JR Scores Research Articles

The Association of Jumbo Femoral Heads and Acetabular Cup Position on Patient Outcomes after Modern Posterior Approach Total Hip Arthroplasty.

Use of jumbo femoral heads (≥ 40 mm) in total hip arthroplasty (THA) decreases postoperative dislocation, however, may leave patients more susceptible to groin pain. Limited data exist for the effect of jumbo femoral heads and acetabular cup position on modern patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). This study evaluated the effect of jumbo femoral heads and acetabular cup position on PROMs after primary THA. A total of 328 consecutive primary THAs of a single implant system with various femoral head sizes (36% ≥ 40 mm) were retrospectively reviewed. Acetabular cup inclination and anteversion were radiographically measured. Demographics, comorbidities, and implant sizes were documented. Prospectively collected University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) Activity Level, Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for Joint Replacement (HOOS JR), and satisfaction were evaluated. The mean follow-up was 1.2 years (range, 1 to 5). A P-value of 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Femoral head size was not associated with UCLA Activity Level at any time point (P ≥ 0.209). Independent of patient sex, the mean HOOS JR score was significantly higher in the ≥ 40 mm femoral head group compared to the < 40 mm head group at 4 months although not reaching a clinically significant threshold (mean difference 4.4, 95% CI [confidence interval]: 0.5 to 8.3, P = 0.027); however, mean scores at the latest follow-up were not different (P = 0.956). The HOOS JR scores ≥ 90 and being 'very satisfied or satisfied' were associated with a wide range and several combinations of acetabular cup inclination and anteversion. A total of 88.9% of patients reported being "very satisfied or satisfied" at the latest follow-up. Patients achieved comparable PROMs regardless of femoral head size, suggesting large femoral heads may not leave patients susceptible to groin pain in addition to reducing the risk of postoperative dislocation. Excellent patient outcomes correlated with wide ranges of acetabular cup positions.

Stepping up recovery: integrating patient reported outcome measures and wearable technology for 90-day rehabilitation following total hip arthroplasty.

There is conflicting data in the literature regarding the clinical utility of wearable devices. This study examined the association between patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) and step and stair flight counts obtained from wearable devices in postoperative total hip arthroplasty (THA) patients. Data was collected from a multicenter prospective longitudinal cohort study from October 2018 to February 2022. A smartphone-based platform with smartwatch was utilized for collection of daily step and stair flight counts. Subjects (N = 1644) completed the Hip disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for Joint Replacement (HOOS JR) and numerical rating scale (NRS) pain scores preoperatively and at 1 and 3months postoperatively. Patients who reported living in a multi-level home (N = 931) were included in analysis of stair flight counts. Pearson correlation coefficients were calculated to determine correlations between step and stair flight counts with NRS pain and HOOS JR scores. Step counts demonstrated a weak negative correlation to NRS pain scores at preoperative (r = -0.15, p < 0.0001), 1-month (r = -0.15, p < 0.0001), and 3-months follow-up (r = -0.06, p = 0.05). Step counts demonstrated a weak positive correlation with HOOS JR scores at preoperative (r = 0.16, p < 0.0001), 1-month (r = 0.15, p < 0.0001), and 3-months (r = 0.13, p < 0.0001). Stair flight counts demonstrated a weak negative correlation with NRS pain preoperatively (r = -0.19, p < 0.0001) and at 1-month (r = -0.11, p = 0.003). Stair flight counts positively correlated with HOOS JR scores at preoperative (r = 0.24, p < 0.0001), 1-month (r = 0.15, p < 0.0001), and 3-months (r = 0.09, p = 0.02). The utilization of wearable technology can enhance the evaluation of patient outcomes after THA, primarily due to the observed correlation between data collected from wearables and PROMs. Our study highlights the importance of the use of objective data, in addition to subjective patient reported data, when analyzing postoperative patient progress, which propels forward the field of postoperative THA patient care.

No need for hip precautions after total hip arthroplasty with posterior approach: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Nowadays, total hip arthroplasty (THA) is one of the most successful procedures in the field of orthopedics and trauma. The posterior approach has historically been associated with a higher rate of hip dislocation. To reduce the rate of hip dislocation in the posterior approach, most orthopedic surgeons would recommend hip precautions (HP) for their patients postoperatively based on previous theories. However, recent randomized controlled trials have shown no significant difference in hip dislocation rates with or without HP, in contrast to previous theories. Based on these, this study conducted a meta-analysis of these randomized controlled trials to try to get qualitative conclusions. Randomized controlled trials of HP after THA up to July 28, 2023, were searched in 3 databases, PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library. Data extraction and literature quality assessment were performed by 2 independent authors and extracted hip dislocation, hip disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score, joint replacement (HOOS JR) scores over 6 weeks, and time to discontinuation of mobility aids. Stata software and Revman software were used to perform this meta-analysis. Following screening, 3 papers with a total of 1215 participants were included in the analysis. This meta-analysis showed that there was no statistically significant difference in hip dislocation rates with or without HP after THA undergoing the posterior approach and that the without HP group instead showed better outcomes in terms of HOOS JR scores and time to discontinuation of mobility aids. THA with a posterior approach does not require hip precautions.

