Jurisprudential Inquiry Research Articles

Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Jurisprudential Inquiry Terhadap Kemampuan Menulis Teks Editorial Siswa Kelas XII SMA Negeri 2 Tanjung Morawa

This research was carried out with the aim of finding out the effect of the jurisprudential inquiry learning model on the ability to write editorial texts. The population of this study was all class XII of SMA Negeri 2 Tanjung Morawa, totaling 7 classes. The sample was taken with no more than 40 students per class, so class XII Science 2 had 35 students as the experimental class and class XII Science had 34 students as the control class. The instrument used is a test of the ability to write editorial texts. Data measurements were carried out twice, namely measurements in the experimental class and the control class. From the data processing, it shows that the ability to write editorial texts in class .05, standard deviation 13.15. This can be seen in the normality test, the jurisprudential inquiry learning model is Lcount < Ltable namely 0.205 < 0.337. Then in the conventional learning model Lcount < Ltable, namely 0.192 < 0.319. Because Lcount is smaller than Ltable, the two data above are said to be normally distributed. Likewise, the results of the data homogeneity test are Fcount < Ftable , namely 0.54 < 0.56, so the data comes from a homogeneous population. After testing normality and homogeneity, hypothesis testing was carried out, obtained tcount > ttable with hypothesis test results of 6.35 and significance a = 0.05 and df = 35+34-2 = 67, so at the 5% level we obtained ttable = 1.99601. Thus it can be concluded that tcount > ttable , namely 6.35 > 1.99601, so the null hypothesis (H0) is rejected and the alternative hypothesis (Ha) is accepted. This proves that the jurisprudential inquiry learning model is more influential in improving the editorial text writing skills of class XII students at SMA Negeri 2 Tanjung Morawa.

The Influence of the Jurisprudential Inquiry Learning Model Assisted by Video Media on the Intellectual Skills and Learning Outcomes of Students

Purpose of the study: The aim of this research is to find out (1) whether there is a significant influence in the application of the jurisprudential inquiry learning model assisted by video media on students' intellectual skills. (2) is there a significant influence in the application of the jurisprudential inquiry learning model assisted by video media on student learning outcomes
 Methodology: The population in this study were all class XI high school students who were divided into 4 classes. The sampling technique is random sampling. The sample in this research was students in class XI social sciences 1 and XI social sciences 2, totaling 66 students. The research method used is an experimental research method. The research design used was Quasi experimental design with nonequivalent control group design. The data collection techniques used are observation and tests. The data analysis technique used was the one-way ANOVA test with a significance level of 0.5%
 Main Findings: The results of the research show (1) there is a significant influence in the application of the jurisprudential inquiry learning model assisted by video media on students' intellectual skills as evidenced by the mean comparison of 22.8888: 20.8056 tested using one way ANOVA with a significance level of 5% obtained Fobs > F table (7.98131106 > 3.07). (2) there is a significant influence in the application of the jurisprudential inquiry learning model assisted by video media on student learning outcomes as evidenced by the mean comparison of 10.1111: 8.1949 which was tested with one way ANOVA with a significance level of 5% obtained Fobs > F table ( 27.35758 > 4.56)
 Novelty/Originality of this study: This research uses a jurisprudential inquiry learning model assisted by video media, which combines a legal learning approach and the use of video media. This approach can be considered its latest, because it tries to combine two different elements to improve student learning. This can provide new insights into how to improve intellectual skills and learning outcomes through a combination of innovative learning models and media

Implementation of Jurisprudential Inquiry Model to Improve Social Skills and Learning Outcomes of Elementary School

The study on the implementation of the Jurisprudential Inquiry Model (JIM) has been conducted at SDN Naioni 1, Kupang, Indonesia. This study will describe the model for implementing JIM to improve social skills and student learning outcomes using the classroom action research method following the McTaggart and Kemmis models on the 29 students. As a result, cycle I showed an increasing value of 2.57% to 3.33% in the sufficient and good categories, respectively. On the other hand, the social skills of students in social studies learning during the learning process showed an increasing value of 2.54% to 3.45% with good and outstanding categories, respectively. These results also affect the Minimum Completeness Criteria in cycle II. In conclusion, we propose implementing the jurisprudential inquiry model to improve fourth-grade students' social skills and learning outcomes at SD Negeri 1 Naioni Kota Kupang.

