Mandibular Fractures Research Articles

Managing Low-Velocity Mandibular Gunshot Wounds: An Institutional Review and the "FLOSS" Severity Scoring System.

Management of mandibular ballistic trauma is poorly delineated, given the variable injury complexity. This study examines surgical outcomes and presents a novel scoring system to define and guide the management of low-velocity ballistic mandibular fractures. A retrospective chart review was performed from 2015 to 2022 to collect data on patients who suffered ballistic mandibular fractures. Computerized tomography facial bone scans were analyzed to determine a mandible severity scoring based on the following "F.L.OS.S." variables: fracture description (F), location of fracture (L), other surrounding fractures (OS), and soft tissue involvement (S). Sixty-six patients suffered handgun-related mandibular fractures and 54 underwent surgical intervention. The mean FLOSS score was 7.9 for all surgical patients and significantly differed between treatment groups (P = 0.011). Certain injury-specific variables were significantly associated with higher FLOSS scores including >2 areas of comminution along load bearing, bony gap >10mm, or intraoral involvement with soft tissue avulsion; however, the degree of displacement, bilateral involvement, or presence of concomitant fractures did not predict higher scores. The types of complications did not significantly vary for total FLOSS score or FLOSS subcategories; the only exception being, an association between bony gap (>10mm) and hardware exposure (P = 0.045). Overall surgical complication rate was 26.9% and presence significantly varied between surgical treatments (P = 0.019); specifically, nonunion was the only significant subcategory (P = 0.030). The FLOSS scoring system may be a useful adjunct in defining fracture characteristics that guide appropriate surgical intervention for low-velocity ballistic mandibular injuries.

Osteosynthesis of mandibular angle fracture: Clinical case report

Maxillofacial trauma is intrinsically linked to a variety of physical injuries that compromise the anatomical structures of the upper, middle, and lower thirds of the face. In this context, the mandible stands out as one of the regions with the highest incidence of fractures in traumatic events. The objective of this study was to report a clinical case of mandibular fracture, detailing the step-by-step process from initial care to surgery to restore function and postoperative follow-up. This is an exploratory, descriptive, and qualitative case report. Data collection and use for the study were carried out following established ethical principles, in accordance with the international guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki. The article describes the management of a mandibular fracture case resulting from a bicycle fall. After clinical diagnosis and completion of complementary and preoperative imaging tests, the patient underwent open reduction with internal fixation and was discharged the day after the procedure, without postoperative complications. The case reinforces the importance of a thorough clinical and radiological evaluation for an accurate diagnosis and for choosing the most appropriate therapeutic approach. Early intervention and correct alignment of bone fragments provide efficient healing, improving the patient's quality of life and reducing the risk of functional and aesthetic sequelae.

Pattern of Ophthalmic Injuries in Patients With Maxillofacial Fractures at a Tertiary Care Centre in Central India.

Maxillofacial injuries are usually associated with ophthalmic injuries that may be mild to severe, and may even result in loss of integrity of the orbital skeleton and impairment of the visual apparatus. To evaluate the pattern of ophthalmic injuries associated with maxillofacial fractures in patients who reported to a tertiary care hospital, associated with a medical college in M.P, India. The records of patients who sustained ophthalmic injuries with maxillofacial trauma from 1st January 2012 to 31st January 2024 and reported to the Department of Dentistry of a tertiary care hospital were evaluated. The data related to demographic characteristics, aetiology of trauma, type of maxillofacial fractures and pattern of ophthalmic injuries were gathered and analysed. A total of 1575 patients with maxillofacial trauma reported to the institute during the study duration. The study sample comprised 1046 (66.41%) maxillofacial trauma patients who sustained ophthalmic injuries. Males were more commonly involved (85.85%) than females (14.15%). The commonly involved age group was 21-30 years with 34.32% of patients belonging to the age group. The most common aetiology was road traffic accidents, reported in 71.89% of patients. Zygomaticomaxillary complex (ZMC) fractures were evident in 73.52%, mandibular fractures in 50.19%, naso-orbito-ethmoidal (NOE) fractures in 19.41% and frontal bone fractures in 18.74% patients. Subconjunctival haemorrhage was seen in 79.83%, periorbital ecchymosis in 72.94% and periorbital oedema in 60.32% of cases. Retrobulbar haemorrhage was seen in 2.58%, traumatic optic neuropathy in 2.01% and retinal detachment in 0.86% of cases. Ophthalmic injuries were seen frequently in 66.41% of cases with maxillofacial trauma, particularly in zygomatic complex fractures (73.52%). The findings emphasise that the competency of maxillofacial surgeons plays a vital role in comprehending the severity and management of post-traumatic ophthalmic consequences in maxillofacial injuries. Also, ophthalmological evaluation in maxillofacial trauma, particularly involving the midface should be considered mandatory.