Early Outcome of a Contemporary Unicondylar Knee System.

In 2019, a new fixed-bearing implant for unicondylar knee arthroplasty (UKA) was introduced that incorporated a round-on-flat design featuring an Oxinium femoral component coupled with a highly crosslinked polyethylene bearing surface. Compared to prior implants, the design featuredsmaller size increments coupled with medial and lateral-specific tibial baseplates. The objective of this study is to describe our institution's early experience with this UKA implant system by evaluating survivorship, reasons for revision, and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). The 944 UKAs that comprise the study population, including 814 medial and 130 lateral joint replacements, were performed by six surgeons from September 2019 through the end of December 2023. All UKA components were cemented, the mean age at surgery was 67.1±10.0 years, 57% (537/944) of the UKAs were performed among women, and the mean body mass index was 30.3±6.2 kg/m2. Outcome measures included Kaplan-Meier survivorship using reoperation for any reason as an endpoint, reasons for reoperation, range of motion, and PROMs that were collected preoperatively and postoperatively at 4 weeks, 4 months, 1 year, and 2 years. Using reoperation for any reason as an endpoint, 1-year survivorship was 99.3% (95% CI, 98.7 to 99.9%) and 2-year survivorship was 98.2% (95% CI, 96.9 to 99.5%). There were nine reoperations among the 944 UKAs, including three for infection, two for tibial loosening, one for femoral loosening, one for progression of arthritis, one for patellar instability, and one for recurrent hemarthrosis. The mean time to reoperation was 0.82±0.68 years and all were performed among medial UKAs. Range of motion increased from 117±8 degrees preoperatively to 122±6 degrees at 1-year follow-up. PROMs, including the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for Joint Replacement (KOOS JR) and the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Global Health Physical score, demonstrated progressive increases from the preoperative assessment through 2-year follow-up. For UKAs with preoperative and 2-year KOOS JR scores, the mean change was 31±17. As new implants and technologies are introduced, documenting the early outcome from high volume centers can offer valuable insights to validate the effectiveness of implant systems before they are adopted by the broader orthopedic community. This study demonstrates encouraging early outcome data associated with a contemporary UKA system based on survivorship and PROMs. At this early stage, there are no implant-related concerns but obtaining additional follow-up will be important to quantify how revisions and PROMs evolve over time.

Evaluating Self-Directed Rehabilitation for Knee and Hip Arthroplasty During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Multicenter Study.

The COVID-19 pandemic has triggered the adoption of new technologies to reduce the need for in-person physical therapy (PT). This study evaluated the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on PT utilization and outcomes of patients prescribed a smartphone-based care management platform (sbCMP) for self-directed rehabilitation (SDR). A secondary analysis of data collected in a multicenter, prospective cohort trial investigating a mobile platform to deliver SDR after arthroplasty was performed. Patients who used the sbCMP for 2 weeks prior to undergoing partial knee arthroplasty (PKA), total knee arthroplasty (TKA), or total hip arthroplasty (THA) and provided 3 months of post-operative data were included. Use of adjunct PT at 3 months, step counts, and KOOS JR and HOOS JR scores were compared during the early versus late pandemic period. The cohort data was available for 1665 patients. Use of SDR without adjunct PT was higher in the early period of the COVID-19 pandemic in TKA (35.3% vs. 27.6%, p = 0.03) and THA (72.5% vs. 59.3%, p < 0.001), but not in the PKA cohort (58.9% vs. 53.3%, p = 0.53). Post-operative step counts improved at 3 months compared to pre-operative levels in all procedure types. Change in HOOS JR and KOOS JR scores from pre-operative to post-operative levels were similar by pandemic period in all cohorts. Use of SDR increased early during the COVID-19 pandemic, corresponding to pandemic restrictions, without negatively impacting patient outcomes. SDR facilitated via a sbCMP may be beneficial for patients unable or unwilling to participate in traditional PT visits.

