Joint Line Convergence Angle Research Articles

Preoperative Ahlbäck radiographic classification grade significantly influences clinical outcomes of double level osteotomy for osteoarthritic knees with severe varus deformity

PurposeThe purpose of this study was to examine the relationship between preoperative Ahlbäck radiographic classification grade and the clinical outcomes of double level osteotomy (DLO) performed for osteoarthritic knees with severe varus deformity.MethodsThe study population comprised a consecutive series of 99 knees (68 patients) for which DLO was performed and follow-up results for a minimum of two years were available. The Ahlbäck radiographic classification system was used to determine the osteoarthritic grade. The following radiological parameters for alignment and bone geometry were measured: mechanical lateral distal femoral angle (mLDFA), mechanical medial proximal tibial angle (mMPTA), joint-line convergence angle (JLCA), and mechanical tibiofemoral angle (mTFA). Clinical results were assessed using the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) and the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) subjective score preoperatively and at 2 years after surgery. Difference between preoperative and postoperative measurements as well as relationship between Ahlbäck grade and radiological/clinical results were statistically assessed.ResultsThe average age of the study participants was 60.9 ± 6.2 years and the mean follow-up period was 45.4 ± 15.2 months. Each of the radiological parameters exhibited preoperative abnormal values. Knees with Ahlbäck grade 3 and 4 osteoarthritis exhibited significantly greater JLCA and mTFA than grade 1 knees. Two years post-surgery, all radiological parameter values measured within a normal range. Clinical evaluation showed significant improvement in KOOS after surgery. Analysis of the relationship between Ahlbäck grade and clinical score showed that the 2-year postoperative KOOS scores in grade 3 and 4 osteoarthritic knees were significantly lower than grade 1 knees (with the mean 2-year KOOS scores of 350.0 ± 79.9, 317.9 ± 78.3, and 420.2 ± 42.9, respectively).ConclusionsWhile DLO may produce significant radiological and clinical improvement in knees with joint space obliteration, Ahlbäck grade 3 and 4 osteoarthritic knees associated with larger JLCA and mTFA showed less satisfactory clinical results compared to grade 1 knees. Level of Evidence: IV case series.

The Effect of Intramedullary vs Extramedullary Tibial Guides on the Alignment of Lower Extremity and Functional Outcomes Following Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) has been known as a definitive treatment for advanced knee osteoarthritis. Both intramedullary (IM) and extramedullary (EM) tibial guides have been used to restore the desired extremity alignment. However, controversy exists regarding the superiority of either technique We aimed to compare the functional outcomes and accuracy of IM and EM tibial guides in providing neutral alignment after TKA. In a randomized, double-blinded clinical trial, we studied 98 patients undergoing primary TKA in two groups of IM and EM. We measured the medial proximal tibial angle (MPTA), varus angle (VA), and joint-line convergence angle with normal ranges of 90°±3°, 0-2°, and 0±3°, respectively, on a three-joint alignment view after three months. We also assessed the functional outcomes at the last follow-up. Finally, we compared these outcomes between the two groups. Eighty-four patients (IM=42, EM=42) were included in the final analysis (16 males, 68 females, mean age: 63.9±8.6 years, mean follow-up: 13±2.9 months). The mean postoperative (post-op) alignment angles showed no significant difference, although MPTA outliers were significantly more frequent in the EM group (26.2% vs. 9.5% in IM, P=0.04). None of the functional outcomes showed a significant difference between the two groups. However, the mean increase in knee range of motion (ROM) was significantly higher in the knees with VAs within ±3° of neutral than those outside this range (30.8 vs. 27.4, respectively, P=0.039). We conclude that both techniques were not different regarding the mean alignment angles and functional outcomes. However, fewer MPTA outliers can be seen with the IM technique. A post-op mechanical axis within ±3° of neutral can result in a more ROM increase after one year.

Factor affecting the discrepancy in the coronal alignment of the lower limb between the standing and supine radiographs

BackgroundConflicting results have been reported regarding the factors that can predict the discrepancy in the coronal alignment of the lower limb between radiographs taken in the standing and supine positions. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate factors that can predict discrepancies in the coronal alignment of the lower limb between radiographs taken in the standing and supine positions.MethodsWe retrospectively evaluated the medical records of patients who underwent full-length anteroposterior radiographs of the lower limb in both standing and supine positions between January 2019 and September 2021. The discrepancy in the coronal alignment of the lower limb between the standing and supine radiographs was defined as the absolute value of the difference in the hip-knee-ankle (HKA) angle between the two radiographs, which is presented as the ΔHKA angle. Correlation and regression analyses were performed to analyse the relationship among ΔHKA angle, demographic data, and several radiographic parameters.ResultsIn total, 147 limbs (94 patients) were included in this study. The mean ΔHKA angle was 1.3 ± 1.1° (range, 0–6.5°). The ΔHKA angle was significantly correlated with body mass index and several radiographic parameters, including the HKA angle, joint line convergence angle, and osteoarthritis grade. Subsequent multiple linear regression analysis was performed using the radiographic parameters measured on the supine radiographs with the two separate models from the two observers, which revealed that body mass index and advanced osteoarthritis (Kellgren–Lawrence grades 3 and 4) had a positive correlation with the ΔHKA angle.ConclusionsBody mass index and advanced osteoarthritis affected the discrepancy in the coronal alignment of the lower limb between standing and supine radiographs. A discrepancy in the coronal alignment of the lower limb could be more prominent in patients with an increased body mass index and advanced osteoarthritis, corresponding to Kellgren-Lawrence grades 3 and 4.