Outcomes and Craniometric Analyses of the Champy Technique in the Treatment of Mandibular Angle Fractures: A Retrospective Study.

The aim of this study is to examine the outcomes of superiorly placed monocortical single miniplate fixation in the treatment of mandibular angle fractures and evaluate treatment efficacy through craniometric measurements. Postoperative craniometrics were compared with both the preoperative measurements and the control group. Thirty-four patients were included with a mean follow-up of 3.1 years. Complications were observed in 6 patients, with 4 treated surgically and 2 managed nonoperatively. In the craniometric analyses, there was no significant difference between the preoperative and postoperative measurements of the gonial angle and condyle-midsagittal plane distance on both the fracture side and the contralateral side. The only significant difference was found in comparison of the degree of the mentum deviation (P=0.001). Postoperative mandibular morphometry was comparable to that of the control group. Single miniplate fixation corrects mentum deviation without resulting in any changes in condyle position and can achieve healthy mandibular morphometry.

Craniomaxillofacial trauma increases the risk of temporomandibular joint disorders and days of work disability—a SWEREG-TMD registry-based study

Although craniomaxillofacial (CMF) trauma is a factor recognized as contributing to the development of temporomandibular joint disorders (TMJD), large population-based research on CMF trauma and subsequent TMJD is lacking. Additionally, it is unknown how previous CMF trauma affects work disability reimbursements for patients with TMJD (pwTMJD). This Swedish registry-based study included 33,315 pwTMJD matched to 333,122 individuals from the general population. Both a case–control design and a cohort design were used in this study to evaluate the association between CMF trauma and TMJD, and to investigate how CMF trauma impacts the number of days on work disability among pwTMJD. The main study finding was that many types of previous CMF trauma were strongly associated with TMJD, with mandibular fractures having the strongest association (adjusted odds ratio 11.4). Furthermore, the strongest association for an increased number of annual days on work disability was found for pwTMJD with a history of CMF trauma. These results suggest that CMF trauma influences the developmental path of TMJD, even in a population-based sample.

Clinical Outcomes of Mandibular Angle Fractures Treated by Single-Versus Double Miniplates

Clinical Outcomes of Mandibular Angle Fractures Treated by Single-Versus Double Miniplates

Osteoradionecrosis of the Jaws and Management Strategies

ABSTRACTBackgroundOsteoradionecrosis of the jaws (ORNJ) is a severe complication arising from radiotherapy for head and neck cancers. It results from irreversible damage to osteocytes, leading to nonhealing of exposed bone. The condition can cause substantial pain, swelling, trismus, and in severe cases, pathological fractures of the jaw, substantially impacting the patient's quality of life and increasing morbidity.AimsThis review aims to describe the pathophysiology of ORNJ, evaluate current management strategies, and explore emerging therapies to provide a comprehensive understanding of this condition.MethodsA comprehensive literature review was conducted to describe the pathophysiology, clinical presentation, and treatment of ORNJ.ResultsThe pathophysiology of ORNJ involves multiple theories, including radiation‐induced fibrosis and the “hypoxia, hypocellular, and hypovascular” model. Management strategies include surgical debridement, hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT), and emerging biological approaches such as tissue engineering and platelet‐rich plasma (PRP), which are all discussed.DiscussionRadiotherapy significantly impairs wound healing, leading to chronic fibrosis and tissue necrosis. Although ORNJ is uncommon, its impact on patients is substantial. Current treatments offer limited success, necessitating a multidisciplinary approach and ongoing research into innovative therapies. Emerging treatments, including tissue engineering and PRP, offer potential but require further research.ConclusionORNJ remains a challenging condition with substantial patient morbidity. Understanding its pathophysiology is crucial for patient education, early detection and developing effective management strategies.

Opioid Use Following Open Reduction and Internal Fixation of Mandibular Fractures.