Effectiveness of Jurisprudential Inquiry Learning Model to Improve Student Learning Achievement in Geography Subject at SMAN 2 Bengkulu Utara

This study aims to explain (1) How the Jurisprudential Inquiry learning model can be applied to SMA N 2 Bengkulu Utara students to increase their social sensitivity, (2) If the Jurisprudential Inquiry learning model can be applied to SMA N 2 Bengkulu Utara students to improve student learning achievement, and (3) How the application of the Jurisprudential Inquiry learning model can effectively improve student learning achievement at SMA N 2 Bengkulu Utara. The classroom action research methodology was utilized in this study, followed by a quasi-experiment. Tests of learning achievement and observation were used to obtain data. Descriptive analysis and the t-test were employed in data analysis. Class XI IPS 3 students are the research subjects, and classes XI IPS 1 and XI IPS 2 are the experiment and control classes, respectively. The findings indicated that the adoption of the Jurisprudential Inquiry model could boost student learning achievement and social sensitivity and that it can significantly enhance learning achievement at SMA N 2 Bengkulu Utara.

The Application of Jurisprudential Inquiry Learning Model to Improve Students' Social Sensitivity and Learning Achievement

Jurisprudential Inquiry, is problem-solving orientated learning, especially related to the application of learning materials in real life. As long as students do problem-solving activities. Jurisprudential Inquiry will run effectively, if the application of learning centres on student activities, namely by developing students' ability to solve problems in real life (contextual), fostering reflective thinking, helping development in the active involvement of students in the learning process. The objectives of this study are: 1) Describing the application of the Jurisprudential Inquiry learning model can increase students' social sensitivity at SMA N 2 Bengkulu Utara. 2) Describing the application of the Jurisprudential Inquiry learning model can improve student learning achievement at SMA N 2 Bengkulu Utara. 3) Describe the application of the Jurisprudential Inquiry learning model can improve student learning achievement at SMA N 2 Bengkulu Utara. The research was conducted at SMA N 2 Bengkulu Utara on 23-25 January 2023. The research sample was XI IPS 1 and 2 class students with a total population of 50 people. Sampling technique using simple random sample research method. quantitative. The research instrument was carried out by classroom action research followed by a quasi-experiment by comparing the treatment of two different classes between the control class and the experimental class. Data collection techniques in this study used subject teacher observation data and questionnaires. The instrument used is an observation instrument sheet, questionnaire analysis Data analysis techniques using a Likert scale.Based on the results of observations and questionnaire results that students want a variety of learning models, one of which is the Jurisprudential Inquiry model.

The Dual State in the United States: The Case of Lynching and Legal Lynchings

Abstract This article uses Ernst Fraenkel’s concept of the “dual state” as the vehicle for examining the role of “lynch law” as a mode of governance of African Americans in the United States from 1865 to 1940 (roughly). It begins with a largely jurisprudential inquiry placing my interpretation of Ernst Fraenkel’s distinction between the normative state and the prerogative state in dialogue with a version of American Legal Realism, in which law consists entirely of “moves” such as permissible distinctions and analogies that are treated (sociologically) as acceptable by relevant professional communities. Seen through that lens the distinction between the normative state and the prerogative state thins out. The arbitrariness Fraenkel associates with the prerogative state infects the normative state and the prerogative state is pervaded by norms that aren’t mere simulacra of legal norms. The two kinds of state are different in degree rather than in kind—but differences in degree can matter. Part II uses the revised distinction in a preliminary examination of lynch law in the U.S. South. Lynch law was not an example of Fraenkel’s prerogative state; the norms enforced through lynch law might have been popular versions of norms drawn from the prerogative state. And yet “lynch law” was different not only in content from the rules of law formally applicable to all people in the United States but also in the lived experience of those subject to lynch law. Lynch law might not have been arbitrary in the sense that it had no knowable normative content, but, perhaps because the norms were popular rather than legislated or formal, it was substantially vaguer than the formal law and significantly less able to guide the choices made by those subject to it.

