C and FJS scores was statistically significant (P < 0.05). Patients who underwent KA-TKA had a postoperative lower limb alignment similar to that of those who underwent MA-TKA. The clinical outcomes of KA-TKA were superior to those of MA-TKA in terms of clinical performance, knee function and subjective sensation up to 2 years after surgery.

A new tibial insert design with ball-in-socket medial conformity and posterior cruciate ligament retention closely restores native knee tibial rotation after unrestricted kinematic alignment

PurposeIn total knee arthroplasty (TKA) with posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) retention, the medial and lateral insert conformity that restores in vivo native (i.e., healthy) knee tibial rotation and high function without causing stiffness is unknown. The purpose was to determine whether a ball-in-socket (B-in-S) medially conforming (MC) and flat lateral insert implanted with unrestricted kinematic alignment (KA) TKA and PCL retention restores tibial rotation to native.MethodsOne group of 25 patients underwent unrestricted KA TKA with manual instruments. Another group of 25 patients had native knees. Single-plane fluoroscopy imaged each knee while patients performed step-up and chair rise activities. Following 3D model-to-2D image registration, anterior–posterior (A-P) positions of the femoral condyles were determined. Changes in A-P positions with flexion were used to determine tibial rotation.ResultsAt maximum flexion, mean tibial rotations of KA TKA knees were comparable to native knees (Step up: 12.3° ± 4.4° vs. 13.1° ± 12.0°, p = 0.783; Chair Rise: 12.7° ± 6.2° vs. 12.6° ± 9.5º, p = 0.941). However, paths of rotation differed in that screw home motion was less evident in KA TKA knees. At 8 months follow-up, the median Forgotten Joint Score was 69 points (range 65 to 85), the median Oxford Knee Score was 43 points (range 40 to 46), and mean knee flexion was 127º ± 8°.ConclusionsThe ball-in-socket medial, flat lateral insert and PCL retention implanted with unrestricted KA TKA restored in vivo native knee tibial rotation at maximum flexion for each activity and high function without stiffness. Providing high A-P stability, this implant design might benefit patients desiring to return to demanding work and recreational activities.Level of evidenceTherapeutic – Level II.

Closed-leg standing long leg radiographs can be a useful tool to assess whether the joint line is parallel to the ground in restricted kinematic alignment total knee arthroplasty

PurposeRestricted kinematic alignment (rKA) is a modified technique of kinematic alignment (KA) total knee arthroplasty (TKA) for patients with an outlier or atypical knee anatomy, striving to preserve the native knee joint line parallel to the ground in a bipedal stance. This study aimed to evaluate the accuracy of rKA TKA with a computed tomography (CT)-based patient-specific instrument (PSI) to achieve the preoperative plan with the joint line parallel to the ground level.MethodsUsing a CT-based PSI, 74 closed-leg standing long-leg radiographs were obtained before and after rKA TKA. The hip-knee-ankle angle (HKA), joint line orientation angle (JLOA), lateral distal femoral angle (LDFA), and medial proximal tibial angle (MPTA) were measured. Bone resection accuracy was evaluated by postoperative HKA deviations from the planned alignment and joint line by postoperative JLOA deviations from the ground level.ResultsThe mean postoperative JLOA and HKA were 2.1° valgus (range, standard deviation: 6.0° valgus to 3.0° varus, 2.0) and 2.6° varus (3.5° valgus to 12.5° varus, 3.2), respectively. Postoperative JLOA and HKA were within ± 3° of the planned alignment for 69% and 86% of cases, respectively.ConclusionsDespite a static verification, we clarified how the joint line after rKA TKA was reproduced in the closed-leg long leg radiographs to mimic the limb position during gait. However, this imaging method is not well-established, and lack of long-term survivorship and the relationship between joint line inclination and clinical outcomes represented limitations of this study.Level of evidenceLevel IV.

The Lateral Malleolus Is a Simple and Reliable Landmark that Can Be Used to Reliably Perform Restricted Kinematically Aligned Total Knee Arthroplasty-Anatomical and Clinical Studies in Japanese Population.

