MLR, 96. , 200I MLR, 96. , 200I Whittakerdrawsparallelsbetween Druidism and Deism in Blake:beginning with TheFour Zoasnaturalreligion is associatedwith Druidism and priestcraftand linked with such elements of patriarchal religion as serpent worship and temples that enshrineauthority. One mightmention anothereighteenth-centurymovement thatinfluencedBlake, that stemming from Winckelmann's advice to revitalize art through producing more vivid portrayalsof traditionalfigures. Blake chose Britishmaterials to forge his epic works. Wordsworth,in the late I790s, also considered the use of British themes, but in a creative reverie was led instead to look within for the topic of his own epic. Thus he broke away from the eighteenth century and the burden of traditionto discovera new world of the imagination. FRAMINGHAMSTATE COLLEGE MARGARET STORCH England in I8i9.- ThePoliticsofLiterary Culture andtheCaseofRomantic Historicism.By JAMESCHANDLER.Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press. I998. xxii+ 584 pp. $35;?27.95. Romantic Imperialism. Universal Empire andtheCulture ofModernity. By SAREE MAKDISI. (CambridgeStudiesin Romanticism)Cambridge,New York,and Melbourne: CambridgeUniversityPress. I998. xv + 248 pp. ?37.50; $59.95 (paperbound ?I3.95; $18.95). Romanticism andColonialism: WritingandEmpire,I780-1830. Ed. by TIMFULFORD and PETERJ. KITSON. Cambridge, New York, and Melbourne: Cambridge UniversityPress. I998. xi + 287 pp.. ?35; $59.95. These books differently engage historical argument within literary criticism. Chandler'sEngland in i8i9, one of the largestand most importantRomantic studies for fifteenyears, offersa dual argument.The criticalargumentis that many British writings of the Romantic period and especially of 1819, canonical and noncanonical , are themselveshistoricist,includingannualizedrepresentationsof events and works,andjoining a representationalmissionwith a purpose of interventionin current conflicts. The meta-critical argument cites Sartre,Levi-Strauss,Althusser, Foucault,Marx, FredricJameson, and others, 'thepolitics of literaryrepresentation in a regime of historicism' (p. xiii). They repeat or continue the historicizing practices of the Romantic-period writers themselves. So to read writings of the Romantic period via historicismis to read them in accordwith theirown meanings and purposes rather than against them. What Chandler calls 'our contemporary "returnto history"' (p. xv) is conceptuallycontinuouswith Romantic writings. First, Chandler explains and documents the arguments about historicizing approaches to literary study. The book-length Part I discusses the hermeneutic superstructureforPartii. PartIalsodevelopsan account of therelationshipbetween polemical literaturesand the 'artof the state'(p. 94) via the tropeof'representation' in the spheresof artandpolitics(pp. 159-66). An 'Interchapter'on Thomas Moore, drawingheavily on the Journals of Thomas Moore(ed. by William S. Dowden, 6 vols (Cranbury,NJ: University of Delaware Press, 1983-9I)) illustratesthe extent and the characterof the activities of historicizingboth representationand intervention in the period. Partii presents'cases':TheBrideofLammermoor by WalterScott, Byron'sDonJuan, Keats's odes and especially'Ode to Psyche',WashingtonIrvingand Englishwriters on America, and Percy Bysshe Shelley. PartII presentspractical criticismbut also massive contextual detail and equally voluminous self-consciousness about the Whittakerdrawsparallelsbetween Druidism and Deism in Blake:beginning with TheFour Zoasnaturalreligion is associatedwith Druidism and priestcraftand linked with such elements of patriarchal religion as serpent worship and temples that enshrineauthority. One mightmention anothereighteenth-centurymovement thatinfluencedBlake, that stemming from Winckelmann's advice to revitalize art through producing more vivid portrayalsof traditionalfigures. Blake chose Britishmaterials to forge his epic works. Wordsworth,in the late I790s, also considered the use of British themes, but in a creative reverie was led instead to look within for the topic of his own epic. Thus he broke away from the eighteenth century and the burden of traditionto discovera new world of the imagination. FRAMINGHAMSTATE COLLEGE MARGARET STORCH England in I8i9.- ThePoliticsofLiterary Culture andtheCaseofRomantic Historicism.By JAMESCHANDLER.Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press. I998. xxii+ 584 pp. $35;?27.95. Romantic Imperialism. Universal Empire andtheCulture ofModernity. By SAREE MAKDISI. (CambridgeStudiesin Romanticism)Cambridge,New York,and Melbourne: CambridgeUniversityPress. I998. xv + 248 pp. ?37.50; $59.95 (paperbound ?I3.95; $18.95). Romanticism andColonialism: WritingandEmpire,I780-1830. Ed. by TIMFULFORD and PETERJ. KITSON. Cambridge, New York, and Melbourne: Cambridge UniversityPress. I998. xi + 287 pp.. ?35; $59.95. These books differently engage historical argument within literary criticism. Chandler'sEngland in i8i9, one of the largestand most importantRomantic studies for fifteenyears, offersa dual argument.The criticalargumentis that many British writings of the Romantic period and especially of 1819, canonical and noncanonical , are themselveshistoricist,includingannualizedrepresentationsof events and works,andjoining a representationalmissionwith a purpose of interventionin current conflicts. The meta-critical argument cites Sartre,Levi...