Effectiveness of Jurisprudential Inquiry Model of Teaching for Enhancing Achievement in Social Science and Social Tolerance among High School Students

Dare not to enter it unless you don’t love it (John Dewey) Teaching is an art as well as Science it is not everybody’s cup of tea. It is a mechanical process which develops all over development of child, The traditional teaching which was teacher centered and full of loopholes and contradiction, it was autocratic in nature. In Indian society there is everywhere social issues, political issues, social injustices and human rights violations. There is no such type of platform were students can rethink on these issues and try to resolve these issues. The Indian education system was not student centered in this system teacher was active and students were passive listeners. Keeping in the mind Oliver and Shaver developed a model namely Jurisprudential Inquiry Model of teaching. by the teaching through this model the students can raise the social issue, rethink on these social issues and try to resolve these issues. and develop social tolerance, by teaching through Jurisprudential Inquiry Model it will enhance social competency, social tolerance, problem solving ability, social leadership team work, SOCIAL TOLERENCE, empathy among the students. so it is a recent trend, it is a method of teaching, device of teaching, tool, technique of teaching through which all round development will be developed among the students.

Jurisprudential Inquiry Based on Edmodo to Improving Students Critical Thinking in Citizenship Education Courses

This study aims to prove and analyze the application of the jurisprudential inquiry method based on the Edmodo electronic learning media to improve students' critical thinking skills in the Citizenship Education course. This type of research uses classroom action research by developing a model from Stephen Kemmis & Robin McTaggart in the form of a cycle of planning, action and observation, and reflection. The research subjects were 32 students. The data collection technique used a structured observation instrument and a free description test. The data analysis technique used descriptive statistics frequencies with the help of the SPSS 24 application to process the data from the student critical thinking observation questionnaire, the one sample t test with SPSS 24 to see the results of student learning completeness, and the nonparametric test - binomal test with SPSS 24 to see the results classical student learning mastery. The results showed that the high level of critical thinking of students in the Citizenship Education course by applying the jurisprudential inquiry learning method assisted by the Edmodo application. Learning Citizenship Education is no longer a boring subject for students because lecturers can apply learning methods and learning media that are combined innovatively, creatively, and effectively.

Developing Jurisprudential Inquiry Based Learning Model of Teaching Fiqh at Madrasah Tsanawiyah

Learning is the most significant activity in education. Through learning activities, the goals of education are achieved. Students’ success in learning mostly depends on their mastery to learn independently and on how they manage their study. The research aims to develop learning model at Madrasah Tsanawiyah, to make the learning process triggers students to be more creative and study better. The method used in the research refers to the nature of Research and Development. The steps of the study are preliminary study, development, and product test. The study found that the development of a jurisprudential inquiry-based learning model for learning Fiqh helps students to improve their learning outcomes. The model has significantly proven effective to support students’ behavior change, thus their achievement increases.

THE INFLUENCE OF THE JURIDICAL CIVIC CRITICAL LEARNING MODEL ON CRIMINAL LAW COURSES AS AN ENHANCEMENT OF STUDENTS' CRITICAL THINKING

The juridical civic critical learning model is a combination of several other learning models such as the direct discussion learning model, the debate learning model and the jurisprudential inquiry learning model. The purpose of carrying out this research is to examine the level of knowledge, understanding, attitudes and behavior of students towards a criminal law incident and to increase it to a higher level. The juridical civic critical learning model trains students to be sensitive to social problems, take positions, towards these problems, and maintain these attitudes with relevant and valid arguments. Juridical civic critical learning model will later become a stimulus for students to increase critical thinking about social phenomena related to criminal law.

