Key Secondary Endpoints Research Articles

Complete vs Culprit-Only Revascularization in Older Patients With Myocardial Infarction With or Without ST-Segment Elevation.

The effectiveness of complete revascularization is well established in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), but it is less investigated in those with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI). This study aimed to assess whether complete revascularization, compared with culprit-only revascularization, was associated with consistent outcomes in older patients with STEMI and NSTEMI. In the FIRE (Functional Assessment in Elderly MI Patients with Multivessel Disease) trial, 1,445 older patients with myocardial infarction (MI) were randomized to culprit-only or physiology-guided complete revascularization, stratified by STEMI (n=256 culprit-only vs n=253 complete) and NSTEMI (n=469 culprit-only vs n=467 complete). The primary outcome comprised a composite of death, MI, stroke, or revascularization at 1 year. The key secondary outcome included a composite of cardiovascular death or MI at 1 year. In the overall study population, physiology-guided complete revascularization reduced both primary and key secondary outcomes. The primary outcome occurred in 54 (21.1%) STEMI patients randomized to culprit-only vs 41 (16.2%) STEMI patients of the complete group (HR: 0.75; 95%CI: 0.50-1.13) and in 98 (20.9%) NSTEMI patients randomized to culprit-only vs 72 (15.4%) NSTEMI patients of the complete group (HR: 0.71; 95%CI: 0.53-0.97), with negative interaction testing (P for interaction, 0.846). Similarly, no signal of heterogeneity with respect to the initial clinical presentation was observed for the key secondary endpoint (P for interaction, 0.654). Physiology-guided complete revascularization, compared with culprit-only revascularization, providedconsistent benefit across the whole spectrum of patients with MI. (FIRE [Functional Assessment in Elderly MI Patients With Multivessel Disease]; NCT03772743).

Outcomes of newly diagnosed atrial fibrillation in patients with acute coronary syndromes.

Acute coronary syndrome (ACS) is frequently accompanied by newly diagnosed atrial fibrillation (AF). We aimed to compare the risk of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) in ACS patients presenting with known, newly diagnosed, or no AF. In our multicentre, prospective registry study, we included patients with confirmed ACS. Patients are classified as having known, newly diagnosed or no AF. Newly diagnosed AF is subdivided according to the duration of the episode, time of onset, post-coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) or spontaneous occurrence, and treatment with oral anticoagulants (OAC). The primary endpoint is MACE at 1 year. Key secondary endpoints include ischaemic stroke and bleeding complications. Amongst 4,433 patients with confirmed ACS, 3,598 (81.2%) had no AF, 438 (9.9%) had newly diagnosed AF, and 397 (9.0%) had known AF. The rates of OAC treatment at discharge were 53.4% in patients with newly diagnosed AF and 89.2% in patients with known AF. After adjusting for baseline imbalances, only new AF was independently associated with increased rates of MACE, whereas known AF was not (hazard ratio [HR] 1.52, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.19-1.90 and HR 0.93, 95% CI: 0.70-1.23). For ACS patients with newly diagnosed AF, episodes lasting >24 hours were associated with a higher risk of MACE compared to episodes <24 hours (HR 1.99, 95% CI: 1.36-2.93). Episodes of new AF occurring post-CABG had more favourable outcomes compared to spontaneously occurring new AF (HR for MACE 0.52, 95% CI: 0.31-0.86). OAC treatment rates were higher in the new AF subcategories with higher rates of MACE and ischaemic stroke. Newly diagnosed AF in ACS patients was associated with higher rates of MACE and ischaemic stroke compared to ACS patients without or with known AF. Among the ACS patients with new AF, an episode lasting >24 hours was associated with worse outcomes than shorter episodes, while post-CABG occurrence of AF showed relatively better outcomes compared to spontaneously occurring AF. Only 53% of new AF patients were discharged on OAC therapy versus 89% with known AF.

Tocilizumab Prophylaxis Following Axicabtagene Ciloleucel in Relapsed or Refractory Large B-Cell Lymphoma

Axicabtagene ciloleucel (axi-cel) is an autologous anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy approved in patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL). Most patients treated with axi-cel experience cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and/or adverse neurologic events (NEs). To explore potential approaches for reducing CAR T-cell-related toxicities with axi-cel, several safety expansion cohorts were added to the pivotal ZUMA-1 trial. ZUMA-1 Cohort 3 was an exploratory safety cohort that investigated the use of the IL-6 receptor-blocking antibody tocilizumab and anticonvulsant levetiracetam as prophylaxis against CRS and NEs in patients treated with axi-cel. Patients with R/R LBCL were enrolled in Cohort 3 and received conditioning chemotherapy on d -5 through -3 followed by a single infusion of axi-cel (2 × 106 cells/kg) on d 0. Prophylactic tocilizumab (8 mg/kg) was administered 48 h after axi-cel infusion. Primary endpoints were incidence and severity of CRS and NEs. Key secondary endpoints included the incidence of adverse events, objective response rate (ORR), duration of response, progression-free survival, overall survival (OS), and biomarker analyses (eg, circulating CAR T cells, cytokines, chemokines). Forty-two patients were enrolled in Cohort 3, 38 of whom received axi-cel. In the 24-month analysis, any-grade CRS and NEs occurred in 92% and 87% of patients, and Grade ≥3 CRS and NEs occurred in 3% and 42% of patients, respectively. One Grade 5 NE (cerebral edema) occurred. With 24-mo minimum follow-up, the ORR was 63%, and 39.5% of patients had ongoing response. With 48-month follow-up, median OS was 34.8 mo (95% CI, 5.4-not estimable). CAR T-cell expansion in ZUMA-1 Cohort 3 was comparable with pivotal Cohorts 1 and 2. Consistent with tocilizumab-mediated inhibition of IL-6R, serum IL-6 levels were increased relative to Cohorts 1 and 2. Grade ≥3 NEs were associated with elevated IL-6 levels, proinflammatory cytokines, and myeloid cells in the cerebrospinal fluid. Based on these findings, prophylactic tocilizumab is not recommended to prevent CAR T-cell-related adverse events, and beneficial effects of prophylactic levetiracetam remain uncertain in patients with R/R LBCL.