A mandible fracture is a common traumatic craniofacial injury for which surgery is sometimes indicated. Post-fracture and postoperative pain are often controlled through prescribed narcotics, which have received increased attention for potential abuse. The current work identified 90-day opioid prescribing patterns following surgically treated mandible fractures. Patients who underwent open reduction and internal fixation to treat a closed mandible fracture between 2011 and 2021 were identified in the PearlDiver Mariner165 database. Exclusion criteria included: (1) patients with records active for fewer than 180 days before the injury and 90 days post-fracture, (2) age younger than 18, and (3) those with long bone fracture within 30 days of mandible fracture. Variables associated with filling an opioid prescription and utilizing excess morphine milligram equivalents (MMEs) were identified through multivariate regression. Prescribing patterns between 2011 and 2021 were analyzed using simple linear regression. A total of 15,049 patients were identified. Of these patients, opioid prescriptions were filled by 10,389 (69.0%). Greater MMEs were filled for those with greater age, prior opioid use, and history of chronic pain (P < 0.01 for all). The proportion of patients who received opioids decreased from 2011 to 2021 (73.3% versus 61.9%) during which declines were also seen for median MMEs (225.0 versus 128.4) and mean number of filled prescriptions (4.1 versus 2.8). The present work identified age and preexisting risk factors as significantly associated with excess MMEs following open reduction and internal fixation-treated mandible fracture. The decreasing proportion of patients receiving opioids along with decreasing MMEs suggests more refined practice with regard to their use.

A Comparative Analysis of Surgical and Conservative Management in Intra-Articular Condylar Fractures: A Retrospective Study

Background: Mandibular condylar fractures are among the most common fractures of the facial skeleton, and their surgical management remains a topic of considerable debate in maxillofacial trauma surgery. Numerous studies in the literature internationally have explored optimal treatment approaches, with a growing preference for open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF). While conservative treatment has traditionally been the standard for intra-articular fractures, recent research suggests that ORIF may also be appropriate for selected cases of these fractures. Methods: This study presents a 14-year review (2009–2023) of the authors’ experience in the surgical management of intra-articular condylar fractures. Data were collected on surgical techniques, early and late complications, clinical and radiological outcomes, and comparisons with conservative treatment. Results: The analysis included evaluations of both short-term and long-term outcomes following ORIF, identifying specific scenarios where ORIF demonstrated advantages over conservative management. Clinical and radiographic assessments provided valuable insights into patient recovery and functional outcomes, while complication rates were documented for both treatment methods. Conclusions: Findings indicate that ORIF can be a beneficial treatment option for intra-articular condylar fractures in select patient groups, offering improved outcomes in cases where conservative treatment may be insufficient. However, conservative management remains a valid approach when surgical risks exceed potential benefits. This study adds to the ongoing discussion, supporting a tailored approach that considers individual patient factors when choosing between ORIF and conservative treatment.

Comparison of intranasal versus intravenous dexmedetomidine in postoperative pain control in traumatic mandibular fractures surgery: a randomized clinical trial

Objective: Effective pain management in mandibular fractures is crucial due to the complications associated with opioids, such as respiratory depression and re-intubation. Non-opioid methods are therefore important. This study aims to compare the effectiveness, safety, and efficiency of intranasal (IN) versus intravenous (IV) dexmedetomidine (Dex) for reducing acute pain following mandibular surgery. Methods: This study was a randomized, double-blind clinical trial. All patients underwent general anesthesia, laryngoscopy, and intubation in a standardized manner. For the IN administration group, Dex was prescribed at a dose of 0.2 µ/kg (in the form of drops) half an hour before the start of anesthesia. For the IV administration group, Dex was administered at a dose of 0.5 µ/kg intravenously over ten minutes, half an hour before anesthesia. During the first 24 hours after surgery, pain intensity and the total amount of opioid medication (measured in mg of pethidine) were recorded for each patient. Results: There was no significant difference in pain intensity between the two groups in the post-anesthesia care unit (P=0.898), one hour (P=0.052) and 24 hours post-surgery (P=0.898). However, pain intensity was significantly lower in the IN Dex group at the second (P=0.044), fourth (P=0.041), sixth (P=0.048), and twelfth (P=0.025) hours. Total pethidine injected in the IN Dex group was significantly lower than in the IV Dex group (P=0.041). Conclusion: This study underscores the efficacy of IN Dex as a viable alternative for postoperative pain management in traumatic mandibular fracture surgeries

Facial Fractures at the Armed Forces Capital Hospital of Korea: A 10-Year Study From 2013 to 2022.