Pragmatic Reconstruction in Jurisprudence: Features of a Realistic Legal Theory

A century ago the pragmatists called for reconstruction in philosophy. Philosophy at the time was occupied with conceptual analysis, abstractions, a priori analysis, and the pursuit of necessary, universal truths. Pragmatists argued that philosophy instead should center on the pressing problems of the day, which requires theorists to pay attention to social complexity, variation, change, power, consequences, and other concrete aspects of social life. The parallels between philosophy then and jurisprudence today are striking, as I show, calling for a pragmatism-informed theory of law within contemporary jurisprudence. In the wake of H.L.A. Hart’s mid-century turn to conceptual analysis, “during the course of the twentieth century, the boundaries of jurisprudential inquiry were progressively narrowed.”1 Jurisprudence today is dominated by legal philosophers engaged in conceptual analysis built on intuitions, seeking to identify essential features and timeless truths about law. In the pursuit of these objectives, they detach law from its social and historical moorings, they ignore variation and change, they drastically reduce law to a singular phenomenon—like a coercive planning system for difficult moral problems2—and they deny that coercive force is a universal feature of law, among other ways in which they depart from the reality of law; a few prominent jurisprudents even proffer arguments that invoke aliens or societies of angels.

Gender differentials in the Use of Instructional Models in Enhancing Adolescents’ Interest and Achievement in Voter Education Contents of Senior Secondary School Government Curriculum

The study determined gender effect in the efficacy of group investigation and jurisprudential inquiry instructional models in enhancing adolescent students’ interest and achievement in voter education related contents of senior secondary school Government curriculum. The study adopted quasi-experimental non-equivalent pre-test, post-test control group design. Sample for the study consisted of 165 SS II students drawn from senior secondary schools in Nsukka Local Government Area of Enugu state Nigeria. Multi-stage sampling technique was used to select the intact classes from each of the schools that were assigned to the two experimental groups. Data collected using Multiple Choice Government Achievement Test (MCGAT) and Government Interest Inventory (GII) were analyzed using mean and standard deviation for the research questions and ANCOVA for testing the hypothesis at P < 0.05 level of significance. The findings showed that both group investigation and jurisprudential inquiry models were effective in enhancing interest and achievement of male and female students in voter education related contents in senior secondary school Government curriculum. However, group investigation proved more efficacious. These findings were exhaustively discussed with recommendations on how to manage gender factor in using student-centred instructional models in enhancing students’ interest and achievement.

Enhancing Voter Education Knowledge of Adolescents Through Social Interaction Instructional Models

The study determined the effects of group investigation and jurisprudential inquiry of social interaction instructional models on adolescents’ knowledge of voter education related contents in senior secondary school Government curriculum. The ultimate aim was to curb voter apathy among young citizens. The design was Quasi-experimental non-equivalent pre-test, post-test control group design. The sample for the study consisted of 165 SS II students drawn from public secondary schools in Nsukka Local Government Area of Enugu state Nigeria. Using a multi-stage sampling technique, the intact classes from the schools were assigned to the two experimental groups. Data collected using Multiple Choice Government Achievement Test (MCGAT) were analyzed employing mean and standard deviation for the research questions and ANCOVA for testing the hypothesis at P < 0.05 level of significance. The findings showed that group investigation and jurisprudential inquiry models enhanced students’ acquisition of knowledge in voter education related contents; although group investigation seemed more efficacious. There was also a statistical difference in the mean achievement scores of students with group investigation performing significantly better. These findings were exhaustively discussed with the far-reaching recommendations on how to improve voter education knowledge and potentials of young ones as future adult citizens.