In restricted kinematic alignment total knee arthroplasty (TKA), bone resection is performed within a safe range to help protect against failure from extreme alignments. Patient-specific instrumentation, navigations, and robotics are often required for restricting bone cuts within a specified safe zone. We hypothesized that the lateral malleolus could be used as a landmark for restricting the tibial osteotomy using a mechanical jig. Here, we examine its feasibility in anatomical and clinical settings. We studied long-leg standing radiographs of 114 consecutive patients (228 knees) who underwent knee arthroplasty in our institution. We measured the lateral malleolus angle (LMA), the angle between the tibial axis and the line between the center of the knee and the lateral surface of the lateral malleolus. The medial proximal tibial angle was also measured before and after restricted kinematic alignment TKA under restriction with reference to the lateral malleolus. Mean LMA was 5.5 ± 0.5 degrees. This was relatively consistent and independent of patient's height, weight, and body mass index. The lateral malleolus is a reliable bone landmark that can be used to recognize approximately 5.5 degrees of varus intraoperatively. A surgeon can use this as a restriction of the tibial varus cut up to 6 degrees without the requirement for expensive assistive technologies.

Kinematic Alignment May Reduce Opioid Consumption and Length of Stay Compared to Mechanically Aligned Total Knee Arthroplasty.

Previous studies have sought to determine the effects of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) using kinematic alignment (KA) versus mechanical alignment (MA) to reproduce the native knee alignment and soft tissue envelope for improved patient satisfaction. There are limited studies that compare acute perioperative outcomes between KA and MA patients as it pertains to pain-related opioid consumption and hospital length of stay (LOS). This study aims to compare early KA and MA in restoring function and rehabilitation after surgery to reduce hospitalization and opioid consumption. A retrospective review of 42 KA and 58 MA primary TKA patients performed by a single surgeon between 2020-2021 was conducted. Demographics were controlled between groups and radiographic measurements and functional outcomes were compared. Pain was evaluated with inpatient/outpatient morphine milligram equivalents (MME) and visual analogue scale (VAS) scores. Mobility was assessed using multiple measures by a physical therapist. Mean preoperative and 3-month postoperative flexion range of motion (ROM) were analyzed, and overall complications, LOS, and non-home discharge between groups compared. Continuous variables were compared using the Wilcoxon rank-sum test, and categorical variables were compared using the chi-square or Fisher exact test. Statistical significance was set at P < 0.05. KA patients had shorter LOS (1.8 vs 3.1 days) and less cumulative opioid requirements compared to MA patients (578 vs 1253 MME). On postoperative day 0, KA patients ambulated on average twice the distance of MA patients (20 vs 6.5 feet). KA patients had residual tibia component in varus (1.4° vs -0.3°), femoral component in valgus (-1.9° vs 0.2°), and valgus joint line obliquity compared with MA (-1.5° vs 0.2°). There were no significant differences between 3-month postoperative flexion arc motion, discharge destination, KOOS or SF-12 outcomes, and surgical complication rates between groups. By restoring the native joint line obliquity and minimizing the frequency of ligament releases, KA for TKA may improve pain relief, early mobility, and decreased length of stay compared with traditional methods of establishing neutral limb axis by MA.

Comparative study on imaging and clinical results of patellofemoral joint with kinematic alignment and mechanical alignment in total knee arthroplasty

Objective: To investigate the changes of imaging parameters of patellofemoral joint after kinematic alignment total knee arthroplasty (KA-TKA) and mechanical alignment total knee arthroplasty (MA-TKA) and the effects on clinical outcomes. Methods: A retrospective analysis was performed on 227 patients diagnosed with knee osteoarthritis, 105 males and 122 females, with the age of (68.6±7.2) years (range: 52 to 86 years). The patients underwent unilateral TKA at the Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, Capital Medical University, from January 2020 to July 2021. The patients were divided into the KA-TKA group (n=102) and the MA-TKA group (n=125) according to the alignment method. The Blackburne-Peel index, lateral patellofemoral angle, patellofemoral tilt angle and patellofemoral index of the two groups were recorded before and 6 months after operation. The frequency of lateral patellar retinaculum release, preoperative and postoperative knee range of motion (ROM), and Oxford knee score(OKS) were also recorded. The differences between preoperative and postoperative measurement data of each group were calculated. If the difference was in line with normal distribution, the independent sample t-test or t'-test was used for comparison between the two groups. If it did not conform to normal distribution, Mann-Whitney U test was used. Paired sample t-test was used for comparison before and after treatment. Chi-square test was used for comparation of categorical data between the two groups. Results: After 6 months of operation, the patellar tilt angles of the KA-TKA group and the MA-TKA group were (14.22±3.26)° and (13.35±2.27)°, and the lateral patellar angles were (9.73±4.86)° and (11.91±3.89)°, respectively. The change of lateral patellofemoral angle in the KA-TKA group was significantly less than that in the MA-TKA group ((1.68±4.86)° vs. (4.15±4.88)°, t=3.805, P<0.01). OKS and ROM were improved in the both groups at 6 months after operation (all P<0.05), but there were no statistic significance in preoperative and postoperative difference between the two groups (all P>0.05). The intraoperative lateral patellar retinacular release rate was 14.4% (18/125) in the MA-TKA group and 6.9% (7/102) in the KA-TKA group, with no statistical difference (χ2=3.256,P=0.071). Conclusions: There are greater patella lateral tilt at 6 months postoperatively in the KA-TKA group compared with the MA-TKA group, but this radiographic difference could not show differences of clinical outcomes and postoperative ROM, the frequency of intraoperative lateral patellar retinacular release wouldn't increase. Therefore, KA-TKA does not increase the difficulty of postoperative patellofemoral joint complications and intraoperative lateral patellar release.