Vebreltinib for Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Harboring c-Met Exon 14 Skipping Mutation: A Multicenter, Single-Arm, Phase II KUNPENG Study.

The KUNPENG study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of vebreltinib (also known as bozitinib, APL-101, PLB-1001, and CBT-101), a potent and highly selective inhibitor of c-mesenchymal-epithelial transition (MET), in patients with locally advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) harboring c-Met alterations. This multicenter, multicohort, open-label, single-arm, phase II trial enrolled patients with c-Met dysregulated, locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC from January 2020 to August 2022 across 17 centers. Cohort 1 included patients with MET exon 14 skipping (METex14)-mutant NSCLC who had not previously received MET inhibitors. Participants were administered vebreltinib at a dosage of 200 mg twice a day in 28-day cycles. The primary end point was the objective response rate (ORR), and the key secondary end point was the duration of response (DoR), both evaluated by a blinded independent review committee according to the RECIST version 1.1. As of August 9, 2022, 52 patients had been enrolled in cohort 1, of whom 35 (67.3%) were treatment-naïve. The ORR reached 75% (95% CI, 61.1 to 86). Among treatment-naïve patients, the ORR was 77.1% (95% CI, 59.9 to 89.6), and in previously treated patients, it was 70.6% (95% CI, 44.0 to 89.7). The disease control rate was 96.2%, with a median DoR of 15.9 months, a median progression-free survival of 14.1 months, and a median overall survival of 20.7 months. The most common treatment-related adverse events were peripheral edema (82.7%), QT prolongation (30.8%), and elevated serum creatinine (28.8%). Vebreltinib has shown promising efficacy and a favorable safety profile in patients with METex14-mutant NSCLC.

Trial Protocol of a Phase II Study of mFOLFOXIRI after Metastasectomy in Patients with Oligometastatic Colorectal Cancer (FANTASTIC Study).

The survival benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy after surgical resection of oligometastases from colorectal cancer (CRC) remains unclear. The prognostic role of circulating-tumor DNA (ctDNA) was reported recently and a risk stratification strategy based on monitoring minimal/molecular residual disease (MRD) has been proposed, however, which drug regimen is most effective for ctDNA-positive patients is unknown. Oligometastatic CRC patients planning to undergo surgery were registered in this study. After metastasectomy, the registered patients were enrolled in the treatment arm, in which 8 courses of modified-FOLFOXIRI (mFOLFOXIRI; irinotecan 150 mg/m2, oxaliplatin 85 mg/m2, l-leucovorin (l-LV) 200 mg/m2, and 46-h continuous infusion of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) 2400 mg/m2 every 2 weeks) followed by 4 courses of 5-FU/l-LV are administered. The patients who did not meet the eligibility criteria for the treatment arm or did not consent to mFOLFOXIRI enrolled in the observation arm in which standard of care treatment is provided. Prospective blood collections for retrospective ctDNA analysis are scheduled pre-surgery, and at 28 days, 4 and 7 months after surgery. The primary endpoint is treatment compliance at 8 courses of mFOLFOXIRI and the key secondary endpoints are the ctDNA-positivity rate and survival outcomes in ctDNA-positive and -negative groups. A total of 85 patients will be enrolled from 11 institutions. First patient-in was on July 2020. Accrual completed in February 2024. This study will potentially identify a better treatment strategy for patients with resectable oligometastatic CRC having postsurgical ctDNA positivity, compared to the current standard of care approaches.

Visceral fat mass dynamics in a 2-year randomized STrength versus ENdurance training trial in people with obesity.