The aim of this study was to analyze facial bone fractures at the Armed Forces Capital Hospital of Korea (AFCH) from 2013 to 2022. This review included individuals who visited AFCH for treatment. The inclusion criteria for the study were fractures resulting from external trauma, specifically coded as S02.1-4 and S02.6-9. The exclusion criteria comprised fractures caused by factors other than external trauma. This retrospective study of 178 facial bone fractures included 176 males (98.9%) and 2 females (1.1%) (22.5±5.1 years). The most common causes of injury were bumps (72.5%), followed by slips (7.3%), assaults (5.6%), and falls (5.1%). The majority of facial bone fractures occurred during sports activities (33.7%), training (31.5%), or everyday activities (28.7%). Nasal bone fractures were the most prevalent (47.7%), followed by fractures of the maxilla (19.2%), orbit (18.7%), mandible (10.3%), and zygoma (3.3%). The interval between the injury and hospital arrival was 6.0±8.0 days. Among the 164 patients, 110 (67.1%) underwent surgery. The overall complication rate was 8.9%. The highest complication rate was mandibular fractures (22.7%), followed by nasal bone fractures (9.8%). Among the 208 recorded facial bone fractures, 145 patients (69.7%) received treatment at AFCH, whereas 63 (30.3%) were treated in a civilian hospital; 59 patients (28.4%) by their own choice and 4 patients (1.9%) on a consignment basis. The average follow-up period was 202.0±183.2 days. The relatively high rate (28.4%) of treatment at civilian hospitals is attributable to legislation allowing injured soldiers the option to choose between military and civilian medical facilities.

Performance evaluation of a low-cost Ti-Mo-Fe (TMF8) as a replacement for Ti-6Al-4V for internal fixation implants used in mandibular angular fractures: a finite element analysis study

Stainless steel and titanium-based alloys have been the gold standard when it comes to permanent implants and magnesium-based alloys have been the best option for bioresorbable alloys. Ti-6Al-4V, Ti-64, with its 110 GPa Young’s Modulus is the most commonly employed alloy to manufacture biomedical implants used for treatment of fractures of skeleton. Recently, researchers have developed a new low-cost and toxic Vanadium-free alternative to this alloy, Ti-3Mo-0.5Fe at.%, namely TMF8. This alloy has a 25% lesser Young’s Modulus compared to Ti-6Al-4V and also demonstrated acceptable mechanical properties while possessing better cell proliferation results. The lower Young’s Modulus can aid in lowering stress shielding effects while its cytocompatibility could enhance healing. This work, therefore, tries to use finite element analyses to compare these two alloys (Ti-64 and TMF8) from a practical structural point of view to analyse the advantages and disadvantages of this new alloy and how a low-cost biocompatible alternative (TMF8) can actually prove to be a more viable option. The analyses confirm that TMF8 shows almost similar biomechanics performance to Ti-64 alloy (and in acceptable range) in bone plate fixation of mandibular angular fracture treatment.Graphical

Evaluation of Bone Supported Ultra Lock Ezy Bar versus Erich Arch Bar for the Treatment of Mandibular Fractures

ABSTRACT Introduction: Maxillofacial trauma treatment involves maxillomandibular fixation. Despite reduced need for post-operative MMF with plating devices, temporary intraoperative MMF is still necessary for proper tooth positioning. The aim of this research is to evaluate the cost-effectiveness, impact on patient gingival health, glove perforation, and time required for utilizing the Ultra Lock Ezy Bar compared to Erich’s Arch Bar. Methods: Ten patients with mandibular fractures were randomly split into two groups for treatment: Group A (study) and Group B (control). Group A received treatment with an Ultra Lock Ezy Bar and screws, while Group B received treatment using an Erich’s Arch Bar and wires. Follow-ups were done for suture removal, wound healing, and evaluations on gingival index, glove perforations, and treatment times. Results: In application time, group A had mean of 44.00 ± 3.391 and group B had 90 ± 9.354, with no significant difference. Neither group showed significant mean differences in removal time. Group B had statistically significant glove perforation (4.80 ± 0.837) compared to 0 in group A. Pre-operative gingival index comparison showed significance. After four weeks, group B’s mean index was 1.720 ± 0.2387 and group A’s was 1.120 ± 0.2049 with no statistical distinctions. Conclusion: To sum up, the randomized control experiment produced convincing results when comparing Erich’s Arch Bar with Ultra Lock Ezy Bar for mandibular fixation in ten patients. With notably quicker application and removal times, no glove perforations, and comparable gingival health immediately following surgery, Ultra Lock Ezy Bar showed clear benefits.