Potential anatomic risk factors resulting oversized postoperative medial proximal tibial angle after double level osteotomy

BackgroundDouble level osteotomy (DLO) has been introduced to prevent increased postoperative joint line obliquity. However, although DLO is planned, knees with postoperative medial proximal tibial angle (MPTA) > 95° in preoperative surgical planning are present. This retrospective study aimed to evaluate risk factors for an MPTA > 95° in preoperative surgical planning for DLO in patients with varus knee osteoarthritis (OA).MethodsA total of 168 knees that underwent osteotomies around the knee for varus knee OA were enrolled. The hip-knee-ankle angle (HKA), weight-bearing line (WBL) ratio, mechanical lateral distal femoral angle (mLDFA), joint line convergence angle (JLCA) and mechanical medial proximal tibial angle (mMPTA) were measured on preoperative radiographs. The postoperative WBL ratio was planned to be 62.5%. When the postoperative mMPTA was more than 95° in isolated high tibial osteotomy (HTO), (DLO) was planned so that the postoperative mLDFA was 85°, and residual deformity was corrected by HTO. Knees with postoperative mMPTA ≤ 95° and > 95° were classified into the correctable group and uncorrectable group, respectively.ResultsDLO was required in 101 knees (60.1%). Among them, 41 knees (40.6%) were classified into the uncorrectable group. Binomial logistic regression analysis showed that preoperative JLCA and mMPTA were independent predictors in the uncorrectable group.ConclusionsEven with DLO, postoperative mMPTA was more than 95° in approximately 40% of cases. Preoperative increased JLCA and decreased mMPTA were risk factors for a postoperative mMPTA of > 95° after DLO.

No benefits of knee osteotomy patient's specific instrumentation in experienced surgeon hands.

To compare the clinical and radiological outcomes of patient-specific instrumentation (PSI) with the conventional free hand (FH) technique in performing coronal plane corrective knee osteotomies in terms of limb alignment and functional scores. The hypothesis is that conventional FH technique in experienced hands with proper pre-operative planning is as precise as PSI. Patients who underwent coronal plane corrective knee osteotomies with either PSI or FH technique between 2017 and 2019 by the same senior surgeon and have a minimum of 2years follow-up period were included in this study. A total of 91 knees (84 patients) with mean age of 42.9 ± 12.5years who had a pre- and post-operative complete weight-bearing radiographic work-up (50 of them were performed with the FH technique and 41 by means of PSI) were included for comparison. The data were retrospectively reviewed both radiologically and clinically using the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) sub-scores. All cases in both groups were evaluated for the following measurements: hip-knee-ankle (HKA), medial proximal tibial angle (MPTA), mechanical lateral distal femoral angle (mLDFA), and joint line convergence angle (JLCA) both preoperatively and postoperatively. In addition, FH and PSI osteotomy cases were also compared for their precision in achieving the target correction that was planned preoperatively. All cases were also evaluated clinically preoperatively and at 2-year follow-up using KOOS sub-scores and the two groups were compared. The mean HKA precision was 1.5 ± 0.9 in FH group and 1.3 ± 0.7 in PSI (P value = n.s.), the mean MPTA precision was 1.6 ± 1.6 in FH group and 2.1 ± 1.2 in PSI (P value = n.s.), the mean m-LDFA precision was 1.9 ± 1.7 in FH group and 1.4 ± 1.3 in PSI (P value = n.s.), and the mean JLCA precision in the FH group was 1.5 ± 1.2 and 1.7 ± 1.2 in PSI (P value = n.s.). For all the radiographic parameters, there were no statistically significant differences between the target correction and the obtained correction in both groups. Moreover, PSI and FH techniques were comparable in terms of clinical outcomes and no significant difference was found between the two groups in any of the 2-year follow-up KOOS sub-scores. Conventional FH method in the hands of experienced surgeons is as precise as PSI in reliably achieving the planned correction in different coronal plane knee corrective osteotomies. Moreover, there was also no difference between both methods in the 2-year clinical outcome scores.