Learning Model Jurisprudential Inquiry to Improve Critical Thinking of MTs N 1 Situbondo Students

The Jurisprudential Inquiry learning model is a learning model in its application facilitating learners to be sensitive to social problems, take a position on the problem, and maintain that position / attitude with relevant and valid arguments so as to improve students' critical thinking skills. Critical thinking in this research refers to five indicators, namely the ability to form conclusions, formulate questions, uncover problems, formulate alternative solutions. The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of Jurisprudential Inquiry learning model on critical thinking skills of MTs N 1 Situbondo students. This study uses experimental research design with the form of Quasi-Experimental Design with the type of pretest posttest control group design. The sample in this study was class VIII G numbering 22 students and VIII H a number of 24 students with purposive sampling sampling technique. The technique of collecting data uses test questions with the description form. The data analysis technique in this study is to use the independent sample t-test. The results of this study indicate that there is a significant influence on the use of the Jurisprudential Inquiry learning model on students' critical thinking with indicators formulating conclusions, formulating questions, expressing problems and providing alternative solutions. The results of the hypothesis test show tcount 3.362 and ttable with a significance level (5%) 0.05, degree of freedom (db) = (n-2) then obtained t(0.05) (44) table = 2.015. The results of tcount>ttable,which shows the results of 3.362> 2.015. As for the significance level of 5% (0.05) has a significance value α> 0.05, i.e. (2-tailed) 0.694> 0.05., it can be concluded that thelearning model is Jurisprudential Inquiry more influential than themodel Problem Solving on the critical thinking ability of students on the material emergence of national organizations and the growing spirit of nationalism.

The Destruction of Legal Reason: Lessons from the Past

The legal predicament of today in Europe and beyond takes the form of a devaluation of the meaning of legality, constitutionality and, of the rule of law. What we are dealing with is yet another crisis of both the tradition of the Rechtsstaat in continental setting and, more broadly, of liberal legality. While this disruption within the sphere of the law seems to mirror the reshuffling in established politics that took place over the last twenty years, it traces back to central jurisprudential questions that have made the substance of crucial debates during the interwar and have fashioned both the field of constitutional theory of the continent and our jurisprudential apparatus for approaching the nexus between law and politics. In this article I argue that the apparent uchronia that the current status of the law opens in relation to past theoretical questions that were seeking to ground legality, is neither a simple by-product of a Zeigeist oversaturated by appeals to procedural democracy or for returns to sovereign power, nor a mere regression to past juridico-political settings. It is a historical development that has been dormant for the past decades, yet has slowly undermined legal thought and praxis. Revisiting, as a matter of historical and jurisprudential inquiry, the context and the content of this original opposition between liberal legality and its enemy, is a way of understanding what constructs our own contemporary situation.

Development of futuristic thinking ability and futurist thinker characteristics for grade 12 students

This study developed the process of futuristic thinking ability and futurist thinker characteristics for Grade 12 students using the Jurisprudential Inquiry Model (JIM) with forecastingtechniques. In addition, theresearchers measured the students’ achievement regarding futuristic thinking ability and futuristic thinker characteristics according to the defined criteria.The target group in this study comprised 45 grade 12 students from Mueang Phayalae Wittaya School, Chaiyaphun province under the Secondary Educational Service Area Office 30 in semester 1 of the 2014 academic year. This target group had attended eight lessons planned using the JIM with forecasting techniques for a total of 16 hours. The instruments utilized in this study were observation form, student opinion record, instruction record, student interview record of learning activities, and post-test futuristic ability. Descriptive statistics were used to examine the students’ achievement in futuristic thinking ability and futurist thinker characteristics. The findings indicated that the grade 12 students had an average score of futuristic thinking ability of 21.40 accounting for 71.33 percent. In addition, the 37 students who met the criteria accounted for 82.22 percent which was higher than the defined criteria. All 45 students (100%) who had attended lessons utilizing the JIM with forecasting techniques presented high futuristic thinker characteristics. The findings contribute significantly to knowledge proposing futuristic thinking ability which can guide teachers in improving their teaching competencies to manage their students’ futuristic thinking abilities effectively.