Does the Method of Open Reduction and Internal Fixation of Mandibular Angle Fracture Differentially Affect Postoperative Strength of Jaw Muscles as Assessed by Surface Electromyography? An Analytical Study

Does the Method of Open Reduction and Internal Fixation of Mandibular Angle Fracture Differentially Affect Postoperative Strength of Jaw Muscles as Assessed by Surface Electromyography? An Analytical Study

Impact of COVID-19 on Maxillofacial Trauma Incidence at Vajira Hospital: A Retrospective Study (2018-2021)

Background: Maxillofacial injuries vary globally depending on social, cultural, and environmental factors. The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has further contributed to global variations in maxillofacial injury incidence owing to precautionary restrictions. Objective: To investigate the impact of COVID-19 on maxillofacial fractures. Materials and Methods: The present study was a retrospective cohort study that analyzed the medical records of patients with maxillofacial fractures admitted to the Emergency Department, Vajira Hospital, Bangkok. The incidence, causes, and anatomical sites of fractures were compared between the pre-COVID-19, 2018 to 2019, and COVID-19 periods, in 2020 to 2021. Results: The present study included 749 patients with maxillofacial fractures. The analysis revealed a 15% decrease in the number of patients with maxillofacial fractures during the COVID-19 pandemic. Males were more affected than females in both periods. Traffic accidents remained the primary cause of injuries, while assault-related injuries decreased significantly. Nasal bone fractures were the most frequent, with a significant reduction in orbital fractures caused by assault (p=0.033) during the COVID-19 period. The incidence of isolated zygomatic arch and panfacial fractures caused by assault increased during the COVID-19 period (p=0.026 and 0.041, respectively). The incidence of mandibular fractures due to other causes was significantly higher (p=0.009). Conclusion: The COVID-19 pandemic had led to significant changes in daily life in Thailand. Understanding the characteristics of patients with maxillofacial trauma provides valuable insights into prevention and management strategies, particularly during prolonged infectious disease outbreaks such as COVID-19 and potential future incidents.

Factors Influencing the Success of Non Vascularized Iliac Bone Graft for Mandibular Reconstruction: A Retrospective Study of 26 Cases

Objective: This study aimed to identify the prognostic factors influencing the success of nonvascularized iliac bone grafts for mandibular reconstruction. Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study conducted at a single center, involving 26 patients who underwent segmental mandibulectomy followed by nonvascularized iliac bone grafts between 2012 and 2022 at the Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Unit, Buddhachinaraj Phitsanulok Hospital. Data were collected by reviewing electronic medical records and radiographic images. Patients who had received vascularized bone grafts or had a history of head and neck irradiation therapy were excluded from the study. The patients were classified into two groups: successful and failed. Success was defined as clinical and radiographic evidence of bone continuity, a graft resorption rate not exceeding 30% of the initial height, and no evidence of chronic infection for at least 6 months. Results: Successful bone grafting was achieved in 19 patients (73.1%). Multivariable risk difference regression analysis identified that the factors influencing graft incorporation were jaw immobilization using reconstruction plates with maxillomandibular fixation for at least 21 days (RD 63.0; 95% CI 33.1, 93.0; p&lt;0.001) and long segmental block graft design (51.3%; 95% CI 16.9, 85.7; p&lt;0.003). A clinically significant factor, although statistically insignificant, was the duration of plate stabilization, which should ideally range from 172 to 232 days prior to plate removal. The sample size constituted a limitation of this study. Conclusions: Nonvascularized bone grafting remains a viable option for reconstructing mandibular segmental defects. The factors influencing graft stability can help improve clinical outcomes.