The pre-diseased coronal alignment can be predicted from conventional radiographs taken of the varus arthritic knee.

The concept of restoring the constitutional, pre-diseased alignment has gained lots of interest among knee surgeons. Previous attempts to use the contralateral limb to bridge the gap between the arthritic and the constitutional alignment were unsuccessful. We investigated the usability of a mathematical formula to predict the constitutional (pre-diseased) coronal alignment once arthritis has occurred. It is our hypothesis that by using the KL grade, CPAK classification and four radiographic measurements of the arthritic knee, the pre-diseased coronal alignment could be predicted. Hundred arthritic patients with consecutive X-rays were used to determine a mathematical formula. Five alignment parameters were determined on full-length X-rays: HKA angle, mechanical lateral distal femoral angle (mLDFA), medial proximal tibial angle (MPTA), joint line convergence angle (JLCA) and the tibial joint line angle (TJLA). A refinement of the algorithm was implemented based on a reference cohort, consisted of 250 young adults aged between 20 and 27years. Moreover, all knees were subdivided based on their CPAK-phenotype and the Kellgren-Lawrence scale (KL scale). An independent arthritic cohort of 289 patients scheduled for primary total knee arthroplasty was included to verify the accuracy of the predicted HKAs (HKAPRED). In CPAK type 1, the HKAPRED was 3.86° varus (STD 1.39) and the HKAYHA was 4.0° varus. In CPAK type 2, the HKAPRED was 1.68° varus (STD 1.95) compared to a HKAYHA of 1.34° (STD 0.81). The average constitutional HKA is not different in both CPAK 1 (p = 0.61) and CPAK 2 (p = 0.25), and the difference in the mean is estimated to be equal to - 0.14 (95CI - 0.68 to 0.40) in CPAK 1 and 0.35 (95CI - 0.06 to 0.75) in CPAK 2. Using the KL grade, CPAK classification and four radiographic measurements of the arthritic knee, the pre-diseased coronal alignment can be predicted in 80% of the varus knees with an accuracy of ≤ 0.5°. The predicted HKA (HKAPRED) can be very useful in the current and future clinical practice.

Prevalence of extra-articular tibia valga morphology in valgus knees and its implications for primary total knee arthroplasty.

Tibia valga, an extra-articular valgus deformity of the tibia, is common in valgus knees and can result in component misplacement and early total knee arthroplasty (TKA) failure. However, the prevalence and importance of tibia valga in TKA have been seldom reported. This study aims to describe the prevalence and characteristics of tibia valga morphology in valgus knees and describe implications for surgical planning in primary TKA. We prospectively examined pre-operative weightbearing whole-body EOS digital radiographs of patients with knee osteoarthritis listed for TKA between December 2018 and December 2020. Hip-knee-ankle angle (HKA), mechanical lateral distal femoral angle (mLDFA), mechanical medial proximal tibial angle (mMPTA), joint line convergence angle (JLCA) and tibial morphology with centre of rotation of angulation of tibia (CORA-tibia) were measured and analysed. In 830 knees, 253 (30%) and 577 (70%) were classified as valgus and varus, respectively. In valgus knees, 89 knees (35%) had tibia valga. Median CORA-tibia was 2.8° (range 0.2°-10.9°). Tibia valga knees had no difference in mLDFA, higher HKA (5.0o versus 3.0°, p = 0.002) and mMPTA (89.6° versus 88.1°, p < 0.01), and lower JLCA (2.1° versus 2.3°, p < 0.01) compared to non-tibia valga knees. Tibia valga deformity was weakly positively correlated with valgus HKA (ρ = 0.23, p < 0.001) and mMPTA (ρ = 0.38, p < 0.001). In varus knees, there were 52 cases of tibia valga (9%) with median CORA-tibia of 3.0° (range 0.5°-5.5°). Tibia valga knees had higher mMPTA (87.0° versus 85.2°, p < 0.05) and no difference in HKA, mLDFA and JLCA. CORA-tibia was weakly positively correlated with mMPTA. Valgus knees may have an extra-articular deformity of the tibia which might be the primary contributor of the overall valgus HKA deformity rather than the distal femoral anatomy. To detect the deformity, full leg-length radiographs should be acquired pre-operatively. Intramedullary instrumentation should be used cautiously in knees with tibia valga when performing TKA.

Preliminary outcomes of kinematically aligned robot-assisted total knee arthroplasty with patient-specific cartilage thickness measurement.

