Previous articleNext article No AccessJohn Stuart Mill and Experiments in LivingElizabeth S. AndersonElizabeth S. Anderson Search for more articles by this author PDFPDF PLUS Add to favoritesDownload CitationTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints Share onFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditEmail SectionsMoreDetailsFiguresReferencesCited by Ethics Volume 102, Number 1Oct., 1991 Article DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1086/293367 Views: 169Total views on this site Citations: 27Citations are reported from Crossref Copyright 1991 The University of ChicagoPDF download Crossref reports the following articles citing this article:Aylon R. Manor Transformative Experimentation, Perspectival Diversity, and the Polycentric Liberal Order, Res Publica 28, no.22 (Sep 2021): 323–338.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11158-021-09528-xJoshua Isaac Fox Two Pessimisms in Mill, Utilitas 33, no.44 (Jun 2021): 442–457.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0953820821000212Sina Fazelpour, Zachary C. Lipton, David Danks Algorithmic Fairness and the Situated Dynamics of Justice, Canadian Journal of Philosophy 81 (Oct 2021): 1–17.https://doi.org/10.1017/can.2021.24Robert Mark Simpson ‘Lost, Enfeebled, and Deprived of Its Vital Effect’: Mill’s Exaggerated View of the Relation Between Conflict and Vitality, Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 95, no.11 (Jul 2021): 97–114.https://doi.org/10.1093/arisup/akab006Gregory Robson The rationality of political experimentation, Politics, Philosophy & Economics 20, no.11 (Sep 2020): 67–98.https://doi.org/10.1177/1470594X20949937Marco Mariotti, Roberto Veneziani The Liberal Ethics of Non-Interference, British Journal of Political Science 50, no.22 (Dec 2017): 567–584.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123417000576Lisa Herzog, Bernardo Zacka Fieldwork in Political Theory: Five Arguments for an Ethnographic Sensibility, British Journal of Political Science 49, no.22 (Jun 2017): 763–784.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123416000703Richard Sturn Endogenous Power and Crises of the Liberal Order, Journal of Contextual Economics – Schmollers Jahrbuch 139, no.2-42-4 (Apr 2019): 385–406.https://doi.org/10.3790/schm.139.2-4.385Menaka Philips Troubling appropriations: JS Mill, liberalism, and the virtues of uncertainty, European Journal of Political Theory 18, no.11 (Feb 2016): 68–88.https://doi.org/10.1177/1474885116631201Nizar Hariri Mill’s qualitative hedonism as an ethics of desire, (Jul 2018): 40–53.https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315113258-4Stephen Darwall Mill II, (Apr 2018): 123–138.https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429498350-13Samuel Clark Mill's Autobiography as Literature, (Apr 2018): 45–57.https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118736739.ch4Sally Haslanger Racism, Ideology, and Social Movements, Res Philosophica 94, no.11 (Jan 2017): 1–22.https://doi.org/10.11612/resphil.1547Ben Saunders Recent Critics of Mill's Qualitative Hedonism, Philosophy 91, no.44 (Sep 2016): 503–521.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0031819116000437Joel Marks Desire and Reason, (Sep 2016): 91–133.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-43799-6_3Jeff Frank Love and Growth: On One Aspect of James Baldwin's Significance for Education, Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education 117, no.99 (Sep 2015): 1–38.https://doi.org/10.1177/016146811511700906RYAN MULDOON Expanding the Justificatory Framework of Mill's Experiments in Living, Utilitas 27, no.22 (Feb 2015): 179–194.https://doi.org/10.1017/S095382081400034XLIZ MCKINNELL ‘A medicine for my state of mind’: The Role of Wordsworth in John Stuart Mill's Moral and Psychological Development, Utilitas 27, no.11 (Feb 2015): 43–60.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0953820814000302KRISTIN SCHAUPP Books before Chocolate? The Insufficiency of Mill's Evidence for Higher Pleasures, Utilitas 25, no.22 (May 2013): 266–276.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0953820812000593 Ethics I (1900–45), (Oct 2012): 113–132.https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203030684-12 Mill's Theory of Value, (Feb 2008): 117–138.https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470776483.ch9 by Robert Sugden Opportunity as a Space for Individuality: Its Value and the Impossibility of Measuring It Sugden, Ethics 113, no.44 (Jul 2015): 783–809.https://doi.org/10.1086/373953Don A. Habibi Mill’s Moral Philosophy, (Jan 2001): 62–116.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-2010-6_3DANIEL JACOBSON Mill on Liberty, Speech, and the Free Society, Philosophy <html_ent glyph="@amp;" ascii="&"/> Public Affairs 29, no.33 (Jul 2000): 276–309.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1088-4963.2000.00276.xGeoffrey Scarre Happiness for the millian, British Journal for the History of Philosophy 7, no.33 (Oct 1999): 491–502.https://doi.org/10.1080/09608789908571041Robert E. Goodin Democracy, preferences and paternalism, Policy Sciences 26, no.33 (Jan 1993): 229–247.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00999718P. J. Kelly The J. S. Mill Bibliography: Recent Additions, Utilitas 4, no.11 (Jan 2009): 196–197.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0953820800004490