BackgroundStudies have shown good reliability for gait analysis interpretation among surgeons from the same institution. However, reliability among surgeons from different institutions remains to be determined. Research questionIs gait analysis interpretation by surgeons from different institutions as reliable as it is for surgeons from the same institution? MethodsGait analysis data for 67 patients with cerebral palsy (CP) were reviewed prospectively by two orthopedic surgeons from different institutions in the same state, each with > 10 years’ experience interpreting gait analysis data. The surgeons identified gait problems and made treatment recommendations for each patient using a rating form. Percent agreement between raters was calculated for each problem and treatment, and compared to expected agreement based on chance using Cohen’s kappa. ResultsFor problem identification, the greatest agreement was seen for equinus (85% agreement), calcaneus (88%), in-toeing (89%), and out-toeing (90%). Agreement for the remaining problems ranged between 66–78%. Percent agreement was significantly higher than expected due to chance for all issues (p ≤ 0.01) with modest kappa values ranging from 0.12 to 0.51. Agreement between surgeons for treatment recommendations was highest for triceps surae lengthening (89% agreement), tibial derotation osteotomy (90%), and foot osteotomy (87%). Agreement for the remaining treatments ranged between 72–78%. Percent agreement for all treatments was significantly higher than the expected values (p ≤ 0.002) with modest kappa values ranging from 0.22 to 0.52. SignificancePrevious research established that computerized gait analysis data interpretation is reliable for surgeons within a single institution. The current study demonstrates that gait analysis interpretation can also be reliable among surgeons from different institutions. Future research should examine reliability among physicians from more institutions to confirm these results.
Read full abstract