To compare the effectiveness of strength versus endurance training on reducing visceral fat in individuals with obesity. For the STrength versus ENdurance (STEN) 24-month randomized clinical trial, we assigned 239 participants with abdominal obesity to either strength or endurance training (two to three times a week, 60 min/training session) in addition to standard nutritional counselling to promote a healthy diet. Changes in abdominal visceral adipose tissue (VAT) area quantified by magnetic resonance imaging after 12 months were defined as a primary endpoint. Participants (aged 44 years, 74% women, body mass index: 37 kg/m2, mean VAT volume: 4050 cm3) had an approximately 50% retention rate and a 30% good training programme adherence at 12 months. There was no difference between strength and endurance training in VAT volume dynamics after 12 and 24 months (p = .13). Only in the good adherence group did we find a trend for reduced VAT volume in both training regimens. Independently of the exercise programme, there was a continuous trend for moderate loss of abdominal subcutaneous AT volume, body fat mass, body mass index and improved parameters of insulin sensitivity. Although parameters of physical fitness improved upon both exercise interventions, the dynamics of resting energy expenditure, glucose and lipid metabolism parameters were not different between the intervention groups and did not significantly improve during the 2-year trial (p > .05). Despite heterogeneous individual training responses, strength and endurance training neither affected VAT volume nor key secondary endpoints differently.

Venetoclax-obinutuzumab for previously untreated chronic lymphocytic leukemia: 6-year results of the randomized phase 3 CLL14 study

AbstractIn the CLL14 study, patients with previously untreated chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) and coexisting conditions were randomized to 12 cycles of venetoclax-obinutuzumab (Ven-Obi, n = 216) or chlorambucil-obinutuzumab (Clb-Obi, n = 216). Progression-free survival (PFS) was the primary end point. Key secondary end points included time-to-next-treatment (TTNT), rates of undetectable minimal residual disease (uMRD), overall survival (OS), and rates of adverse events. Patient reported outcomes of time until definitive deterioration (TUDD) in quality of life (QoL) were analyzed. At a median observation time of 76.4 months, PFS remained superior for Ven-Obi compared with Clb-Obi (median, 76.2 vs 36.4 months; hazard ratio [HR], 0.40; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.31-0.52; P < .0001). Likewise, TTNT was longer after Ven-Obi (6-year TTNT, 65.2% vs 37.1%; HR, 0.44; 95% CI, 0.33-0.58; P < .0001). In the Ven-Obi arm, presence of del(17p), unmutated immunoglobulin heavy-chain variable region, and lymph node size of ≥5 cm were independent prognostic factors for shorter PFS. The 6-year OS rate was 78.7% in the Ven-Obi and 69.2% in the Clb-Obi arm (HR, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.48-1.01; P = .052). A significantly longer TUDD in global health status/QoL was observed in the Ven-Obi than in the Clb-Obi arm (median, 82.1 vs 65.1 months; HR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.51-0.97). Follow-up–adjusted second primary malignancies incidence rates were 2.3 and 1.4 per 1000 patient-months in the Ven-Obi and Clb-Obi arm, respectively. The sustained long-term survival and QoL benefits support the use of 1-year fixed-duration Ven-Obi in CLL. This trial was registered at www.ClinicalTrials.gov as #NCT02242942.

Efficacy and safety of eculizumab in Guillain-Barré syndrome: A phase 3, multicenter, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial.

Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS) is an acute, self-limited, immune-mediated peripheral neuropathy. Current treatments for GBS include intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) and plasma exchange, which may not sufficiently benefit severely affected patients. This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of eculizumab add-on therapy to IVIg (standard-of-care treatment) in patients with severe GBS. This phase 3, multicenter, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial (NCT04752566), enrolled Japanese adults (age ≥ 18 years) with severe GBS (Hughes functional grade [FG] score FG3 or FG4/FG5 within 2 weeks of onset of GBS). Participants were randomized 2:1 to receive intravenous infusion of eculizumab or placebo (once weekly for 4 weeks) with IVIg treatment with 20 weeks of follow-up. Primary efficacy endpoint was the time to first reach FG score ≤1 (able to run). Key secondary endpoints were proportion of participants achieving FG ≤1 at weeks 8 and 24 and FG improvement ≥3 at week 24. Pharmacodynamic analysis of serum free C5 concentration over time was performed. Safety was evaluated. The analysis included 57 participants (eculizumab, n = 37; placebo, n = 20). Primary endpoint was not achieved (hazard ratio, 0.9; 95% CI, 0.45-1.97; p = .89). Key secondary endpoints did not reach statistical significance. Serum C5 concentration was reduced by 99.99% at 1 h postdose and sustained to week 5 but returned to baseline at the end of follow-up period. No new safety signals for eculizumab were identified. Although well tolerated, eculizumab treatment did not show significant effects on motor function recovery compared to placebo in patients with GBS.

