H ATANAKA SHIGEO +$4, the editor of Chuio Koron 41X& forced to resign in 1943, reminisced recently about wartime Japanese intellectual dissent. Referring to the activities of his fellow liberals, he noted, 'Just to look at the titles now is embarrassing, they sound so right-wing . . . [but] our readers during the war were far more progressive than we were. They understood even without our saying it. If we just suggested something, they grasped our liberal intentions.'l The kamikaze pilots bear sufficient testimony to Japanese courage and selfsacrifice in wartime, yet there were no kamikaze dissenters. Liberal intellectual dissent in wartime Japan, to the extent that it existed, had virtually no effect on government or military policy, and little on the general public. Certainly the war ended no sooner, or less disastrously, as a result of the efforts of the small group of liberal intellectual dissenters.2 The oppositional writings of these men, often disguised in the rhetoric of ultra-nationalism, and presented so subtly as to be indecipherable to all but a group of sympathizers, were ineffective as instruments of dissent. Yet dissent must have been personally meaningful to Hatanaka Shigeo and others who engaged in it. Those who wrote even veiled messages of dissent may at least have been preserving their own consciences. Facing the consequences of open public dissent-loss of livelihood, arrest, imprisonment, torture, mobilization to the front, and murder3-the safest course for dissenters clearly
Read full abstract