Patient Satisfaction is Nearly 90% After Total Knee Arthroplasty; We Are Better Than We Were

Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is frequently performed to reduce pain and improve quality of life. Patient satisfaction following TKA is commonly reported at 80%. However, given recent advancements in perioperative management, implants, and operative techniques, new assessments on patient satisfaction are warranted. Patients who underwent unilateral or bilateral TKA between November 2018 and December 2023 and used a web-based home therapy program were included. In total, 1,702 patients with 1,527 (89.7%) reporting satisfaction following TKA were included. Patients were stratified by satisfaction with postoperative outcomes. Univariate analyses were performed on demographics and patient-reported outcomes. Multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to identify parameters predictive of postoperative satisfaction with TKA. Satisfied patients had higher mean age, body mass index (BMI), and hypertension (all P= 0.05). Throughout the entire cohort, Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS), Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score Junior (KOOS Jr), and visual analog scale pain scores improved from preoperatively to 1 year postoperatively (P < 0.001). Preoperatively, satisfied patients reported higher PROMIS overall, PROMIS mental, and KOOS Jr scores (all P < 0.05). At one year postoperatively, satisfied patients noted larger improvements in all functional outcomes, thus resulting in better PROMIS overall, PROMIS physical, PROMIS mental, KOOS Jr, and visual analog scale pain scores (all P < 0.001). Multivariate logistic regression analyses revealed that only age (odds ratio= 1.0, P= 0.005) and BMI (odds ratio= 1.0, P= 0.006) were predictive of satisfaction after TKA procedure. In a modern cohort of TKA patients, nearly 90% reported satisfaction following surgery. Satisfied patients had higher preoperative and postoperative functional outcome scores. Older age and BMI were strongly predictive of postoperative satisfaction. Although careful preoperative selection of patients should still be employed, patient satisfaction following TKA may be higher than commonly reported.

Outcomes Following Isolated Medial Meniscus Posterior Root Repair Using An Anatomic Transtibial Pull-Out Technique In Patients Aged &gt; 60 Years: A Matched Cohort Study

Objectives To compare patient-reported outcomes following anatomic transtibial pull-out repair for isolated medial meniscus posterior root (MMPR) tears in patients &gt; 60 versus ≤60 years of age, as well as the incidence of repair failures. Methods Patients aged ≥18 years undergoing isolated anatomic transtibial pull-out repair for MMPR tears at a single institution between January 2016 and September 2020 were analyzed. Patients with minimum 2-year follow-up were divided based on age: &gt;60 versus ≤60 years. Patients completed IKDC, KOOS JR, and VR12 surveys before surgery and at final follow-up. Differences in outcome scores between age groups, as well as repair failures, defined by the need for repeat arthroscopy, were analyzed. Results Twenty patients aged ≥60 with a mean age of 65.7 ± 4.1 years (range, 60.2 – 74.9 years) were compared to 40 patients ≤ 60 years of age with a mean age of 49.3 ± 9.0 years (range, 23.4 – 59.8). Significant improvement in all outcomes scores was observed in both groups at final follow-up relative to pre-operative values. No significant difference in IKDC, KOOS JR, or VR12-Physical scores was observed between groups. Revision repair was required in one patient (2.5%) under age 60, but no patients over age 60. Conclusion Anatomic transtibial pull-out repair for MMPR tears resulted in improved outcome scores at minimum 2-year follow-up, with no significant differences among our cohorts of patients &gt;60 or ≤60 years of age. While chronologic age should be accounted for when discussing expectations and management of MMPR tears, a specific age cut-off should not exclude consideration for root repair, as appropriately selected patients &gt;60 years of age exhibit non-inferior outcomes compared to patients aged ≤60 years.

Survivorship and Functional Outcomes After Complex Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty With Contemporary Rotating-Hinge Implants

Background: Initial fixed-bearing hinge designs for primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) had high rates of aseptic loosening. There are limited data on contemporary rotating-hinge implants. Purpose: We sought to determine survivorship and functional outcomes of contemporary rotating-hinge implants used in primary TKA. Methods: Retrospective review identified 54 primary rotating-hinge TKAs implanted in 49 patients from 2014 to 2018 at a single institution. Patients identified were 76% women, the mean body mass index was 29 kg/m2, the mean age was 65 years, and the mean follow-up was 3 years. The primary diagnosis for TKA in all cases was severe instability and ligamentous compromise. Secondary diagnoses included post-traumatic osteoarthritis (11, 20%), neurologic disease (10, 19%), inflammatory arthritis (10, 19%), connective tissue disease (3, 6%), valgus deformity (16, 30%), varus deformity (2, 4%), and recurvatum (2, 4%). Preoperative, postoperative (within 6 weeks), and most recent radiographs were reviewed. In this study, we collected preoperative, 1-year, and 2-year patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) for patients with primary rotating-hinge TKA. Patient-reported outcome measures were prospectively collected, including the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Survey for Joint Replacement (KOOS JR) scores and the Mental (MCS) and Physical Component Scores (PCS) of the Veterans RAND 12-Item Health Survey (VR-12). Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to determine implant survivorship. Results: Reoperation was required in 6% (3/54); indications included periprosthetic joint infection (1), peripatellar fibrosis (1), and periprosthetic femur fracture (1). At both 2 and 5 years, survivorship free from all-cause reoperation was 95% and from revision for aseptic loosening was 100%. Mean KOOS JR scores increased from 47 preoperatively to 65 at 2 years postoperatively. On radiographic review, there were no progressive radiolucent lines consistent with aseptic loosening at final follow-up. Conclusion: The findings of this single-center, multi-surgeon retrospective case series on the use of rotating-hinge implants for primary TKA suggest excellent 2-year survivorship free from reoperation and no revisions for aseptic loosening. We report modest improvement in a variety of PROMs at 1-year and 2-year follow-up. Despite improvement, clinical outcomes were poor for a primary implant. Longer-term follow-up is required to monitor the durability of primary hinges.