Dupilumab in Adults With Moderate to Severe Atopic Dermatitis

Moderate to severe atopic dermatitis (AD) is a chronic inflammatory skin disease that often requires continuous long-term systemic management. Long-term safety and efficacy data for treatment options are critically important. To assess the safety and efficacy of dupilumab treatment for up to 5 years in adults with moderate to severe AD. The 5-year LIBERTY AD open-label extension study was conducted from September 2013 to June 2022 at 550 sites in 28 countries. The study enrolled adult patients with moderate to severe AD who had participated in previous dupilumab clinical trials. Data were analyzed from August 2022 to February 2023. At enrollment, patients initiated a regimen of subcutaneous dupilumab, 200 mg, weekly (400-mg loading dose). The regimen was amended in June 2014 to dupilumab, 300 mg, weekly (600-mg loading dose) based on a dose-ranging study and again in November 2019 to dupilumab, 300 mg, every 2 weeks to align with the regulatory regimen approvals. The primary end points were the incidence and rate of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs). Key secondary end points included incidence and rate of serious TEAEs and adverse events of special interest, proportion of patients achieving an Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) score of 0 or 1 (clear or almost clear), and proportion of patients with 75% or more improvement in the Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) from the parent study baseline. A total of 2677 patients were enrolled and treated in the open-label extension study; 1611 (60.2%) were male, and the mean (SD) age was 39.2 (13.4) years. A total of 334 patients (12.5%) completed treatment up to week 260. The most common reasons for withdrawal were due to regulatory approval of dupilumab in compliance with the study protocol (810 of 1380 [58.7%]), patient withdrawal (248 of 1380 [18.0%]), and adverse events (116 of 1380 [8.4%]). Exposure-adjusted rates of TEAEs were generally stable or declined throughout the study. Common TEAEs (incidence of 5% or greater) included nasopharyngitis, worsening AD, upper respiratory tract infection, conjunctivitis, conjunctivitis allergic, headache, oral herpes, and injection-site reaction. At week 260, 220 of 326 patients (67.5%) achieved an IGA score of 0 or 1 and 288 of 324 (88.9%) achieved 75% or greater improvement in the EASI. The mean (SD) EASI score was 16.39 (14.60) at baseline and 2.75 (5.62) at end of study. In this study, there was sustained safety and efficacy of continuous long-term dupilumab treatment for adults with moderate to severe AD.

Total neoadjuvant therapy with mFOLFIRINOX versus preoperative chemoradiotherapy in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer: long-term results of the UNICANCER-PRODIGE 23 trial

The standard of care for the treatment of locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) results in an excellent local disease control but the metastasis rates remain high. PRODIGE 23 demonstrated improved disease-free survival (DFS) and metastasis-free survival (MFS) with total neoadjuvant therapy versus standard of care in this population. Long-term analysis of overall survival (OS) is reported here. The study design, participants, and primary endpoint DFS have been reported for this multicenter, randomized, open-label, phase III trial investigating the neoadjuvant chemotherapy with mFOLFIRINOX (6 cycles) followed by chemoradiotherapy, surgery, and adjuvant chemotherapy (6 cycles), versus chemoradiotherapy, surgery, and adjuvant chemotherapy (12 cycles) in patients with locally advanced rectal adenocarcinoma under peritoneal reflection on magnetic resonance imaging, and staged cT3/T4. Key secondary endpoints included OS, MFS, and local and metastatic recurrence rate. With a median follow-up of 82.2 months, the 7-year DFS was 67.6% [95% confidence interval (CI) 60.7% to 73.9%] and 62.5% (95% CI 55.6% to 68.6%) [restricted mean survival time (RMST) difference 5.73 months, 95% CI 0.05-11.41 months, P= 0.048] in the neoadjuvant chemotherapy and the standard-of-care groups, respectively. The 7-year MFS was 79.2% (95% CI 73.0% to 84.4%) in the neoadjuvant chemotherapy group and 72.3% (95% CI 65.8% to 77.8%) in the standard-of-care group (RMST difference 6.1 months, 95% CI 0.93-11.37 months, P= 0.021). The 7-year OS was 81.9% (95% CI 75.8% to 86.6%) in the neoadjuvant chemotherapy group and 76.1% (95% CI 69.7% to 81.2%) in the standard-of-care group (RMST difference 4.37 months, 95% CI 0.35-8.38 months, P= 0.033). The safety profile remained unchanged since the previous analysis. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy with mFOLFIRINOX followed by chemoradiotherapy improved OS, confirmed long-term DFS and MFS benefits in LARC patients, and should be considered as one of the best options of care for these patients.

Preclinical study and phase II trial of adapting low-dose radiotherapy to immunotherapy in small cell lung cancer

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) provide modest but unsatisfactory benefits for extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC). Developing strategies for treating ES-SCLC is critical. We preliminarily explored the outcomes of salvage low-dose radiotherapy (LDRT) plus ICI on refractory SCLC patients. Next, we evaluated the combinational efficacy in murine SCLC. The tumor immune microenvironment (TIME) was analyzed for mechanistic study. Subsequently, we conducted a multicenter, prospective phase II trial that administered concurrent thoracic LDRT plus chemoimmunotherapy to treatment-naive ES-SCLC patients (MATCH trial, NCT04622228). The primary endpoint was confirmed objective response rate (ORR), and the key secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS) and safety. Fifteen refractory SCLC patients treated with LDRT plus ICI were retrospectively reviewed. The ORR was 73.3% (95% confidence interval [CI], 44.9-92.2). We identified a specific dose of LDRT (15 Gy/5 fractions) that exhibited growth retardation and improved survival in murine SCLC when combined with ICIs. This combination recruited a special Tcell population, TCF1+ PD-1+ CD8+ stem-like Tcells, from tumor-draining lymph nodes into the TIME. The MATCH trial showed a confirmed ORR of 87.5% (95% CI, 75.9-94.8). The median PFS was 6.9months (95% CI, 5.4-9.3). These findings verified that LDRT plus chemoimmunotherapy was safe, feasible, and effective for ES-SCLC, warranting further investigation. This research was funded by West China Hospital (no. ZYJC21003), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (no. 82073336), and the MATCH trial was fully funded by Roche (China) Holding Ltd. (RCHL) and Shanghai Roche Pharmaceuticals Ltd. (SRPL).

