Purpose: To describe the incidence and progression of foot osteoarthritis (OA) in a large population-based cohort. Methods: Data were obtained from the Johnston County Osteoarthritis Project (JoCoOA), a prospective population-based cohort of African American and Caucasian residents of Johnston County, North Carolina. Participants completed foot radiographs at baseline (2013-2015) and follow-up (2016-2018). Five specific joints were examined: the first metatarsophalangeal (1st MTP), first cuneometatarsal (1st CMT), second cuneometatarsal (2nd CMT), naviculocuneiform (NC), and talonavicular (TN). Using the La Trobe Foot Atlas, which examines osteophytes (OP, score 0-3) and joint space narrowing (JSN, score 0-3) in the five specified joints, incident foot radiographic OA (rOA) was defined as baseline score <2 OP and JSN in all 5 joints with ≥2 OP or JSN at follow-up in any of the 5 joints. Progression was defined as worsening score of OP or JSN in a joint with baseline foot rOA. At baseline and follow-up, participants were asked to rate their pain, aching, or stiffness [PAS] in each foot as 0-10 (none to extreme) on most days of any month in the past 12 months. PAS worsening was defined as an increase in the PAS from baseline to follow-up. The Foot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS), a 42-item questionnaire assessing patient relevant outcomes in five subscales (pain, other symptoms, activities of daily living [ADL], sport and recreation function [Sports & Rec], foot and ankle-related quality of life [QOL]) was also obtained. Joint-based logistic regression models with generalized estimating equations were used to examine associations of foot rOA incidence and progression and covariates of interest (refer to Table 1 for full list). Two-way interactions between risk factors and foot rOA status at baseline were assessed at a 0.10 alpha level and adjusted odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals (aOR [95% CI]) were shown by baseline status if significant; otherwise overall associations were shown. Results: A total of 541 participants were included with radiographs of 1082 feet. Table 1 shows baseline characteristics: 71% were women, with mean age of 69 years; 35% were African American and 53% were obese. The most commonly affected joint at baseline was the first MTP (42%) followed by the TN (31%). Table 1 shows the incidence and progression of foot rOA. Among 928 feet without baseline rOA, 4% developed incident foot rOA and roughly 2% of those had PAS of the same foot at follow-up. Among 154 feet with baseline foot rOA, 55% had radiographic progression and 16% of those had PAS of the same foot at follow-up. Female sex and higher BMI were associated with incident foot rOA, while self-reported history of gout was associated with increased odds of both incidence and progression of foot rOA (Table 2). A history of foot injury was associated with significantly increased odds of foot OA with PAS present, but not for rOA alone. Although work disability was not associated with increased odds of foot rOA incidence or progression, it was associated with PAS and FAOS worsening particularly for pain, ADL, and Sports & Rec subscales (Table 3). BMI was associated with increased odds for worsening of all FAOS subscales. Age was not associated with worsening of FAOS symptoms or QOL. Gout was associated with increased odds of worsening for FAOS ADL and Sports & Rec subscales. Conclusions: Progression of foot rOA is relatively common although it is not necessarily related to worsening symptoms. Older age was not found to be associated with incidence or progression of foot rOA suggesting that other factors may be more important such as sex, BMI and history of gout. Given increased risk of foot rOA with higher BMI, BMI may be a modifiable risk factor for the development of foot rOA, similar to other weight-bearing joints such as the hip and knee. Strategies for prevention of foot injuries may be particularly important for foot rOA with symptoms. Further studies should determine if interventions, such as weight loss or intensive gout control, could lead to better symptom control in foot OA and should examine the association of foot OA with OA at other joints.
Read full abstract