This study aimed to assess the preliminary outcomes of kinematically aligned robot-assisted total knee arthroplasty (TKA) with patient-specific cartilage thickness measurement. Patients who underwent kinematically aligned robot-assisted TKA were included in this study. Robot-assisted total knee arthroplasties were performed by NAVIO Surgical System (Smith & Nephew, Memphis, USA), an image-free handheld robotic system. The kinematic alignment technique was performed according to our intraoperative cartilage thickness measurement technique. Hip-knee-ankle angle (HKA), mechanical lateral distal femoral angle (mLDFA), mechanical medial proximal tibial angle (mMPTA), joint-line orientation angle (JLOA), and joint-line convergence angle (JLCA) were measured through standing full-length anteroposterior radiographs. Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score, Oxford score, VAS pain and satisfaction score, and Forgotten Joint Score were used to assess clinical outcomes. A total of 142 knees of 109 patients (92 females and 17 males) were evaluated in this study. There was a significant correction in HKA, JLCA, and mMPTA postoperatively (p ≤0.001, < 0.001, and 0.029, respectively). We observed no significant change in mLDFA and JLOA measurements. All clinical scores significantly increased at the latest follow-up. Our results demonstrated that kinematically aligned robot-assisted TKA with patient-specific cartilage thickness measurement demonstrated no significant change in mLDFA and JLOA, as expected; however, significantly corrected the deformity in HKA, mMPTA, and JLCA measurements.

An artificial intelligence based on a convolutional neural network allows a precise analysis of the alignment of the lower limb.

The objective of this study was to develop a numeric tool to automate the analysis of deformity from lower limb telemetry and assess its accuracy. Our hypothesis was that artificial intelligence (AI) algorithm would be able to determine mechanical and anatomical angles to within 1°. After institutional review board approval, 1175 anonymized patient telemetries were extracted from a database of more than ten thousand telemetries. From this selection, 31 packs of telemetries were composed and sent to 11 orthopaedic surgeons for analysis. Each surgeon had to identify on the telemetries fourteen landmarks allowing determination of the following four angles: hip-knee-ankle angle (HKA), medial proximal tibial angle (MPTA), lateral distal femoral angle (LDFA), and joint line convergence angle (JLCA). An algorithm based on a machine learning process was trained on our database to automatically determine angles. The reliability of the algorithm was evaluated by calculating the difference of determination precision between the surgeons and the algorithm. The analysis time for obtaining 28 points and 8 angles per image was 48 ± 12s for the algorithm. The average difference between the angles measured by the surgeons and the algorithm was around 1.9° for all the angles of interest: 1.3° for HKA, 1.6° for MPTA, 2.1° for LDFA, and 2.4° for JLCA. Intraclass correlation was greater than 95% for all angles. The algorithm showed high accuracy for automated angle measurement, allowing the estimation of limb frontal alignment to the nearest degree.

Factors Associated With Unfavorable Radiological Outcomes After Opening-Wedge High Tibial Osteotomy for Varus Knees.

Corrective osteotomy around the knee is based on deformity profiles of the femoral and tibial sides. Opening-wedge high tibial osteotomy (OWHTO) can be favored if the outcomes are not different, even if there is a certain degree of abnormal parameters after correction. The purpose of this study was to identify the factors associated with unfavorable radiological outcomes after OWHTO for varus knees. Our hypothesis was that there would be an optimal situation in which double-level osteotomy (DLO) has advantages over isolated OWHTO and an optimal cutoff value of structural parameters for which DLO should be considered in patients with severe varus knees. Case-control study; Level of evidence, 3. The radiological and clinical outcomes of 337 patients who underwent OWHTO were retrospectively evaluated. A subgroup analysis was performed according to the weightbearing line ratio (WBLR) (group 1: <25th percentile; group 2: 25th-75th percentile; and group 3: >75th percentile) and factors associated with unfavorable radiological outcomes. For the assessment of cutoff values of the parameters favoring DLO, unfavorable radiological outcomes were categorized as follows: (1) medial proximal tibial angle (MPTA) >95°, (2) joint-line convergence angle (JLCA) >4° (insufficient medial release), (3) JLCA <0° (medial instability), (4) recurrence of a varus deformity, and (5) lateral hinge fracture. The mean follow-up period was 66.2 ± 19.1 months. A low preoperative WBLR was related to a larger preoperative to postoperative change (Δ) in the WBLR, a larger reduction in coronal translation, a larger ΔMPTA, a wide preoperative lateral joint space, and a narrow preoperative medial joint space (P < .001, P < .001, P < .001, P = .016, and P = .003, respectively). However, only an MPTA >95° was significantly related to a low WBLR in the subgroup analysis according to unfavorable radiological outcomes (P = .038). The cutoff value of ΔWBLR causing an MPTA >95° was 46.5%, which showed a good area under the curve of 0.800, with a sensitivity of 74.4% and a specificity of 82.7%. The clinical outcomes significantly improved at the final follow-up compared with those preoperatively, with no significant differences between the WBLR groups. A ΔWBLR ≥46.5% led to an MPTA >95°. However, clinical outcomes were not affected. DLO should be considered if the surgeon desires a postoperative MPTA ≤95°.