Neoadjuvant short-course radiotherapy followed by camrelizumab and chemotherapy in locally advanced rectal cancer (UNION): early outcomes of a multicenter randomized phase III trial

Neoadjuvant short-course radiotherapy (SCRT) followed by CAPOX and camrelizumab (a programmed cell death protein 1 monoclonal antibody) has shown potential clinical activity for locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) in a phase II trial. This study aimed to further confirm the efficacy and safety of SCRT followed by CAPOX and camrelizumab compared to long-course chemoradiotherapy (LCRT) followed by CAPOX alone as neoadjuvant treatment for LARC. In this randomized, phase III trial, patients with T3-4/N+ rectal adenocarcinoma were randomly assigned (1 : 1) to receive SCRT or long-course chemoradiotherapy (LCRT), followed by two cycles of camrelizumab and CAPOX or CAPOX alone, respectively. After surgery, each arm underwent either six cycles of camrelizumab and CAPOX, followed by up to 17 doses of camrelizumab, or six cycles of CAPOX. The primary endpoint was pathological complete response (pCR) rate (ypT0N0) assessed by a blinded independent review committee. Key secondary endpoints tested hierarchically were 3-year event-free survival (EFS) rate and overall survival (OS). Between July 2021 and March 2023, the intention-to-treat population comprised 113 patients in the experimental arm and 118 patients in the control arm, with surgery carried out in 92% and 83.9%, respectively. At data cut-off (11 July 2023), the pCR rates were 39.8% [95% confidence interval (CI) 30.7% to 49.5%] in the experimental arm compared to 15.3% (95% CI 9.3% to 23.0%) in the control arm (difference, 24.6%; odds ratio, 3.7; 95% CI 2.0-6.9; P < 0.001). In each arm, surgical complication rates were 40.0% and 40.8%, and grade ≥3 treatment-related adverse events were 29.2% and 27.2%. Three-year EFS rate and OS continue to mature. In LARC patients, neoadjuvant SCRT followed by camrelizumab plus CAPOX demonstrated a significantly higher pCR rate than LCRT followed by CAPOX, with a well-tolerated safety profile. SCRT followed by camrelizumab and chemotherapy can be recommended as a neoadjuvant treatment modality for these patients.

Efficacy and safety of Tianqi Pingchan Granule, a compound Chinese herbal medicine, for levodopa-induced dyskinesia in Parkinson’s disease: A randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial

BackgroundPatients with Parkinson’s disease (PD) undergoing long-term levodopa therapy are prone to develop levodopa-induced dyskinesia (LID). Amantadine is the main drug recommended for the treatment of LID by current guidelines, but it is far from meeting clinical needs. Tianqi Pingchan Granule (TPG), a compound Chinese herbal medicine, has been developed to relieve symptom of LID. ObjectiveThis randomized controlled trial evaluated the efficacy and safety of the combination of TPG and amantadine for LID. Design, setting, participants and interventionsThis is a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial, conducted from January 2020 to August 2021 at 6 sites in Jiangsu, Zhejiang and Shanghai, China. One hundred PD patients with ≥ 0.5 h of LID were randomly assigned to either the TPG plus amantadine group (TPG group) or the placebo plus amantadine group (placebo group), and treated for a period of 12 weeks. To ensure unbiased results, all study participants, investigators and sponsors were unaware of group allocations. Additionally, the data analysts remained blinded until the analysis was finalized. Main outcome measuresThe primary outcome was assessed using the Unified Dyskinesia Rating Scale (UDysRS) (Range 0–104). The key secondary end point was improvement of motor and non-motor symptoms. Safety analyses included all enrolled patients. ResultsOne hundred patients were enrolled and randomized into the two treatment groups. The changes in UDysRS at week 12 were –11.02 for the TPG group and –4.19 for the placebo group (treatment difference –6.83 [–10.53 to –3.12]; P = 0.0004). Adverse events were reported for 2 of 50 patients (4.0%) in each of the groups. ConclusionThis study indicated that a 12-week treatment of amantadine plus TPG effectively reduced UDysRS scores and was well tolerated, demonstrating the efficacy and safety of TPG for the treatment of LID in PD.Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04173832. Please cite this article asZhang Y, Zhu XB, Zhao Y, Cui GY, Li WT, Yuan CX, Huang JP, Wan Y, Wu N, Song L, Zhao JH, Liang Y, Xu CY, Liu MJ, Gao C, Chen XX, Liu ZG. Efficacy and safety of Tianqi Pingchan Granule, a compound Chinese herbal medicine, for levodopa-induced dyskinesia in Parkinson’s disease: A randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial. J Integr Med. 2024; 22(5): 545–551.