Comparable Outcomes Between Autologous Chondrocyte Implantation and Osteochondral Allograft Transplantation in the Setting of Patellar Realignment

PurposeThe purpose of this study was to determine clinical and functional outcomes in patients treated with autologous chondrocyte implantation (ACI) or osteochondral allograft (OCA) transplantation for chondral defects secondary to patellar instability with concomitant medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction and tibial tubercle osteotomy (TTO) for patellar realignment. MethodsA retrospective review identified patients who underwent ACI or OCA transplantation with concomitant MPFL reconstruction and TTO . Patients were excluded if they did not have concomitant MPFL reconstruction and TTO, had the presence of other intra-articular pathologies, or failed to complete postoperative subjective outcome evaluations at a minimum of 2 years following surgery. Subjective outcome measures included the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for Joint Replacement (KOOS JR), International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) evaluation, and Short Form Health Survey (SF-12) physical scores, collected a minimum of 2 years after surgery. Defect location, size, complications, and rate of subsequent surgery were determined. ResultsEighteen total patients were included in this study. The ACI cohort included 11 patients with 13 total defects that were treated with ACI. The OCA cohort included 7 patients with 10 total defects that were treated with OCA. This was due to a number of patients in either group having multiple cartilage defects. Twenty-three total chondral defects were compared to analyze clinical and functional outcomes following surgical correction (ACI: n=13, OCA: n=10). Five defects were noted on the femoral condyle and 18 on the patellar facets/central ridge. Defects were comparable between groups including, size measured during index-arthroscopy (ACI = 3.34 cm2, 95% CI [2.3 cm2 - 4.4 cm2] vs OCA = 4.03 cm2, 95% CI [3.1 cm2 - 5.0 cm2]; P=.351), Outerbridge classification (ACI = 54.8% grade 4 vs OCA = 60.0% grade 4; P=1.000), and AMADEUS score (ACI = 47.1 vs OCA = 58.6; P=.298). Postoperative outcomes were comparable including revision rate (ACI = 15.4% vs OCA = 10.0%; P=1.000) and 2-year IKDC scores (ACI = 74.2, 95% CI [65.2 - 83.2] vs OCA = 51.2, 95% CI [30.3 - 72.1]; P=.077). ACI did have significantly higher 2-year KOOS JR (85.1, 95% CI [76.9 - 93.3] vs 63.7, 95% CI [49.1 - 78.3]; P=.031) and SF-12 scores (54.1, 95% CI [52.0 - 56.2] vs 42.6, 95% CI [35.8 - 49.4]; P=.007) compared to OCA. ConclusionACI or OCA transplantation for chondral defects with concomitant MPFL reconstruction and TTO can be safely performed in an outpatient setting with functional and clinical outcomes being comparable. Level of EvidenceRetrospective Case Series Study (Level 3)

REVISION HIP ARTHROPLASTY IN PATIENTS WITH SEVERE SICKLE-CELL DISEASE: CHALLENGES AND EARLY OUTCOMES

Total hip arthroplasty (THA) has proved to be an effective treatment modality for sickle-cell hip arthropathy (mosaic-like dense bone due to infarcts). However, mode of failure, survival rates and challenges associated with revision hip arthroplasty in sickle-cell disease patients are mostly unknown.We retrospectively evaluated prospectively collected data from all patients with sickle-cell disease who underwent revision hip arthroplasty from 2016. Patient, surgery, medical and surgical complications related data were collected. The pinnacle and reclaim revision system with gription augments (JJ) was used in all patients. Pre-op and post-op clinical outcome data (both objective and subjective, HOOS Jr and OHS) were recorded. Cumulative success rates were recorded with re-revision surgery as an end point.We performed fifteen revision THAs on 13 patients (mean follow up of 6.6 years). The mean age of the patients was 48 years (range, 30–59). At final follow-up, a statistically significant improvement of mean OHS and HOOS JR scores eas found in all patients. reported (OHS: 34.0 and HOOS JR: 77.7). Cumulative success rate was 100% for re-revision for all reasons at 6 years. Five intensive care unit (ITU) admissions, two vaso-occlusive sickle cell crises, one transfusion-related complication and one acute chest syndrome (ACS) were recorded. On admission, the mean percentage of HbS was 75.25% (64.6–86.4%).Revision arthroplasty in sickle-cell disease patients poses increased risks, with medical and surgical challenges. However, with careful preparation, planning and a multi-disciplinary team approach, revision arthroplasty can result in excellent clinical outcomes and excellent functional scores in the majority of patients in the short and mid-term.