Decision-making factors and their thresholds for total knee arthroplasty in lateral tibiofemoral osteoarthritis patients: a retrospective cohort study

BackgroundThere has been no study examining lateral tibiofemoral (TF) osteoarthritis (OA) and objective decision-making factors affecting when patients decide to have total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The purpose of this study was to assess which factors and their thresholds cause patients with lateral TF OA to decide on TKA.MethodsWe conducted a retrospective cohort study and identified patients who had initially been diagnosed with isolated lateral TF OA from October 2004 to February 2021. We finally included 56 patients; patients who had chosen conservative treatment followed by in-depth interviews for the deliberation stage (n = 32), and the other patients who decided to undergo TKA for the decision-making stage (n = 24). Demographic, clinical, and radiographic characteristics were considered candidate predictive factors. Radiographic variables included the Ahlbäck grade, hip–knee–ankle (HKA) angle, joint line convergence angle (JLCA), and TF subluxation. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed.ResultsClinically, the pain visual analog scale (VAS) score was significantly higher and the knee flexion angle was lower at the decision-making stage. Radiographic measurements showed that the Ahlbäck grade, HKA angle, JLCA, and TF subluxation measured at the center, in addition to the tibiotalar angle, differed statistically between the two stages. According to univariate analyses, two clinical characteristics and six radiographic variables on the ipsilateral side of the leg, and one radiographic variable on the contralateral side of the leg were included as factors influencing the patients’ decision to undergo TKA. After making adjustments based on multivariate analysis, the ipsilateral knee pain VAS (OR = 1.61; 95% CI = 1.14–2.28, p = 0.007) and medial TF subluxation measured at the center (OR = 1.14, 95% CI = 1.01–1.32, p = 0.072) were found to be significant factors for choosing TKA. The area under the curve (AUC) for pain VAS was 0.757 and the cutoff value was 4.5. The AUC for TF subluxation measured at the center was 0.697 and the cutoff value was −4.10% of medial TF subluxation.ConclusionHigher ipsilateral knee pain VAS and more severe medial TF subluxation measured at the center were independent factors affecting patient decisions to undergo TKA with lateral TF OA. Understanding the determining factors that may affect patient decision-making when considering TKA may be an essential aspect of evaluating the prognosis of patients with lateral TF OA.Level of evidenceIII.

Facteurs extra articulaires du tibia et du fémur influençant l’équilibre du genou dans les prothèses totales de genou implantées selon un alignement mécanique

PurposeAlthough the joint gap distance and compartment loading of the knee are different parameters for obtaining balanced knees in patients with total knee arthroplasty (TKA), the extent to which a balanced knee is achieved in patients with mechanically aligned TKA (MA-TKA) is unclear. This study aimed to investigate the anatomical factors that affect the ligament balancing in MA-TKA according to a gap balancing technique by measured resection technique. MethodsThe relationship between compartment loading, gap distance, and lower limb alignment was analysed in forty-three patients who underwent navigation-assisted MA-TKA with the minimum soft-tissue release. Radiographic parameters included hip-knee-ankle (HKA) angle, femorotibial angle, mechanical lateral distal femoral angle (mLDFA), medial proximal tibial angle, posterior tibial slope, varus and valgus joint line convergence angle, femoral valgus angle, femoral shaft curve, and tibial shaft curve (TSC). ResultsThe postoperative HKA angle was 0.4°±1.5°, with one coronal alignment outlier (2.3%). The gap distance showed four unbalanced knees for extension (9.3%) and flexion (9.3%), whereas the compartment loading identified 17 unbalanced knees (39.5%) at extension, 8 (18.6%) at 45° flexion, 7 (16.2%) at 90° flexion, and 10 (23.2%) at full flexion in MA-TKA. Mediolateral differentials of compartment loading correlated with femoral valgus angle (0°, 45°, and 90° flexion), mLDFA (45° and 90° flexion), and TSC (45° and 90° flexion). Femoral valgus angle and TSC were risk factors of the mediolateral differentials of compartment loading. ConclusionExtra-articular factors of femoral valgus angle, mLDFA, and TSC were associated with the mediolateral imbalance of compartmental loading, suggesting there is a limit to obtaining balanced knees in MA-TKA due to these unadjustable extra-articular factors. Level of evidenceIV, therapeutic case series.