Where did the Donoghue v. Stevenson Decision Come From? A Jurisprudential Inquiry

Is the concept of law primarily about taking rights seriously or a sociological process which produces a rule of recognition? Are Judges either Herberts or Hercules or they are simply consciously looking out to enforce values that have gone through the washing machine and consequently seeking stability, certainty, and following precedents? When judges depart from this role how far should they go creating new forms of rights even if that will disturb the natural order of society? The UK Supreme Court decision in Donoghue v. Stevenson was a landmark precisely because it extended the boundaries of torts and contract law; completely upending the principles of privity of contract and the traditional conception of the torts of negligence. In this essay, I will attempt to use Hartian ‘rules of recognition’ and Dworkinian ‘principles’ to explain how the Law Lords navigated the strict structures of legalism to arrive at a very fundamental ‘neighborliness principle’ that continues to be expanded so long as there is an established duty of care; a breach of that duty; and injury suffered.

The Effectiveness of Jurisprudential Inquiry Learning Model in Developing the Students’ Competence in Writing Analytical Exposition Texts

The purposes of this exploratory mixed method research are to describe the implementation of Jurisprudential Inquiry Learning Model in developing the students’ competence in writing analytical exposition texts and the students’ motivation in learning writing. The subject of this study is the fifth semester students of English Department of Tidar University in 2016/2017 academic year. This study employed in-depth interviews, and on-site observation in collecting the data of the effectiveness of this model in developing the students’ motivation in learning writing. In addition to that, the writer used writing test of analytical exposition text to know the improvement of the students’ writing skill. Following Milles and Hubberman’s theory (1994: 10-11), the writer analyzed the qualitative data through data reduction, data display, conclusion and verification. For the quantitative data, the writer used descriptive statistics. The triangulation was employed in checking the validity of the data. The results show that the implementation of Jurisprudential Inquiry Learning Model is an effective way to develop the students’ motivation in learning writing. Besides, it develops the students’ competence in writing analytical exposition text.

THE APPLICATION OF JURISPRUDENTIAL INQUIRY LEARNING MODEL TO INCREASE STUDENT’S SOCIAL SKILLS AND LEARNING ACHIEVEMENT

This study aims to (1) describe how the improvement of social skill ability through learning Model Jurisprudential Inquiry in social studies learning in grade V SDN 06 Pondok Kelapa (2) describe how the improvement of student achievement in learning social studies through learning Model Jurisprudential Inquiry in social studies learning in class V SDN 06 Pondok Kelapa (3) describes how the effectiveness of Learning Model Yurisprudential Inquiry to improve student achievement in learning social studies in class V SDN 06 Pondok Kelapa. The research is a classroom action research combined with quasi experiments. The subjects of this study are VA class students and VB SDN 06 Pondok Kelapa class as PTK and experimental class. While the class VC SDN 06 Pondok Kelapa, as a control class. The results of this study indicate that the application of learning yurisprudential inquiry model can: (1) improve social skills in social studies learning, (2) Application of learning model Jurisprudential Inquiry can improve achievement in learning social studies, (3) Effectiveness of application of learning model Jurisprudential Inquiry can improve student achievement on learning IPS class V SDN 06 Pondok Kelapa Keywords: learning model jurisprudential inquiry, social Skills, and learning achievement

Jurisprudential Inquiry sebagai Model Pembelajaran Alternatif untuk Mata Pelajaran Pendidikan Kewarganegaraan Di Sekolah Menengah Atas

This study explores the learning model of civic education for Senior High School students.The purpose of Civic education in Senior High School are preparing to be smart and good citizen. In fact,learning program by teacher isn’t enough to make student active. To make student active in civic eduction learning, the idea is application Jurisprudential Inquiryas a model.This qualitative case study draws on interview from eight students and a teacher in Senior High School. The research shows that Jurisprudential inquiry model can be used as an alternative model for civic education as it is effective, efficient and attractive.