Smoking cessation prior to elective total joint arthroplasty results in sustained abstinence postoperatively.

Tobacco use is a well-documented modifiable risk factor for perioperative complications. To determine the tobacco abstinence rates of patients who made cessation efforts prior to a total joint arthroplasty (TJA) procedure. A retrospective evaluation was performed on 88 self-reported tobacco users who underwent TJA between 2014-2022 and had tobacco cessation dates within 3 mo of surgery. Eligible patients were contacted via phone survey to understand their tobacco use pattern, and patient reported outcomes. A total of 37 TJA patients participated. Our cohort was on average 61-years-old, 60% (n = 22) women, with an average body mass index of 30 kg/m2. The average follow-up time was 2.9 ± 1.9 years. A total of 73.0% (n = 27) of patients endorsed complete abstinence from tobacco use prior to surgery. Various cessation methods were used perioperatively including prescription therapy (13.5%), over the counter nicotine replacement (18.9%), cessation programs (5.4%). At final follow up, 43.2% (n = 16) of prior tobacco smokers reported complete abstinence. Patients who were able to maintain cessation postoperatively had improved Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS)-10 mental health scores (49 vs 58; P = 0.01), and hip dysfunction and osteoarthritis outcome score for joint replacement (HOOS. JR) scores (63 vs 82; P = 0.02). No patients in this cohort had a prosthetic joint infection or required revision surgery. We report a tobacco cessation rate of 43.2% in patients undergoing elective TJA nearly 3 years postoperatively. Patients undergoing TJA who were able to remain abstinent had improved PROMIS-10 mental health scores and HOOS. JR scores. The perioperative period provides clinicians a unique opportunity to assist active tobacco smokers with cessation efforts and improve postoperative outcomes.

Comparison of Patients Based on Their Self-Selected Discharge Pathway after Total Knee Arthroplasty at an Ambulatory Surgical Center.

Outpatient total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is being performed more frequently in ambulatory surgical centers (ASCs) to decrease the cost of care. Discharge pathways include 23-hour observation (OBSERVATION) or same-day discharge home (HOME), which differ in postoperative medical supervision. Few studies allow patients to self-select their discharge pathway. This study compared patient variables between self-selected OBSERVATION or HOME discharge after TKA at an ASC. We hypothesized that age, sex, and distance lived from the ASC would differ between discharge pathways. Clinical and patient-reported outcomes were explored.A chart review identified 130 patients with TKA at an ASC between November 2017 and December 2019. Patients self-selected OBSERVATION or HOME during a preoperative physician visit. Patient variables obtained from the electronic medical record were age, sex, race/ethnicity, marital status, body mass index, diabetic status, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) class, distance lived from the ASC, anesthesia type, procedure time, and time in the postanesthesia recovery unit. Clinical outcomes (knee range of motion, infection rate, and reoperation rate) and patient-reported outcomes (Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score, Joint Replacement [KOOS, JR]; Oxford Knee Score [OKS]) were collected at either 6 or 12 weeks postsurgery. Variables were compared between groups.Pathway selection was n = 70 OBSERVATION and n = 60 HOME, and all patients completed their self-selected discharge pathway. Age and proportion of females were significantly higher in OBSERVATION than in HOME (61.3 ± 3.5 vs. 58.5 ± 5.4 years, 85.7 vs. 65.0%, respectively; p < 0.05). Distance lived from the ASC tended to be greater in OBSERVATION than HOME (22.1 ± 24.6 vs. 15.3 ± 10.1 miles, p = 0.056). Across groups, clinical outcomes were favorable (i.e., >88% met the 6-week knee flexion milestone, 1.9% infection rate, and 3.1% manipulation under anesthesia), and the preoperative to 12-week postoperative change in KOOS, JR and OKS scores met the minimal clinically important difference.Older age, female sex, and farther distance lived from the ASC may influence patients to select OBSERVATION over HOME discharge following TKA at an ASC. No robust differences were found in early outcomes.

Patient-Reported Outcomes of Total Hip Arthroplasty at an Ambulatory Surgery Center Versus a Hospital-Based Center.