Fully automated measurement on coronal alignment of lower limbs using deep convolutional neural networks on radiographic images

BackgroundA deep convolutional neural network (DCNN) system is proposed to measure the lower limb parameters of the mechanical lateral distal femur angle (mLDFA), medial proximal tibial angle (MPTA), lateral distal tibial angle (LDTA), joint line convergence angle (JLCA), and mechanical axis of the lower limbs.MethodsStanding X-rays of 1000 patients’ lower limbs were examined for the DCNN and assigned to training, validation, and test sets. A coarse-to-fine network was employed to locate 20 key landmarks on both limbs that first recognised the regions of hip, knee, and ankle, and subsequently outputted the key points in each sub-region from a full-length X-ray. Finally, information from these key landmark locations was used to calculate the above five parameters.ResultsThe DCNN system showed high consistency (intraclass correlation coefficient > 0.91) for all five lower limb parameters. Additionally, the mean absolute error (MAE) and root mean squared error (RMSE) of all angle predictions were lower than 3° for both the left and right limbs. The MAE of the mechanical axis of the lower limbs was 1.124 mm and 1.416 mm and the RMSE was 1.032 mm and 1.321 mm, for the right and left limbs, respectively. The measurement time of the DCNN system was 1.8 ± 1.3 s, which was significantly shorter than that of experienced radiologists (616.8 ± 48.2 s, t = -180.4, P < 0.001).ConclusionsThe proposed DCNN system can automatically measure mLDFA, MPTA, LDTA, JLCA, and the mechanical axis of the lower limbs, thus helping physicians manage lower limb alignment accurately and efficiently.

Evaluation of hindfoot and knee alignment by the hip-to-calcaneus view in patients with knee osteoarthritis and healthy individuals

BackgroundHip-to-calcaneus (HC) view is a whole-leg standing view that can visualize the hindfoot in detail. The aim of this study was to investigate the reliability and validity of tibiocalcaneal angle in HC view (H-TCA) by comparing it with that in long axial view (L-TCA). We also verified whether periarticular knee alignment parameters, measured conventionally in whole-leg standing radiography, could be measured in HC view. MethodSixty healthy volunteers and 61 patients with medial knee osteoarthritis were included. H-TCA was measured by two examiners in the healthy group, and intra-class correlation coefficients (ICCs) were evaluated. H-TCA and L-TCA were then measured in the healthy and osteoarthritis groups and correlated. Finally, we measured hip–knee–ankle angle, mechanical axis deviation ratio, mechanical lateral distal femoral angle, medial proximal tibial angle, and joint-line convergence angle in HC view and conventional whole-leg standing radiography to evaluate statistical differences and correlations. ResultsThe intra-observer and inter-observer ICCs were 0.86 and 0.76, respectively. Correlation coefficients (r) between H-TCA and L-TCA were r = 0.87 in healthy group and r = 0.81 in osteoarthritis group, indicating a strong positive correlation in both groups. There was no significant difference in periarticular knee alignment parameters between HC view and conventional whole-leg radiography. ConclusionsHindfoot evaluation in HC view showed high intra-observer and inter-observer reliabilities and strong positive correlation with TCA in long axial view. By using HC view before knee surgery, such as total knee arthroplasty, other necessary alignments can be evaluated simultaneously.

Deep learning-based landmark recognition and angle measurement of full-leg plain radiographs can be adopted to assess lower extremity alignment.

Evaluating lower extremity alignment using full-leg plain radiographs is an essential step in diagnosis and treatment of patients with knee osteoarthritis. The study objective was to present a deep learning-based anatomical landmark recognition and angle measurement model, using full-leg radiographs, and validate its performance. A total of 11,212 full-leg plain radiographs were used to create the model. To train the data, 15 anatomical landmarks were marked by two orthopaedic surgeons. Mechanical lateral distal femoral angle (mLDFA), medial proximal tibial angle (MPTA), joint line convergence angle (JLCA), and hip-knee-ankle angle (HKAA) were then measured. For inter-observer reliability, the inter-observer intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was evaluated by comparing measurements from the model, surgeons, and students, to ground truth measurements annotated by an orthopaedic specialist with 14years of experience. To evaluate test-retest reliability, all measurements were made twice by each measurer. Intra-observer ICCs were then derived. Performance evaluation metrics used in previous studies were also derived for direct comparison of the model's performance. Inter-observer ICCs for all angles of the model were 0.98 or higher (p < 0.001). Intra-observer ICCs for all angles were 1.00, which was higher than that of the orthopaedic specialist (0.97-1.00). Measurements made by the model showed no significant systemic variation. Except for JLCA, angles were precisely measured with absolute error averages under 0.52 degrees and proportion of outliers under 4.26%. The deep learning model is capable of evaluating lower extremity alignment with performance as accurate as an orthopaedic specialist with 14years of experience. III, retrospective cohort study.

