Key Cover Types Research Articles

Blanket bog CO2 flux driven by plant functional type during summer drought

AbstractRecent climate predictions for the United Kingdom expect a nationwide shift towards drier and warmer summers, increasing the risk of more frequent and severe drought events. Such shifts in weather patterns impede functioning of global peatlands, especially rare intact blanket bogs abundant in Scotland and representing nearly a quarter of the UK's soil carbon. In this in situ study, carbon dioxide (CO2) fluxes from dominant peatland plant functional types (PFTs) such as Sphagnum spp., graminoids, ericoids and other key cover types (i.e., pools and bare peat) were measured and compared across upland and low‐lying blanket bog margins and centres, immediately before and during a summer drought in 2018, and over the subsequent year. During that period, most sites acted as net sources of CO2 to the atmosphere. Our results showed that net ecosystem exchange (NEE) was limited by water availability during the drought, with ericoid shrubs showing the highest drought resilience, followed by graminoids (which were still limited in GPP in 2019) and Sphagnum mosses. Diverging NEE estimates were observed across centre and margin areas of the blanket bogs, with highest variability across the upland site where signs of active erosion were visible. Overall, our study suggests that estimating growing season carbon fluxes from in situ peatland PFT and cover types can help us better understand global climate change impacts on the dynamics and trajectories of peatland C cycles.

Display Behavior of Male Ruffed Grouse (Bonasa umbellus) In Two Key Cover Types In Minnesota

ABSTRACT Mechanisms underlying habitat use in most species are poorly understood. Therefore, we integrated behavioral and forest cover type data to test hypotheses underlying the choice of two key cover types used by male Ruffed Grouse (Bonasa umbellus) in northern Minnesota, USA. Forests of aspen (Populus spp.) are the presumptive highest quality cover type for Ruffed Grouse because this bird species achieves its highest breeding densities in this cover type. Yet, males select cover types of conifer even when nearby cover types of aspen remain vacant. We examined this conundrum – selection of inferior cover types when presumed better types are available – by randomly selecting 23 male Ruffed Grouse from among a contiguous population of territorial males and used automated video systems to monitor their breeding display behavior. We predicted that if conifer cover types were indeed inferior habitat for Ruffed Grouse, males that established territories in these cover types would either drum (auditory displ...