A NUMBER of studies have been reported comparing high and low anxious Ss on condition ing experiments, complex learning experiments, and academic performance (1, 3-5, 8-15, 17). One theoretical expectation is that if the learning situation is a simple one involving a single or dominant response, anxious Ss will show supe rior performance because of their higher drive level, but if the learning situation is complex, a number of response tendencies would be aroused and, if the dominant response is not correct, high drive level would impede performance (16). This formulation has been generalized to the relation between general manifest anxiety and scholastic achievement (4,5,8,9). Personality theorists and educators have shown considerable interest in the discrepancy between potential and scholastic performance and com monly have held that personality attributes, anxi ety especially, are significant factors in producing this discrepancy. However, a paucity of studies is seen in the literature concerning the variables thought to be relevant to this situation ; i.e., anxi ety, intelligence, and scholastic achievement. There appears also to be an extreme lack of developmental data regarding the interrelations of these variables over an extended age range. The present study proposed: a) to investigate further the relations among anxiety, intelligence, and scholastic achievement; b) to investigate the use of the statistical combination of intelligence and anxiety in an effort to increase the efficiency of predicting scholastic performance; c) to pro vide an upward age extension of previous investi? g?tions; and d) to explore the possible usefulness of the Children's Manifest Anxiety Scale (CMAS) with junior high children. Procedure