Preoperative joint line convergence angle correction is a key factor in optimising accuracy in varus knee correction osteotomy

PurposeThis study aimed to identify and prevent preoperative factors that can be influenced in preoperative planning to reduce postoperative malcorrections.MethodsThe method used in this study was a retrospective two-centre analysis of 78 pre and postoperative fully weight-bearing radiographs of patients who underwent valgus osteotomy correction due to symptomatic medial compartment osteoarthritis. A computer software (TraumaCad®) was used to aim for an intersection point of the mechanical tibiofemoral axis (mTFA) with the tibia plateau at 55–60% (medial = 0%, lateral = 100%). Postoperative divergence ± 5% of this point was defined as over- and undercorrection. Preoperative joint geometry factors were correlated with postoperative malcorrection. Planning was conducted using the established method described by Miniaci (Group A) and with additional correction of the joint line convergence angle (JLCA) using the formula JLCA-2/2 (Group B). Additionally, in a small clinical case series, planning was conducted with JLCA correction. Statistical analysis was performed using (multiple) linear regression analysis and analysis of variance (ANOVA) with p < 0.05 considered significant.ResultsIn 78 analysed cases, postoperative malcorrection was detected in 37.2% (5.1% undercorrection, 32.1% overcorrection). Linear regression analysis revealed preoperative body mass index (BMI, p = 0.04), JLCA (p = 0.0001), and osteotomy level divergence (p = 0.0005) as factors correlated with overcorrection. In a multiple regression analysis, JLCA and osteotomy level divergence remained significant factors. Preoperative JLCA correction reduced the planned osteotomy gap (A 9.7 ± 2.8 mm vs B 8.3 ± 2.4 mm; p > 0.05) and postoperative medial proximal tibial angle (MPTA: A 94.3 ± 2.1° vs B 92.3 ± 1.5°; p < .05) in patients with preoperative JLCA ≥ 4°. The results were validated using a virtual postoperative correction of cases with overcorrection. A case series (n = 8) with a preoperative JLCA > 4 revealed a postoperative accuracy using the JLCA correction of 3.4 ± 1.9%.ConclusionPreoperative JLCA ≥ 4° and tibial osteotomy level divergence were identified as risk factors for postoperative overcorrection. Preoperative JLCA correction using the formula JLCA-2/2 is proposed to better control ideal postoperative correction and reduce MPTA. The intraoperatively realised osteotomy level should be precisely in accordance with preoperative planning.Level of evidenceIII, cross-sectional study.

Association of the joint line orientation angle of the contralateral limb with the alignment change of the unilateral and bilateral opening-wedge high tibial osteotomy.

This study aimed to evaluate and compare unilateral and bilateral open-wedge high tibial osteotomy (OWHTO) using mid-term serial assessment of clinical and radiological outcomes, especially focussing on coronal lower extremity alignment. Serial radiological assessments were performed in 40 patients (80 knees) with bilateral OWHTO and 49 patients (49 knees) with unilateral OWHTO. Both groups were further divided into four subgroups to compare each limb (unilateral involved and non-involved limbs and bilateral primarily and secondarily treated limbs). Radiological and clinical outcomes were evaluated and compared among the four groups. For the alignment change assessment, the pelvic tilt angle (PTA), weight-bearing line ratio (WBLR), joint line orientation angle (JLOA), medial proximal tibia angle (MPTA), joint line convergence angle (JLCA), distal tibia articular angle (DTAA), and talar inclination (TI) were measured pre- and postoperatively at 3, 6, and 12months and annually thereafter. Student's t-test, one-way repeated-measures analysis of variance, and correlation analysis were used to compare the groups. Patients in the unilateral and bilateral OWHTO groups had similar postoperative radiological and clinical outcomes. Each unilaterally involved limb and primarily treated bilaterally involved limb were negatively affected by the contralateral limb with respect to increased JLOA during the postoperative period (unilateral OWHTO group: r = -0.350, p = 0.023; bilateral OWHTO group: r = -0.520, p = 0.005). The correction change of the ankle parameters in the secondarily treated limb showed greater varus alignment than the primarily treated limb after bilateral OWHTO (DTAA (0.1±3.0 vs. -0.5 ± 3.8°, p = 0.014) and TI (0.9±3.2° vs. -0.3 ± 2.9, p = 0.001)). Unilateral and bilateral OWHTOs shared similar postoperative radiological and clinical outcomes. Alignment changes of the unilateral OWHTO and the primarily treated limb of the bilateral OWHTO were associated with the JLOA of the contralateral limb. Cohort study; Level III.

A novel way of quantifying bone defect in primary total knee replacements using plain radiographs.