Efficacy and safety of topical minocycline foam (FMX101 4%) in treatment of Chinese subjects with moderate‐to‐severe facial acne vulgaris: A phase 3, multi‐centre, randomized, double‐blind, vehicle‐controlled study

AbstractBackgroundFMX101 4%, as a topical foam formulation of minocycline, has been approved by US Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of moderate‐to‐severe acne vulgaris (AV).ObjectiveTo evaluate the efficacy and safety of FMX101 4% in treating Chinese subjects with moderate‐to‐severe facial AV.MethodsThis was a multi‐centre, randomized, double‐blind, vehicle‐controlled phase 3 study in Chinese subjects with moderate‐to‐severe AV. Eligible subjects were randomized 2:1 to receive either FMX101 4% or vehicle foam treatment for 12 weeks. The primary efficacy endpoint was the change in inflammation lesion count (ILC) from baseline at week 12. The key secondary endpoint was the treatment success rate according to Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) at week 12.ResultsIn total, 372 subjects were randomized into two groups (FMX101 4% group, n = 248; vehicle group, n = 124). After 12 weeks treatment, the reduction in ILC from baseline was statistically significant in favour of FMX101 4%, compared with vehicle foam (−21.0 [0.08] vs. −12.3 [1.14]; LSM [SE] difference, −8.7 [1.34]; 95% CI [−11.3, −6.0]; p &lt; 0.001). FMX101 4% treatment yielded significantly higher IGA treatment success rate at week 12 as compared to the control treatment (8.06% vs. 0%). Applying FMX101 4% also resulted in significant reduction in noninflammatory lesion count (nILC) versus vehicle foam at week 12 (−19.4 [1.03] vs. −14.9 [1.47]; LSM [SE] difference, −4.5 [1.74]; 95% CI [−8.0, −1.1]; p = 0.009). Most treatment‐emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were mild‐to‐moderate in severity, and no treatment‐related treatment‐emergent serious adverse event (TESAE) occurred. Thus, FMX101 4% was considered to be a safe and well‐tolerated product during the 12‐week treatment period.ConclusionFMX101 4% treatment for 12 weeks could lead to significantly reduced ILC and nILC, and improved IGA treatment success rate in Chinese subjects with moderate‐to‐severe facial AV. It also showed a well acceptable safe and tolerability profile.

Nemolizumab with concomitant topical therapy in adolescents and adults with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (ARCADIA 1 and ARCADIA 2): results from two replicate, double-blind, randomised controlled phase 3 trials

Nemolizumab, an interleukin (IL)-31 receptor subunit α antagonist, inhibits the IL-31 pathway of itch and skin inflammation in atopic dermatitis. Two international phase 3 studies were done to assess the efficacy and safety of nemolizumab in atopic dermatitis. In this Article we report results for the 16-week initial treatment period of both trials. ARCADIA 1 and ARCADIA 2 were identical 48-week randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 trials in adult and adolescent participants (aged ≥12 years) with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis, associated pruritus, and inadequate response to topical steroids. Participants were enrolled from 281 clinics, hospitals, and academic centres in 22 countries across both trials, and were randomly assigned (2:1) to receive nemolizumab 30 mg subcutaneously (baseline loading dose 60 mg) or matching placebo once every 4 weeks with background topical corticosteroids (TCS) with or without topical calcineurin inhibitors (TCI; ie, TCS-TCI background treatment). Randomisation was done via interactive response technology and stratified by baseline disease and pruritus severity. Study staff and participants were masked throughout the study, with outcome assessors masked until database lock. Coprimary endpoints at week 16 post-baseline were Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) success (score of 0 [clear skin] or 1 [almost clear skin] with a ≥2-point improvement from baseline) and at least 75% improvement in Eczema Area and Severity Index score from baseline (EASI-75 response). Outcome rates were compared between groups with the Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test adjusting for randomisation strata. The key secondary endpoints were the proportion of participants with Peak Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale (PP-NRS) score improvement of at least 4 points at weeks 1, 2, 4, and 16; PP-NRS score below 2 at weeks 4 and 16; Sleep Disturbance Numerical Rating Scale score improvement of at least 4 points at week 16; EASI-75 response plus PP-NRS score improvement of at least 4 points at week 16; and IGA success plus PP-NRS score improvement of at least 4 points at week 16. Efficacy analyses were done on an intention-to-treat basis; safety analyses included all participants who received one dose of nemolizumab or placebo. Both studies are completed (ClinicalTrials.gov: ARCADIA 1, NCT03985943 and ARCADIA 2, NCT03989349). Between Aug 9, 2019, and Nov 2, 2022, 1728 participants were enrolled across both trials: 1142 were allocated to nemolizumab plus TCS-TCI (620 in ARCADIA 1 and 522 in ARCADIA 2) and 586 to placebo plus TCS-TCI (321 in ARCADIA 1 and 265 in ARCADIA 2). ARCADIA 1 included 500 (53%) male participants and 441 (47%) female participants, and ARCADIA 2 included 381 (48%) male participants and 406 (52%) female participants. Mean age ranged from 33·3 (SD 15·6) years to 35·2 (17·0) years across the treatment groups. Both trials met the coprimary endpoints; at week 16, a greater proportion of participants receiving nemolizumab plus TCS-TCI versus placebo plus TCS-TCI had IGA success (ARCADIA 1: 221 [36%] of 620 vs 79 [25%] of 321, adjusted percentage difference 11·5% [97·5% CI 4·7-18·3], p=0·0003; ARCADIA 2: 197 [38%] of 522 vs 69 [26%] of 265, adjusted difference 12·2% [4·6-19·8], p=0·0006) and an EASI-75 response (ARCADIA 1: 270 [44%] vs 93 [29%], adjusted difference 14·9% [7·8-22·0], p<0·0001; ARCADIA 2: 220 [42%] vs 80 [30%], adjusted difference 12·5% [4·6-20·3], p=0·0006). Significant benefits were observed with nemolizumab for all key secondary endpoints including improvement in itch, as early as week 1, and sleep improvement by week 16. The safety profile was similar between nemolizumab plus TCS-TCI and placebo plus TCS-TCI. In the safety sets, 306 (50%) of 616 participants (ARCADIA 1) and 215 (41%) of 519 participants (ARCADIA 2) who received nemolizumab plus TCS-TCI had at least one treatment-emergent adverse event (serious treatment-emergent adverse events in six [1%] and 13 [3%], respectively); and 146 (45%) of 321 (ARCADIA 1) and 117 (44%) of 263 (ARCADIA 2) who received placebo plus TCS-TCI had at least one treatment-emergent adverse event (serious treatment-emergent adverse events in four [1%] and three [1%], respectively). Ten serious treatment-emergent adverse events possibly related to nemolizumab were reported in five (1%) participants in ARCADIA 2. No deaths occurred. Nemolizumab plus TCS-TCI was efficacious and showed statistically and clinically significant improvements in inflammation and itch in adults and adolescents with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis. Nemolizumab might offer a valuable extension of current therapies if approved. Galderma.