Restoration of the Joint Line Configuration Reproduces Native Mid-Flexion Biomechanics after Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Matched-Pair Cadaveric Study.

Background: Recent evidence supports that restoration of the pre-arthritic condition via total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is associated with improved post-TKA performance and patient satisfaction. However, whether the restored pre-arthritic joint line simulates the native mid-flexion biomechanics remains unclear. Objective: We performed a matched-pair cadaveric study to explore whether restoration of the joint line via kinematically aligned (KA) TKA reproduced native knee biomechanics more accurately than the altered joint line associated with mechanically aligned (MA) TKA. Methods: Sixteen fresh-frozen cadaveric knees (eight pairs) were affixed onto a customized knee-squatting simulator for measurement of femoral rollback and medial collateral ligament (MCL) strain during mid-flexion. One knee from each cadaver was randomly designated to the KA TKA group (with the joint line restored to the pre-arthritic condition) and the other to the MA TKA group (with the joint line perpendicular to the mechanical axis). Optical markers were attached to all knees and rollback was analyzed using motion capture cameras. A video extensometer measured real-time variations in MCL strain. The kinematics and MCL strain prior to and following TKA were measured for all specimens. Results: KA TKA was better for restoring the knee kinematics to the native condition than MA TKA. The mid-flexion femoral rollback and axial rotation after KA TKA were consistently comparable to those of the native knee. Meanwhile, those of MA TKA were similar only at ≤40° of flexion. Furthermore, KA TKA better restored the mid-flexion MCL strain to that of the native knee than MA TKA. Over the entire mid-flexion range, the MCL strain of KA TKA and native knees were similar, while the strains of MA TKA knees were more than twice those of native knees at >20° of flexion. Conclusions: The restored joint line after KA TKA effectively reproduced the native mid-flexion rollback and MCL strain, whereas the altered joint line after MA TKA did not. Our findings may explain why patients who undergo KA TKA experience superior outcomes and more natural knee sensations during daily activities than those treated via MA TKA.

The Trochlear Groove of a Femoral Component Designed for Kinematic Alignment Is Lateral to the Quadriceps Line of Force and Better Laterally Covers the Anterior Femoral Resection Than a Mechanical Alignment Design.

Background: A concern about kinematically aligned (KA) total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is that it relies on femoral components designed for mechanical alignment (MAd-FC) that could affect patellar tracking, in part, because of a trochlear groove orientation that is typically 6° from vertical. KA sets the femoral component coincident to the patient’s pre-arthritic distal and posterior femoral joint lines and restores the Q-angle, which varies widely. Relative to KA and the native knee, aligning the femoral component with MA changes most distal joint lines and Q-angles, and rotates the posterior joint line externally laterally covering the anterior femoral resection. Whether switching from a MAd- to a KAd-FC with a wider trochlear groove orientation of 20.5° from vertical results in radiographic measures known to promote patellar tracking is unknown. The primary aim was to determine whether a KAd-FC sets the trochlear groove lateral to the quadriceps line of force (QLF), better laterally covers the anterior femoral resection, and reduces lateral patella tilt relative to a MAd-FC. The secondary objective was to determine at six weeks whether the KAd-FC resulted in a higher complication rate, less knee extension and flexion, and lower clinical outcomes. Methods: Between April 2019 and July 2022, two surgeons performed sequential bilateral unrestricted caliper-verified KA TKA with manual instruments on thirty-six patients with a KAd- and MAd-FC in opposite knees. An observer measured the angle between a line best-fit to the deepest valley of the trochlea and a line representing the QLF that indicated the patient’s Q-angle. When the trochlear groove was lateral or medial relative to the QLF, the angle is denoted + or −, and the femoral component included or excluded the patient’s Q-angle, respectively. Software measured the lateral undercoverage of the anterior femoral resection on a Computed Tomography (CT) scan, and the patella tilt angle (PTA) on a skyline radiograph. Complications, knee extension and flexion measurements, Oxford Knee Score, KOOS Jr, and Forgotten Joint Score were recorded pre- and post-operatively (at 6 weeks). A paired Student’s T-test determined the difference between the KA TKAs with a KAd-FC and MAd-FC with a significance set at p < 0.05. Results: The final analysis included thirty-five patients. The 20.5° trochlear groove of the KAd-FC was lateral to the QLF in 100% (15 ± 3°) of TKAs, which was greater than the 69% (1 ± 3°) lateral to the QLF with the 6° trochlear groove of the MAd-FC (p < 0.001). The KAd-FC’s 2 ± 1.9 mm lateral undercoverage of the anterior femoral resection was less than the 4.4 ± 1.5 mm for the MAd-FC (p < 0.001). The PTA, complication rate, knee extension and flexion, and clinical outcome measures did not differ between component designs. Conclusions: The KA TKA with a KAd-FC resulted in a trochlear groove lateral to the QLF that included the Q-angle in all patients, and negligible lateral undercoverage of the anterior femoral resection. These newly described radiographic parameters could be helpful when investigating femoral components designed for KA with the intent of promoting patellofemoral kinematics.