Bone defect assessment in primary advanced knee arthritis can present a challenge for the surgeon and lead to unfavourable outcomes if not adequately determined during preoperative planning. The aim of this study was to introduce a new, simple and quick way to assess and quantify bone defect using short film radiographs and utilising it to choose the total knee prosthesis. This is a prospective case series of patients who underwent TKA (Total Knee Arthroplasty) using various types of prostheses. Three different angles - Tibiofemoral angle, MPTA (medial proximal tibial angle), and JLCA (joint line convergence angle) - were measured preoperatively to evaluate limb alignment, placement of the tibial, and femoral components of total knee prosthesis. Postoperatively roentgenographic index introduced by Lotke et al was used to assess our preoperative methodology. The American knee society score was used pre- and postoperatively up to one year. A total of eight knees of six patients were analysed (four males, two females). The mean age of the patients was 57.75±5.701 years. All the knees were in varying degrees of varus deformity preoperatively. The accuracy of the preoperatively used radiological angles was analysed by postoperative measurement of tibiofemoral angle (d), tibial anatomical axis (b) and femoral anatomical axis (a), and Roentgenographic index as suggested by Lotke et al. Postoperatively, all the knees were in valgus with tibiofemoral angle (d) 6.50±0.926, tibial component alignment (b) mean was 89±1.195, and femoral component alignment (a) mean was 5.13±0.991 valgus. Mean roentgenographic index was 89.38±3.292. American knee society score improved at one-year follow-up postoperatively and was statistically significant with p<0.001. In this study, a new classification for bone defects in primary arthritic knees by utilising simple plain radiograph short films and as a guide for implant selection is proposed.

Relationship between the height of fibular head and the incidence and severity of knee osteoarthritis.

The purpose of this study was to investigate the correlation between fibular head height and the incidence and severity of osteoarthritis associated with varus knee deformity. The fibular head height, joint line convergence angle (JLCA) and medial proximal tibial angle (MPTA) were measured in a three-dimensional model. Ordinal multivariate logistic regression was used to analyze the correlation between fibular head height and Kellgren–Lawrence (K–L) grade. Pearson correlation was used to analyze the correlation between fibular head height and K–L grade. A total of 232 patients (232 knees) were finally included in the study. There were significant differences in JLCA and hip–knee–ankle angle (P < 0.05), and both JLCA and hip–knee–ankle angle increased with severe aggravation of K–L grade. Both fibular head height and MPTA decreased as the K–L grade was severely aggravated. There was a significant negative correlation between K–L grade and fibular head height (r = −0.812, P < 0.001). Furthermore, there was a significant negative correlation between fibular head height and hip–knee–ankle angle (r = −0.7905, P < 0.001). In addition to body mass index, fibular head height is a risk factor for the pathogenesis of osteoarthritis associated with varus knee deformity; the smaller the fibular head height, the more severe the degree of varus deformity.

Distal femoral osteotomy versus lateral unicompartmental arthroplasty for isolated lateral tibiofemoral osteoarthritis with intra-articular and extra-articular deformity: a propensity score-matched analysis

PurposeLateral unicompartmental arthroplasty (UKA) and distal femoral osteotomy (DFO) represent surgical solutions in cases of valgus malalignment and isolated lateral osteoarthritis (OA) of the knee. The aim of the present study was to assess the clinical results, complications, and the overall postoperative alignment of a series of DFO and lateral UKA with a minimum 2-year follow-up in active middle-aged patients.MethodsPatients with valgus knee and isolated lateral OA who underwent opening-wedge DFO or UKA from 2017 to 2019 were reviewed. Each patient was characterized by a joint line convergence angle (JLCA) > 3° and mechanical lateral distal femoral angle (mLDFA) < 87°. We excluded patients who underwent meniscus or osteochondral allograft during DFO. The Oxford Knee Score (OKS), Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), complications, and postoperative alignment were assessed. Propensity score matching was used to identify comparable patients.ResultsThe DFO and lateral UKA groups consisted of 29 patients each. No statistically significant differences in gender, age, body mass index (BMI), length of follow-up, or limb deformity were reported between the two groups. In the DFO group, OKS was reported to improve from 27.51 to 38.59 (p < 0.05) and KOOS from 51.14 to 67.2 (p < 0.05). Similarly, in the UKA group, OKS improved from 26.23 to 35.43 (p < 0.05) and KOOS from 50.12 to 65.91 (p < 0.05). However, the improvement in OKS and KOOS (delta) did not differ between groups (p = 0.35 and p = 0.95). The DFO and UKA groups were characterized by similar postoperative hip-knee-ankle (HKA) angle measurements of −3.26 and −3.00, respectively (p = 0.65). No patients in the UKA group underwent revision or other knee surgeries during follow-up. No infections were detected in either group. In the DFO group, no cases of nonunion or delayed union were reported. However, 40% of DFO patients underwent plate removal. One patient in each group was characterized by progression of medial OA with Kellgren-Lawrence (KL) grade > 3.ConclusionUKA and DFO represent an effective treatment in lateral knee OA with intra-articular and extra-articular deformity. Both surgeries were able to provide a significant and comparable clinical improvement.Level of evidence: III, comparative retrospective cohort study.