Clinical efficacy of three plating systems in management of mandibular parasymphyseal fractures: a retrospective study

BackgroundThe main goal of management of the mandibular fracture is to obtain the pre-injury contour of the bone and pre-injury occlusion as well as regain function early. For Parasymphyseal fractures, the ideal fixation method is still debatable. It could range from rigid to semi-rigid fixation. The current study aimed to compare the clinical and radiographic effect of two miniplates, 2.3 high-profile Miniplates, and three-dimensional (3D) Miniplates for internal fixation treatment of mandibular para-symphyseal fractures.MethodsThe study reviewed 240 medical records, dividing 60 patients into three treatment groups: Group I (25 patients received 2.0 mini plates), Group II (22 patients received 2.3 high profile miniplate), and Group III (13 patients received 3D miniplate). Data included demographics, fracture diagnosis, radiographs, maxillomandibular fixation use, surgical time, intervention, postoperative stability, and complications.ResultsThe present study included 60 patients with mandibular parasymphyseal fractures, divided into three treatment groups: Group I (n = 25, 41.67%), Group II (n = 22, 36.67%), and Group III (n = 13, 21.67%). The study found no significant differences in age and sex distribution among the three groups, but the mean surgery time varied significantly. Group II had the highest rate of complications at 22.73%, followed by Group I at 20% and Group III at 7.69%.ConclusionIn conclusion, the (3D) Miniplates could provide better internal fixation treatment of mandibular para-symphyseal fractures in terms of easy use, short surgery time and less complication such as malocclusion and infection.

Platelet-rich plasma and its effect in bone regeneration in mandibular fractures. Controlled clinical trial

Platelet-rich plasma and its effect in bone regeneration in mandibular fractures. Controlled clinical trial

Mandibular Fractures in Edentulous Patients with Bone Atrophy and Osseointegrated Dental Implants: Therapeutic Management in a Case Series.

Background and Objectives: This research describes the management of mandibular fractures in edentulous patients with atrophic mandibles and implant-retained overdentures, exploring etiologies and treatment options. Materials and Methods: A retrospective study (January 2010-December 2023) was conducted on six patients from two hospitals (Hospital Gregorio Marañón y Hospital La Paz, Madrid). The data collected included fracture etiology, treatment type, and complications. Results: All six patients were women, with a mean age of 76.33 years. The most common cause of fracture was peri-implantitis (50%). Surgical treatment (open reduction and internal fixation) was performed in five patients, with different surgical approaches and fixation methods. One patient, due to multiple comorbidities, received conservative treatment. Complications occurred in 50% of cases, including delayed healing and hypoesthesia. The average hospital stay was four days, with a mean follow-up of 34 months. Conclusions: Mandibular fractures in these patients are rare. Surgical treatment using rigid fixation plates is recommended. The rational use of bone grafting should be taken into account. Treatment depends on fracture type, patient condition, and surgeon experience.

Comparison of Pediatric and Adult Mandibular Fractures: Identifying Differences in Presentation and Management Using a National Trauma Database.

Facial fractures in children are less common than in adults but can lead to significant long-term complications, including growth abnormalities and functional issues. Mandibular fractures are the most common facial fractures in both age groups, yet there is no consensus on optimal management strategies. This study investigates the epidemiology, presentation, treatment, and outcomes of mandibular fractures in pediatric versus adult populations. The authors conducted a retrospective, population-based study using 2016 to 2019 data from the National Trauma Data Bank. Patients with mandibular fractures were categorized into pediatric (below 18y) and adult (18y or above) groups. The authors analyzed demographics, fracture mechanism, treatment modality, hospital outcome, and complication data. Of the 42,866 patients with operative mandibular fractures, 3968 were pediatric (mean age: 13.3y), and 38,898 were adult (mean age: 36.2y). The primary fracture etiology for both groups was being struck, followed by motor vehicle incidents and falls. Pediatric patients were more frequently treated at level I trauma centers, had shorter times for surgical intervention, and were more frequently transferred to other facilities compared to adults. Antibiotic use was similar between groups, and hospital complications were infrequent, with low rates of infection and unplanned return to the operating room. Mandibular fractures in children, though less common than in adults, exhibit unique epidemiological and management characteristics. Children were more frequently transferred for care and received surgical intervention sooner than adults. Antibiotic use and complication rates were low and similar across both groups. Further research is needed to establish specific treatment guidelines for pediatric mandibular fractures.