Left ventricular diastolic dysfunction in patients with heart failure with mildly reduced ejection fraction

ObjectiveThis study investigates the prevalence and prognostic impact of diastolic dysfunction (DD) in patients hospitalized with heart failure (HF) with mildly reduced ejection fraction (HFmrEF) in sinus rhythm. BackgroundData regarding the prognostic impact of DD in patients with HFmrEF is limited. MethodsFrom 2016 to 2022, all patients hospitalized with HFmrEF (i.e., left ventricular ejection fraction 41–49% and signs and/or symptoms of HF) were retrospectively included at one institution. Patients with DD were compared to patients without (i.e., non-DD), further risk stratification was performed according to the severity of DD. The primary endpoint was all-cause mortality at 30 months (interquartile range (IQR) 15–61 months), key secondary endpoint was rehospitalization for worsening HF. ResultsFrom a total of 1154 patients (median age 68 years, 68% males) hospitalized with HFmrEF, concomitant DD was present in 72% (grade I: 56%, grade II: 14%, grade III: 2%). Patients with DD were older (71 years vs. 65 years; p = 0.001) and presented with higher rates of cardiovascular comorbidities. The presence of DD was not associated with the risk of long-term all-cause mortality (adjusted HR = 0.815; 95% CI 0.612–1.085; p = 0.161) or HF-related rehospitalization (adjusted HR = 0.736; 95% CI 0.442–1.225; p = 0.238). Furthermore, the outcome did not differ in patients with more advanced stages of DD. ConclusionDD is commonly prevalent in patients with HFmrEF, but not associated with long-term prognosis.

Efficacy and safety of deuruxolitinib, an oral selective Janus kinase inhibitor, in adults with alopecia areata: Results from the Phase 3 randomized, controlled trial (THRIVE-AA1)

BackgroundAlopecia areata (AA) is a hair loss disorder that can seriously impact quality of life. Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors, including deuruxolitinib, have previously demonstrated significant hair regrowth in AA. ObjectiveThe Phase 3 THRIVE-AA1 randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial (NCT04518995) evaluated safety and efficacy of the oral JAK1/JAK2 inhibitor deuruxolitinib in adult patients with AA. MethodsPatients aged 18–65 years with ≥50% hair loss were randomized to deuruxolitinib 8 mg BID, deuruxolitinib 12 mg BID, or placebo for 24 weeks. The primary endpoint was percentage of patients achieving Severity of Alopecia Tool (SALT) score ≤20. A key secondary endpoint was percentage of satisfaction of hair patient-reported outcome (SPRO) responders. ResultsSignificantly higher proportions of patients taking deuruxolitinib met the primary endpoint (8 mg 29.6%; 12 mg 41.5% versus placebo 0.8%). Both deuruxolitinib doses achieved significant improvements in all secondary endpoints versus placebo, including SPRO (8 mg 42.1%; 12 mg 53.0% versus placebo 4.7%). Most treatment-emergent adverse events were mild or moderate, consistent with other oral JAK inhibitors. LimitationsFurther studies are required to understand longer-term safety, efficacy, and impact of treatment cessation. ConclusionBoth doses of deuruxolitinib were effective for hair regrowth. Patient satisfaction aligned with hair growth.

Early Conversion to Everolimus Within 180 Days of Living Donor Liver Transplantation.