The utilization of ambulatory surgery centers (ASCs) and same-day discharge (SDD) from hospital-based centers (HBCs) after total hip arthroplasty (THA) continues to increase. There remains a paucity of literature directly comparing patient-reported outcomes by surgery site. We sought to compare outcomes between patients undergoing THA at an ASC versus HBC while controlling for medical comorbidities. Patients undergoing primary THA with SDD (postoperative day 0) from a single HBC (1,015 patients) or stand-alone ASC (170 patients) from December 2020 to 2021 were identified. Patient demographics, comorbidities, and 90-day complications were collected. Hip Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS JR), VR-12, and procedural satisfaction scores were collected preoperatively and at 3, 6, and 12 months. Patients were matched by age and American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA). Chi-squared analysis was conducted to compare categorical variables, and a Wilcoxon rank-sum test was used for continuous variables. Linear regression models were conducted considering age, sex, and presence of comorbidities. Patients undergoing THA at an ASC had markedly higher VR-12 Physical Component Scores at all time points and improved VR-12 Mental Component Scores at preoperative visit and 6 months. These patients had increased procedural satisfaction at 3 months, although there was no difference at 1 year. No notable difference was observed in 90-day complication rates between groups. After matching by age and ASA, each group had 170 patients. In the matched analysis, preoperative HOOS JR scores were markedly lower in the HBC group. However, there was no notable difference in HOOS JR scores, change in HOOS JR scores, and procedural satisfaction, at any postoperative time point. No notable difference was observed in patient-reported outcomes at any time point for SDD after THA performed at an ASC or an HBC when controlling for age and comorbidities. This study suggests noninferiority of stand-alone ASCs for outpatient THA, regarding patient satisfaction and patient-reported outcomes.

The influence of body mass index on patient-reported outcome measures following total hip arthroplasty: a retrospective study of 3,903 Cases.

The influence of obesity on patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) following total hip arthroplasty (THA) is currently controversial. This study aimed to compare PROM scores for pain, functional status, and global physical/mental health based on body mass index (BMI) classification. Primary, elective THA procedures at a single institution between 2018 and 2021 were retrospectively reviewed, and patients were stratified into four groups based on BMI: normal weight (18.5-24.99kg/m2), overweight (25-29.99kg/m2), obese (30-39.99kg/m2), and morbidly obese (> 40kg/m2). Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) and Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for Joint Replacement (HOOS, JR) scores were collected. Preoperative, postoperative, and pre/post- changes (pre/post-Δ) in scores were compared between groups. Multiple linear regression was used to assess for confounders. We analyzed 3,404 patients undergoing 3,903 THAs, including 919 (23.5%) normal weight, 1,374 (35.2%) overweight, 1,356 (35.2%) obese, and 254 (6.5%) morbidly obese cases. HOOS, JR scores were worse preoperatively and postoperatively for higher BMI classes, however HOOS, JR pre/post-Δ was comparable between groups. All PROMIS measures were worse preoperatively and postoperatively in higher BMI classes, though pre/post-Δ were comparable for all groups. Clinically significant improvements for all BMI classes were observed in all PROM metrics except PROMIS mental health. Regression analysis demonstrated that obesity, but not morbid obesity, was independently associated with greater improvement in HOOS, JR. Obese patients undergoing THA achieve lower absolute scores for pain, function, and self-perceived health, despite achieving comparable relative improvements in pain and function with surgery. Denying THA based on BMI restricts patients from clinically beneficial improvements comparable to those of non-obese patients, though morbidly obese patients may benefit from additional weight loss to achieve maximal functional improvement.

A Comparison of Clinical Outcomes After Total Knee Arthroplasty in Patients Who Have and Do Not Have Self-Reported Nickel Allergy: Matched and Unmatched Cohort Comparisons

BackgroundThe impact of a preoperative self-reported nickel allergy in patients undergoing primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) remains unclear. The aim of this study was to compare the revision rates and outcomes of patients who have a self-reported nickel allergy undergoing primary TKA to patients who do not have a self-reported nickel allergy. MethodsOver 5 years, a total of 284 TKAs in patients who have and 17,735 in patients who do not have a self-reported nickel allergy were performed. Revision rates and differences in preoperative and postoperative patient-reported outcome measures, including Knee Osteoarthritis Outcome Score Joint Replacement (KOOS JR), Visual Analog Scale, Lower Extremity Activity Scale, and the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Mental and Physical Scores, were compared. ResultsSurvivorship free of all-cause revision at 1 year was similar for patients who have and do not have a self-reported nickel allergy (99.5% [95% CI (confidence interval): 98.6 to 100.0] versus 99.3% [95% CI: 99.1 to 99.4]), P = .49). Patients who have a self-reported nickel allergy undergoing primary TKA had no difference in KOOS JR, Visual Analog Scale, or Lower Extremity Activity Scale scores at 6 weeks and 1 year and slightly worse Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System mental and physical scores at 6 weeks compared to patients who did not have an allergy. Matched analysis revealed no difference in 6-week or 1-year KOOS, JR scores between patients who did and did not have a self-reported nickel allergy when stratified by implant class (nickel-free versus standard cobalt-chromium) (P = .113 and P = .415, respectively). ConclusionsPatients who have a self-reported nickel allergy can be advised that, on average, their clinical outcome scores will improve similarly to patients who do not have a self-reported nickel allergy, and revision rates will be similar.

