Soil is an indispensable and important natural resource and it is necessary to manage and monitor soil quality with appropriate methods in order to ensure the sustainability of the soil. The aim of this study is to determine the current state of soil quality in different land uses where soil functions change. This study was carried out in the Karasu river watershed with an area of 19,178 ha where Entisols soil order is dominant, located Andırın, Kahramanmaraş. The Soil Management Assessment Framework (SMAF) method and Principal Component Analysis (PCA) was used to assess the dynamic soil quality in watershed scale. In the evaluation of soil quality, random samples were taken from a total of 360 topsoil layers (0−30) according to land use and physiography. Soil indicators such as bulk density, aggregate stability, total organic carbon, pH, electrical conductivity, available phosphorus (P), potassium (K), available water amount and water-filled pore volume were selected to create the minimum data set (MDS). The results showed that the productivity, environmental protection, waste recycling quality scores and general soil quality index of forest lands are higher than agricultural lands. According to expert opinion, general soil quality scores were found to be 0.86 in forest land, 0.78 in crop land and 0.83 in grassland, while in PCA, general soil quality scores were calculated as 0.85 in forest land, 0.79 in crop land and 0.78 in grassland. Contribution level of soil functions to management targets was observed in water relations function the most. The contribution levels of the water relations function to the productivity, environmental protection and waste recycling management targets are 0.38, 0.32 and 0.34 in forest lands, 0.42, 0.33 and 0.35 in croplands, respectively; It was showed that 0.40, 0.33 and 0.36 in grasslands. Contribution rates of productivity, environmental protection and waste recycling management targets to soil quality were 30%, 37% and 33%, respectively, in forest lands; 29%, 37% and 34% in crop lands; It has been determined as 30%, 36% and 34% in the grasslands. Negative effects such as heavy rainfall in the watershed, wrong agricultural practices (excessive fertilization and irrigation, improper tillage, and crop selection, etc.) and excessive grazing have led to soil degradation and erosion, reducing the soil function capacity of agricultural lands and meadows. In order to increase the functional capacity of the soil, a soil management approach aimed at protection, improvement and sustainability must be adopted and implemented.
Read full abstract