Integrated assessment models are increasingly used to build prospective life cycle databases. While these models provide projections on an economy-wide scale, they can lack detail, with some industries aggregated at sector level and a technological resolution that tends to be too low for the demands of an LCA. This limitation hinders the accurate modelling of several industries in a prospective LCA. This paper aims to bridge the gap in detail between LCA and Integrated assessment models by means of an econometric model, using the cement industry as a case study. While this model sits outside of the integrated assessment model, it ensures consistency with the integrated assessment model's scenario by using data from the integrated assessment model to build its projections. The case study estimates the capital stock required, the fuel mix in the kiln, the most cost-effective kiln type and finally the capital stock composition. This was done for a baseline, moderate and climate stringent scenario, for the EU, USA and Canada. The projections of the model were integrated into a prospective life cycle assessment to determine the global warming potential of clinker production in the future. Results show an increase in alternative fuel use, especially for the EU. The use of natural gas increases for the USA and Canada but remains negligent for the EU. Kilns with carbon capture are adopted, if the carbon tax is high enough and the alternative fuel share is not too high.