Stepping Up Recovery: Integrating Patient-reported Outcome Measures and Wearable Technology for Rehabilitation Following Knee Arthroplasty.

Improvement after knee arthroplasty (KA) is often measured using patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). However, PROMs are limited due to their subjectivity. Therefore, wearable technology is becoming commonly utilized to objectively assess physical activity and function. We assessed the correlation between PROMs and step/stair flight counts in total (TKA) and partial knee arthroplasty (PKA) patients.Analysis of a multicenter, prospective, longitudinal cohort study investigating the collection of average daily step and stair flight counts, was performed. Subjects (N = 1,844 TKA patients and N = 489 PKA patients) completed the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for Joint Replacement (KOOS JR) and provided numerical rating scale pain scores pre- and postoperatively. Only patients who reported living in a multilevel home environment (N = 896 TKA patients and N = 258 PKA patients) were included in analysis of stair flight counts. Pearson correlation coefficients were calculated to determine correlations between variables.Among TKA patients, pain scores demonstrated a negative correlation to mean step counts at preoperative (r = -0.14, p < 0.0001) and 1-month follow-up (r = -0.14, p < 0.0001). Similar negative correlations were true for pain and stair flight counts at preoperative (r = -0.16, p < 0.0001) and 1-month follow-up (r = -0.11, p = 0.006). KOOS JR scores demonstrated weak positive correlations with mean step counts at preoperative (r = 0.19, p < 0.0001) and 1-month postoperative (r = 0.17, p < 0.0001). Similar positive correlations were true for KOOS JR scores and stair flight counts preoperatively (r = 0.13, p = 0.0002) and at 1-month postoperatively (r = 0.10, p = 0.0048). For PKA patients, correlations between pain and KOOS JR with step/stair counts demonstrated similar directionality.Given the correlation between wearable-generated data and PROMs, wearable technology may be beneficial in evaluating patient outcomes following KA. By combining subjective feedback with the objective data, health care providers can gain a holistic view of patients' progress and tailor treatment plans accordingly.

Trends in Preoperative Outcome Measures From 2013 to 2021 in Patients Undergoing Primary Total Joint Arthroplasty.

The prevalence of total joint arthroplasty (TJA) continues to increase exponentially. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are used to define clinical and quality-of-life improvement and for reimbursement. Temporal trends of preoperative PROMs and specifically how COVID-19 has affected these PROMs is lacking. This study evaluated preoperative PROMs over time, whether medical factors affected preoperative PROMs, and what correlations the COVID-19 pandemic had with these trends in PROMs. A total of 3,014 patients who underwent primary total hip total hip arthroplasty or total knee arthroplasty from 2013 to 2021 were retrospectively reviewed for covariates and preoperative PROMs. Commonly reported preoperative PROMs were evaluated in univariate and multivariate models. Preoperative activity level steadily increased from 2015 to 2021 for THAs and steadily increased from 2015 to 2019 for TKAs, followed by a decrease in 2020. Preoperative KOOS JR scores increased from 2016 to 2019 and then decreased in 2020 and 2021. Preoperative knee pain with level walking and climbing stairs steadily increased from 2013 to 2019, with additional increases in 2020. The COVID-19 era was significantly associated with higher activity levels for THAs, higher levels of pain with level walking, and lower KOOS JR scores. Preoperative PROM scores demonstrated correlations with postoperative PROM scores, which differed from that during the COVID era (rho range 0.105 to 0.391) at a mean of 2.0 years postoperatively. Surgical delays because of COVID-19 were associated with increased preoperative disability as evidenced by lower activity levels. Aside from this pandemic era, patient activity levels increased over time, indicating that modern TJA patients are more active preoperatively and likely to demand higher levels of function after surgery. Additional studies should evaluate the clinical effect of these statistically significant findings. Providers should consider the trends in preoperative PROMs over time when counseling patients on expectations after TJA.

Capability After Total Knee Arthroplasty for Osteoarthritis Is Strongly Associated With Preoperative Symptoms of Depression.

Primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) aims to improve the level of capability (ability to perform valued life activities) associated with knee osteoarthritis (OA). However, some evidence suggests a substantial proportion of patients remain dissatisfied with their outcomes after this procedure. We sought to better understand the association between mental health, specifically symptoms of depression, with postoperative outcomes. Symptoms of depression are shown to be common among orthopaedic populations in general and can be briefly and conveniently evaluated using the Patient Health Questionnaire-2 (PHQ-2) in a less burdensome manner compared with longer mental health surveys. This study assesses the association between preoperative depressive symptoms (PHQ-2) and levels of capability at 6 weeks and 6 months after TKA. We conducted a prospective cohort study involving 114 patients with knee OA across five clinics in California and Texas scheduled for TKA. Participants completed a preoperative PHQ-2 and Knee Injury and OA Outcome Score for Joint Replacement (KOOS JR) survey at 6 weeks and 6 months post-TKA. We analyzed these data using bivariate and multivariable regression. Preoperative PHQ-2 scores were significantly associated with lower KOOS JR scores at 6 weeks and 6 months post-TKA. Latino/Hispanic race was also associated with lower KOOS JR scores at 6 weeks. The association between preoperative depressive symptoms and level of capability after TKA were more pronounced at 6 months compared with 6 weeks. Preoperative symptoms of depression are strongly associated with reduced capability after TKA and can be screened for using the PHQ-2-a brief tool that can be feasibly incorporated into clinical workflows. User-friendly assessment of depressive symptoms can assist orthopaedic surgeons in identifying and addressing mental health at the outset during the management of knee OA.

Preoperative Symptoms of Depression are Associated With Worse Capability 6-weeks and 6-months After Total Hip Arthroplasty for Osteoarthritis

BackgroundSymptoms of depression have been associated with greater incapability following total hip arthroplasty (THA). A brief, 2-question, measure of symptoms of depression – the Patient Health Questionnaire-2 (PHQ-2) – may be sufficient to measure associations with the magnitude of incapability during recovery from THA. This study investigated whether preoperative symptoms of depression (measured with the PHQ-2) correlated with levels of incapability 6 weeks and 6 months after THA, accounting for demographic and clinical factors. MethodsWe performed a prospective cohort study across 5 centers and recruited 101 patients undergoing THA, of whom 90 (89%) completed follow-up. Patients completed demographics, a preoperative 2-item (PHQ-2) measure of symptoms of depression, and the Hip Dysfunction and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for Joint Replacement (HOOS JR) at 6-weeks and 6-months postoperatively. Negative binomial regression models determined factors associated with HOOS JR at 6 weeks and 6 months, accounting for potential confounders. ResultsAccounting for potential confounding factors, we found that higher preoperative PHQ-2 scores (reflecting greater symptoms of depression) were associated with lower HOOS JR scores (reflecting a greater level of hip disability) at both 6 weeks (regression coefficient = −0.67, P < .001) and 6 months (regression coefficient = −1.9, P < .001) after THA. ConclusionsSymptoms of depression on a 2-question preoperative questionnaire are common, and greater symptoms of depression are associated with reduced capability within the first year following THA. These findings support the prioritization of routine mental health assessments before THA. Measuring mindset using relatively brief instruments will be important considering the current shift toward implementing self-reported measures of health status in clinical practice and incorporating them within alternative payment models.

Staged Bilateral Total Knee Arthroplasty: Differing Results Comparing the First and Second Knees

BackgroundPatients often prefer one knee over the other following staged bilateral total knee arthroplasty (BTKA). Our study compared patient-reported outcomes scores of each knee following BTKA and identified factors that may contribute to the identified discrepancies. MethodsAll patients who underwent staged BTKA between July 2014 and August 2022 were identified. The patient-reported outcomes were collected preoperatively and at 2 weeks, 6 weeks, 1 year, and 2 years postoperatively. Each knee’s results were compared using paired t-tests and McNemar tests. Preoperative Kellgren-Lawrence Grade (KLG), postoperative range of motion (ROM), reoperation rates, and manipulations under anesthesia (MUAs) were collected. Results were stratified based on time between TKAs (< 3 months, 3 to 12 months, 1 to 2 years, and > 2 years). ResultsThere were 911 patients who underwent staged BTKA, with a mean 4.1-year follow-up. The ROM, patient satisfaction, MUAs, and reoperations were not significantly different between knees. Comparing the KLG of the first and second knees, 71% had the same KLG for both knees, 21% had a lower KLG, and 7% of the second knees had a higher KLG. The first knee had greater pain reduction (−10.6 at 2 weeks, −27.4 at 6 weeks) compared to the second (9.3 at 2 weeks, −8.1 at 6 weeks) (P < .0001) and better improvement in Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for Joint Replacement (KOOS JR) score (8.5 at 2 weeks, 16.9 at 6 weeks) compared to the second (−5.8 at 2 weeks, 5.0 at 6 weeks) (P < .0001). The 1-year outcomes between first and second knees, or recovery curves, were not different when stratifying by time between TKAs. ConclusionsThe second knee in a staged BTKA has less delta improvement in KOOS JR and pain scores at early follow-up, likely due to higher starting KOOS JR and Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System scores, despite similar final patient satisfaction and clinical outcome measures. Lower KLG in the second total knee arthroplasty (TKA) may contribute to these findings. An MUA after the first TKA is highly predictive of an MUA after the second TKA.