Illusory contours demonstrate an important function of the visual system-object inference from incomplete boundaries, which can arise from factors such as low luminance, camouflage, or occlusion. Illusory contours can be perceived with varying degrees of clarity depending on the features of their inducers. The present study aimed to evaluate whether illusory contour clarity influences visual search efficiency. Experiment 1 compared visual search performance for Kanizsa illusory stimuli and nonillusory inducer stimuli when manipulating inducer size as a clarity factor. Experiment 2 examined the effects of illusory contour clarity on visual search by manipulating the number of rings with missing arcs (i.e., line ends) comprising the inducers, for both illusory and nonillusory stimuli. To investigate whether surface alterations had an impact on visual search in Experiment 1, Experiment 3 examined search performance for Kanizsa-like stimuli formed from "smoothed" inducers compared with standard Kanizsa figures. The results of Experiments 1 and 2 indicated that while Kanizsa produced inefficient search, this was not contingent on the clarity of the illusory contours. Experiment 3 suggested that surface alterations of Kanizsa figures did impact visual search performance. Together, the results indicated that illusory contour clarity did not have much bearing on search performance. In certain conditions, Kanizsa figures even facilitated search compared with nonillusory stimuli, suggesting that rather than contour inference, surface features might have greater relevance in guiding visual attention.
Read full abstract