Low tibial baseplate migration 1year after unrestricted kinematically aligned total knee arthroplasty using a medial conforming implant design.

Varus alignment of the tibial baseplate and limb > 3° might adversely affect baseplate fixation after total knee arthroplasty (TKA), especially for unrestricted kinematically aligned (KA) TKA which aligns a majority of baseplates in varus. The purposes of this study were to determine whether baseplate migration at 1year (1) was significantly less than a stability limit of 0.5mm, (2) increased over time, and (3) was related to varus alignment of the baseplate and limb after unrestricted KA TKA. Thirty-five patients underwent unrestricted KA TKA using a fixed-bearing, cemented, medial conforming tibial insert with posterior cruciate ligament retention. Using model-based radiostereometric analysis, maximum total point motion (MTPM) (i.e., largest displacement on the baseplate) was computed at 6weeks, 3months, 6months, and 1year postoperatively relative to the day of surgery. Baseplate and limb alignment were measured postoperatively on long-leg CT scanograms. At 1year, mean MTPM of 0.35mm was significantly less than the 0.5mm stability limit (p = 0.0002). Mean MTPM did not increase from 6weeks to 1year (p = 0.3047). Notably, 89% (31/35) of tibial baseplates and 46% (16/35) of limbs were > 3° varus. Baseplate and limb alignment had no relationship to MTPM at 1year (|r|≤ 0.173, p ≥ 0.3276). Low and non-progressive tibial baseplate migration 1year after unrestricted KA TKA with a medial conforming design should allay any concern that unrestricted KA TKA increases risk of baseplate looseningdue to varus alignment of the baseplate and limb. Level II, therapeutic prospective cohort study.

Effects of Femoral Component Design on the Deepest Point Position of the Trochlear Grove in Kinematically Aligned Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Comparison of Four Prothesis Designs.

The aim of the study is to explore and compare the differences in trochlear shape and knee anatomy between four types of prostheses and preoperative native knee matched with preoperative computed tomography (CT). Thirty patients were scheduled for primary kinematically aligned total knee arthroplasty (TKA) for varus knee osteoarthritis at our hospital and the region between their pelvis to ankle joint was simulated using a CT-based three-dimensional planning software. The axial plane containing the transepicondylar axis was set as Slice A, and the 10-mm distal plane from Slice A was set as Slice B. The distances to the deepest trochlear groove between the native knee and each prosthesis and the medial and lateral facet heights were compared among the four groups. The deepest femoral trochlear groove of the prostheses was located 1.6 to 3.0 mm more medial than that of the native knee, and in the Persona group, it was significantly more medial than in the e-motion or Triathlon groups on both Slices A and B. The native knee and the medial and lateral facet heights of the four prostheses on both Slices A and B were significantly lower than those of preoperative native knees when femoral prostheses were set in the kinematically aligned (KA)-TKA position. The deepest point of the trochlear groove of the Persona group was the most medial among the four prostheses studied, and the deepest points differed depending on the prosthesis design in KA-TKA. Thus, surgeons should carefully select the type of prostheses used in KA-TKA.