Early conversion to Everolimus (EVR) post deceased donor liver transplant has been associated with improved renal function but increased rejection. Early EVR conversion has not been evaluated after living donor liver transplant (LDLT). A retrospective cohort study was conducted to compare the rate of rejection and renal function in patients converted to EVR early post-LDLT to patients on calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs). This was a single center retrospective cohort study of adult LDLT recipients between January 2012 and July 2019. Patients converted to EVR within 180 days of transplant were compared to patients on CNIs. The primary endpoint was biopsy proven acute rejection (BPAR) at 24 months posttransplant. Key secondary endpoints included eGFR at 24 months, change in eGFR, adverse events, and all-cause mortality. From a total of 173 patients involved in the study: 58 were included in the EVR group and 115 in the CNI group. Median conversion to EVR was 26 days post-LDLT. At 24 months, there was no difference in BPAR (22.7% EVR vs. 19.1% CNI, p = 0.63). Median eGFR at 24 months posttransplant was not significantly different (68.6 [24.8 to 112.4] mL/min EVR vs. 75.9 [35.6-116.2] mL/min CNI, p = 0.103). Change in eGFR from baseline was worse in the EVR group (-13.0 [-39.9 to 13.9] mL/min EVR vs. -5.0 [-31.2 to 21.2] mL/min CNI, p = 0.047). Median change from conversion to 24 months posttransplant (EVR group only) was -3.43mL/min/1.73 m2 (-21.0 to 9.6). Early EVR conversion was not associated with increased risk of rejection among LDLT recipients. Renal function was not impacted. EVR may be considered as an alternative after LDLT in patients intolerant of CNIs.

Salvaging the transected hypoglossal nerve using descendens hypoglossi in patients undergoing hypoglossal-facial nerve anastomosis for facial palsy: a randomized clinical trial.

Hypoglossal-facial nerve anastomosis (HFA) is the most commonly used surgical treatment for severe facial palsy that does not respond to conservative treatments. A major complication of HFA is the loss of tongue function. The authors aimed to evaluate whether anastomosing the transected hypoglossal nerve using the ramus descendens hypoglossi could prevent tongue deviation and dysfunction in patients undergoing HFA. In this randomized trial, adult patients with severe peripheral facial palsy (House-Brackmann grade V or VI) who did not respond to at least 6 months of conservative treatment were randomized at a 1:1 ratio to undergo either HFA alone (control group) or HFA plus anastomosis between the hypoglossal nerve and descendens hypoglossi (intervention group). The primary endpoint was tongue deviation angle at 12 months. Key secondary endpoints included tongue disability (chewing difficulty, swallowing defect, and articulation defect), tongue disability index (TDI; range 1-4, with a higher score indicating more severe disability), and facial nerve function. Twenty patients were enrolled (10 in each group). At 12 months, the tongue deviation angle was significantly lower in the intervention group than in the control group (7.8° ± 5.1° vs 23.6° ± 9.6°, p < 0.001). Although not statistically significant, the intervention group had lower rates of chewing difficulty (1/10 vs 3/10, p = 0.58), swallowing defect (1/10 vs 5/10, p = 0.14), and articulation defect (2/10 vs 6/10, p = 0.17). TDI was significantly lower in the intervention group (1.5 ± 0.6 vs 2.5 ± 0.3, p < 0.001). The percentage of the patients achieving House-Brackmann grade II or III was 80% in each group. Anastomosis of the descendens hypoglossi to the transected hypoglossal nerve attenuated tongue deviation in patients undergoing HFA for facial palsy, without compromising facial nerve function. Clinical trial registration no: ChiCTR2000034372 (Chinese Clinical Trials Registry).

Empagliflozin to prevent post-operative atrial fibrillation in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft surgery: Rationale and design of the EMPOAF trial.

Postoperative atrial fibrillation (POAF) is one of the most common types of acute AF and can complicate the treatment course of approximately one third of patients undergoing cardiac surgery. Sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitors are among the newest antidiabetic drugs which can be therapeutic options for preventing POAF by different mechanisms. Empagliflozin to Prevent POAF (EMPOAF) is an interventional, investigator-initiated, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter, randomized controlled trial which will be conducted in two referral teaching cardiology hospitals in Tehran. Four-hundred ninety-two adult patients who are scheduled for elective isolated coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery will be randomly assigned to one of the groups of intervention (empagliflozin 10mg daily) or placebo starting at least 3 days before surgery until discharge. Key exclusion criteria are a history of diabetes mellitus, AF, ketoacidosis, or recurrent urinary tract infections along with severe renal or hepatic impairment, unstable hemodynamics, and patients receiving SGLT2 inhibitors for another indication. The primary outcome will be the incidence of POAF. Key secondary endpoints will be the composite rate of life-threatening arrhythmias, postoperative acute kidney injury, hospitalization length, in-hospital mortality, stroke, and systemic embolization. Key safety endpoints will be the rate of life-threatening and/or genitourinary tract infections, hypoglycemia, and ketoacidosis. EMPOAF will prospectively evaluate whether empagliflozin 10mg daily can reduce the rate of POAF in patients undergoing elective CABG. Enrolment into this study has started by November 2023 and is expected to be ended before the end of 2025.